Helping Active Missions Convert to PDS4 Ray Arvidson and Susie Slavney PDS MC, November 29-30,2017

PDS Management Council How the Geosciences Node is helping active missions make their conversion plans ODY MER MRO MSL LRO Planning steps  Geo opens conversation with mission and offers to help make plan Geo creates preliminary assessment of level of effort for each data set, with input from the other nodes archiving for the mission Geo and mission hold initial DAWG meeting so all teams and nodes are informed in progress Nodes and individual teams meet to scope the work for each data set Nodes and teams break down conversion work into steps and assign each step to team, PDS, or others (e.g. OPGS/MIPL) Responsible parties estimate the costs of each step Mission compiles the results in a report to deliver with extension proposal in April 2018 November 29-30, 2017 PDS Management Council

PDS Management Council Considerations for scoping the conversion effort for a given instrument team What data should be converted? All PDS3 data sets for the instrument? Ancillary data: browse, calibration, extras, etc. For each of the above, is it A, B, or C? A = PDS-compliant data, PDS3 keywords easily mapped into a PDS4 label. B = PDS-compliant data, some dictionary work needed to make a PDS4 label. C = Data are not PDS-compliant. For Category B, what dictionary work is needed? For Category C, what needs to be done to make the data PDS-compliant? What software will need to be acquired, revised, or created? Tools to design and mass-produce PDS4 labels Revisions to existing software that reads PDS3 What documentation will need to be revised or created? Who is best positioned to do the work? Instrument team PDS node Third party such as MIPL/OPGS November 29-30, 2017 PDS Management Council

PDS Management Council Questions Can missions wait until end of operations before beginning to convert data to PDS4? Should all of a mission’s data be converted to PDS4? When is the one-year extension plan due? For Mars missions it’s “estimated to be April 2018” but what about LRO and others? How detailed should the PDS4 conversion plan be? Rumor is that it might be just one slide with a total cost per fiscal year. November 29-30, 2017 PDS Management Council

PDS Management Council Background November 29-30, 2017 PDS Management Council

“Dear Colleague” letter from Jim Green November 29-30, 2017 PDS Management Council

PSD Plan to Align with 3yr SR Cadence PSD plans to extend its missions in extended operations through FY19 through an enhanced PPBE request. Each flight project is requested to provide a sciene plan for an additional 12 months of mission extension through FY19, indicating the science they plan to conduct Each Project is required to submit a plan, coordinated with their Planetary Data System counterparts, to migrate datasets from PDS3 to PDS4. Additional funds will be provided by NASA to accomplish this effort. Each project is requested to propose a plan for delivery of any higher-order data products that should be archived by the PDS. Schedule & Specific Instructions All Mars Projects should submit their science plans concurrent with the next PPBE cycle (estimated to be April 2018) MAVEN will be asked to propose science based on the Mars orbit NASA determines they will be operating in for relay purposes LRO to provide an integrated Lunar science plan coordinating multi-instrument observations Juno will submit their plan in Nov, after completion of the Operations Review for FY19 Source: message received by Noah Petro, LRO, and forwarded to Susie Slavney and Maria Banks November 29-30, 2017 PDS Management Council