Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages e5 (December 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Molecular Tattoo: Subcellular Confinement of Drug Effects
Advertisements

Two Phases of Astral Microtubule Activity during Cytokinesis in C
Fanny Jaulin, Xiaoxiao Xue, Enrique Rodriguez-Boulan, Geri Kreitzer 
Long-Range Ca2+ Waves Transmit Brain-Damage Signals to Microglia
Dual Modes of Cdc42 Recycling Fine-Tune Polarized Morphogenesis
Philsang Hwang, Shih-Wei Chou, Zongwei Chen, Brian M. McDermott 
Vesicle Docking Is a Key Target of Local PI(4,5)P2 Metabolism in the Secretory Pathway of INS-1 Cells  Chen Ji, Fan Fan, Xuelin Lou  Cell Reports  Volume.
Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis Persists during Unperturbed Mitosis
Myosin II Dynamics Are Regulated by Tension in Intercalating Cells
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages e5 (December 2017)
Dynamics of interphase microtubules in Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Tjakko J. van Ham, David Kokel, Randall T. Peterson  Current Biology 
Emergence of an Apical Epithelial Cell Surface In Vivo
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Golgi Outposts Shape Dendrite Morphology by Functioning as Sites of Acentrosomal Microtubule Nucleation in Neurons  Kassandra M. Ori-McKenney, Lily Yeh.
Hermann Broder Schmidt, Rajat Rohatgi  Cell Reports 
Volume 57, Issue 5, Pages (March 2008)
Amy Shaub Maddox, Lindsay Lewellyn, Arshad Desai, Karen Oegema 
Organization of Actin Networks in Intact Filopodia
Volume 18, Issue 19, Pages (October 2008)
Ksenia Smurova, Benjamin Podbilewicz  Cell Reports 
Actin Polymerization Mediated by AtFH5 Directs the Polarity Establishment and Vesicle Trafficking for Pollen Germination in Arabidopsis  Chang Liu, Yi.
Fat2 and Lar Define a Basally Localized Planar Signaling System Controlling Collective Cell Migration  Kari Barlan, Maureen Cetera, Sally Horne-Badovinac 
The Origin of Phragmoplast Asymmetry
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (November 2006)
A Super-Assembly of Whi3 Encodes Memory of Deceptive Encounters by Single Cells during Yeast Courtship  Fabrice Caudron, Yves Barral  Cell  Volume 155,
Volume 27, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
She1-Mediated Inhibition of Dynein Motility along Astral Microtubules Promotes Polarized Spindle Movements  Steven M. Markus, Katelyn A. Kalutkiewicz,
Large Cytoplasm Is Linked to the Error-Prone Nature of Oocytes
Adhesion-Dependent Wave Generation in Crawling Cells
Long-Range Directional Movement of an Interphase Chromosome Site
A Rho GTPase Signal Treadmill Backs a Contractile Array
Petra Haas, Darren Gilmour  Developmental Cell 
Dual Modes of Cdc42 Recycling Fine-Tune Polarized Morphogenesis
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (December 2017)
Anam Qudrat, Abdullah Al Mosabbir, Kevin Truong  Cell Chemical Biology 
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
EB1-Recruited Microtubule +TIP Complexes Coordinate Protrusion Dynamics during 3D Epithelial Remodeling  Sarah Gierke, Torsten Wittmann  Current Biology 
Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages e6 (March 2017)
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages e10 (November 2017)
Volume 80, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Giulia Varsano, Yuedi Wang, Min Wu  Cell Reports 
Lunhua Liu, Satarupa Das, Wolfgang Losert, Carole A. Parent 
A Change in the Selective Translocation of the Kinesin-1 Motor Domain Marks the Initial Specification of the Axon  Catherine Jacobson, Bruce Schnapp,
Tilak Das, Bernhard Payer, Michel Cayouette, William A. Harris  Neuron 
A New Model for Asymmetric Spindle Positioning in Mouse Oocytes
Yuri Oleynikov, Robert H. Singer  Current Biology 
Yu-Chiun Wang, Zia Khan, Eric F. Wieschaus  Developmental Cell 
Volume 133, Issue 4, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
Autonomous Modes of Behavior in Primordial Germ Cell Migration
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Kristýna Kotýnková, Kuan-Chung Su, Stephen C. West, Mark Petronczki 
Masakazu Hashimoto, Hiroshi Sasaki
Anna Marie Sokac, Eric Wieschaus  Developmental Cell 
Rsp1p, a J Domain Protein Required for Disassembly and Assembly of Microtubule Organizing Centers during the Fission Yeast Cell Cycle  Sabina Zimmerman,
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
Spatio-Temporal Regulation of Rac1 Localization and Lamellipodia Dynamics during Epithelial Cell-Cell Adhesion  Jason S. Ehrlich, Marc D.H. Hansen, W.James.
Live-Cell Imaging of Dual-Labeled Golgi Stacks in Tobacco BY-2 Cells Reveals Similar Behaviors for Different Cisternae during Movement and Brefeldin A.
Volume 11, Pages (January 2019)
Differential Roles of WAVE1 and WAVE2 in Dorsal and Peripheral Ruffle Formation for Fibroblast Cell Migration  Shiro Suetsugu, Daisuke Yamazaki, Shusaku.
Hermann Broder Schmidt, Rajat Rohatgi  Cell Reports 
Volume 12, Issue 23, Pages (December 2002)
Emergence of an Apical Epithelial Cell Surface In Vivo
Marko Kaksonen, Yidi Sun, David G. Drubin  Cell 
Yuki Hara, Christoph A. Merten  Developmental Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages 577-587.e5 (December 2017) Bleb Expansion in Migrating Cells Depends on Supply of Membrane from Cell Surface Invaginations  Mohammad Goudarzi, Katsiaryna Tarbashevich, Karina Mildner, Isabell Begemann, Jamie Garcia, Azadeh Paksa, Michal Reichman- Fried, Harsha Mahabaleshwar, Heiko Blaser, Johannes Hartwig, Dagmar Zeuschner, Milos Galic, Michel Bagnat, Timo Betz, Erez Raz  Developmental Cell  Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages 577-587.e5 (December 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.10.030 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Cell Shape and Membrane Characteristics during Bleb Inflation In Vivo (A) 3D reconstruction showing a PGC before and after bleb inflation. The graph on the right shows the ratio of the cell surface area and the volume comparing bleb with the pre-bleb time points. (B) Schematic view of a PGC circumference prior to and following bleb formation, with black and orange colors representing the measured areas. The graph shows the ratio between the circumference of cells excluding the bleb area before and after bleb expansion (normalized to the whole-cell circumference) and the same ratio for the bleb area (median = 94.1% and 141.8% for “Rest” and “Bleb,” respectively). The circumference of the bleb prior to inflation was defined as the membrane length of the bleb neck at the pre-bleb time point. (C) 3D surface reconstruction for bleb (green) and the whole cell (gray) prior and after bleb expansion. The graph on the right shows the change in surface area of the bleb and the whole cell, before (Pre-Bleb) and after (Bleb) bleb expansion. (D) A PGC expressing farnesylated EGFP protein prior to and following bleb inflation. The cell outline was calculated using the Radial analysis program (see STAR Methods) and the bleb was defined by the change in the velocity of the plasma membrane. The central half of the bleb region (red dashed line) was monitored over time and the fluorescence intensities were plotted (right). The average intensity obtained from 10 measurements is presented in red. The graphs in (A) and (B) show median and interquartile range for data obtained in three independent experiments. The p value (∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001) was calculated using a non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. n represents the number of blebs analyzed. In all of the panels the PGC membrane was labeled with farnesylated EGFP. See also Figure S6. Developmental Cell 2017 43, 577-587.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2017.10.030) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Lack of Membrane Flow in the Direction of the Forming Bleb in PGCs Migrating within Live Embryos (A) Farnesylated-Dendra2 (Dendra2-F) expressed on the plasma membrane of PGCs from 7 to 8 hr post fertilization (hpf) embryos was photoconverted (green to red) at the border of a forming bleb (white dashed line shows the contours of two sequential blebs, with the blue dashed line marking the edge of the converted area up to the 12 s time point). Cells were imaged at a frequency of one time point per second and the photoconversion time point is presented as zero (0 s). No directional flow with respect to the forming bleb is observed. Seven events of photoconversion next to a forming bleb were analyzed. Scale bar, 5 μm. (B) 3D surface plot of the converted area showing the intensity change along the circumference (0°–60°) of the cell presented in (A) over 48 s, but no change in the position of the center of the converted area. The inset shows the circumferential intensity in the first (1 s) and the last frame after photoconversion (48 s). A schematic of the cell analyzed is presented below the x axis. (C) Graph showing the velocity of the center of the photoconverted region in cells where blebs did not form (n = 5, black) and in cells in which bleb inflation occurred next to the photoconverted area (n = 7, red). t = 0 is the time of bleb formation. See also Figure S1. Developmental Cell 2017 43, 577-587.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2017.10.030) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Detailed Analysis of PGCs within the Tissue Reveals Membrane Invaginations (A) Three confocal planes of a PGC plasma membrane labeled with farnesylated mCherry providing a z axis view of invaginations extending into the cell interior. One such invagination is highlighted with a red arrowhead at each of the three planes. Note that in the first plane, the connection of the structure to the membrane is not clearly seen, such that it resembles a vesicle. Additional invaginations connected to the plasma membrane are marked with black asterisks. (B) The graph shows the number of membrane invaginations in wild-type PGCs and in PGCs with elevated contractility (CA-MLCK), with an example for a manipulated cell presented on the right (n = 22 and n = 29 cells from 6 to 19 embryos, respectively; the graph shows the combined data from two independent experiments). The red dashed line highlights the contour of a large traveling bleb with black asterisks marking membrane invaginations within the cell body (see also Movie S4D). The p value (∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001) is calculated using a non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. (C) Localization of PGCs for the correlative EM analysis, employing an arrowhead-shaped laser mark (asterisk). The dashed area labels one of the PGCs studied in the Teneo VolumeScope (right panel). (D) The Teneo VolumeScope data was used to measure the extent of extra plasma membrane stored in invaginations and wrinkles in PGCs (excluding long membrane tubes that span multiple planes). Every 200 nm the circumference of the cell was outlined, either by following the invaginations and wrinkles precisely or by crude tracing of the cell circumference (see example in the magnified region at the bottom). The ratio between the circumference lengths obtained using the detailed Teneo VolumeScope data and the coarse estimate for two cells is presented (29 and 15 sections were used for example A and B, respectively). Scale bars, 5 μm. See also Figure S2. Developmental Cell 2017 43, 577-587.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2017.10.030) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Analysis of Plasma Membrane Invaginations Unfolding and Folding during Bleb Inflation and Retraction (A) The YFP-labeled N-BAR domain of amphiphysin interacts with the plasma membrane and marks membrane structures protruding into the cytoplasm, and the mCherry-F protein labels the PGC's plasma membrane. White arrowheads point to the position of bleb expansion. The graph on the right shows that the signal intensity of the BAR domain (Amph-N-BAR-YFP) on the plasma membrane is reduced upon bleb expansion, with a smaller reduction observed using the farnesylated mCherry (mCherry-F) probe (median = 0.41 and 0.71 for the N-BAR probe and the mCherry-F, respectively; n = 37 cells from 21 embryos). (B) A similar analysis to that in (A) was conducted during bleb retraction. White arrowheads point to the position of bleb retraction. The graphs present the intensity ratio of each of the two probes, Amph-N-BAR-YFP and mCherry-F, between the retracted bleb and the expanded bleb (median = 1.91 and 1.35 for the N-BAR probe and the mCherry-F, respectively; n = 21 cells from 15 embryos). (C) Two PGCs in deyolked embryos expressing N-BAR domain of amphiphysin and lifeAct in iso-osmotic (left, upper panel) and later in hypo-osmotic conditions (left, lower panel). The graph shows the change in the circumference of the cells in a confocal section after the exposure to hypo-osmotic medium. The values are normalized to the circumference in the iso-osmotic solution (n = 26 cells). Right panels show a PGC expressing N-BAR domain of amphiphysin (Amph-N-BAR-YFP) subjected to a change from hypo-osmotic to hyper-osmotic conditions (right upper and lower panels, respectively). All graphs show median and interquartile range. The p value (∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001) was calculated using a non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. Scale bars, 5 μm. See also Figures S3 and S4. Developmental Cell 2017 43, 577-587.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2017.10.030) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Membrane invaginations in PGCs migrating within live embryos require Cdc42 for formation and colocalize with polymerized actin structures (A) Lack of co-localization between membrane invaginations labeled by Amph-N-BAR-YFP and microtubules labeled with mCherry-CLIP170. (B) Confocal images of membrane invaginations labeled with the Amph-N-BAR-YFP protein and their co-localization with polymerized actin labeled with LifeAct-mCherry protein. The cell orientation is such that the front is facing the lens. (C) Co-localization of membrane invaginations in polarized PGCs labeled by Amph-N-BAR-YFP with polymerized actin labeled with LifeAct-mCherry protein. The cell front faces upper right. (D) Membrane invaginations labeled with the Amph-N-BAR-YFP protein in cells in which contractility was inhibited by the expression of a dominant-negative form of ROCK (DN-ROCK). mCherry-F labels the plasma membrane. (E) Dominant-negative form of Cdc42 (DN-Cdc42) expressed in the cells reduces the number of dynamic membrane invaginations labeled with Amph-N-BAR YFP. Polymerized actin is labeled with LifeAct-mCherry protein. (F) Inhibition of Cdc42 function in a fraction of the PGC population led to mislocalization of the treated cells (yellow cells). The asterisks mark the migration target of the cells in 24 hpf embryos and the white arrowheads point to PGCs expressing a control or the DN-Cdc42 proteins. The graph shows the quantitation of the result (n = 41 and n = 38 embryos from two independent experiments). Median (1 and 5, respectively) and interquartile range are shown. The p value (∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001) was calculated using a non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. Scale bars, 5 μm. Developmental Cell 2017 43, 577-587.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2017.10.030) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Release of Membrane Invaginations Is Required for Cell Blebbing In Vivo (A) The morphology of a wild-type PGC at 18 hpf, injected with control RNA (left) and of a PGC expressing high levels of the amphiphysin N-BAR domain (two right panels). Domains of increased plasma membrane accumulation (mCherry-F label, red) are observed at locations where high levels of YFP-tagged N-BAR domain protein (yellow) are present (arrowheads). The graph on the right presents the persistence of the invaginations as measured over 2 min under conditions of low (50 pg, n = 1,014 in 28 cells) and high (250 pg, n = 437 in 33 cells) amounts of RNA injected per embryo. Three independent experiments were conducted with a median of 30 s (for 50 pg) and 40 s (for 250 pg). Scale bar, 5 μm. (B) An overlay of six membrane contours (each 20 s apart) of PGCs labeled with farnesylated mCherry in control (250 pg RNA, upper) and in cells overexpressing the amphiphysin N-BAR domain (250 pg RNA, lower), with the graph showing the number of blebs per minute (n is the number of cells analyzed, median = 1.5 and 0.5 for control and N-BAR expression, respectively). Scale bar, 5 μm. (C) PGCs expressing high levels of the amphiphysin N-BAR domain protein exhibit defects in arrival at the region where the gonad develops. Asterisks label the migration target of PGCs in 24-hpf and 48-hpf embryos, and arrowheads point to some of the mislocalized PGCs. The graph presents the percentage of mislocalized PGCs in control and in PGCs expressing RNA encoding for the N-BAR domain protein (250 pg, N is the number of embryos analyzed) (median = 0% and 29% for control and Amph-N-BAR respectively, data obtained from three independent experiments). The p value (∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001) was calculated using a non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. The graphs show medians and interquartile ranges. See also Figure S5. Developmental Cell 2017 43, 577-587.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2017.10.030) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions