Design Law 2018 Strategies for using the Hague System

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Changes to the PCT Regulations which entered into force on 1 April 2006 The Smart Patenting Solution.
Advertisements

Neil WILSON Director, Functional Support Division Brands and Designs Sector Seminar on WIPO Services and Initiatves Global IP Systems The Madrid, Hague.
Michael Neas Supervisor Office of PCT Legal Administration
Anatomy of a Patent Application Presented by: Jeong Oh Director, Office of Technology Transfer & Industrial Development Syracuse University April 30, 2009.
THE MADRID PROTOCOL SYSTEM AIPPI (Hyderabad 2011) Regina Quek One Legal LLC.
USPTO Madrid Protocol Seminar on Tips for Filing International Applications and Maintaining International Registrations MPU Review of International Application.
Overview of the Madrid System Legal Perspective Basic Level Place Day Month Year Legal Division Madrid Registry Brands and Designs Sector.
U.S. Implementation of the Hague Agreement
WIPO’s Activities in the ASEAN : Focus on the Madrid Protocol AIPA Annual Conference March 28, 2015 Denis CROZE Director, WIPO Office in Singapore.
© 2010 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein, & Fox P.L.L.C. All Rights Reserved. Using the Hague System to Protect Designs Tracy-Gene G. Durkin, Esq. November 10,
Hague System for the International Registration of Industrial Designs Alan Datri.
Trade Mark Registration “Protecting your brand”. Trade Mark O Trade Mark – (Brand) a sign that is graphically represented and identifies and distinguishes.
Legal Framework (II) October 2010 Diego Agustín CARRASCO PRADAS Head, Legal Section, Legal and Promotion Division, International Registries of Madrid and.
Tomohiro(Tom) Nakamura Konishi & Nakamura Co-Chair, International l Committee Japan Trademark Association(JTA) AIPLA Annual Meeting 2014 Pre-Meeting with.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association USPTO Proposed Rules to Implement Title I of the Patent Law Treaty The Hague Agreement.
Madrid – A System for Businesses Madrid Seminar Washington 23 October 2013 Rodrigo Garcia-Conde Examiner.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association MADRID SYSTEM VS. DIRECT INTERNATIONAL FILINGS BY U.S. PARTIES JPO/AIPLA Joint Meeting.
The Madrid system An update on the latest development Israel February 2012 Debbie Roenning Director, Legal Division, Brands and Designs Sector.
Overview of the PATENTSCOPE® search service Jerusalem 21 July 2010 Alex Riechel Associate Officer, Innovation and Technology Support Section.
PCT- Short Flow Chart Priority PCT Application Filed Restoration of Priority Deadline Search by ISA Int’l Publication + ISR Deadline to File Demand for.
Patent Cooperation Treaty and Application Conference September 24, 2012 Neal L. Slifkin 99 Garnsey Road Pittsford, NY (585)
India and the Madrid Protocol An update on the Madrid system AIPPI, Hyderabad October 14, 2011 Debbie Roenning Director, Legal Division, Brands and Designs.
THE MADRID SYSTEM Legal Framework (I) October 2010 Diego Agustín CARRASCO PRADAS Head, Legal Section, Legal and Promotion Division, International Registries.
THE HAGUE SYSTEM INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REGISTRATION **** A TREATY READY FOR RATIFICATION Background, Procedure and Selected Statistics (1998 and 1999) William.
Protecting Designs via the Hague Agreement March 18, 2010 Thibault Fayette Senior Counsel The Procter & Gamble Company.
1 John Calvert Supervisory Patent Examiner
Intellectual Property. John Ayers February 25, 2005.
PCT-SAFE and e-Services developments Webinar September 7/
Madrid – A System for businesses Handling the Madrid Portfolio Diego Agustín CARRASCO PRADAS Head, Legal Section, Legal and Promotion Division, International.
World Intellectual Property Organization THE MADRID SYSTEM FOR THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS: OBJECTIVES AND BASIC FEATURES Tel Aviv, July 4,
Japanese Design Law Practice - Is Japan ready to join Hague Agreement? – Shigeyuki Nagaoka 2013 JPAA-AIPLA Premeeting October 22-23, 2013 Washington D.C.,
ASIAN PATENT ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION 59 TH COUNCIL MEETING “INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FROM A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE: WHAT IT TAKES TO MAKE IT CLICK” Linda Wang TAY.
Utilizing The Madrid Protocol Todd S. Bontemps, Esq. Cooley Godward LLP Christian Larsen Cooley Godward LLP Legal Texts regarding the Madrid System:
Industrial Design Marco Marzano de Marinis SMEs Division.
WIPO Global Forum Of Intellectual Property Authorities Geneva, September 17-18, 2009 Panel 5B: Industrial Design Registration Key Design.
1 1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association U.S. Implementation of the Hague Agreement For Designs John (Jack) J. Penny, V Event.
“Protecting your brand”.   Trade Mark (TM) – (Brand) a sign that is graphically represented and identifies and distinguishes the goods and services.
World Intellectual Property Organization The Strategic Use for SME’s of the Madrid and Hague Systems Betty Berendson, Senior Information Officer Information.
Conference on the Accession of the European Community to the Madrid Protocol The Accession of the European Community to the Madrid Protocol - the long.
World Intellectual Property Organization The 1999 Geneva Act of the Hague System for the International Registration of Industrial Designs WIPO National.
USPTO Madrid Protocol Seminar on Tips for Filing International Applications and Maintaining International Registrations Miscellaneous Issues October 23,
WIPO-INSME International Training Program on Intellectual Property and Management of Innovation in Small and Medium- Sized Enterprises May 12, 2005 José.
NA, Yanghee International Application Team Korean Intellectual Property Office National Phase of PCT international applications April 26,
The Madrid Protocol: Key Benefits, Risks and Strategies.
1 Giulio C. Zanetti, WIPO Alicante, April Giulio C. Zanetti, WIPO Alicante, April 2000 Recent developments in the Madrid system for the International.
The International Registration of Designs Background and Key Principles of the Hague System.
Study Visit to WIPO by Graduate Students from Hongik University, Republic of Korea An Overview on the Registration of Designs under the Hague System Betty.
WIPO 에서의 국제상표 심사 황 영익 심사관 국제상표심사팀. International Application and Examination n Contents of the International Application n Examination by the Office of.
IP experiences and challenges of SMEs of the Republic of Tajikistan
What is intellectual property and
The Hague System for the International Registration of Industrial Designs Sub-regional seminar organized by the World Intellectual Property Organization.
Webinar on ePCT Electronic portal for PCT applications
Getting to know the Hague Agreement
PCT Statistics PCT Working Group Tenth Session
Trade Mark Registration
Introduction to the International World of Intellectual Property (IP)
Options to Protect an Invention: the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and Trade Secrets Hanoi October 24, 2017 Peter Willimott Senior Program Officer WIPO.
ASEAN PATENTSCOPE Service
Speed of prosecution at the EPO Andy Harding – October 20th, 2017
for the International Registration of Industrial Designs
The Lifecycle of an International Registration
The Hague System: Going Global Designating the European Union, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation and the United States of America.
EC Accession to the Madrid Protocol
A Canadian Design Update
Growing Union Changing face of the Hague Agreement Tyrone Berger
Protecting a Valuable Asset – How to Protect Your Brand With Madrid
PCT Statistics Meeting of International Authorities Twenty-Sixth Session Cairo February 13 and 14, 2019.
A Business-Oriented Overview of Intellectual Property for Law Students
Overview of the Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks Roving Seminar on WIPO Services and Initiatives Kui Wou KWUN.
Presentation transcript:

Design Law 2018 Strategies for using the Hague System Washington, DC October 24, 2018 Quan-Ling Sim Head, Operations Service The Hague Registry

Hague System Snapshot Complete filing to registration solution Preserves the greatest number of protection options for applicants 69 Contracting Parties and counting Recent accessions: Russian Federation, United Kingdom, Canada Pipeline: Mexico, China, Israel, Viet Nam One application, one set of requirements, one set of drawings (up to 100 designs), one set of fees

Hague System Main Features Filing (indirect or direct), designation of Contracting Parties Formalities(+) examination by the International Bureau Registration Publication (Immediate, Standard, Deferred) Communication to National Offices Refusal (primarily Examining Offices) Statement of Grant of Protection (if not provided, right is automatic after refusal period) Centralized management (transfer, changes, renewal)

Examination by the International Bureau (1) Entitlement Content Number of designs, reproductions Product indication Classification Description and legends Creator (US requires oath or declaration) Claim (US designation only)

Examination by the International Bureau (2) Fees Other formalities (e.g., supporting documents)

Best practices for US practitioners (1) File direct with the International Bureau Instead of indirect filing, file US first application and then Hague application claiming priority to US first filing Document Upload (to be launched shortly) Forms (prepare/sign electronically) Other correspondence Hague System accommodates US design practices (e.g., cross-section, enlarged, and exploded views) Creator oath or declaration Use text string signature “/ John Smith /”

Best practices for US practitioners (2) Claim Align with the product indication (in case of multiple products, include them all) Classification Avoid class 32 (graphic symbols, logos, surface patterns, ornamentation) if designating Japan or the Republic of Korea Search Hague Express to obtain guidance on product indication and classification

Best practices for US practitioners (3) Member Profiles Database http://www.wipo.int/hague/memberprofiles/#/ Electronic renewal DAS - Digital Access Service for priority documents No power of attorney required for applications filed on or after January 1, 2019 Fax discontinued as of January 1, 2019

Source: Internal WIPO statistics * USPTO refusals on ground of Unity of Design per IR’s: 39,76 % Source: Internal WIPO statistics