Chapter 8 The History of Life
Worldviews and the History of Life Chapter 8A Worldviews and the History of Life
Worldview The frame of reference that a person uses to interpret and understand the world around him Everyone has a worldview, and this worldview affects every choice he makes.
The Christian Worldview Creation (“ex nihilo”) The Fall Redemption
I Peter 3:15 “But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear.”
Creation and evolution do not mix. Key point 1 Creation and evolution do not mix.
The earth is NOT billions or even millions of years old. Key point 2 The earth is NOT billions or even millions of years old.
The Bible and science do not disagree. Key point 3 The Bible and science do not disagree.
“It is better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in man.” Psalm 118:8 “It is better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in man.”
Noah’s flood is a significant catastrophe. Key point 4 Noah’s flood is a significant catastrophe.
The genetic basis of biological evolution is statistically impossible. Key point 5 The genetic basis of biological evolution is statistically impossible.
Evolution A belief about all the changes that have transformed life on the earth from its earliest beginnings to the diversity that characterizes it today
Change over time toward greater complexity Evolution Change over time toward greater complexity
Results of Believing Evolutionary Theory
Results of Believing Evolutionary Theory God does not exist. Man is not responsible to God. Man no longer needs a Savior.
Results of Believing Evolutionary Theory Man is a highly evolved animal. Man’s religion should be scientism. the belief that science is the only path to truth
“The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God.” Psalm 53:1 “The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God.”
A Matter of Viewpoint
A Matter of Viewpoint A person either accepts the Bible or not. Many are unwilling to admit that there is a God to whom they are accountable. Based on faith, not science
Evolutionary Beliefs & the Word of God
Is there proof for evolution & against the Bible? Science cannot prove. Both creationists and evolutionists have the same physical evidence. It is our interpretations of that evidence that differ.
Is there proof for evolution & against the Bible? Any accurate observation of God’s creation could not contradict the revealed Word of God.
How Should a Christian View Biology? A Proper Balance A Proper Motivation A Proper Perspective
Chapter 8B Biological Evolution
Jean Lamarck Theory of need Theory of use and disuse Theory of inheritance of acquired characteristics
Analysis of Lamarck’s Theory Basic problem: passing on acquired characteristics to future generations
The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection (1859) Charles Darwin Theory of natural selection The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection (1859)
Artificial Selection Vs. Natural Selection
Descent with Modification Proposed that all living things descended from a single common ancestor
Survival of the Fittest peppered moth
Analysis of Darwin’s Theory There is not always overpopulation.
Analysis of Darwin’s Theory The “fittest” do not always survive and reproduce.
Analysis of Darwin’s Theory An organism must have the gene for a certain characteristic in order for it to be produced.
Analysis of Darwin’s Theory The theory does not allow for the formation of new characteristics. It only selects for already existing traits.
Analysis of Darwin’s Theory Natural selection regroups existing characteristics. No new genetic information is created.
Later Developments in Evolutionary Theory
Species and Varieties, Their Origin by Mutation Hugo De Vries Species and Varieties, Their Origin by Mutation
Mutation-Selection Theory (Neo-Darwinism) Blending of Darwin’s theory of natural selection & De Vries’ theory of mutations Mutations supply the variations, and natural selection determines which variations survive.
Mutation-Selection Theory (Neo-Darwinism) For evolution to occur, new genes must form. Mutations are the only known way for this to happen. However, mutations have not been shown to increase the amount of genetic information.
Problems with the Mutation Theory of Evolution Mutations are random. Scientists cannot control or predict which genes mutations will affect.
Problems with the Mutation Theory of Evolution Mutations are rare. It is estimated that uncorrected mutations occur once in 10 million cell divisions.
Problems with the Mutation Theory of Evolution To be passed on, mutations must occur in the germ cells. Mutations in somatic cells will not affect the organism’s offspring.
Problems with the Mutation Theory of Evolution Requires “good mutations” Must be beneficial Mutations are either neutral or harmful.
Problems with the Mutation Theory of Evolution Requires “good mutations” happening repeatedly In many, many organisms all over the world Not just unlikely . . . impossible!
Problems with the Mutation Theory of Evolution Too many mutations will kill an organism. Genetic load
Problems with the Mutation Theory of Evolution The mutation theory of evolution is statistically impossible. Mathematicians have proved that it could not have occurred, even given billions of years.
Problems with the Mutation Theory of Evolution What about the missing links?
Punctuated Equilibrium Stephen Jay Gould The view that evolution occurred in periods or leaps of time, while at other times, no or very little evolution took place
Chapter 8C Biblical Creationism
The Short-Day Theory A literal interpretation Each day (morning and evening) was a 24-hour period.
The Short-Day Theory “Morning and evening” Use of the Hebrew word “yom” Exodus 20:9-11
Nonliteral Interpretations of Creation
Theistic Evolution A mixture of the Bible and evolution Tries to interpret biblical statements to support evolution as God’s method of creation
Day-Age Theory (Long-Day Theory) Holds that the seven days in Genesis 1 were long periods of time or ages
Progressive Creationism Holds that the earth is millions of years old and that at particular moments in time, God created new creatures
Framework Hypothesis Tries to interpret Genesis in a literary light
The Gap Theory Holds that there was a long period of time between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1:2 First creation fall of Satan new creation
Arguments Against The Gap Theory 1 Corinthians 15:45 Romans 5:14 Romans 5:12 Exodus 20:11
Noah’s Flood & Fossils
Noah’s Flood Antediluvian Postdiluvian The earth before the flood The earth after the flood
Reasons for a Universal Flood God’s revelation to Noah Purpose of the flood Genesis 6:13, 17
Reasons for a Universal Flood Confirmation in the New Testament Luke 17:27 2 Peter 2:5 and 3:6
Reasons for a Universal Flood The covenant of the rainbow Genesis 9:11-15 The continental shelves and seamounts
Reasons for a Universal Flood Universality of the fossil record The waters covered the mountains to over 20 feet. Fossils have been found on mountaintops.
Reasons for a Universal Flood The duration of the Flood was over a year. If the Flood was local, the ark would have been unnecessary.
Fossil Fossilization Lasting evidence of a once-living organism The formation of fossils
Types of Fossils Preservation of parts Preservation of carbon (coal) Preservation of forms Preservation of tracks Petrification Freezing
The Deluge & Fossilization The Flood described in Genesis 6-9 is referred to as the deluge.
The Deluge & Fossilization Sedimentation laying down of materials Sedimentary rock layers of rock deposits
The Deluge & Fossilization Evolutionists propose fossil formation by many smaller catastrophes. Suggest that fossils are a progressive record
Support for the Deluge-Fossilization Theory Abundant fossilization is not taking place today. Fossil arrangement & abundance Polystrate fossils
Support for the Deluge-Fossilization Theory Fossilization must be rapid. Most fossils required water for formation.