2018 State Implementation Plan For the Annual PM2.5 Standard

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GOODS MOVEMENT & Air Quality Considerations Presented by Larry Greene, Executive Director Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD)
Advertisements

National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Proposed Rule & 40 CFR Parts 53 and 58 Revisions to Ambient Air Monitoring Regulations;
EPA’s New Fine Particle Standard & Metropolitan Washington Region Sunil Kumar MWAQC, December 18, 2012 MWCOG Item #3.
Southern Environmental Law Center Georgia Air Summit May 4, 2006.
Status of 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS Program in Clark County Presentation to Air Quality Forum May 10, 2005.
1 Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
Kansas City Air Quality, Emissions, and Strategies Douglas Watson Kansas Department of Health and Environment Bureau of Air and Radiation January 10, 2006.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule for the 1997 PM2.5 Standards Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
Imperial County APCD Regulatory Update CDAWG 2014 Brad Poiriez Air Pollution Control Officer October 8, 2014.
PM-10 EMISSION INVENTORY Average of Peak PM10 Monthly Concentrations, Average of 1998 to 2001 peak readings from the highest site for each month.
ADEQ Uses of ICF Modeling Analysis Tony Davis, Branch Manager – Air Planning Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Criteria Pollutant Modeling Analysis.
September 2006 Revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter Overview
How Ozone is Regulated under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
Air Quality 101: Clean Air Act Overview/ Update. 2 Origins of the Clean Air Act Historic air pollution Donora, Pennsylvania, – PSD, tribes.
PM 2.5 Implementation Program New Jersey Perspective Sandra Krietzman, Bureau Chief New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection Bureau of Air Quality.
Air Pollution Control Board October 1, 2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management We Protect.
Bay Area Emission Reduction Strategies June 4, 2008 Jean Roggenkamp Deputy Air Pollution Control Officer Bay Area Air Quality Management District.
South Coast AQMP/SIP Ozone & PM2.5 Control Strategy Laki Tisopulos, Ph.D., P.E. Assistant Deputy Executive Officer South Coast Air Quality Management.
Commanding Clean Air The Clean Air Act of 1970 as a Model for U.S. Environmental Policy Clean Air Act.
Minnesota Air Quality and Attainment Status Frank Kohlasch Kari Palmer Statewide Travel Demand Coordinating Committee Meeting October 14, 2010.
Air Quality Planning, Metro. Washington, DC-MD-VA Joan Rohlfs, Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington COG October 27, 2005.
Implementation Issues for the Hour PM2.5 Standard EPA / WESTAR Residential Wood Smoke Workshop Salt Lake City, Utah March 1, 2011 Rich Damberg.
” Particulates „ Characterisation of Exhaust Particulate Emissions from Road Vehicles Key Action KA2:Sustainable Mobility and Intermodality Task 2.2:Infrastructures.
Environmental Protection Division Air Quality Update Georgia EPD Jimmy Johnston Georgia Environmental Protection Division August 5, 2010.
Presentation for Air Quality Coalitions The 2015 Proposed Ozone Standard.
Imperial County APCD Regulatory Update CDAWG 2013 Brad Poiriez Air Pollution Control Officer November 13, 2013.
Inventory Needs and Legal Requirements Martin Johnson Emission Inventory Workshop Air Resources Board March 13, 2006.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
You are here.. Kern Council of Governments PM 10 Control Measures Workshop: Identifying the Best Available Control Measures to Local Government for Mobile.
Summary of Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule Proposed in November 2005 EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards August 17, 2006.
1 National Ambient Air Quality Standards and State Implementation Plans North Carolina Division of Air Quality National Ambient Air Quality Standards and.
1 PM2.5 Redesignation Request for the Metropolitan Washington,D.C. Region Joan Rohlfs Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington COG.
Clean Air Act and New Source Review Permits EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park NC March
ANPR: Transition to New or Revised PM NAAQS WESTAR Business Meeting March 2006.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Current Status of Air Quality Laura Boothe North Carolina Division of Air Quality MCIC Workshops March 2012.
The Clean Air Act First Clean Air Act passed in 1967: 1970 Amendments established current relationship between states and federal government and required.
EPA’s Revisions to Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards (PM NAAQS) Air Quality Committee Meeting January 9, 2013 Sushma Masemore,
Imperial County PM 10 SIP: Update Imperial County APCD SIP Workgroup Meeting September 24, 2008.
Indiana Department of Environmental Management 2009 Fine Particles (PM 2.5 ) Summary Report Office of Air Quality.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule Briefing for NTAA EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards April 17, 2007.
State Implementation Plans Could Rule Your Life or why NAAQS Are Important Chuck Sams R9 Air Quality Program Manager.
Clean Air Act SAFE 210. Purpose Protect public health and regulate air emissions Addresses both stationary and mobile sources.
PM 2.5 Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #1 South Coast Air Quality Management District June 8, 2006.
Determining Attainment Dates for Different Types of Nonattainment Areas Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality and Standards June 20, 2007.
July 21, Today’s Proposed Action Approve ozone SIP revisions for South Coast and San Joaquin Valley Reasonable Further Progress Transportation.
Particle Pollution: It’s a Serious Concern. So small, you can’t see just one of them … Particle pollution is a complex mixture of extremely small particles.
CAPCOA’S Perspective on Recent Key PM Legislation in California Presented by Mel Zeldin CAPCOA Technical Consultant.
Update on the PM2.5 Designations Process and the PM2.5 Implementation Rule Joseph Paisie WESTAR April 8, 2004.
IMPERIAL COUNTY EMISSION INVENTORY Reyes Romero May 28, 2008.
Western Regional Technical Air Quality Studies: support for Ozone and other Air Quality Planning in the West Tom Moore Air Quality Program Manager Western.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Proposed Rule January 17, 2006.
November 15, Clean Air Act Framework National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) set public health goals Planning process considers science,
NAAQS Status in GA & PSD Inventory Update James W. Boylan Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch Manager, Planning & Support Program AWMA Regulatory Update.
Pulp & Paper Sector Strategy & New Source Performance Standards Strategy Peter Tsirigotis, Director Sector Policies & Programs Division National Association.
SIP 101 Kristin Patton SIP Project Manager, Air Quality Division Presented to Environmental Trade Fair and Conference May 3, 2016.
PROPOSED FINE PARTICULATE ATTAINMENT/ NONATTAINMENT DESIGNATION RECOMMENDATIONS This proposal is available on the DEP Website at
Imperial County 2013 State Implementation Plan for the Hour PM2.5 Moderate Non-attainment Area December 2, 20141, 2014.
New Ozone NAAQS Impacts: What Happens Next with a Lower O3 Standard? Nonattainment Designation and Industry’s Opportunity to Participate New Ozone NAAQS.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
Clean Air Act Glossary.
Clean Air Act (CAA) Purpose
Review of Important PM2.5 Source Categories
COMPONENTS OF AQMP DEVELOPMENT
Issues on Ozone Planning in the Western United States
Proposal to Revise the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particle Pollution WESTAR Meeting March 2006.
PM2.5 Annual primary standard currently 15 ug/m3
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
Defining “Significant Impact” from Mobile Sources and Road Dust
2018 State Implementation Plan for the Imperial County 12 ug/m3 PM2
Presentation transcript:

2018 State Implementation Plan For the Annual PM2.5 Standard Imperial County APCD 2018 State Implementation Plan For the Annual PM2.5 Standard

NAAQS – National Ambient Air Quality Standards Background CAA – Clean Air Act First passed in 1963, updated in 1970 to establish NAAQS NAAQS – National Ambient Air Quality Standards Establishes concentration limits for certain pollutants in the ambient air, including particulate matter (24-hour and annual) PM2.5 Annual NAAQS: 12.0 μg/m3 (3-year avg.) PM2.5 24-hour NAAQS: 35.0 μg/m3 (3-year avg. of 98th percentile) Imperial County designated as Moderate nonattainment of the annual PM2.5 NAAQS in 2015 and required to submit a SIP Primary = provide public health protection Secondary = provide public welfare protection (against decreased visibility, damage to animals/vegetation/buildings) Both are annual means averaged over 3 years.

Sources of particulate matter in the atmosphere Background – PM2.5 Sources of particulate matter in the atmosphere Primary: Emitted directly by agricultural and industrial activities, construction/demolition, windblown dust, etc. Secondary: Forms from precursor emissions, many of which are combustion byproducts such as NOX, SOX, and VOCs Human health effects of PM2.5 exposure Small particle size allows PM2.5 to penetrate deeply into the body, contributing to: Respiratory effects like asthma, lung disease, and decreased lung function Cardiovascular complications such as heart attacks and arrhythmia Conclusion of the slide/transition into next one: Imperial needed to prepare this SIP to address the sources of PM2.5 that can be controlled in order to decrease atmospheric levels to below the NAAQS and reduce PM2.5’s impact on these health issues.

Background – Components of the SIP Moderate Area Requirements: Comprehensive emission inventories An attainment demonstration A reasonably available control measure (RACM) assessment A reasonably available control technology (RACT) assessment Demonstration of reasonable further progress (RFP) Quantitative milestones schedule Contingency measures Other clean air act requirements (e.g. Transportation Conformity)

Nonattainment Area Perhaps transition to next slides by mentioning that the Calexico-Ethel station is only a few miles from the border with Mexico and is effectively in the greater metropolitan area of the large city of Mexicali. Mexico

Overview of existing air quality Annual PM2.5 Design Value Design value definition for PM2.5: Perhaps remark that the overall trend for the county has been a decrease in PM2.5 but that Calexico has remained above the standard for reasons that will be discussed later.

Overview of existing air quality 24-hour PM2.5 Design Value The situation is similar for the 24-hour design value. DV definition: the fourth highest daily measurement averaged over three years.

Emission Inventory – Example: Baseline (2012) Source Category PM2.5 (tons/day) % Total NH3 (tons/day) NOX (tons/day) SOX (tons/day) VOC (tons/day) Stationary Sources Fuel Combustion 0.13 1.08% 0.00 0.00% 1.52 10.71% 1.74% 0.05 0.44% Waste Disposal 1.19 5.13% Cleaning and Surface Coatings 0.41 3.44% Petroleum Production and Marketing 0.50 4.17% Industrial Processes 3.37% 0.02 0.15% 0.01% Total Stationary Sources 0.55 4.45% 1.54 10.85% 0.96 8.06% Areawide Sources Solvent Evaporation 12.87 55.37% 3.01 25.35% Farming Operations 0.91 7.36% 8.68 37.34% 1.48 12.47% Unpaved Road Dust 4.76 38.73% Fugitive Windblown Dust 3.69 30.00% Managed Burning and Disposal 0.82 6.70% 0.54% 0.29 2.05% 18.11% 0.60 5.04% Other Processes 0.40 3.21% 0.26 1.13% 0.08 0.56% 0.74% 0.04 0.36% Total Areawide Sources 10.58 86.01% 21.94 94.37% 0.37 2.62% 18.86% 5.14 43.22% Mobile Sources On-Road Vehicles 0.19 1.55% 0.11 0.49% 5.31 37.38% 5.85% 1.77 14.86% Off-Road Vehicles 0.98 7.99% 6.98 49.15% 0.21 73.56% 4.03 33.86% Total Mobile Sources 1.17 9.54% 0.12 0.50% 12.28 86.53% 0.22 79.40% 5.79 48.71% Total for Imperial County 12.30 100% 23.24 14.19 0.28 11.89 Don’t need to explain in detail but just an example for the public of what an emission inventory looks like. Can point out that the major sources of direct PM2.5 are shown in blue (will help lead into our slides on the controls analysis)

Emission Inventory, Baseline year (2012)

Emission Inventory, Attainment year (2021)

Emission Inventory – Precursor Demonstration CARB conducted an analysis to determine the effect that precursors have on ambient PM2.5 levels The modelling results indicated that none of the four common PM2.5 precursors (NOX, SOX, NH3, and VOCs) significantly contribute to PM2.5 levels in the nonattainment area Conclusion: Imperial not required to consider precursors in the control measures analysis and other SIP requirements beyond the emission inventory

Attainment Demonstration – Section 179(B) (CARB)

Control Strategy– Analysis of Current Controls The CAA requires implementation of all “reasonably available” controls as needed for expeditious attainment of the NAAQS The District analyzed the current measures controlling each source of PM2.5 in the emission inventory and found that: All of the top stationary sources were evaluated for RACT requirements All mobile sources are controlled by RACM Some area sources such as agricultural burning, windblown dust, and road dust are controlled by RACM, but others like residential wood burning are not Can explain the difference between RACM and RACT and the role technology plays in controlling stationary sources. Can potentially explain that part of this analysis was to compare the relevant rules with similar rules in other air districts in order to determine if Imperial’s are as stringent.

Control Strategy– Newly Proposed Controls To control residential wood burning to RACM standards, the District is proposing a rule that would require new residential wood burning devices to comply with NSPS requirements Additionally, several Additional Reasonable Measures (ARM) have been proposed that involve: Curtailment of residential wood burning in Calexico when PM2.5 levels are forecasted to be elevated at the Calexico monitor NOX emission limits for boilers, steam generators, process heaters, and residential water heaters Management practices to limit NH3 emissions from biosolids, animal manure, and poultry litter composting Potentially explain that: NSPS = New Source Performance Standards, a program created by EPA to set limits for certain pollutants based on the type of technology. ARM = Additional Reasonable Measures which means they satisfy RACM requirements but cannot be implemented within 4 years of designation as nonattainment. Even though precursors don’t significantly impact PM2.5 levels, these ARM are still anticipated to have a beneficial effect on public health and welfare.

Control Strategy– Contingency Measures In the event that the District fails to meet the requirements of RFP and the quantitative milestones, the following proposed contingency measures will be implemented automatically: An expansion of the applicability of Rule 804 to control more parcels of open areas in rural parts of the county A lower threshold of the PM2.5 levels required to trigger curtailment of wood burning These measures are required to be equivalent to one year’s worth of the emission reductions between the baseline year (2012) and attainment year (2021) assuming consistent annual decreases in emissions. Details:

border strategic concepts Mexicali/Imperial Air Quality Task Force (AQTF) Web-based air quality and health information center Includes mobile air quality alert application AQI advertisement – billboards and media (TV and radio) Mexicali and Imperial County Educational Media Campaign Vehicle idling emissions study (Calexico ports of entry) Diesel truck inspection program Mexicali monitoring study Mexico emission inventory improvements (contract starting soon) Program to improve air quality in Mexicali 2011-2020 by Mexican government

Next Steps Presentation of SIP to Imperial County Board of Supervisors with District recommendation for adoption RACM/ARM rulemaking process Presentation of SIP to CARB for adoption Submittal to USEPA for final review

Additional questions can be directed to: ICAPCD Questions/Comments? Additional questions can be directed to: ICAPCD Reyes Romero, Assistant APCO (442) 265-1800 reyesromero@co.imperial.ca.us Monica Soucier, Division Manager (442) 265-1786 monicasoucier@co.imperial.ca.us