- 1- Just enough. Just in time. Just for you March 24, 2011 Building a solid foundation: A new approach to ERP acquisition March 24, 2011 Mike Reyna Project.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Cycle Management
Advertisements

SHOW ME THE MONEY BUDGETING 101.
2 Session Objectives Increase participant understanding of effective financial monitoring based upon risk assessments of sub-grantees Increase participant.
1 Income Eligible Re-Procurement Board of Early Education and Care January 14, 2009.
Modern Systems Analyst and as a Project Manager
Project Appraisal Module 5 Session 6.
Amitava Mitra, Solution Architect, Oracle Primavera, TCS
Effectively Structuring and Managing Design- Build Projects Timothy John Murphy and Jason J. Annibale Wednesday November 25, 2009.
Program Controls Systems & Processes Board of Trustees Workshop October 11, 2005.
Lessons Learned from Financial Management Reviews May 15, 2008 Bruce Robinson FTA Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation.
Vision: A strong and capable civil society, cooperating and responsive to Cambodias development challenges 1.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan Evaluation February 16, 2005.
A Roadmap to Successful Implementation Management Plans.
NIH RESEARCH CONTRACTS
Effective Contract Management Planning
Contents Introduction and Background The Objective Recommendations
Abstract To provide efficient and effective access to enterprise information that meets stakeholder needs and supports mission success, NASA is implementing.
GSA Federal Supply Service DOING BUSINESS WITH GSA.
Fostering Ad-Hoc Collaboration Between Marketing and R&D Departments
Financial System Replacement Project
1. 2 August Recommendation 9.1 of the Strategic Information Technology Advisory Committee (SITAC) report initiated the effort to create an Administrative.
Department of Finance and Administration Office of the Mississippi Management and Reporting System 1 MAGIC Implementation Services Discussion February.
Connections for Classrooms Georgia Technology Grants & Related Funding Unified Infrastructure Funding to Enable Digital and Blended Learning.
Program Management Office (PMO) Design
YES New Mexico Enterprise Eligibility System
04/28/2010 Department of Health Planning Certification Request Health Emergency Management (HEM) Systems Project.
Roadmap for Sourcing Decision Review Board (DRB)
How to commence the IT Modernization Process?
System Testing 2  Effective March 3, 2014, new requirements for system testing were implemented  State Agencies are now required to provide to FNS:
10-1 © Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 10: Selecting the Best Alternative Design Strategy Plus Project Management Concepts.
Optimize tomorrow today. TM Cost and Affordability approach at Development Planning stage 1.
Project Kick-off Meeting > > Presented By: > >
Creative Commons Sustainable IT Architecture year plan 1 / 18 Sustainable IT Architecture Sustainable IT Architecture.
1. 2 Introduction Industry trends Engagement models Governance Innovation Case Study Summary & Wrap Up Agenda.
1. 2 RE Case Study What was the Project Objective? When did it all Start? What was the Plan? How did Negotiations take place? What were the Benefits of.
Project Kickoff PeopleSoft Financials Implementation April 2, 2014.
Global Business Blueprint Summary Presenters: Laurie Dempsey, CBP Lois McCluskey, eCP January 28, 2004.
Delivery Business Solutions April 29, Nashville PMI Symposium April 29, 2013 Stephanie Dedmon, PMP Director, Business Solutions Delivery Department.
Making Sense of the WIC EBT IAPD IAPD Session of the 2014 WIC EBT User Group Meeting July 23, :00 AM to 12:00 PM Presented by Cheryl Owens, MAXIMUS.
Enterprise Architecture The Arkansas Approach. Key Areas What is enterprise architecture? Why is it important? How you can participate Current status.
1 Purchasing and Procurement Processes Module Four Revision Date: 2/06/2015.
Introductions Jim Enzinna, Chief, Licensing Division Mark DiNapoli, Assistant Chief, Licensing Division Tracie Coleman, Head, Information Section Vince.
Enterprise Architecture
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
Margin Management Tool (MMT) Recommended Approach 23-January-2014
Financials – Phase II Kick-Off Meeting September 11, 2008 Brenda Bolander, State Comptroller Michael Grisser, Project Manager.
Project Management Process Overview
The West Virginia ERP Story – Part 1 NASACT August 12, 2014.
Virginia Enterprise Applications Program (VEAP) Agency Information Technology Resource (AITR) Tuesday, May 15 th, 2007
FI$Cal Change Discussion Guide FI$Cal Project Overview March 2015.
Project Kick-off Meeting Presented By: > > > > Office of the Chief Information Officer.
Illuminating Britelite’s Internal Services for Success Strategy for Process Improvement.
Decision Making Chi Emodi Project and Contract Management Office December 9, 2015.
University of Wyoming Financial Reporting Initiative Update April 2016.
FI$Cal Change Discussion Guide Appendix C – FI$Cal Project Overview April 2016.
© CGI GROUP INC. All rights reserved ERP Success: An extraordinary opportunity Gordon Bruce, City and County of Honolulu, HI.
Enterprise Content Management Owners Representative Contract Approval
Phase 2 Tollgate Review Discussion Template
Phase 2 Tollgate Review Discussion Template
Fix it or Forget it? Dealing with Troubled Projects
General Services Department
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Facilities Management Division PROOF –NM (Process Reengineering & Optimization of O&M Functions for New Mexico) Phase II.
Department of Licensing HP 3000 Replatforming Project Closeout Report
Phase 2 Tollgate Review Discussion Template
SHARE Special Project Enterprise Learning Management Pilot Project Planning/Implementation Certification December 17, 2014 Requesting Agency: Cassandra.
NM Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
Closeout Certification Request May 23, 2019
General Services Department (GSD) Asset Management (AM) Project Project Certification Committee Implementation Phase Request October 24, 2019 Duffy.
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Facilities Management Division PROOF –NM (Process Reengineering & Optimization of O&M Functions for New Mexico) Project.
Presentation transcript:

- 1- Just enough. Just in time. Just for you March 24, 2011 Building a solid foundation: A new approach to ERP acquisition March 24, 2011 Mike Reyna Project Director FI$Cal Project Graeme Finley Director Grant Thornton LLP

- 2- Just enough. Just in time. Just for you Agenda The importance of procurement Issues with traditional procurement approaches FI$Cal overview The FI$Cal procurement approach

- 3- Just enough. Just in time. Just for you The importance of procurement For most government organizations, implementing a complex business solution requires planning and executing a significant IT software and services acquisition. In many cases, the success or failure of a large IT project can be traced back to the way in which the acquisition for the project was conducted.

- 4- Just enough. Just in time. Just for you The traditional procurement Issue Request For Proposal Receive vendor proposals Conduct negotiations (sometimes) Issue contract award Issue contract modification etc….

- 5- Just enough. Just in time. Just for you The problem of requirements A key objective of the acquisition process is to obtain responsive, realistic proposals from vendors. The likelihood of receiving good vendor proposals is greatly increased when: o Vendors have a sound understanding of the governments business needs o The government has a sound understanding of the information needed by the vendor community to develop an effective response Too often, System Integrators' (SIs) only learn the nature and complexity of the states needs after a contract has been signed, a price has been negotiated, and a vendor team is on the ground. The Oh, thats what you meant! moment should be before, not after, the contract is signed. All too often it is not.

- 6- Just enough. Just in time. Just for you Issues with traditional procurement approaches Typical consequences of an imperfect understanding of government needs and requirements: Unrealistic timelines or budgets, causing cost and schedule overruns, and disagreements between the government and vendors over scope, cost and timeline; Gaps in necessary government and vendor staff experience, reducing the likelihood that project cost, schedule and quality commitments will be met; Solutions that do not meet user business needs, causing user dissatisfaction with the delivered product and reducing the benefits gained from the final system; and Ineffective project management, which increases the likelihood of cost, schedule and/or quality problems.

- 7- Just enough. Just in time. Just for you How can we address this issue?

- 8- Just enough. Just in time. Just for you FI$Cal overview The Financial Information System for California (FI$Cal) Project is a statewide business transformation project that will significantly reengineer the states financial management business processes using the inherent best practices embodied in a Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) tool. FI$Cal will enable the state to operate as a single financial enterprise, for the first time in California history.

- 9- Just enough. Just in time. Just for you Why is FI$Cal necessary? The state uses outdated systems, technologies, and applications which are expensive to maintain. Current systems lack functionality, which require many state agencies to maintain auxiliary systems and spreadsheets. Existing systems are not integrated, which results in countless hours manually entering, reentering, and reconciling data to ensure accuracy and reliability. Non-standard and complex business processes result in inefficiencies as well as a lack of financial management effectiveness and transparency.

- 10- Just enough. Just in time. Just for you The FI$Cal approach To view the State of California as a single financial enterprise requires a partnership of the key financial management authorities: o Department of Finance o State Controllers Office o State Treasurers Office o Department of General Services o The Partnership also includes the collective participation of all departments.

- 11- Just enough. Just in time. Just for you FI$Cal scope Accounting Budgeting Cash Management Procurement Vendor Management FI $ Cal

- 12- Just enough. Just in time. Just for you The FI$Cal vision Information in a single system Statewide and department functions connect in a single system Work flows between electronically departments

- 13- Just enough. Just in time. Just for you The FI$Cal approach Mitigate procurement and implementation risks by: o Leveraging the inherent best practices embodied in COTS software, rather than trying to reinvent the wheel. o Phasing in functionality and departments over time, rather than all at once so that lessons learned from past challenges can be applied to future phases. o Engaging state departments and staff early and often to seek their input and prepare them for change. o Using a two-stage procurement strategy to get the right vendor with the right solution at the right price.

- 14- Just enough. Just in time. Just for you The FI$Cal procurement approach Two-Stage Procurement: Publish a single RFP with content for both phases. Stage 1: Awards contracts to three Fit-Gap bidders to participate in the Fit-Gap phase. Stage 2: Awards a single contract to one of the three fit-gap contractors to implement the FI$Cal system.

- 15- Just enough. Just in time. Just for you What is the Fit-Gap and why is it important? The Fit Gap is Stage One of the two-stage procurement process, during which three vendors are paid a fixed price to identify gaps between their COTS software solution and the states business and technical requirements. Each vendor will use the information developed during Fit Gap to estimate the effort required to fit their solution to the needs of the state and submit a Stage Two bid proposal with a detailed implementation plan and all costs required to carry it out. Five deliverables from each vendor: o Functional Architecture o Technical Architecture o Business Process Reengineering Opportunities o Implementation Plan o Pilot demonstration of COTS

- 16- Just enough. Just in time. Just for you Benefits of the FI$Cal procurement approach Fit Gap addresses a major source of IT project overruns (i.e., extensive and expensive work order changes) caused by bidders misunderstanding of business and data conversion requirements, existing processes and systems, and the impact of the new solution on the organization. A two-way flow of information: o Bidders gain a deeper understanding of state business processes and functional and technical requirements o State gains a fuller understanding of the capabilities (and limitations) of the software Fit Gap deliverables become property of the state, regardless of contract award decision Fit Gap process also includes advance negotiation of contract terms and conditions

- 17- Just enough. Just in time. Just for you FI$Cal procurement status Awarded the Stage One Fit Gap contracts to three vendors in June 2010: o Accenture (PeopleSoft) o CGI (CGI-AMS) o IBM (SAP) Fit Gap presentations and requirements review complete Four of five Fit Gap deliverables complete Deliverable five (software pilots) will be complete by March 25 th 2011

- 18- Just enough. Just in time. Just for you The FI$Cal procurement next steps Stage Two proposals due from Fit Gap vendors in June Contract award scheduled no later than April 2012.

- 19- Just enough. Just in time. Just for you Questions