AVHRR and Ship IR sensor versus in situ SAIL, BOOM and CTD instruments

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
15 May 2009ACSPO v1.10 GAC1 ACSPO upgrade to v1.10 Effective Date: 04 March 2009 Sasha Ignatov, XingMing Liang, Yury Kihai, Boris Petrenko, John Stroup.
Advertisements

Pathfinder –> MODIS -> VIIRS Evolution of a CDR Robert Evans, Peter Minnett, Guillermo Podesta Kay Kilpatrick (retired), Sue Walsh, Vicki Halliwell, Liz.
UPRM Lidar lab for atmospheric research 1- Cross validation of solar radiation using remote sensing equipment & GOES Lidar and Ceilometer validation.
GHRSST XI Science Team Meeting, ST-VAL, June 2010, Lima, Peru Recent developments to the SST Quality Monitor (SQUAM) and SST validation with In situ.
VIIRS LST Uncertainty Estimation And Quality Assessment of Suomi NPP VIIRS Land Surface Temperature Product 1 CICS, University of Maryland, College Park;
A Fundamental Climate Data Record for the AVHRR Jonathan Mittaz Manik Bali & Andrew Harris CICS/ESSIC University of Maryland.
AMSR-E Soil Moisture Retrievals Using the SCA During NAFE’06 T.J. Jackson and R. Bindlish USDA ARS Hydrology and Remote Sensing Lab September 22, 2008.
Remote Sensing of the Ocean and Atmosphere: John Wilkin Sea Surface Temperature IMCS Building Room 214C ext 251.
Surface Skin Temperatures Observed from IR and Microwave Satellite Measurements Catherine Prigent, CNRS, LERMA, Observatoire de Paris, France Filipe Aires,
GOES-13 Science Team Report SST Images and Analyses Eileen Maturi, STAR/SOCD, Camp Springs, MD Andy Harris, CICS, University of Maryland, MD Chris Merchant,
Foundation Sea Surface Temperature W. Emery, S. Castro and N. Hoffman From Wikipedia: Sea surface temperature (SST) is the water temperature close to the.
1 Remote Sensing of the Ocean and Atmosphere: John Wilkin Sea Surface Temperature IMCS Building Room 214C
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 NOAA Operational Geostationary Sea Surface Temperature Products from NOAA.
Introduction Land surface temperature (LST) measurement is important for understanding climate change, modeling the hydrological and biogeochemical cycles,
CRN Workshop, March 3-5, An Attempt to Evaluate Satellite LST Using SURFRAD Data Yunyue Yu a, Jeffrey L. Privette b, Mitch Goldberg a a NOAA/NESDIS/StAR.
Finding the Time Lag Between Solar Heating and Surface Temperature EAS 4480: Data Analysis Final Project Arielle Nixon 24 April 2012.
Walton McBride U.S. Naval Research Lab, Stennis Space Center MS Robert Arnone University of Southern Mississippi, Stennis Space Center MS Jean-François.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 CLOUD MASK AND QUALITY CONTROL FOR SST WITHIN THE ADVANCED CLEAR SKY PROCESSOR.
Applications and Limitations of Satellite Data Professor Ming-Dah Chou January 3, 2005 Department of Atmospheric Sciences National Taiwan University.
Diagnosing Climate Change from Satellite Sounding Measurements – From Filter Radiometers to Spectrometers William L. Smith Sr 1,2., Elisabeth Weisz 1,
Determination of the optical thickness and effective radius from reflected solar radiation measurements David Painemal MPO531.
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Chapter 15 Multiple Regression n Multiple Regression Model n Least Squares Method n Multiple.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss High Resolution Snow Analysis for COSMO
ECOOP-WP3 Better use of remote-sensing data and in situ measurements Francis Gohin, Ifremer T3.1 Optimal synergy between altimetry and tide gauge data.
Assimilating Retrievals of Sea Surface Temperature from VIIRS and AMSR2 Bruce Brasnett and Dorina Surcel Colan CMDE November 21, 2014 Brasnett, B. and.
Satellite-derived Sea Surface Temperatures Corey Farley Remote Sensing May 8, 2002.
AGU 2002 Fall Meeting NASA Langley Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences Validation of GOES-8 Derived Cloud Properties Over the Southeastern Pacific J.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Developing GOES and POES Land Surface Temperature Products Yunyue Yu 1.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 In Situ SST for Satellite Cal/Val and Quality Control Alexander Ignatov.
Southern Surveyor. Instruments on the Southern Surveyor Radiosondes PNNL Atmospheric Remote Sensing Laboratory (PARSL) Surface Fluxes Sea Surface Temperature.
Investigation on the possibilities of trend detection of spectral irradiance Merle Glandorf and Gunther Seckmeyer Institute of Meteorology and Climatology.
Andrew Heidinger and Michael Pavolonis
Hyperspectral Infrared Alone Cloudy Sounding Algorithm Development Objective and Summary To prepare for the synergistic use of data from the high-temporal.
AIRS Radiance and Geophysical Products: Methodology and Validation Mitch Goldberg, Larry McMillin NOAA/NESDIS Walter Wolf, Lihang Zhou, Yanni Qu and M.
Progresses in IMaRS Caiyun Zhang Sept. 28, SST validation over Florida Keys 2. Potential application of ocean color remote sensing on deriving.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Using CALIPSO to Explore the Sensitivity to Cirrus Height in the Infrared.
Ship-Image map derived from a Terra MODIS image from October 20, 2003 (01:35 UT acquisition time), showing the course of the ARISE cruise (red line) between.
MODIS Sea-Surface Temperatures for GHRSST-PP Peter J. Minnett & Robert H. Evans Otis Brown, Erica Key, Goshka Szczodrak, Kay Kilpatrick, Warner Baringer,
Retrieval Algorithms The derivations for each satellite consist of two steps: 1) cloud detection using a Bayesian Probabilistic Cloud Mask; and 2) application.
Satellites Storm “Since the early 1960s, virtually all areas of the atmospheric sciences have been revolutionized by the development and application of.
Infrared and Microwave Remote Sensing of Sea Surface Temperature Gary A. Wick NOAA Environmental Technology Laboratory January 14, 2004.
NOAA Environmental Technology Laboratory Gary A. Wick Observed Differences Between Infrared and Microwave Products Detailed comparisons between infrared.
AVHRR Radiance Bias Correction Andy Harris, Jonathan Mittaz NOAA Cooperative Institute for Climate Studies University of Maryland Some concepts and some.
November 28, 2006 Derivation and Evaluation of Multi- Sensor SST Error Characteristics Gary Wick 1 and Sandra Castro 2 1 NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory.
9th GHRSST-PP Science Team Meeting Perros-Guirec, Brittany France, 9-13 June 2008 Merging Satellite Infrared and Microwave Sea Surface Temperature in the.
The MODIS SST hypercube is a multi-dimensional look up table of SST retrieval uncertainty, bias and standard deviation, determined from comprehensive analysis.
A comparison of AMSR-E and AATSR SST time-series A preliminary investigation into the effects of using cloud-cleared SST data as opposed to all-sky SST.
EARWiG: SST retrieval issues for High Latitudes Andy Harris Jonathan Mittaz NOAA-CICS University of Maryland Chris Merchant U Edinburgh.
EARWiG: SST retrieval issues for TWP Andy Harris Jonathan Mittaz Prabhat Koner NOAA-CICS University of Maryland Eileen Maturi NOAA/NESDIS, Camp Springs,
Validation in Arctic conditions Steinar Eastwood (met.no) David Poulter (NOCS) GHRSST9, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF METOP SST, days mean.
Sandra Castro and Gary Wick.  Does direct regression of satellite infrared brightness temperatures to observed in situ skin temperatures result in.
Visible vicarious calibration using RTM
Validation of MTSAT-1R SST for the TWP+ Experiment Leon Majewski 1, Jon Mittaz 2, George Kruger 1,3, Helen Beggs 3, Andy Harris 2, Sandra Castro 4 1 Observations.
Joint GRWG and GDWG Meeting February 2010, Toulouse, France
Deep Convective Clouds (DCC) BRDF Characterization Using PARASOL Bidirectional Observations Bertrand Fougnie CNES.
Jeremy Fisher & John Mustard Geological Sciences - Brown University
Validation of Satellite-derived Lake Surface Temperatures
AVHRR operational cloud masks intercomparison
Building-in a Validation cycle for GSICS Products
Hyangsun Han and Hoonyol Lee
Identifying cloud layers on Rawinsondes and IR satellite images
Comparison of Different Sea Surface Temperature Measurements
Deep Convective Clouds (DCC) BRDF Characterization Using PARASOL Bidirectional Observations Bertrand Fougnie CNES.
Validation for TPW (PGE06)
Comparison of XBT vs CTD Data
Na Xu, Xiuqing Hu, Lin Chen, Min Min
Operational Oceanography
Comparison of Sea Surface Temperature Collection Methods at Sea
Comparison of observed SST Vs. Satellite AVHRR SST
Cal/Val-Related Activities at CICS
Presentation transcript:

AVHRR and Ship IR sensor versus in situ SAIL, BOOM and CTD instruments OC 3570 Final Project AVHRR and Ship IR sensor versus in situ SAIL, BOOM and CTD instruments LCDR Marcus Simoes

OC 3570 AVHRR/Ship IR versus CTD,SAIL and BOOM in situ data Guidelines Introduction Data acquisition Data processing Statistics Computations and Results Conclusions

Introduction Main Goal to compare /BOOM/ Sail /CTD in situ data with AVHRR and IR sensor data SST Data from AVHRR only in 5 and 8 of Feb( leg 1) due to cloud conditions. Differences in data due to acquisition depths

Data Acquisition Remote. In situ. Boom probe. NOAA-14 AVHRR/2 ( channels 1 to 5) images of 5 and 8 Feb. Infrared ship sensor onboard. In situ. Boom probe. SAIL – Serial ASCII Interface Loop. CTD – Conductivity-Temperature-Depth Sea bird SBE-9 – on stations 1,2,3 (5th Feb) and 8and 9 (8th Feb). All data placed on the WEB in suitable ASCII.

Data Processing BOOM , SAIL, CTD and IR sensor temperatures ready to use. AVHRR temperatures should be retrieved by a preset SST algorithm stored in TERASCAN manually (as you did in RS labs…) IR sensor does not work well these days and it was disregard ( many possible reasons as moisture contamination, malfunction,etc.) Only 5 CTD stations in two days so they were used as cross check information for BOOM and SAIL temperatures.Disregarded on the comparative statistical analysis and plots.

Data Processing AVHRR Summary AVHRR SST retrieval Methodology used. Exclusion of Data at Large Zenith Angles Cloud Clearing (Measurements over cloud area are not used). IR uniformity test. Maximum Value in the Channel 2 Albedo . Difference in Channel 3,4 and 5. Test for daytime/nighttime Minimum Channel 4 Temperature Use of Day and Night time algorithms

Data Processing AVHRR SST Algorithms NOAA-14 Daytime Algorithm MCSST Day Split Window Algorithm sst = (1.017342 * T4 ) + 2.139588 * (T4 - T5 ) + 0.779706 * (T4 - T5 ) *(sec(ZA) - 1) + -278.43 + 273.16 where: sst - computed SST value in degrees ° C. T4 - channel 4 scene temperature T5 - channel 5 scene temperature ZA - solar zenith angle

Data Processing AVHRR NOAA-14 Night time Algorithms MCSST Night Dual Channel Algorithm sst1 = (1.008751 * T4 ) + 1.409936 * (T3 - T4 ) + 1.975581 * (sec(ZA) - 1) - 273.914 + 273.16 MCSST Night Split Window Algorithm sst2 = (1.029088 * T4 ) + 2.275385 * (T4 - T5 ) + 0.752567 * (T4 - T5 ) * (sec(ZA) - 1) - 282.24 + 273.16 MCSST Night Triple Channel Algorithm sst3 = (1.010037 * T4 ) + 0.920822 * (T3 - T5 ) + 0.067026 * (sec(ZA) - 1) - 275.364 + 273.16 where: sst n - computed SST value in degrees ° C. T3 - channel 3 scene temperature T4 - channel 4 scene temperature T5 - channel 5 scene temperature ZA - solar zenith angle Computed SST rejected if differs from climatology by more than 10°

AVHRR data processing day 5 results

AVHRR Data processing day 8 results

BOOM Data Processing Day 5 Results

BOOM Data Processing Day 8 Results

SAIL Data Processing Day 5 Results

SAIL Data Processing Day 8 Results

Statistical Computations and Results Calculate parameters for each instrument Mean temperature. Standard deviation and Variance. Calculated parameters among instruments Correlation Linear Regression

Statistical Computations and Results

Statistical Computations and Results

Statistical Computations and Results

Conclusions BOOM x SAIL with good agreement in the cruise AVHRR useful to detected large features. Be sure when you are retrieving temperatures from AVHRR that you have a good image, the methodology and the right algorithm. Use good in situ measurements as control points to AVHRR images.

OC 3570 AVHRR/Ship IR versus CTD,SAIL and BOOM in situ data Questions ?