The Literacy Model and Intervention: Bridging the Gap

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
Advertisements

How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
Knox County Schools Transition to RTI2
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Getting Started With ‘Response to Intervention’ : A Guide for Valley Central Schools
Issue Analyses RtI Yvette Benton Brad Baietto Brad Scarbrough.
Albany Unified School District Strategic Plan Board Study Session June 21, 2011.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Lindenhurst Schools
Universal Screening: Answers to District Leaders Questions Are you uncertain about the practical matters of Response to Intervention?
Multi-tiered Instruction at the Secondary Level “I think what makes a difference for our kids is that they graduate with a sense of place: high school,
Kansas accreditation is:  1.A school improvement plan  2.An external assistance team  3.Local assessments aligned with state standards  4.Teachers.
TUSCALOOSA COUNTY SCHOOLS Where Students Learn, Grow, and Achieve.
1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.
Eugene Field Elementary School “Inspiring and empowering each other to positively impact our community and our world.” Our Journey to Responsive Intervention.
Problem Solving Model Problem Solving Model NC DPI Summer Preparation Preparation & Implementation Implementation North Carolina.
JUNE 26, 2012 BOARD MEETING Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Maximizing Reading Gains to Meet AYP Targets: Decision Support Analytics for School Board Providence School District, RI April 2014.
Clarifying Retreat.
RTI: How do we make all the pieces fit into the puzzle? Lynn Wallasky and Marnie Zabel.
1 RtII: Response to Instruction and Intervention Wissahickon School District.
Annual Report For the School Year Principal: Russ Facione Annual Report Meeting: Tuesday, September 9 th PM.
1 CSIP: Clarifying Retreat June TODAY Observations Hypotheses Connection to Student Performance CSIP ASPIRING Goal Staff Development Objectives.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
Montgomery County R-II Schools November 8, 2012 School Board Report Title I Instructional Coaches introducing Mrs. Jeania Burton, Literacy Coach Mrs. MaryAnn.
Annual Report School Year Principal: Russ Facione Annual Report Meeting: Tuesday, September 24 th PM.
Mississippi’s Three Tier Model of Instruction An Overview of the Intervention Policy and Process.
Mississippi’s Three Tier Model of Instruction An Overview of the Intervention Policy and Process.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
The Law  Section , paragraph 3… A requirement that a pupil not be promoted from the third grade if the pupil obtains a score on the reading portion.
Students At-Risk for Reading Difficulties: High and Low Responders Sharon Vaughn and Greg Roberts Center on Instruction, University of Texas Sylvia Linan-Thompson,
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
Literacy Framework: What Does It Look Like at Shawnee Heights? Tamara Konrade ESSDACK Educational Services and Staff Development Association of Central.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
The Learning Journey Christie Kay, Teacher, Solana Pacific School Lisa Denham, Principal, Skyline School Leslie Fausset, Superintendent.
What makes a literacy intervention effective at the elementary, middle school, and high school level? MCLP Project Presenter: Julie Meltzer.
What does an effective secondary school look like and sound like?
Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.
Using DIBELS to Improve Reading Outcomes in Grades 3-5.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Tier I Tier II All Students Participate Effective for 80% - 85% 15% Whole Group AND Small Group! Additional Small Group Differentiated Instruction Delivered.
1 Average Range Fall. 2 Average Range Winter 3 Average Range Spring.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
Anderson School Accreditation We commit to continuous growth and improvement by  Creating a culture for learning by working together  Providing.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
Response to Intervention & Positive Behavioral Intervention & Support
Mississippi’s Three Tier Model of Instruction
Bixby North Elementary
Response to Intervention
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
The School Counseling Program
PLC Book Gro.
Problem Solving Response-to-Intervention Bringing Theory to Practice
Literacy Update Board of Education October 11, 2016
Issue Analyses RtI Yvette Benton Brad Baietto Brad Scarbrough.
Comprehensive Planning
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Measuring College and Career Readiness
English Language Arts Program Update
Anderson Elementary School
Bull Run Middle School School Advisory Meeting, 6:30 – 8:00 p.m. Library.
Implementation of Data-Based Decision-Making in an Urban Elementary School Doug Marston Jane Thompson Minneapolis Public Schools March 26, 2009.
RTI Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier approach to the early identification and support of students with learning and behavior needs. Struggling.
Data-Based Decision Making
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Implementing RTI Webinar
Presentation transcript:

The Literacy Model and Intervention: Bridging the Gap Board Presentation January 11, 2011

Literacy Vision Statement Aiken County Public Schools demonstrates an unwavering commitment of the educational community to embrace their responsibility for ensuring that each student at any level becomes a successful reader and writer.

Response to Intervention - Three Tier Model 1 - 5% 5 10% 80–90% 80 90% Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment High Intensity Assessment-based Assessment - based Intense, direct instruction Individual Students – Reading Recovery Intense, Strategic, Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response to student needs Small-group instruction- push in/pull out Additional time Certified teacher Identified by intervention team Universal Interventions All students Preventive, proactive Classroom Interventions Additional in-class instruction Specific to identified needs Research-based strategies Supplemental materials Academic Systems District Implementation Response to Intervention - Three Tier Model

Reading Interventionists Assess and teach students in need Assist in providing informal, ongoing professional development for teachers Serve on the School Intervention Team Collect and analyze data to inform instruction Engage in continuous professional development Research and implement current best practices in literacy

Students Served by School ARRA Interventionists Elementary – 25 Interventionists serve: 200 students in Tier III – Reading Recovery 1,025 students in Tier II – Small groups Middle – 4 Interventionists serve: 25 students in Tier III – 1-on-1 Intensive 38 students in Tier II – Strategic Small groups 70 students in Tier I – Classroom push in TOTAL NUMBER OF AIKEN COUNTY STUDENTS BENEFITTING FROM INTERVENTION 1,358

Elementary Student Achievement

Reading Recovery Data 2009-2010 79% of students (158) successfully completed Reading Recovery at grade level as compared to the national average of 75%. 21% of students (42)who did not successfully complete Reading Recovery at grade level were referred by the SIT for further interventions, Special Ed referrals, or identified with other problems.

Middle School Student Achievement School (current) Fall 2009 Reading RIT Spring 2009 Reading RIT Difference A. L. Corbett Middle 209.19 212.02 2.83 Aiken Middle 204.56 208.85 4.29 New Ellenton Middle 209.63 217.51 7.89 Ridge Spring-Monetta Middle 201.01 206.47 5.46 District Average 214.32 4.68 Intervention Schools’ Average 211.21 5.12 National Norm 215.0 3.0

Projected PASS Performance

Longitudinal Effect Even though all students are not projected to meet the standard this year, interventions are essential to their continued growth as readers and writers. 61% of all intervention students had significant gains from Fall to Winter MAP after receiving intervention.

Reading is Core When struggling students experience success in intervention, it has a positive correlation that permeates all other areas of academia. Improvements in reading comprehension lower retention rate and positively impact the graduation rate.

IT MATTERS!