1 The ERPA and Post-2012 Implications Hannah Logan Norton Rose (Asia) LLP 28 August 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2008 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential.
Advertisements

Due Diligence for Directors Martin Elliott Kovnats Jeffrey Kyle Merk.
1 CLIENT CONSULTANT AGREEMENT. 2 Negotiations Types of Consulting Contracts Standard Form of Contract Form of Contract General Conditions Special Conditions.
Copyright © 2004 by Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Slides to Accompany BUSINESS LAW E-Commerce and Digital Law International Law and Ethics.
Baker & McKenzie International is a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional.
Orientation Session on International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) September 1, 2009.
Jari Vayrynen Operations Team Leader Carbon Finance Unit World Bank March 2007 World Bank ERPA Features and Risk Profile of JI Projects.
The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
Durban Decisions on the Clean Development Mechanism DUAN Maosheng Chair of the CDM Executive Board First SDM Joint Coordination Workshop Bonn,
1 ITU Interconnection Workshop 17 August 2001 Role of the Regulator K S Wong Office of the Telecommunications Authority Hong Kong, China.
A GIA is a contract between a surety company and a contractor (or subcontractor)/principal. A GIA is a standard, typical document in the construction.
Financing Essentials for Public-Private Partnerships United Nations SU/SSC Training Course September 19, 2006.
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE, MINING AND COMMODITIES TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION PHARMACEUTICALS AND LIFE SCIENCES Break out session:
Commercial Bank Operations
The Federal Reserve System Chapter 14 Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Bank Guarantees and Indemnities 26 th August 2013 Abdul Yassim Vice President Trade and Working Capital 1 Absa presentation title Date of presentation.
Effectively applying ISO9001:2000 clauses 6 and 7.
Human Capital Investment Programme Disability Activation Project (DACT) WELCOME Support Workshop Thursday 7 th February
Chapter Outline Hedging and Price Volatility Managing Financial Risk
+ African Legal Support Facility Negotiations of natural resource contracts : Role of ALSF 2013 African Legal Support Facility Stephen Karangizi Director,
BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS THE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT: General Introduction to M&A Agreements AND PURCHASE PRICE ©2010 Joseph D. Lehrer.
BY UCHE UWALEKE PhD. Understand key financial instruments Learn how derivatives could be used as Hedging instruments Be familiar with the main requirements.
Chapter 4 Introduction to Risk Management 4-1. Copyright © 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 4-2 Basic Risk Management Firms convert inputs.
JCF March, 2006 Issues on and Requests for Joint Implementation ( “JI” ) Projects Institutional Framework on Joint Implementation ( “JI” ) Projects Yusuke.
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT I AND II
International Accounting Standard 33
International Accounting Standard 37
The Balance Sheet Statement
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved CHAPTER16CHAPTER16 CHAPTER16CHAPTER16 Financing Project Development.
Enhancing ERPAs to obtain third party financing Conference at the World Bank Paris, November 19-20, 2003 Prepared by the Merzbach Group, LLC.
Glenn S. Hodes UNEP Risø Center CDM Project Screening & PIN Development.
World Bank/KenGen Workshop on CDM Project Methodologies and Preparation October 3 & 4, 2006 CDM Contracting and Legal Issues.
Conducting Carbon Projects Presented by Adam Shepherd Regional Workshop on Legal, Institutional and Financial aspects of Carbon Finance Istanbul, Turkey.
FINANCING LNG PROJECTS. Contracting for and financing LNG assets April 2006.
THE CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM: Legal Considerations for Buyers and Sellers Introductory Workshop on CDM/JI March 1, 2006 Inn at the Forks Winnipeg, Manitoba.
CARBON CONTRACTS - the PCF experience September 30, 2002.
Annual Meeting of the Host Country Committee on Carbon Finance Washington D.C. February 15-16, The World Bank Carbon Funds:
Business Acquisition Process Implementation & transition Closing Negotiation of the transaction Due Diligence Engagement TargetIdentification.
Overview of BioCF ERPA terms December 15, 2005 The World Bank, Washington, DC.
Practical Legal Issues concerning the relationship between project proponents, investors and buyers Workshop on Landfill Gas Development and the CDM Denpasar,
RIBA/UKTI “Working Internationally” Mike Allan Partner Projects and Construction.
EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT OHS SEMINAR Due Diligence for Community Sector Leaders PRESENTATION PART 4 (Avenues for information and support; checklist for getting.
FINANCIAL SERVICES… Presented by: Ruchika Sharma.
Negotiating M&A and Joint Venture Deals Rome, 8 June 2005.
Breaking Legal Grounds…. Implementing a PCF Project Sao Paulo, Brazil - November 20, 2002 Charlotte Streck, PCF.
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE AND COMMODITIES TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGY United Kingdom: First Corporate Sukuk Shatha Ali Associate Norton Rose.
Strategic Planning for Company Exit Legal considerations Mark Harden, Partner Thrings LLP.
Emission reduction value in financing clean energy projects By Jan-Willem Martens EcoSecurities.
Managing carbon project risks Presented by Adam Shepherd Regional Workshop on Legal, Institutional and Financial aspects of Carbon Finance Istanbul, Turkey.
The CDM Project Cycle. The first step -- submit a PIN (template on Description of Project Proponent Type of Project Location of.
WB Carbon Finance Project Cycle and Role of Key Players Introduction to Carbon Finance March 10, 2004.
Strategic Alliances How to Structure, Negotiate, and Implement Successful Alliances February 11, 2003 Debra J. Dorfman Copyright © 2003 by Hale and Dorr.
Councillor Community Fund Isabell Procter Director of Resources Francis Fernandes Borough Secretary.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada14-1 Chapter 14: Corporations.
CDM Project Cycle & Project Design Document Project Design Document First Extended & Regional Workshops CD4CDM Project Siem Reap, Cambodia March.
1 Chapter 33 International business Copyright © Nelson Australia Pty Ltd 2003.
© 2006 UNDP. All Rights Reserved Worldwide. Proprietary and Confidential. Not For Distribution Without Prior Written Permission. CDM Project Cycle Anna.
UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment Capacity Development for CDM - Egypt, Second Nationa Workshop - Phase II - Cairo, January 2004.
(C) 2007 Prentice Hall, Inc.2-1 The Balance Sheet-Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity “Old accountants never die; they just lose their balance” --Anonymous.
1 PDD and PIN preparation Technical Workshop on CDM Paramaribo, 18 June 2008 Adriaan Korthuis.
Trade Credit Insurance Presentation 2015 Finance Ministers’ Process (FMP) Conference on Reforming the Asia-Pacific Financial Infrastructure Panel Discussion.
Introduced some basic knowledge of the contract First, what is the contract? Contract, also known as contract. China's definition of the contract, the.
Oracle E-Business Suite R12.1 Accounts Payables Partner Boot Camp Training Courseware Part VIII – Transaction Taxes in Payables.
HOW TO PROTECT YOUR INTEREST IN A SALE CONTRACT Focus on what you “get” when you sign!
Improving Compliance with ISAs Presenters: Al Johnson & Pat Hayle.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 9 Fundamental Legal Principles.
To us there are no foreign markets. ™ Understanding Your Employee Stock Option Plan June 2014 To us there are no foreign markets. ™
Legal Aspects of Finance
Corporations and Trusts Law Chapter 3 Choosing a Business Structure
Environmental Upgrade Finance
Presentation transcript:

1 The ERPA and Post-2012 Implications Hannah Logan Norton Rose (Asia) LLP 28 August 2009

2 Content Commercial drivers Importance of due diligence The ERPA –Commercial context –Legal principles –Clause specific review Post 2012-implications

3 1. Commercial Drivers Commercial strategy drives transaction targets, documentation and risk mitigants Post 2012 considerations Seller Opportunities –Additional CER revenue stream from the project Potential Buyers –Compliance buyers: need to meet their binding emission reduction targets –Financial buyers: CERs are bought and re-sold in the carbon market with a view to generating profits –Increasing interest in debt structures and equity stakes

4 2. Due Diligence – Key Issues Key Objective –risks are identified and reflected in the commercial terms Key Focus –Legal, regulatory, technical, financial and commercial Key Sources –Seller: responses to due diligence questions, site visits –Legal: Host Country laws and regulations, corporate documents, licences, permits and consents –Buyer: own knowledge of market and previous transactions Key Findings –Project Owner operates the CDM project lawfully –Project Owner owns project assets and CERs

5 CDM Project Risks (some…) Licensing/Regulatory appraisal (PDD) registration (CDM Exec Bd) certification monitoring crediting period verification Political Risk regulatory change tax change host country approval Technology Cost/Delay compliance cost completion delay Financial currency price ERPA Counterparty credit performance regulatory change tax change host country approval

6 Why do DD? What risks to Buyer during term of ERPA: –Does Seller exist (no Seller no ERPA)? –Does Seller own the assets (who should be Seller?) –Is Seller operating legally (could Seller be shut down during term)? –Maximising delivery –Additional Risks: Litigation/insurance/corruption/reputation Better understand Seller (valuable for ERPA negotiation): –State owned: Profit less important, less transparent, more political; –Private Co: More commercial and transparent, profit motive –Where is power within the company (who makes decisions)

7 Legal due diligence Ownership of host facility / land – e.g. ERPA is not with entity which actually owns asset Relevant permits (operation, construction, environmental, feasibility study) - e.g. no construction permit for original facility, old environmental permit Lawsuits and disputes – e.g. land ownership disputes Mortgages and encumbrances – e.g. bank has first lien over power generation equipment Liabilities impacting ability to carry on business – e.g. unpaid creditor can initiate a winding up if debt is not repaid Anti-corruption – e.g. reputation for corrupt practices Tax – e.g. transaction structure is tax efficient Legal authority to enter into contracts – e.g. understanding who is entitled to enter into contracts on the companys behalf; enforceability opinion

8 Regulatory due diligence Post 2012 regulatory framework – international negotiations Project construction and operational approvals - e.g. project conflicts with local development or environmental goals Methodology risk - e.g. project does not use an approved methodology Host country LoA risk - e.g. China does not support flaring-only LFG projects Buyer country LoA risk - e.g. UK will not authorise participation in large hydro projects unless they comply with World Commission on Dams criteria Validation risk - e.g. reason to believe the project may run into problems with validation for reasons different than above Registration risk - e.g. reason to believe the EB may request a review of the registration application

9 3. Introduction to the ERPA Emission Reduction Purchase Agreement – Purchase and sale of Certified Emission Reductions (CERs) Most common legal instrument used in carbon market Tend to be standardised Usually English law governed Hybrid between: –Project development agreement –Services agreement –Commodity contract –(sometimes) Finance document

10 ERPA: Legal v Commercial Parameters Delivery risk Consequences of breach Contractual v extra contractual protections Risk allocation & liability Enforceability Interaction of local law & other transaction agreements Requirements of DNAs Long term management Closing v not closing the deal Meeting volume targets or compliance requirements Relationship Keep it simple & concise Flexibility Performance incentives e.g. commercial alignment Distribution e.g. monetise the asset

11 English law: legal principles Clear body of contract law familiar to Buyers and internationally- recognised Freedom of contract: parties best placed to allocate risk Certainty of terms: if fundamental terms (e.g. price) have not been agreed or are unclear, ERPA may be unenforceable Agreements to agree: generally not enforceable Interpretation: unclear wording construed against party seeking to rely So: where contract is drafted in accordance with English law, changing the governing law can have significant consequences

12 ERPA: Conditions Precedent Transfer/Purchase Obligations not binding until, e.g.: –Completion of due diligence to the satisfaction of the Buyer –Listing of Buyer as a Project Participant in the PDD –Issuance of Letters of Approval –Registration of the Project with the Executive Board –Submission of the Statement of Modalities of Communication to the Executive Board –Legal Opinion from Host Country law firm –Commissioning of the Project Right to walk away –If CPs not satisfied within an agreed timeframe

13 ERPA: Sale and purchase of CERs Seller must transfer and Buyer must purchase: –Pre-2012 CERs: Binding obligation to purchase all or agreed portion of CERs –Post-2012 CERs: Obligation or option of Buyer Volume Price Payment structure: Prepayment, payment against delivery or set-off, structure as a loan

14 ERPA: Delivery Delivery: all rights in and to CERs and underlying ERs transferred and assigned to Buyer upon Delivery –constituted by transfer of CERs into Buyers Account –Limit scope for Seller to argue cannot deliver in line with ERPA Hard ERPA: Minimum delivery obligations –Seller must deliver minimum delivery volume per Verification Period by a fixed date –Delay/failure to deliver – Event of Default Soft ERPA: (or one where Buyer has control) –Volume and delivery more flexible

15 Post 2012 CERs: Options What are Post 2012 CERs? Option: creates a right to purchase underlying CERs upon request –Buyer exercises control over price and the time of purchase Early approach: free option over post 2012 ERs at Contract Price Existing contracts: negotiating strategy when to exercise New contracts: Firm Post 2012 pricing either for: –All ERs (come what may) –Only CERs that can be used for compliance

16 What does this mean for new contracts? If retain option approach: –Consider enhancing detail of option itself –When and how should it trigger? –How to price in the case of early termination Delivery of all ERs –enhance capacity to control verification etc to capture alternative markets –provide for minimum fallback to ensure delivery can occur without any argument as to certainty Delivery of compliance CERs –Careful drafting re trigger of rejection rights –What follows trigger? Walk away?

17 Post 2012 CERs: right of first refusal Right of First Refusal: before a Seller sells Post 2012 CERs to a third party they must first offer them to Buyer on the same terms –Buyer has no control over price, terms or time it buys CERs (dependent upon third party offer) –If market dropped may be preferable to Option

18 ERPA: Project Participant and Focal Point Project Participant: parties involved in the Project –Only a Project Participant can buy and sell CERs –Buyer may introduce new Project Participants in order to on-sell Focal Point: manages communications with the Executive Board –Can be sole or joint and cover: Communication Distribution of CERs Adding and removing Project Participants –Tends to be Buyer role - experience communicating with the EB –Role of Focal Point should be returned to Seller upon termination of ERPA

19 ERPA: Costs, Monitoring, Verification and Certification Monitoring of Project, Verification and Certification of CERs –Parties must communicate to maximise CERs generated –Selection of DoE (Buyer) and assistance to DoE (Seller) –Seller must keep Buyer informed as to status of the Project Costs – Costs split in accordance with the agreement between the parties – E.g. ERPA, PDD, Registration, EB, development, MVC

20 ERPA : Representations, Warranties & Undertakings Both parties make statements of fact or undertakings about the Projects (complements Due Diligence) –Due incorporation and authorisation –Seller owns the CERs it sells –Seller wont transfer the CERs or Project Assets to a third party –Seller will operate the Projects in a prudent fashion (licences, maintenance, insurance) –No litigation –Seller will keep Buyer updated as to any changes which may affect its ability to deliver CERs –Buyer will pay Seller on time –Buyer will purchase all CERs

21 ERPA : Event of Default Step 1 – Events of Default, e.g. –Failure to transfer CERs or under-delivery of CERs by Seller –Failure to pay for the CERs by Buyer –Breach of provisions of ERPA –Insolvency of a party –Misrepresentation Step 2 – Notice of EoD Step 3 – Cure the Breach 30 days to cure default, depends on breach Seller delivers replacement CERs (from other projects or goes into market to buy CERs) Buyer pays the outstanding amount to cure default

22 ERPA : Event of Default Step 4 – Terminate ERPA –If breach not cured, other party can terminate on notice Step 5 – Pay damages based on innocent partys loss Include mechanism for calculating loss in ERPA Seller Loss: Agreed Purchase Price minus CER market price (Sellers Replacement Cost) Buyers Loss: Market price minus Agreed Purchase Price (Buyers Replacement Cost)

23 ERPA: Enforcement Arbitration most common dispute resolution –Less formal means of resolving disputes –Less expensive than courts and normally quicker New York Convention on the Enforcement of Arbitral Awards –If both UK and Host Country are a party, neither has jurisdiction and so will not accept case regarding the ERPA Two step process to enforce: –Step 1: Go to seat of arbitration (e.g. Singapore) to get award; –Step 2: Get award enforced by Host Country courts against Seller assets in Host Country (assuming no assets elsewhere) Theory: Host Country should not review the award but should enforce it Practice: Can differ between jurisdictions

24 4. Post-2012 Issues What do developments at EU and international level mean for contracting strategies? –Depends on outcomes of Copenhagen –Likely that a high level international agreement will be reached –Hard to predict what the flexible mechanisms such as CDM will look like under the agreement –Risks: volume limits, qualitative limits, new mechanisms –Big picture: emission reduction commitments, climate change, new emission trading schemes, Obama factor

25 What conclusions can be drawn? Strong likelihood that the CDM, broadly in its present form, will continue post-2012 CERs from projects registered before 2012 can continue to be used in Post 2012 market Likely to be some form of sectoral and/or NAMA-based crediting mechanisms with an agreed timetable for further development of such mechanisms (under an international agreement) –Country-specific focus on: advanced developing countries that are significant contributors to greenhouse gas emissions, e.g. China and India; and countries which are strong supporters of sector or country-wide NAMAs, e.g. Korea and Mexico. Safety net: post-2012 Carbon Credit Fund

26 SE Asia has post-2012 advantages China and India probably less attractive post-2012 –China in particular, risk may have obligations to reduce emissions (steel and cement) –China imposes floor price on post-2012 Ex China/India, e.g. Philippines: greater possibilities for post-2012 –Lower risk will have obligations –No floor price, so prices can reflect post-2012 risks Buyers need to diversify portfolios away from India/China Going forward, more project financing involving CDM in Asia –Greater certainty as to post-2012 –CER revenues as security

27 So… There is sufficient certainty to develop post-2012 strategy, e.g. –Look for pre-registered projects –Be wary of industrial gas projects –Consider diversifying away from advanced developing countries (e.g. China and India) –Consider partnering with others to manage risk profile (e.g. equipment/technology providers) –Alternative business models –Hedge against price falls by taking equity stake and floating price –Engage with DNA: an efficient and informed DNA is a great benefit

28 Further information Contact details: Hannah Logan – Senior Associate Norton Rose (Asia) LLP Singapore Handouts: –Global climate change and carbon finance –Asia clean energy and carbon –Clean energy production and supply –Others on request Newsletter and updates

29 Our international practice

30 Presentation 1No individual who is a member, partner, shareholder, employee or consultant of, in or to any constituent part of Norton Rose Group (whether or not such individual is described as a partner) accepts or assumes responsibility, or has any liability, to any person in respect of this presentation. 2Any reference to a partner means a member of Norton Rose LLP or a consultant or employee of Norton Rose LLP or one of its affiliates with equivalent standing and qualifications. 3This presentation contains information confidential to Norton Rose Group. Copyright in the materials is owned by Norton Rose Group and the materials should not be copied or disclosed to any other person without the express authorisation of Norton Rose. 4This presentation is not intended to give legal advice and, accordingly, it should not be relied upon. It should not be regarded as a comprehensive statement of the law and practice in this area. Readers must take specific legal advice on any particular matter which concerns them. If you require any advice or information, please speak to your usual contact at Norton Rose Group.

31