CERP PLENARY PostEurop position on the European Commission Proposal for a Regulation on cross-border parcel delivery Elena Fernández- Rodríguez, PostEurop.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reliability Provisions of EPAct of 2005 & FERC’s Final Rule
Advertisements

The role of competition authorities in utilities regulation. Co-operation with sector regulators. The role of Competition Council of Latvia Valdis Latkovskis.
1 page 1 C O U P L E D Joint TSO-PX presentation NWE Day-Ahead Price Coupling IG meeting May 9 th 2012 Copenhagen Joint Presentation from TSOs and PXs.
GATS & Telecom Transparency. Key Ingredients for Reform }Clearly set out policies in laws, regulations, licenses, contracts }Make all processes open.
1 “Introduction to EU Trade Policy” – July 2008 How We Make Trade Policy n Contents n Part I: EU Trade Powers n Part II: The evolving scope of Trade Policy.
Long term competition in roaming markets : A challenger’s view.
1 S.Tronchon Legal Considerations when drafting a standard.
Price Undertakings Under U.S. Antidumping Duty Law Prepared by Import Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce for the June 2 nd Korea Trade Commission’s.
(14) HAKOM © 2014 Harmonized End User’s Rights Marina Ljubić Karanović CROATIAN REGULATORY AUTHORITY FOR NETWORK INDUSTRIES.
Broadband to everybody!? Torstein Olsen Director Norwegian Post and Telecommunications Authority LLU Conference, Bucharest, 5 July 2005.
Update on GSE Activities Klaus-Dieter Barbknecht GSE President GIE General Assembly Madrid 21 November 2007.
Rocío PRIETO – Comisión Nacional de Energía Benoît ESNAULT – Commission de Régulation de l’Energie LNG TF chairs 18th Madrid Forum Madrid, 27/28 September.
International roaming Pál Belényesi University of Verona November 2006.
©Ofcom The Review of the Roaming Regulation I/ERG’s views John Doherty, I/ERG Vice Chair EPP/ED hearing, Brussels, 8 January 2008.
Grupo Santander Competition policy and financial market integration European Parliament Financial Services Forum Brussels – 15 June 2005.
Emergency Briefing Remote Gambling - European Update THIBAULT VERBIEST Attorney-at-law at the Brussels and Paris Bars Founding Partner of ULYS LawFirm.
Nov/Dec 2003ElectraNet BSP-2 Workshop (khb) 1 EU Telecoms Regulatory Status Governing Legislation Package 2002  Directive 2002/19/EC Access to, and interconnection.
Case COMP/ – ENI (Abuse of Dominant Position) International Competition Law Dushanka Dovichinska 24 Nov 2010.
Implementation of EU Electronic Communication Directives.
-EU Climate and Energy Package- Mihai Tomescu Policy Officer, Unit ‘Energy and Environment’ Directorate-General Environment European Commission Enabling.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Mark van Stiphout – DG TREN – C2 Internal market for electricity and gas Third Package Progress GIE conference
The Notification Procedure of national telecoms markets Pál Belényesi 27 October 2006.
Directorate General for Energy and Transport European Commission Directorate General for Energy and Transport Regulation of electricity markets in the.
Directorate General for Energy and Transport Johannes ENZMANN Administrator DG Energy and Transport European Commission GTE 2nd Annual Conference 23 September.
Public presentation of the draft ERGP work programme for 2013 Luc Hindryckx ERGP Chair 2013 Brussels December 13 th 2012.
EU agenda in motor insurance. Contents Cross-border claims Anti-discrimination Report on issues relating to motor insurance Recast of the Motor Insurance.
Directive on the Authorisation of electronic communications networks & Services Directive (2002/20/EC) Authorisation Directive Presented by: Nelisa Gwele.
Ainārs Meņģelsons Public Utilities Commission Latvia 10th Baltic ERI June 4, 2010 Kuressare, Estonia IMPLEMENTATION OF 3-rd EC PACKAGE IN LATVIA.
Comparative Telecommunications Law Spring, 2007 Prof. Karl Manheim 4: Regulation in the EU Copyright © 2007.
Regulation of the postal market TAIEX Multi-beneficiary Workshop on TAIEX Assistance within Chapter 10 – Information society and Media, 12 April 2016 Daiva.
Thomas Kramler DG Competition, European Commission (The views expressed are not necessarily those of the European Commission) E-commerce and EU competition.
ROMANIA NATIONAL NATURAL GAS REGULATORY AUTHORITY Public Service Obligations in Romanian Gas Sector Ligia Medrea General Manager – Authorizing, Licensing,
Directorate-General for Energy and Transport Mark van Stiphout – C2 Electricity and Gas GSE Workshop on storage investment 24 May 2007 Policy framework.
European Commission, DG Competition, Policy and Strategy, International Relations 1 New EU Competition Rules for Purchase and Distribution agreements Kris.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 10 – Information society and media.
Marek Stavinoha Legal officer DG MOVE A4 European Commission
The Protection of Confidential Commercial or Industrial Information in Environmental Law: Analysis and Call for a Graded Concept of Protection Prof. Dr.
Latest developments in Estonia
Heading in the wrong direction
Views on the EC Draft LNG Paper
Dispute Resolution Between ICT Service Providers in Saudi Arabia
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
A EUROPEAN WORKS COUNCIL WHAT IS IT FOR ?
September, Lev Razovskiy Director, International Affairs
THE UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES 2010:
Content of Tender Dossier Instructions to Tenderers
Interactive Gaming Council Board Meeting I-Gaming Legal status
INTERCONNECTION GUIDELINES
The new European regulatory framework for electronic communications and perspectives 27th january.
What Does it Mean for UN/CEFACT ?
European Labour Law Jean Monnet Chair of EU Labour Law Academic Year Silvia Borelli:
Background and Process
NWE Day-Ahead Price Coupling
Continuing Professional Development, the Professional Qualifications Directive, and the Architects Council of Europe Margaret Hynds O’Flanagan Chair, ACE.
Complainant's rights within the competition proceedings Access to file
Moderator dr Nikola Trubint Madrid 1-2 June 2017
The competition enforcement in regulated sectors
Update on European Network Codes
Dan Tofan | Expert in NIS 21st Art. 13a WG| LISBON |
The Economic Regulation of Transport Bill, 2018
EU Postal Regulation CERP Plenary 2018
GIE Annual Conference Bratislava, September 2006
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) IN FP7
Implementation of the Services Directive
Future Monitoring and Evaluation: Focus on results Antonella Schulte-Braucks Ines Hartwig ESF Evaluation Partnership Brussels 17 November 2011.
European Commission proposals for data protection
Simplification of the 1st and 11th Directive
Exemptions and Disproportionate Costs
Modernisation of EU public procurement policy
Presentation transcript:

CERP PLENARY PostEurop position on the European Commission Proposal for a Regulation on cross-border parcel delivery Elena Fernández- Rodríguez, PostEurop – EAC Chair 1 June 2017

PostEurop‘s position on the Commission‘s proposal Parcel delivery markets are growing rapidly and are highly competitive… From PO, through express operators to new business models (Amazon, Uber…) On average, 8 different operators for domestic parcel delivery and 7 different operators for cross-border delivery (incl. USPs and competitors) E-commerce turnover increased by 13,3% in 2015 and 12% in 2016 E-commerce barometer (2017): “Companies not selling cross‐border indicated as main reasons for not doing so because of overly restricting regulations in other Member States”

Commission’s proposal for a Regulation on Cross-Border Parcel Delivery Services Commission proposal PostEurop position Objectives Make markets work more effectively by increasing regulatory oversight encouraging competition Increase transparency of tariffs in order to reduce unjustifiable differences and lower tariffs for individuals and SMEs Highly competitive market Avoid of red tape Proportionality Information requirements (Art. 3) All parcels delivery service providers to submit to NRA: (i) Annual turnover & numbers of postal items from parcels delivery (domestic/import/export) Only small scale operators should be exempt New business models should be also affected Confidentiality

Commission’s proposal for a Regulation on Cross-Border Parcel Delivery Services Commission proposal PostEurop position Transparency of tariffs and terminal rates (Art. 4) USPs to report public lists prices (annex 1) to NRA and Commission as well as publication on a dedicated web-site USPs to report terminal rates for imports to NRA, Commission and other NRAs Support transparency (public list prices). Should apply to ALL operators active in the market. NO justification for transparency of terminal rates: highly sensitive business data Affordability assessment of all prices disproportionate Assessing affordability of tariffs (Art. 5) NRA to assess affordability, taking into account domestic tariff of originating and destination MS, terminal rates and application of uniform tariff If tariffs are not affordable, request for further information. Affordability assessments to be submitted to COM and other NRAs Non-confidential version to be published on the dedicated web-site BEREC-ERGP „ before introducing any additional measure: need to evidence the problem & clear impact assessment. Disproportionate. Since the EC expects only 5 to 10 % of the tariffs to fail the affordability assessment. Should avoid redundancy and be limited only to cases were there is insufficient competition

Commission’s proposal for a Regulation on Cross-Border Parcel Delivery Services Commission proposal PostEurop position Transparent and non-discriminatory cross-border access (Art. 6) USPs to meet all reasonable requests for access whenever concluding multilateral agreements on terminal rates. USP to publish reference offer, subject to approval by NRA. NRA may impose changes   Disproportionate Cross-border delivery is extremely competitive. Multi operator & partnerships. In a free market, access should be part of normal commercial negotiations.

PostEurop‘s position on the Commission‘s proposal Conclusion Transparency of prices acceptable, but no justification for transparency of terminal rates: Affordability assessments as drafted by the Commission: involve significant resources and costs restrict the post’s pricing strategies and thereby their ability to compete entirely disproportionate, if (as expected by the Commission) only 5 to max. 10% might not be affordable No justification for a sector-specific regulation of third party access: Cross-border delivery provided through a variety of networks and agreements No market failure demonstrated Agreements and access to agreements are part of normal commercial negotiations Applicability of general competition law sufficient Request for a proportionate approach that reflects market conditions

Thank you! PostEurop AISBL Linkedin.com/posteurop Twitter @PostEurop Facebook.com/posteurop PostEurop AISBL Boulevard Brand Whitlock 114 1200 Brussels, Belgium T: + 32 2 761 9650 F: + 32 2 771 4856 E: info@posteurop.org