Best Path Selection Mechanism

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /2797r00 Submission Oct 2007 Jiyoung et al. Path Selection and Path Switch Mechanism Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Advertisements

FBMS Termination Date: Name Compay Address Phone
LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
TGn Sync Atlanta Presentation on Confirmation
IEEE White Space Radio Contribution Title
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Waveform Generator Source Code
March 2014 Election Results
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2007 Month Year
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
3GPP liaison report May 2006 May 2006 Date: Authors:
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
Protected SSIDs Date: Authors: March 2005 March 2005
3GPP liaison report July 2006
[place presentation subject title text here]
(Presentation name) For (Name of group) (Presenter’s name,title)
TGp Motions Date: Authors: November 2005 Month Year
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
On Coexistence Mechanisms
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2007 Month Year
Contribution on Location Privacy
Call for OLSR Participation
On Coexistence Mechanisms
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
TGv Redline D0.07 Insert and Deletion
TGv Redline D0.06 Insert and Deletion
Solution for comment 32 Date: Authors: July, 2008
ADS Study Group Mid-week Report
Selection Procedure Recommendation
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
September Opening Report
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
TGv Redline D1.04-D1.0 Insert and Deletion
TGv Redline D0.10 Insert and Deletion
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Redline of draft P802.11w D2.2 Date: Authors:
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
Off-channel selection
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
March Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2011
3GPP2 Liaison Report Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
May 2005 CAPWAP AHC Closing Report
Liaison Report From Date: Authors: Month Year
Beamforming and Link Adaptation Motions
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Path Selection and Path Switch Mechanism
Draft P802.11s D1.03 WordConversion
Path Selection and Path Switch Mechanism
Questions to the Contention-based Protocol (CBP) Study Group
January Opening Report
Motion to go to Letter Ballot
EC Motions – July 2005 Plenary
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
Method for geting Link RCPI
Transition Nowhere Date: Authors: Sept 2005 Sept 2005
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
Reserve Option Contradiction
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
TGp Motions Date: Authors: January 2006 Month Year
Presentation transcript:

Best Path Selection Mechanism Date: 2007-10-30 Name Compay Address Phone E-mail Jiyoung Huh LG Electronics jyhuh@lge.com Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.11. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.11. Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures <http:// ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair <stuart.kerry@philips.com> as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE 802.11 Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at <patcom@ieee.org>. Jiyoung et al.

TDLS Best Path Selection Link RCPI Request Link RCPI Report BSSID STA Address Octets 6 BSSID RCPI1 STA Address RCPI2 Octets 6 1 A STA may transmit a Link RCPI Measurement Request to an (intended) peer STA to obtain an indication of the RCPI values at the peer STA. The Link RCPI measurement request and report are sent to the peer STA directly. The RCPI information may be used to decide whether to switch over to a direct link for communication with the peer STA. Jiyoung et al.

1st Issue for Best Path Selection Why is the Link RCPI Request/Report required? 1. In the wireless environment, both uni-direction links between two STA generally have multi-path. So, RCPIs of two links are never same basically. Wall STA3 STA4 Direct Link 3. This link can cause the interference not to STA1, but to STA2. Bluetooth Microwave oven 2. These devices can cause the interference not to STA2, but to STA1. STA1 STA2 Direct Link Therefore, two STAs using Direct Link never know the RCPI of peer STA and cannot determine the best path! Jiyoung et al.

2nd Issue for Best Path Selection When should STA send the Link RCPI Request? The link status changes frequently and randomly. The requesting STA (STA1) never know when the link status changes. AP STA1 STA2 Link RCPI Request Periodically? Randomly? After receiving several NAKs? The requested STA (STA2) can always know the link status changes!! If a triggered autonomous measurement is used, the requesting STA (STA1) can know the link status changes in real-time after sending Link RCP Request only once. Jiyoung et al.