Clustering Analysis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Analysis, Characterization and Visualization of Freeway Traffic Data in Los Angeles Alain L. Kornhauser Professor, Operations Research & Financial Engineering.
Advertisements

Keweenaw North Waterway Buoy Bob Shuchman: Colin Brooks: Nate Jessee:
Management and Operations In MPO Planning Christopher O’Neill.
Case Study 4 New York State Alternate Route 7. Key Issues to Explore: Capacity of the mainline sections of NYS-7 Adequacy of the weaving sections Performance.
Traffic Signal Warrants
Evaluating InSync Performance in Microsimulation Aleksandar Stevanovic, PhD, PE Florida Atlantic University Transpo 2012 Bonita Springs, FL October 29,
1 Modeling Active Traffic Management for the I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) Project Terry Klim, P.E. Kevin Fehon, P.E. DKS Associates D.
© Copyright 2011 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. HP Confidential. Mahalia.
Freeway Congestion In The Washington Region Presentation to National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board February 15, 2006 Item # 9.
AASHTO SCOTE Annual Meeting 2011 Dr. Nick Compin Caltrans Office of Systems Management Planning Performance Measurement and Traffic Data Branch Ph: (916)
Robert Brydia Project Lead, I-35 Traveler Information During Construction Texas A&M Transportation Institute WORK ZONES & LARGE TRUCKS THE CENTRAL TEXAS.
1 Congestion Measurement Mark Hallenbeck TRAC. 2 Historical Use of volume data –AADT –AWDT, –Hourly volumes To estimate delays Can produce a reasonable.
Senior Project SR-60/Theodore St. November 14, 2014.
I-270/MD 355 Simulator: An Intelligent Online Traffic Management System Dr. Gang-Len Chang Nan Zou Xiaorong Lai University of Maryland Saed Rahwanji Maryland.
LCS Objectives Provide a standard interface for lane closure operations, closure tracking, and data retrieval for WisDOT regional offices statewide Provide.
Transpo 2012 Yan Xiao, Mohammed Hadi, Maria Lucia Rojas Lehman Center for Transportation Research Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Florida.
The National Weather Service has recorded tornadoes in all months of the year for the St. Louis area. Historically there is “peak” of activity in early.
US 36 Bus Rapid Transit RTD Board Update January 6, 2015.
L08: INCORPORATING RELIABILITY INTO THE HCM FREEWAY AND MULTILANE SUBCOMMITTEE JANUARY 22, 2012 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Cambridge Systematics Dowling.
Problems of the Day 1.Number of cars that exceeded the speed limit on Guangzhou avenue during the first 16 days of a October are listed below. Make a box-and-whisker.
I-84 Baker Valley Variable Speed Limit System
I-66 OUTSIDE THE BELTWAY Shrevecrest HOA JUNE 21, Susan Shaw, P. E
Englewood Mews HOA May 23, 2017 Michelle Holland, Megaprojects Communication Manager Virginia Department of Transportation John Morse, I-66 Project.
(Expressway Traffic Management System)
Macro / Meso / Micro Framework on I-395 HOT Lane Conversion
The I-465 West Leg Reconstruction Project
Corridors Safety and Efficiency: Using Active Traffic Management to Achieve Congestion and Safety Benefits The purpose of our discussion here is to provide.
TRB Planning Applications Conference 2017
MONDAY- FRIDAY CITY OF MIRAMAR Parks & Recreation Department
Overview Project Limits Improvements Cost Anticipated Schedule
Linear vs. Nonlinear Functions!
Overview Project Limits Improvements Cost Anticipated Schedule
Parks & Recreation Department SWIM CLASSES SESSIONS 2017
S2 Poisson Distribution.
An update on the Service Change proposal
Here is the graph of a function
SIMULATION RESULTS.
Solar City: Effect of Solar Technologies on Network Performance
Question a Distance-time graphs (2)
Telling Time to the Hour
Telling Time to the Hour
Chapter 12: Statistical Displays
Pushing the Button / Relief Duration Design Areas
WEEKDAY SCHEDULE WEEKEND SCHEDULE
MONDAY- FRIDAY CITY OF MIRAMAR Parks & Recreation Department
Week 5 Descriptive Statistics
MODULE 5: TSMO to Improve Reliability
Forensics Case Study Semester Project
ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE Four exit ramp, split level (SPUI)
Propagation Algorithm in Bayesian Networks
Unit 4 Day 6 More With Piecewise Functions
Title of Session Presentation Here
Twenty Questions Subject: Time.
Unit 4 Day 5 Piecewise Functions
Word Art – using text to create a work of art
MODULE 2: TSMO Strategies
INCIDENT ANALYSIS USING PROBE DATA
SCHOOL, DEPARTMENT, PROGRAM, OR OTHER TEXT IF NEEDED
Graphing Systems of Equations Day 2
Current and proposed HOT facilities update
Application of a Macro Based Capacity Constraint Assignment Technique
1. Where should buses run and with what frequency?
Modes and Modal Classes
A PBL Activity for Speed
Putting all the Graphs Together
MODULE 2: TSMO Strategies
MODULE 5: TSMO to Improve Reliability
IMPROVING INCIDENT DETECTION KPI ON SANRAL’S FREEWAYS IN GAUTENG
Broward County Congestion Assessment
Comparison and Analysis of Big Data for a Regional Freeway Study in Washington State Amanda Deering, DKS Associates.
Presentation transcript:

Clustering Analysis

Final Results Scope Results I-210, EB and WB, postmile 25 - 36 AM peak (5 - 10 am) and PM peak (3 - 8 pm) January to May, 2014 (151 days) Results Cluster Type WB AM # of days WB PM EB AM EB PM Weekend/Holiday 50 Weekday Regular 58 55 78 44 Incident * 38 41 19 53 Others 5 4 Total 151 * There are many other types of clusters: events, weather, etc. This analysis focuses on incidents for now.

Illustration The table shows the final result of the clustering analysis for I-210. The scope of the analysis is both directions of I-210 (within our corridor from postmile 25 to 36), both AM peak (5-10am) and PM peak (3-8pm). The 151 days from January 2014 to May 2014 are grouped into four clusters: weekend/holiday, regular, incident, and others (typically lack of data). Note that the clustering is different depending on the direction (WB/EB) and time (AM/PM).

Flow & speed vs. CHP (210WB, AM) PeMS CHP Total Non-incident Incident W’nd/H’day PeMS flow & speed Regular 58 24 82 9 4 13 Others 5 1 6 50 72 29 151 Type Number of days Weekend/Holiday 50 Weekday Regular 58 Incident 38 Others 5

Flow & speed vs. CHP (210WB, PM) PeMS CHP Total Non-incident Incident W’nd/H’day PeMS flow & speed Regular 55 26 81 3 9 12 Others 5 8 50 63 38 151 Type Number of days Weekend/Holiday 50 Weekday Regular 55 Incident 41 Others 5

Flow & speed vs. CHP (210EB, AM) PeMS CHP Total Non-incident Incident W’nd/H’day PeMS flow & speed Regular 78 9 87 5 4 Others 1 50 14 151 Type Number of days Weekend/Holiday 50 Weekday Regular 78 Incident 19 Others 4

Flow & speed vs. CHP (210EB, PM) PeMS CHP Total Non-incident Incident W’nd/H’day PeMS flow & speed Regular 44 27 71 8 13 21 Others 4 5 9 50 56 45 151 Type Number of days Weekend/Holiday 50 Weekday Regular 44 Incident 53 Others 4

Incident Frequency (# of incidents per day reported by CHP among incident days) These graphs show the incident frequency (in incident per day) on the dates clustered as “incident days”. Note that incidents refer to those reported by CHP through PeMS. So 0 incidents per day means we have evidence that incidents occur on these days, but CHP did not report anything. Note that the dominant situation for each direction (WB/EB) and time (AM/PM) is when there is only 1 incident per day.

Incident Severity (all incidents) The graph here shows the joint distribution of closure duration (in minutes) and number of mainline lanes closed. When the number of mainline lanes closed is 0, this means closure occurs on the ramp. Note that the most dominant situation is when 1 lane is closed for around 30 minutes. * Number of mainline lanes closed = 0 means lane closure occurs on the ramp

Incident Severity (WB incidents) * Number of mainline lanes closed = 0 means lane closure occurs on the ramp

Incident Severity (EB incidents) * Number of mainline lanes closed = 0 means lane closure occurs on the ramp