MDE’s Phase III WIP Inventory 2018 Fall Regional WIP Meetings

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning for Our Future:
Advertisements

Clean Water Act Integrated Planning Framework Sewer Smart Summit October 23, 2012.
Final Thoughts. Special Acknowledgments Board of Water & Soil Resources Local Soil & Water Conservation Districts County Environmental Services & Planning.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Watershed Management Framework Mission of watershed management –Coordinate and integrate the programs, tools, and resources of multiple stakeholder groups.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
Region III Activities to Implement National Vision to Improve Water Quality Monitoring National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
Progress Update: Evaluation of Federal Facilities in WIPs and Milestones CBPO Management Board March 6, Jim Edward, EPA Greg Allen, EPA.
Regional Grant Funding Coordination for Implementation of Watershed Management Plans Project Clean Water Summit July 15, 2004 David W. Gibson SDRWQCB
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Water Quality Program Financial Assistance Progress and Plans for Meeting RCW Requirements (Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee)
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Jim Edward EPA Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office DDOE Meeting with Federal Partners February.
Suzanne Trevena EPA Water Protection Division Chair Milestone Workgroup December 4,
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. September 16, 2015 How can we make sure the Chesapeake Bay Restoration really works?
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
Watershed Stewardship Program Status of Marin County Public Works Watershed Program 11/7/08 11/7/08.
Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan Plenary Session October 22-23, 2007.
Stream Health Outcome Biennial Workplan Neely L. Law, PhD Center for Watershed Protection Chesapeake Bay Program Sediment & Stream Coordinator Habitat.
Puget Sound Partnership Action Agenda: Roadmap to Completion.
California’s Flood Future Recommendations for Managing the State’s Flood Risk Flood Risk Management & Silver Jackets Workshop August 21, 2012.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final
1 Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan – Phase II James Davis-Martin, Chesapeake Bay TMDL Coordinator Citizens Advisory Committee to the Chesapeake.
Improving Local Water Quality in Pennsylvania and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay.
K1 Proposed National Levee Safety Program An Introduction for the Tribal Assistance Coordination Group May 12, 2011.
Leveraging Resources with National Estuary Programs
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
Update for the Citizens Advisory Committee February 22, 2017
Streamlining Integrated Infrastructure Implementation: Workshop Report
CBP Update: Climate Change and the Chesapeake Bay TMDL
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Moving to Phase II: Watershed Implementation Plans
WIP Regional Meetings Jason Keppler
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Funding from the Local Perspective
Watershed Implementation Plan
Funding from the Local Perspective
Stormwater Management Program
Mulberry Watershed Management Plan
Funding from the Local Perspective
Federal Facilities and the District’s Phase III WIP
Stormwater Management Tools
Local Partners Engagement and Communication Strategy
U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office June 1, 2012
Commonwealth of Virginia
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN FOR (Permittee)
FISH HABITAT OUTCOME Gina Hunt MD. Department of Natural Resources
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
Communicating Credit Where Credit is Due
Funding from the Local Perspective
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
Maryland’s Phase III WIP Planning for 2025 and beyond
Approach to Setting Local Planning Goals
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
James Davis-Martin Chesapeake Bay Program Manager
Chesapeake Bay Program Climate Change Modeling 2.0
Expectations for Federal Agencies in Support if Chesapeake WIPs/TMDL
North Shore Streamkeepers February 23, 2019
Maryland’s Draft Phase III WIP for the Chesapeake Bay
San Francisco Bay Water Board
Bannock County Comprehensive Plan
Citizens Advisory Committee EPA/CBP Program Update Jim Edward Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office February 20-21,2019 Williamsburg, VA.
Presentation transcript:

MDE’s Phase III WIP Inventory 2018 Fall Regional WIP Meetings Gregorio Sandi MDE Integrated Water Planning Program

What is the Inventory? MDE’s WIP Inventory is a process that is designed to: Promote long-term partnerships State/County/Municipalities MDE Integrated Water Planning Program Provide interactive format to coordinate Developing the Phase III WIP Support local priorities Assist in implementing WIP strategies Identify barriers and solutions to meeting local and State goals Identify Best Management Practices (BMPs) for planning and future funding Incorporate “co-benefits” concept

MDE WIP Inventory Timeline Summer/Fall 2018: Conduct focused meetings between county staff and MDE/MDP staff to investigate current status of WIP Strategies and to identify needs Fall 2018 Regional Workshops: Local staff to review WIP Summary sheets to provide strategy refinement for WIP goals Winter/ Spring 2019: Build feedback from local partners into the WIP adaptive management strategy Summer 2019: WIP is approved by EPA and MDE conducts follow up visits to each jurisdiction 2019 & Beyond: Continue outreach to ensure all partners are aware of changes in planning and WIP efforts

First Round of Meetings Completed in July – October 2018 Promote State/Jurisdiction partnership Assessments of what we can achieve now and what we can plan for post 2025

Statewide Feedback We are listening! A high-level synopsis of key feedback from around the State

County Feedback: State-Level Support Jurisdictions believe they are understaffed and underfunded, the State needs to provide additional resources Money (Particularly Non-MS4 jurisdictions) Increase funding levels of existing grants Need ranking metrics beyond pounds per dollar Need dedicated WIP Implementation funds Ensure equitable distribution of funds across the State Staffing BMP Verification (Inspections and Maintenance are a HUGE time commitment) GIS & Data Management (Tracking BMPs) Proposed urban “SCD” model

County Feedback: Designing the WIP The Phase III WIP should reflect goals that align with local priorities Stormwater permit obligations Local water quality Flooding Sea level change Other Jurisdiction priorities Realize the Maryland WIP community is not one size fits all Stormwater? Predominantly rural counties Competitive economic pressures from other States (shrinking populations) Ultra urban areas with little land to implement BMPs

County Feedback: Increased Outreach Jurisdictions feel that the State needs to maintain more consistent and frequent communication with local jurisdictions Greater outreach to promote the process Promote private landowners that participate in restoration Design tools that better highlight local success

County Feedback: Phase III BMP Strategies MS4 Community: MS4 Stormwater restoration strategies reflect WIP goals Non MS4: Phase II BMP strategies were robust and represent current WIP strategy Strategy and Targeting Many efforts rely on opportunity more than strategic goals We need to come up with new BMP solutions The permitting process needs to be more streamlined Stream Restoration Stormwater Management Wetlands

County Feedback: Adapting to Changing Conditions Witnessing larger, flashier storms with greater precipitation rates Need to plan/design for greater water quantity and flow control Need to be able to drain flat coastal areas Counties are witnessing site level BMPs overwhelmed in urban areas Increased flooding Increased volume and flow rates are damaging infrastructure Need ways to address this in a more timely fashion (e.g. reduced permiting requirements) There needs to be a plan for loss of coastal land

Next Steps for today WIP Summary Sheet: Conservative estimate of possible implementation potential Developed in response to collective inventory meeting responses Give jurisdictions a visual look at potential Phase III WIP goals Not final, opportunity for feedback from each jurisdiction (Actual #s will vary) Build Phase III WIP Goals Help us with creating meaningful feedback Build in Adaptive Management Prioritize BMPs that are in the Long-term plan for potential inclusion in near-term Breakout Sessions: Vet the WIP Summary created by MDE, improve the document to ensure that goals it is consistent with local priorities, Make the document a useful high-level planning tool

Establishing Local Goals STATE-LOCAL ENGAGEMENT WIP Inventory Meetings Regional Meetings Other meetings, as necessary Estimate number & type of BMPs to be installed within each county by 2025 BMPs input into P6 CAST model: Load reductions by county/sector Adaptive Management Phase III WIP Final Report August 2019 Updates at each 2-year milestone Local Goals county-wide by sector U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Expectations for the Phase III Watershed Implementation Plans EPA expects each of the seven jurisdictions to describe in their respective Phase III WIPs: Local planning goals below the state-major basin scales and in the form best suited for directly engaging local, regional, and federal partners in WIP implementation. https://www.chesapeakebay.net/channel_files/27552/ii.a._epa_ph_iii_wip_expectations-jurisdictions_6-19-18.pdf

Moving Forward MDE will continue to work directly with local jurisdictions to: Develop and implement plans to meet water quality goals Assist in aligning these plans with other local priorities Promote, and assist with, additional work that goes into long-term planning To 2025 and beyond!!! Gregorio Sandi MDE – Integrated Water Planning Program Chesapeake Bay Restoration Section Gregorio.Sandi@maryland.gov Acknowledgement: All of the photographs in this presentation came from MDE or Unsplash.com