A Case Study of Transitioning: The CMMI Rosetta Stone

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kai H. Chang COMP 6710 Course NotesSlide CMMI-1 Auburn University Computer Science and Software Engineering Capability Maturity Model Integration - CMMI.
Advertisements

Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.
More CMM Part Two : Details.
© Copyright Richard W. Selby and Northrop Grumman Corporation. All rights reserved. 0 Process Synchronization and Stabilization February 2007 Rick.
Space and Airborne Systems NDIA/SEI CMMI Technology Conference Presented by N. Fleischer 1 Raytheon’s Six Sigma Process and Its Application for CMMI By.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Business & Enterprise Systems AF Systems Engineering Assessment Model (AF SEAM) Self-Assessment.
Use of an Organizational Process for Corporate-Wide Process Improvement via CMMI® NDIA/SEI CMMI® Technology Conference November 2003 John Evers David.
S/W Project Management
Integrated Capability Maturity Model (CMMI)
Ken Weinberg El Segundo, CA November 19, 2003 Adapting Small Projects Processes to CMMI.
Software Quality Assurance Activities
CMMi What is CMMi? Basic terms Levels Common Features Assessment process List of KPAs for each level.
A Project ’ s Tale: Transitioning From SW-CMM to CMMI-SE/SW Warren Scheinin Systems Engineer, NG Mission Systems CMMI Technology Conference & User Group.
CMS 00_ Copyright 2002 Raytheon Company All Rights Reserved CMMI – What a Difference a Sponsor Makes! Ann Turner Raytheon Company
NDIA Systems Engineering Supportability & Interoperability Conference October 2003 Using Six Sigma to Improve Systems Engineering Rick Hefner, Ph.D.
Copyright 2003 Northrop Grumman Corporation 0 To PIID or Not to PIID: Lessons Learned in SCAMPI Evidence Preparation To PIID or Not to PIID: Lessons Learned.
By Ritesh Reddy Nagaram.  Organizations which are developing software processes are facing many problems regarding the need for change of already existing.
10/16/2015Bahill1 Organizational Innovation and Deployment Causal Analysis and Resolution 5 Optimizing 4 Quantitatively Managed 3 Defined 2 Managed Continuous.
EngMat/JWS.PPT 10/17/ CMMI ® Today – The Current State CMMI ® Technology Conference 2003 November 18, 2003 Ron Paulson Vice President, Engineering.
IIL’s International Project Management Day, 2007 The Power of the Profession: A Lesson Learned and Solution Implemented Becomes a Best Practice in Project.
Managing CMMI® as a Project
3 rd Annual CMMI ® Technology Conference and User Group Dave Castellano US Army Representative to CMMI Steering Group 4 August 2003 US Army Armaments Research.
1 Implementing A PMO & Enterprise Project Management at NIH February 3, 2005 Bill Vesey, PMP Manager EPM Consulting Practice Forte Systems, Inc General.
July 09, 2008 NIH Project Management Community Project Scope and Change Management Discussion This document is confidential and is intended solely for.
@2002 Copyright, Itreya Technologies CMMI kick off July 2005.
CMMI. 1.Initial - The software process is characterized as ad hoc, and occasionally even chaotic. Few processes are defined, and success depends on individual.
COPYRIGHT 2010 GENERAL DYNAMICS ADVANCED INFORMATION SYSTEMS Published and used by TwinSPIN with permission CMMI Level 5 Journey (A.K.A. Things I Wish.
An organizational structure is a mostly hierarchical concept of subordination of entities that collaborate and contribute to serve one common aim... Organizational.
A Process Improvement Plan for a High Maturity (and Diverse) Organization Alan Pflugrad Northrop Grumman Information Technology Defense Enterprise Solutions.
CMMI ® – The Current State Presented by Gregory Shelton Corporate Vice President Engineering, Technology, Manufacturing & Quality 3 rd Annual CMMI Technology.
Intelligence and Information Systems 1 3/17/2004 © 2004 Raytheon Company USC/CSE Executive Workshop on Agile Experiences March 17, 2004 A Raytheon Agile.
MSA Orientation – v203a 1 What’s RIGHT with the CMMI?!? Pat O’Toole
Project Management Strategies Hidden in the CMMI Rick Hefner, Northrop Grumman CMMI Technology Conference & User Group November.
Managing Multiple Projects Steve Westerman California Department of Motor Vehicles Steve Young Mathtech, Inc.
Enterprise Architectures. Core Concepts Key Learning Points: This chapter will help you to answer the following questions: What are the ADM phase names.
Adaptive Software Development Process Framework. Version / 21 / 2001Page Project Initiation 2.0 Adaptive Cycle Planning 5.0 Final Q/A and.
1 Integration of Process Initiatives And Assessments Common Process Framework Integration of Management System Standards and Initiatives (QMS/CMMI/Lean/PMBP)
CMMI for Services, Version 1.3 Speaker: Business Excellence Date:
Overview of CMMI Global Certification Consultant is aiming to designed CMMI Presentation to share knowledge about CMMI,
A Program of Training for CMMI®-based Process Improvement
Training Course on Integrated Management System for Regulatory Body
Software Configuration Management
AF Systems Engineering Assessment Model (AF SEAM) Validation Assessment Training Current: 14 January 2015.
CMMI Overview Quality Frameworks.
ISA 201 Intermediate Information Systems Acquisition
Software Engineering (CSI 321)
ISA 201 Intermediate Information Systems Acquisition
SW-CMM Level 5 in 2005 NYC SPIN - February 2005 Sandra J. Baptiste.
CMMI Overview.
School of EE and Computer Science
INCOSE – North Texas Chapter
Using Behavior Surveys for CMMI Process Deployment
Using Behavior Surveys for CMMI Process Deployment
CMMI – Staged Representation
Raytheon Parts Management
Quality management standards
The Journey to CMMI Level 4
Estimating Effort for PPQA Using the Raytheon 6 Process
Use of Tailored PIIs November 17, 2003
Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e Chapter 2 Process: A Generic View copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc.
Adaptive Product Development Process Framework
Presented to National Defense Industrial Association
Use of CMMI in an Acquisition Context Using CMMI for Process Improvement at USAF Space and Missile Systems Center (SMC) Dr. Jack R. Ferguson
Small Organizations are Different?
Process Improvements Achieved From Using The CMMI Model: A Success Story At Raytheon’s SAS Engineering Organization Presented to National Defense Industrial.
Class “B” Appraisal Implemented Lessons Learned
Performance Management End-of-Year Review
Executive Project Kickoff
Capability Maturity Model
AF Systems Engineering Assessment Model (AF SEAM) Self-Assessment Training Current: 24 September 2018 This document was developed for use by programs.
Presentation transcript:

A Case Study of Transitioning: The CMMI Rosetta Stone Electronic Warfare Systems Sandra Bryn Robinson November, 2003

Contents Background Enterprise Management System What to Do? CMMI Rosetta Stone Tailoring Tool Collaboration Tool Breakthrough Questions & Answers 2/15/2019

Background – Electronic Warfare Systems (EWS) A business unit of Space and Airborne Systems Division (SAS) SAS is a large diverse organization with the workforce located in El Segundo and Goleta, California; North Texas; and Mississippi. A premier provider of electronic warfare solutions for the war fighter in the U.S. and our allied International Defense communities. EWS Software Engineering obtained CMM Level 3 in December, 2001. 2/15/2019

Background (Continued) SAS, foreseeing the business value, Initiates a CMMI program to obtain Level 3 for SE and SW Creates the Enterprise Management System (EMS) Integrated with Raytheon’s Integrated Product Development System (IPDS) Provides infrastructure and organization-level policies EWS steps up to the plate 2/15/2019

Enterprise Management System As a Program-oriented set of processes, IPDS does not, by itself, satisfy CMMI Integrated Product Development System (IPDS) Directives Organizational Processes Detailed, Local Procedures A Suite of Processes is Needed 2/15/2019

What To Do? Using Raytheon’s Six Sigma approach Representatives from Engineering, Program Management and Support formulate a plan for EWS 2/15/2019

Where We Are Significant variability in processes used across programs exists within Program Management and Engineering (except for Software Engineering) Therefore, the clear-cut route is to build on the SAS provided suite for our processes 2/15/2019

Where We Want to Be Employ an artifact-oriented tailoring tool Capitalize on artifact-oriented appraisal approach Provide electronic collaboration tool Facilitate collection Growth engine for full CMMI implementation 2/15/2019

Presentation Title February 15, 2019 CMMI Rosetta Stone By providing to our programs the required artifact template Programs through executing the artifact templates are CMMI compliant 2/15/2019 Speaker Name

Preparation for Deployment Identify the typical work product produced today Validate the work product meets the CMMI intent Identify new artifacts for any gaps Create the artifact template Results in a List of Artifacts that comply with Raytheon’s EMS 2/15/2019

Tailoring Tool Each program tailors based on artifact templates 2/15/2019 Page 11

Tailoring Tool (Continued) Facilitates a program’s tailoring to their requirements A program understands what they need to produce in terms of artifacts Contains the required set of artifacts to be produced to meet CMMI Level 3 The Project Process A program tailors the standard process set 2/15/2019

Collaboration Tool Helps programs by facilitating collaboration and retainment of artifacts Artifact repository may contain: Program plans and schedules Program calendars Meeting agendas, minutes, and reports Action item logs Risk watch lists Peer reviews and electronic approvals Tool evaluation in progress 2/15/2019

Breakthrough to the Other Side When an organization moves to CMMI, they acknowledge a business need to integrate management processes, and place the focus where it belongs, on the process and product. 2/15/2019

Questions and Answers 2/15/2019