The Art of Teaching Honors Courses and Honors Contracts Susan R. Rakow, Ph.D. 216-523-7296.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Differentiation in the Art Classroom
Advertisements

Project-Based Learning and Performance-Based Assessment.
When Students Can’t Read…
Writing Effective Learning Outcomes Department for the Enhancement of Learning, Teaching and Assessment RGU:DELTA.
Writing Course-Level Student Learning Outcomes
A-G Updates and the New Piece of the Puzzle: Common Core Monica H. Lin, Ph.D. Associate Director of Undergraduate Admissions University of California |
An Overview of Service Learning: Building Bridges, Making Connections
What is LEAP? Roundtable Discussions October 19 & 20.
SENIOR SEMINARS Specifics & Example Performances CEPR Center for Educational Policy Research.
TOSS-BFK Administrators’ Evaluation Crosswalk to School-wide Changes
Course Design: The Basics Monica A. Devanas, Ph.D. Director, Faculty Development and Assessment Programs Center for Teaching Advancement and Assessment.
Teaching Methods Related to Student Progress in Lower-level STEM Courses Steve Benton, Ph.D. Senior Research Officer IDEA Emeritus Professor, Kansas State.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
UNDERSTANDING THE STANDARDS IN CTE WITH FOCUS ON LITERACY HELEN ARNETT CTE INSTRUCTIONAL SPECIALIST FEBRUARY 20, 2012.
Evaluating teaching and learning Prof Sarah Moore.
Intellectual Challenge of Teaching
The Program Review Process: NCATE and the State of Indiana Richard Frisbie and T. J. Oakes March 8, 2007 (source:NCATE, February 2007)
Principles of High Quality Assessment
QUESTIONS TO PROMOTE SELF-DIRECTED LEARNING SAMANTHA RONSICK AET/531 DECEMBER 8, 2014 DANENE MIMS, INSTRUCTOR.
Effingham County Who is a Gifted Student? A student who demonstrates a high degree of intellectual and/or creative ability, exhibits an exceptionally.
Catherine Wehlburg, Ph.D. Office for Assessment & Quality Enhancement.
ABC Curriculum Showcase Coventry Public Schools February 10, 2009 An introduction for parents and community members Left click your mouse to advance to.
How to build effective WORD WALLS and PERFORMANCE TASKS
IMPROVING GRADES, COMPREHENSION and INTEREST in DEVELOPMENTAL MATH COURSES Paola Di Muro - Brandon University NADE 2009.
Unwrapping Standards.
The Technology Integration Planning Model (TIP)
A Conversation Across the Disciplines to Integrate Literacy into Middle & Secondary Classrooms Drs. Pixita del Hill Prado, Ellen Friedland, & Jevon Hunter.
Shifting to a Standards- Based Mindset Through Quality Assessments and Backwards Design LMS Department Everett High School October 10, 2014.
Welcome to Unit 6 Seminar: Learning The Language Learning and Assessment Strategies 1.
Foundations of Educating Healthcare Providers
The Framework for Teaching and the Student-Led Classroom
Achievement for All Implementing Differentiation through the MOSAICS Program Dr. Denise Pupillo.
Copyright © 2008 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Susan Agre-Kippenhan, Portland State University Professor, Art Department Evaluating the Effectiveness of Service Learning.
Student Centered Teaching Through Universal Instructional Design Part II.
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
ELA SCHOOL TEAM SESSION Welcome to EEA, 2012! 10/2/2015MSDE1.
The Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum January 29, 2013 Karen M. Beerer, Ed.D.
Beyond Multiple Choice: Using Performance and Portfolio Assessments to Evaluate Student Learning.
Taking it to Another Level: Increasing Higher Order Thinking Session 3 BHCA PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT SERIES.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
David Steer Department of Geosciences The University of Akron Writing Learning Outcomes October 2013.
Write On! Your Course Outline. Pedagogy Unbound Series Facilitated by: Deborah Richards Florence Daddey.
Information from  Project Based Learning is an instructional approach built upon authentic learning activities that engage student interest.
A Basic Guide to Academic Assessment Presented by Darby Kaikkonen Director of Institutional Research.
Effective Grading Strategies Alison Morrison-Shetlar Faculty Center for Teaching and Learning Adapted from the book Effective Grading by Barbara Walvoord.
What the*!?# is an SLO? Workshop on Student Learning Outcomes For De Anza College Faculty.
How Much Do We know about Our Textbook? Zhang Lu.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Race to the Top Assessment Program: Public Hearing on Common Assessments January 20, 2010 Washington, DC Presenter: Lauress L. Wise, HumRRO Aab-sad-nov08item09.
ASSESSMENT DO THIS, NOT THAT! UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO ASSESSMENT DAY
JANET LYNNE TASSELL, PH.D. REBECCA STOBAUGH, PH.D. WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY AACTE SPRING 2010 Improving.
1 Engaging Students Incorporating Depth, Complexity, and Questioning Strategies into the classroom. Phase 1 “Plan for Using Questioning” November 4, 2009.
Assessment My favorite topic (after grammar, of course)
Welcome to Watauga County Schools Professional Development High School Healthful Living and Physical Education March 15 th and 16th.
Gifted and Talented Academy Year 2 Curriculum and Instruction Session 4 HAEAnet-public Password: education0309.
Building Effective Content Literacy Tasks. The Cycle of Assessment Teach: Does the instruction and the tasks align to the identified learning target(s)?
Roles/Responsibilities/Effectiveness.  Be able to explain the curriculum writing process  Identify ad explain the roles and responsibilities of Special.
RUBRICS Presented by: Dan, Chanel & Nancy. What is a rubric? For TEACHERS:a tool for assessment, for providing instructions to students, and for outlining.
Goals and Objectives  Why Use Questioning Strategies?  Effective Questioning Techniques  Levels of Questioning…Increasing Understanding, Models for.
KNOWING THE MIDDLE YEARS LEARNER Tuesday, January 13.
Learning Objectives for Senior School Students. Failing to plan is planning to fail. / Psychology of Achievement /
D 4 Understanding the Common Core State Standards & Assessment Katie McKnight, Ph.D.
Writing Teaching Philosophies
Competency Based Learning and Project Based Learning
SPE 578 STUDY perfect education/spe578study.com
Advanced Program Learning Assessment
Hale High School DEPTHS of Teaching.
We VALUE HIPs Utilizing VALUE Rubrics and HIP QA Tools in Course Revitalization Presented by Melynda Conner, TBR OSS HIP Specialist 2019.
Presentation transcript:

The Art of Teaching Honors Courses and Honors Contracts Susan R. Rakow, Ph.D

Developing an Honors Contract Meet with the Individual Student What does she already know? What does she want to learn or do in this course? How might you help the student develop a passion for your subject as a result of their work on this contract? How might you help this individual student understand what it means to be a scholar or expert in your field?

Basic Starting Assumptions We all know our discipline. We all know how to help our typical CSU students gain the essentials in our discipline in a particular course. Knowledge Skills Attitudes Values Magic of Teaching & Learning Student Content Teacher

How should Honors Courses, and Contracts be Different? Start with the WHO: Honors Students Background and preparation Motivation Surprise! Study Skills and Work Habits (often lacking) Maturity (asynchronous development) Get to Know the Individuals

BLOOMS TAXONOMY (cognitive) Know Understand Apply Analyze Evaluate Create

Depth. Complexity. Challenge. Varies for Each Individual Student GUIDING QUESTIONS AND POSSIBLE RESOURCES References: The Ingredients of Challenge by Carrie Winstanley Guide to Critical Thinking: Concepts and Tools by Paul and Elder (distribute)

How should Honors Courses, and Contracts be Different? A Contract is an explicit agreement between faculty and student. THE CONTENT AND LEARNING ACTIVITIES Different, not just More Qualitatively NOT Quantitatively Different Greater Depth and Complexity Challenging for an individual student (contracts)

Strong Contracts v. Weak Contracts 3 Key Questions on the Honors Contract Course Petition: How does the contract modify the non-honors version of the course? What additional and/or different work will the student perform? (be as specific as possible) Ho will the outcomes deepen or extend the students learning beyond what would be achieved in the non-honors version of the course (please be as specific as possible) How will assessment of the honors student differ from assessment of typical students What portion of the course grade will be accounted for by the honors component of the course?

Strong Contracts v. Weak Contracts QUESTION 1: Weak Contracts The honors student will be responsible for completing the team term project by themselves. Double the work. The student will create a more comprehensive ___ campaign plan. More in-depth. Will write a 1500 word book review essay on top of regular requirements. Honors student will produce an expanded page assigned research paper on a topic related to the curriculum of the course, incorporating 6 or more scholarly sources.

Strong Contracts v. Weak Contracts QUESTION 2: Weak Contracts Answer is omitted Student will have a deeper knowledge of their industry as they will do double the work. Other students will not produce as extensive a research paper and honors students will produce a draft for revision. The student will have a better understanding of important concepts and principles of ___.

Strong Contracts v. Weak Contracts QUESTION 3(Assessment): Weak Contracts I will grade the project more rigorously for the honors student. Student will meet with professor during office hours to discuss research. Twenty-five percent of the grade will be comprised by the research paper. Different criteria will be employed. The campaign project and presentation portion of the course grade will be accounted for by the honors component. Question Omitted.

Strong Contracts v. Weak Contracts Handouts of Strong Contracts. Strong (not necessarily ideal or perfect!)

Assessment Grading on a Curve – Impact on Honors Students and Honors Courses Value of Rubrics to Student and Faculty: Clear Communication (a WOW Column)

QUESTIONS?