Are You (Click).

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCHOOL LEADERS: THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION
Advertisements

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
Training for Teachers and Specialists
Pre-Service Teacher Goal Setting Agreement University of Cincinnati Teacher Preparation Programs.
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
New Hanover County Schools Board of Education Presentation November 5, 2013.
A Quality Matters “Quickie”
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Acknowledging and Honoring Quality Performance.  The purpose of the EAS process is to provide teachers with the opportunity to reflect on professional.
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
Introduction to Creating a Balanced Assessment System Presented by: Illinois State Board of Education.
1 Orientation to SAFE-T. 2 ADEPT A Assisting, D Developing, and E Evaluating P Professional T Teaching.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
Copyright, 1996 © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc. Cincinnati Public Schools Teacher Evaluation System.
Utah Effective Teaching Standards-based Jordan Performance Appraisal System Orientation (UETS-based JPAS)
Special Education and Teacher Evaluations Janelle Smith Dr. Peter Verona O Director of Special Services O Byron CUSD #226 O O Byron.
Teacher Evaluation Model
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Peninsula School District
A specialized accrediting agency for English language programs and institutions Accreditation Presentation ABLA conference 2012.
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY14-15 Evaluation Systems Office, HR John Adams, CHRO.
ADEPT for School Guidance Counselors
1 ADEPT Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty Winthrop University.
Assisting Developing Evaluating Professional Teaching South Carolina/InTASC Alignment Statewide system for all teacher candidates and practicing teachers.
1 ADEPT for Speech-Language Therapists. 2 ADEPT Web Site
Your Mentoring Program: Step by Step including the Danielson Framework North Palos #117 Presenters: Marilyn Marino, NBCT – Mentor Coordinator David Creagan.
for School Library Media Specialists
For Faculty, Supervisors and Cooperating Teachers
ADEPT Framework
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Revised Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE-R)
Division of School Effectiveness Office of Instructional Practices and Evaluations.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
1 EPT Adding the A and D back into AD.
ADEPT A D E P T Assisting Developing Evaluating Professional Teaching.
The Jordan Performance Appraisal System (JPAS) is designed to help educators in their continuing efforts to provide high quality instruction to all students.
1 ADEPT for School Guidance Counselors. 2 ADEPT Web Site
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
START Supporting Teachers and Rewarding Them. Is mentoring enough?
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
SAFE-T NET Introduction
Copyright, 1996 © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc. Cincinnati Public Schools Teacher Evaluation System.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Evaluation School Year Review. Evaluation Intent  Collaborative process to support professional growth  Conversations and reflection should.
Mentoring and Induction Journey to Excellence Iowa Training Model for Mentors of Beginning Educators.
Kansas Educator Evaluation Bill Bagshaw Asst. Director Kansas State Department of Education February 25, 2015.
Chapter 14 Providing for Personal and Professional Staff Development ©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Teacher Evaluation ___________________________ Modified ADEPT Model Assisting Developing Evaluating Professional Teaching
School Counselor Evaluation RubricEvaluating with Fidelity Linda Brannan, M.Ed, NBCT K-12 Student Support Services Consultant NC Department of Public Instruction.
Master Teacher Program Fall House Bill 1 Changes to Master Teacher Program –Eliminates EMIS report until 2011 Form I deleted Removes December timeline.
Teacher Observations Summative or Formative? ( Glickman et. al.)
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
1 Rose Hermodson Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education December 13, 2011 Teacher Evaluation Components in Legislation.
1 Expanded ADEPT Support and Evaluation System Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty.
Expanded ADEPT Guidance Presentation Office of Educator Effectiveness May 9, 2016.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
 The professional growth and development of teachers is the fundamental purpose of teacher assessment.
By: Miss Michelle M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School PSCA President-Elect.
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Doreen Griffeth, Director.
New Teacher Program for Induction Contract Teachers
Dissemination Training
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Chapter 14: Evaluation of Instruction
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY
Personal Growth and Professional Development
Program Overview for South Carolina
Start with the Science & Technology Standards (2002, 2008?)
Resident Educator Program
Presentation transcript:

Are You (Click)

What is South Carolina has developed a consistent system for assessing, evaluating and developing more professional teaching in this state. That system is called ADEPT. (click)

Assisting Developing Evaluating Professional Teaching This system begins with information in the first education classes in teacher preparation programs and follows those preservice teachers through their entry in the teaching profession in South Carolina. (Click) Teaching

SC State Board of Education Regulation ADEPT Legislation SC State Board of Education Regulation R43-205.1 The ADEPT system is the result of this legislation (click)

ADEPT Standards apply to all contract levels provide appropriate expectations for what all school-based professionals in South Carolina should know and be able to do. reflect fundamental principles of competent professional practice. are consistent with nationally recognized standards. So why do you have to know about ADEPT? Our goal is to help you really understand what is going to be an important part of your future as a teacher in South Carolina. (click)

Understanding the Terminology of ADEPT Here are some important terms used in the ADEPT system (click)

Definition of Terms Contract – the employment agreement between the school district and the teacher. The current levels are Induction contract Annual contract Continuing contract Diagnostic Assistance The Contract is a legal agreement signed by the teacher. It is binding and should not be broken lightly. (click)

Contract Levels Induction – First year of teaching Annual - Second/third year of teaching Continuing – Highest level of professional teaching in South Carolina (similar to tenure in other states) *Diagnostic Assistance *May be Used if teacher has not been deemed acceptable on Annual evaluation

Definition of Terms Induction First year teacher provided with mentoring assistance. One year only. The district may decide not to re-hire the teacher the next year. In this event, the teacher is eligible to seek employment in another school district at the annual-contract level. OR The district may elect to re-hire the teacher at the annual-contract level the next year.

(after Successful Induction Year) Annual (after Successful Induction Year) Following the induction year, the teacher is eligible for employment at the annual contract level under one of the following two ADEPT processes, at the discretion of the school district: Annual Contract – Formal Evaluation 1 OR Annual Contract – Diagnostic Assistance A teacher may remain on an annual contract for up to four years. After two unsuccessful evaluations at the annual-contract level, the state must suspend the teacher’s certificate for a minimum of two years. The teacher also must complete a state-approved remediation plan before becoming eligible to return to the profession. Teachers at the Annual contract level are not covered under the Employment Act. They have no greivance rights (click)

Continuing (after Successful Annual Contract Year) Teachers must pass the formal evaluation at the annual-contract level in order to be eligible to advance to a continuing contract and a professional teaching certificate. Teachers at the continuing-contract level must be evaluated on a continuous basis, either formally (with advance written notification) or informally (i.e., GBE). The teacher now has job security and is covered under the Employment Act. (click)

Teacher Contracts The contract level (i.e., induction, annual, or continuing) must be indicated on the teacher contract. This is a new regulation – previously all teacher contracts looked the same within a district. (click)

Definition of Terms Teaching Certificate – the “license” to practice, issued by the State Department of Education. This is handled through a pecial office at the South Carolina Department of Education (click)

Definition of Terms ADEPT Process – the type(s) of assistance that must be provided and/or evaluation(s) that must be conducted, as specified in the ADEPT statute, regulation, and guidelines. This is the “system” we have been talking about (click)

Definition of Terms ADEPT Process (continued) The current ADEPT requirements include a formal evaluation process a diagnostic assistance process an informal evaluation (GBE) process Let’s look at these closer (click)

Definition of Terms Formal Evaluation A summative assessment of teaching performance upon which high-stakes, consequential decisions are based. Used with Annual contract teachers. Formal evaluation is at the Annual contract level and during the diagnostic assistance level This is what most teachers mean when they say that they are “gong through ADEPT” (click)

Diagnostic Assistance Definition of Terms Diagnostic Assistance ♦Annual (Contract) Diagnostic Assistance (ADA) replaces provisional contracts ♦Provided if needed at the annual contract level. ♦One year only; only once in career span. ♦For teachers who show potential but who are not ready for formal evaluation. ♦May be provided either after the induction year or after the first unsuccessful formal evaluation. This is a new program to help weak teachers who have displayed the potential to grow professionally (click)

Definition of Terms Informal Evaluation – most often referred to as GBE (Goals-Based Evaluation). At this stage, experienced, successful teachers are expected to engage in self-assessment and reflection in order to develop goals that promote student achievement through continuous professional growth and contributions to the profession. There are fewer, if any, observations by outside people. Usually three goals are set by the individual teacher for a three year time span (click)

Definition of Terms Formative Feedback – involves low-stakes assessments of teaching performance conducted for the purpose of informing, guiding, and improving practice. Formative feedback may be obtained from others and/or from self-evaluations. Formative feedback is an important component of the induction, diagnostic assistance, and informal evaluation (GBE) processes. Formative feedback is expressly for helping the teacher grow and is usually not part of the high-stakes formal evaluation. (click0

ADEPT Performance Standards Definition of Terms ADEPT Performance Standards – the standards, or expectations, for competent practice. The ADEPT system includes separate sets of PDs for four groups of professionals, as follows: General and Special Education Teachers (10 PDs) School Guidance Counselors (7 PDs) Library Media Specialists (7 PDs) Speech-Language Therapists (10 PDs) (click)

ADEPT Performance Standards The ten APSs for classroom-based teachers are grouped into four domains. Planning Instruction Environment Professionalism Each of these domains have key elements that must be met for a successful formal evaluation (click)

Courses at Winthrop teaching the ADEPT Standards EDUC 110- Introduction EDUC 310/610 – ADEPT I EDUC 390/660 – ADEPT II EDUC 391/475 – Using ADEPT Evaluation in the field (click)

Web Site http://www.scteachers.org/scteachers/Adept/evaluation.htm Just in case you would like to see the total package that is the ADEPT system (click)

Are You To be continued in your 300 level classes! The End