Leader SLTs 2017 - 2018.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DPAS II: Component V The Process: Step 1: MUST use a minimum of two (2) measures MUST use Measure A for all students assessed by DCAS in reading and/or.
Advertisements

Compass: Module 3 Student Growth.
Freehold Borough Teacher Evaluation System Freehold Intermediate School Friday – February 15, 2013 Rich Pepe Director of Curriculum & Instruction.
It’s All About Student Growth Objectives
Student Learning Targets (SLT)
Student Learning Targets in the CCSS Classroom: Mathematics.
Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden
Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.
Student Learning Targets (SLT) You Can Do This! Getting Ready for the School Year.
Compass: Louisiana’s path to educator excellence
A New School Accountability Model. Draft – March Check for Updates to this Presentationhttp://
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
TPSS Leader & Teacher SLTs School Year.
JUNE 26, 2012 BOARD MEETING Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.
School Performance Score Elementary School - October 2013 i LEAP Grade 3 LEAP Grade 4 Assessment Points * 150Advanced 125Mastery 100Basic 0Approaching.
Student Learning targets
2012 Secondary Curriculum Teacher In-Service
LOUISIANA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION JOHN WHITE Tracking Readiness: Measuring High School Effectiveness in Louisiana National Conference on Student.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
Information for school leaders and teachers regarding the process of creating Student Learning Targets. Student Learning targets.
School Accountability
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
Student Growth Objectives Unifying Standards, Instruction, and Assessment to Improve Student Learning June
Release of PARCC Student Results. By the end of this presentation, parents will be able to: Identify components of the PARCC English.
Compass Framework & Goal Setting for Principals: Work Session St. James Parish August 25, Compass Framework & Goal Setting for.
Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. How Do They Do That? EVAAS and the New Tests October 2013 SAS ® EVAAS ® for K-12.
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
Student Learning and Growth Goals Foundations 1. Outcomes Understand purpose and requirements of Student Learning and Growth (SLG) goals Review achievement.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts School Year Results.
Teacher SLTs General Format for Teacher SLTs with a District-wide Common Assessment The percent of students scoring proficient 1 in my 8 th.
Assessment Report October 26, Types of Assessments Given Formative Summative Aptitude/Achievement Curriculum Based Assessments.
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING.
35% Non-FCAT Teachers – Teacher Level Student Growth Component – 40% Bay District has adopted teacher-level student growth measures for those teachers.
Understanding the Relationship between Administrator Evaluation and Data Teams “1-2-3 goal setting” Phase I: Whole School Learning Indicator (analyze data)
Franklin Public Schools MCAS and PARCC Results Spring 2015 Joyce Edwards Assistant Superintendent for Teaching and Learning December 8, 2015.
2017 Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Leader slts PRIOR TO : Principal set a minimum of two goals, which express an expectation of student growth. SPS available for use.
New Teacher Induction.
Value-Added Calculation
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
WorkKeys February 19 – 21, 2013 Online
Teacher SLTs
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
PARCC Results: Orange Board of Education 2017
Teacher SLTs
Bennett County School District
Release of PARCC Student Results
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Growth Models Oklahoma
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
Milton Public Schools 2013 Accountability Status
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
Teacher SLTs
EOCT BACKGROUND SPRING 2012
Redesign Family Meeting
Leader SLTs
Redesign Family Meeting
Jayhawkville Central High School
Teacher SLTs
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Presented by Joseph P. Stern
Teacher SLTs
NEWARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
English Learner Accountability Component
Presentation transcript:

Leader SLTs 2017 - 2018

Compass Improvements: Principal Goal Setting PRIOR TO 2015-2016: Principal set a minimum of two goals, which express an expectation of student growth. SPS available for use as the measure of student growth. BEGINNING 2015-2016: Principals will set goals where two are based in SPS with: One goal based on overall SPS improvement One goal aligned to components of school performance improvement Sample Principal Goals: PRIOR to 2015-2016 Goal 1: 80% of students in grade 3 will meet or exceed 80% proficiency on the end of year teacher administered math fluency assessment. Goal 2: 80% of my teachers will score a 3 or higher on their end of year Compass ratings. Sample Principal Goals: BEGINNING 2015-2016 Goal 1: Current year student achievement, as measured by SPS, will meet or exceed which is an increase of points in overall SPS. Goal 2: Current year student achievement, as measured by the Math Assessment Index, will meet or exceed . Louisiana Believes.

Student Achievement Data Component Dropout/Credit Accumulation Index Set Goals C LETTER GRADE K-8 SCHOOLS TPSS 2017-2018 Recommended Targets: K-8 Student Achievement Data Component State Average Our School 2016-2017 2017-2018 Recommended Target Insufficient Attainment Partial Attainment Full Attainment Exceeds SCHOOL PERFORMANCE SCORE (SPS): with grade 8 76.3   ≤ 0.0^ 0.1 – 3.2 3.3 – 6.3 > 6.3 SCHOOL PERFORMANCE SCORE (SPS): w/out grade 8 76.5 0.1 – 3.7 3.8 – 7.4 > 7.4 Assessment Index Overall 71.3 3.3 – 6.4 > 6.4 ELA Assessment Index 75.8 0.1 – 2.4^ 2.5 – 4.8 > 4.8 Math Assessment Index 69.4 0.1 – 5.7 5.8 – 11.3 > 11.3 Science Assessment Index 66.8 0.1 – 3.3 3.4 – 6.6 > 6.6 Dropout/Credit Accumulation Index DCAI Index 131.1 0.1 – 2.6 2.7 – 5.2 > 5.2 Progress Points Math: % of non-proficient students exceeding their target 46.2 0.1 – 2.3^ 2.4 – 4.5 > 4.5 ELA: % of non-proficient students exceeding their target 49.6 0.1 – 3.3^ < 6.6 K-8 A ^Range adjusted to reflect improvement.

Goal 1: Improvement in Overall SPS K-8 Student Achievement Data Component State Average Our School 2016-2017 Insufficient Attainment Partial Attainment Full Attainment Exceeds SCHOOL PERFORMANCE SCORE (SPS): with grade 8 76.3 72  ≤ 0.0^ 0.1 – 3.2 3.3 – 6.3 > 6.3 SCHOOL PERFORMANCE SCORE (SPS): w/out grade 8 76.5   0.1 – 3.7 3.8 – 7.4 > 7.4 Goal #1: Improve Math Performance – B School Target Statement (based on full attainment) My School Performance Score will increase by 3.3 points from 72 to 75.3. Insufficient Attainment of Target (1 point) Partial Attainment of Target (2 points) Full Attainment of Target (3 points) Exceptional Attainment of Target (4 points) Achievement Range: SPS did not increase. SPS increased from 0.1 to 3.2 points. Index increased from 3.3 to 6.3 points. Index increased more than 6.3 points.

Goal 2: Improvement in a Component of the SPS K-8 Student Achievement Data Component State Average Our School 2016-2017 Insufficient Attainment Partial Attainment Full Attainment Exceeds Assessment Index Overall 71.3   ≤ 0.0^ 0.1 – 3.2 3.3 – 6.4 > 6.4 ELA Assessment Index 75.8 0.1 – 2.4^ 2.5 – 4.8 > 4.8 Math Assessment Index 69.4 0.1 – 5.7 5.8 – 11.3 > 11.3 Science Assessment Index 66.8 0.1 – 3.3 3.4 – 6.6 > 6.6 Goal #1: Improve Math Performance – B School Target Statement (based on full attainment) My school will increase our math assessment index by 5.8 points from 60 to 65.8 points. Insufficient Attainment of Target (1 point) Partial Attainment of Target (2 points) Full Attainment of Target (3 points) Exceptional Attainment of Target (4 points) Achievement Range: Index did not increase. Index increased from 0.1 to 5.7 points. Index increased from 5.8 to 11.3 points. Index increased more than 11.3 points.

Goal 3: Student Growth Goal 50% of students in my school will meet their expected growth target on state tests. 1 Should include all of the students in your school that take a state exam. You can divide the grades/subjects up among assistants for one their goals if you would like. Insufficient Attainment of Target (1 point) Partial Attainment of Target (2 points) Full Attainment of Target (3 points) Exceptional Attainment of Target (4 points) Achievement Range: Less than 35% meet their expected growth target. 35% - 49% meet their expected growth target. 50% - 65% meet expected growth target. More than 65% meet expected growth target.

TPSS Leader SLT Requirement All assessment components of the School Performance score must be covered by the administrative team at the school. Growth rate will be determined by grade level of school and LDOE charts. Team approach – we are all in this together.

K-8 Example Principal: Goal 1: SPS growth Goal 2: Growth in lowest assessment index from previous year Goal 3: Student Growth Goal – including entire school Assistant Principals/AA Goal 1: assessment index growth by grade and/or subject based on areas of responsibility. Goal 2: assessment index growth by grade and/or subject based on areas of responsibility. Goal 3: student growth goal divided by grade or subjects. All grades and assessment indexes should be covered by the administrative team.

High School Example Principals Assistant Principals/AA/Counselors Goal 1: SPS growth Goal 2: Growth in lowest assessment index (EOC or ACT) Goal 3: Student Growth Goal – ELA and math EOCs. Assistant Principals/AA/Counselors Possible Goals depending on areas of responsibilities: Growth in an assessment index (EOC or ACT) all or parts depending on area of responsibility. (i.e. An assistant who observes and provides support to all of the English teachers could do SLTs on the English II and III EOC.) Graduation Index Graduation Cohort rate Student Growth Goal – divided by subjects

Sample Leader Goals Goal 1: The School Performance Score will increase by ______ points from current SPS to goal SPS. Goal 2: The Math Assessment Index will increase by __ points from current index to goal index. Goal 3: 50% of students in my school will meet their expected growth target on state tests.

Timeline October 13: SLT's discussed and approved by evaluators October 27: SLT's posted and accepted in CIS by evaluators

Resources District SLT website (C&I Webpage): http://www.tangischools.org//site/Default.aspx?PageID=17531