Red and Orange Future Reliability

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing Hardware and Software Assets
Advertisements

IBM SMB Software Group ® ibm.com/software/smb Maintain Hardware Platform Health An IT Services Management Infrastructure Solution.
RiT PatchView Solution
Capacity Planning IACT 918 July 2004 Gene Awyzio SITACS University of Wollongong.
MBTA State of Good Repair Database
Beverly A. Scott, Ph.D. MBTA General Manager MassDOT Rail & Transit Administrator Richard A. Davey MassDOT Secretary and CEO GREEN LINE OVERVIEW May 2014.
Peter Plevka, BMC Software Managing IT and Your Business – Optimizing Mainframe Cost and Performance.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Rail Capacity Unit 3: Measuring & Maximizing Capacity.
Darton Ito Manager, Long Range & Capital Planning Drew Howard
ARISTOTELION UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI SCHOOL OF TECHNOLOGY FACULTY OF RURAL AND SURVEYING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING.
T-FLEx October 2007 Workshop The Future of Fare Collection Ed Oliphant, CFO Nashville MTA October 29, 2007.
SUMMARY OF BENEFITS AND RETURN ON INVESTMENT GPS FLEET TRACKING.
Caltrain Modernization Program CA Passenger Rail Summit April 29, 2015.
BART Briefing for Mayor’s Transportation 2030 Task Force April 30, 2013.
Infrastrucure presentation VZNERRAC PLENARY 11 Railway Infrastructure for the Twenty First Century John Amoore Network Rail and ERRAC.
Schneider Electric 1 Foundational BUSINESS OVERVIEW Rev 2 Virtualization and physical infrastructure – Integrations with Microsoft and VMware.
Fleet Performance and Reliability in Generation Utilities
SGR & Capital Working Group Initial Overview 8/31/2015 Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only1.
EarthLink Server Management and Monitoring Updated August 6, 2015.
Future Road Map – Modern Control, Command Signalling Systems BY Anshul Gupta DRM, Adra, South Eastern Railway Secretary, Institution of Railway Signal.
A smart signalling system for Indian railways Smart signalling system – user’s view Full capacity realisation Flexibility of movements Easy to operate.
FY2013 ROPA Presentation University of Alaska System.
0 Christopher A. Pangilinan, P.E. Special Assistant to the Deputy Administrator Research and Innovative Technology Administration, ITS Joint Program Office.
Delay Attribution Guide April 2011 Changes Ana Maria Sanchez Delay Attribution Board Administrator.
1 PTC 101 A primer for PTC PTC 101 A primer for PTC.
Capacity and Service to Road Users Task 05: To optimise the capacity of the road network Mike Wilson, Bristol 27 January 2006.
Next Generation ISEA Roadmap
Company for Urban Innovative Transport (CUIT) 19/12/2007 Request for proposal.
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data David T. Crout Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet) Presented at Transportation.
Summary and Wrap-up Discussion 8 July 2015
Capital Plan Update FMCB Meeting February 26, 2016 Pre-Decisional – Draft for discussion only.
CTA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. FY FY 2019 CIP Preliminary Marks.
Transforming rail travel in the North Sheffield Chamber of Commerce & Industry Mark Barker Stakeholder Manager Northern Franchise.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
ACEC National Energy and Environment Challenges in Asset Management? Brian Long Transmission Line Performance Xcel Energy August 15, 2015.
Distribution Automation The utilization of IEDs (Intelligent Electronic Devices) and advanced communications to unlock the benefits of operational efficiency.
EQUATE PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY EQUATE RCM Project Implementation By Khalid Al-Anzi.
Update & Overview. August 12, : Assessment and Action Challenges: Understand RTD’s people, practices, projects, challenges Compare with others.
Road Investment Decision Framework
MODULE 4, LESSON 5 Developing Service: Calculating Capacity.
Policies Controlling Risk
Background data to Stage 1
Deputy General Manager Remarks
Chapter 19: Network Management
Risk management.
Red Line Customer Capacity Update
Mattapan High Speed Line
Fire Station Recap Strategic Theme: Exemplary Service & Governance
Chicago Transit Authority Energy Initiatives
Leading With Safety Mike Huwar, President
GPS Based Earthquake Detection And Warning System
2017 November Financial Plan Presentation to the Board
Scene 1: Show EV cars charging in a city
Increasing Asset Lifecycle through the application of Innovative Technology
OVERVIEW: POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL (ptc)
Aim: What are the fundamental components of the business cycle?
D Line Station Plan Overview
D Line Station Plan Overview
Network Rail South East Route Performance for NTF 22 October 2014
D Line Station Plan Overview
D Line Station Plan Overview
Focus40 Overview A long-range plan for how the MBTA can meet the needs of the region in 2040: A 20-year plan as required by MBTA enabling legislation A.
D Line Station Plan Overview
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data
World-Views of Simulation
MTA 2019 Final Proposed Budget November Financial Plan
Department of Licensing HP 3000 Replatforming Project Closeout Report
CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE RESILIENCE INDEX (CIRI)
Prepared by: Riyaaz Ebrahim
Presentation transcript:

Red and Orange Future Reliability 2019 - 2029 August 13, 2018

Agenda Review Future Capacity Define the Magnitude of Orange and Red Line Changes Review the controllable and noncontrollable factors that impact current reliability Present Prediction for Future Orange and Red Line Reliability 8/13/2018

Preface The Red and Orange Line are complicated networks that operate as a “system of systems” consisting of: Traction Power, Signals, Communications, Vehicles, Operating Rules, Environment, Crew and Customers Predicting interactions between such complex “system of systems” is challenging given the nearly infinite combination of scenarios and starting conditions. Reliability predictions utilize system models and expected performance of system components to predict future performance in a defined starting condition. We have developed a forward looking qualitative reliability prediction utilizing the same tools used for measuring and reporting our performance reliability today. 8/13/2018

Future Capacity The MBTA is investing in programs to increase the system capacity on the Red and Orange Lines. A larger and new fleet of vehicles Upgrades to the Signal and Train Control System Dwell Time Improvement Initiative Future Service Red Line going to 3 minute peak headways Orange Line going to 4.5 minute peak headways 8/13/2018

Capacity vs Reliability Future Capacity Current Capacity 8/13/2018

Capacity vs Reliability The lines are running faster and doing more in the same time period increasing the wear on our system. The charts below show the weekly wear before and after of both lines. Increasing a systems wear increases that systems probability of failure. 8/13/2018

Orange Line and Red Line Reliability Today 8/13/2018

Delay Impact Any incident has cascading impacts on each line. Cascading Delays can be worse than the initial delay. Recovery Detection Time Trouble Shooting Problem Arises Back In Service Taken Out of Service Capacity Impacts Dwell Time Impacts Longer time a passenger takes to board a train due to crowded platforms or trains. This results in train spending more time at a station 8/13/2018

30% Uncontrollable Delays Causes of Delay Other Factors Delay 30% Uncontrollable Delays Police Action Special Events 70% Controllable Delays Disabled Train Signal Problem Dwell Time Dwell Time Uncontrollable Delays will always limit our real service reliability. Using today’s reporting methods our maximum achievable reliability is 97% & 98% for the Red & Orange lines respectively. 8/13/2018

Controllable Delays Delay 70% Controllable Delays Other Factors Delay 70% Controllable Delays Disabled Train Signals Problem Dwell Time Completely New Fleets Larger Fleet Better Maintenance Tech Automatic Train Control Automatic Station Stopping Wider Doors Improved Procedures Modern Signal Controls Upgraded Sections Better Maintenance Tech 8/13/2018

We expect A reliability prediction was conducted considering: Improvements to vehicles and infrastructure Increased wear on the system due to increased capacity Shorter recovery time due to faster headways. Disabled Train Train Related Delays to drop 50-60% Signals Problem Signals related delays drop by 50-70% Dwell Time Dwell time related delays will drop by 30-40% 8/13/2018

Reliability Goal We expect to be able to achieve the following Average Performance Reliability when all vehicles, infrastructure and operational programs are implemented: Orange Line Red Line Average Reliability 2025 96% 95% maximum achievable 97% maximum achievable 98% We expect hourly, daily weekly and yearly variations based on both controllable and uncontrollable variables 8/13/2018

Refine performance calculation beyond current Reliability Metric Next Steps Development of a 25 year Long Term Asset Management Plan commencing in 2025 to ensure we sustain asset performance Develop reliability improvement predictions for the line as projects are being completed by 2025 Refine performance calculation beyond current Reliability Metric Update to Board in January 2019 8/13/2018

Additional Information Appendix Additional Information 8/13/2018

Red Line Vehicle and Infrastructure Programs Signal Design/Build NTP 14 New Cars Signal Design Underway Expanded Wellington Yard 62 New Cars 8 Signal Sections Complete 110 New Cars 13 Signal Sections and ATO Complete 186 New Cars Expanded Codman Yard Rebuilt Cabot Facility & Yard 252 New Cars Automatic Train Operation (ATO) System Tuning 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Increases fleet size by 16% The design considers both reliability and availability. Modern components and systems, which increases reliability. Decreases the need to immediately remove a car from service and impact to service. RL Vehicles Program All track circuits and 90% of relays will be replaced with electronic microprocessor system, providing redundancy and improved life cycle. Provides early warning diagnostic and maintenance alerts to MBTA Maintenance, reducing failure response time. RL Signals Program Improving the Alewife crossover allowing operating speeds through the crossover to increase from 10 mph to 15 mph. New Test Track New Testing Shed (allows for static testing/commissioning of the new vehicles without impacting existing maintenance facilities and operations) Updated Maintenance Facility and Equipment and new Electronics Room (to service the new vehicles and accommodate storage needs) Upgraded Yard Infrastructure RL Infrastructure Program New Headway Operations 8/13/2018

Improved Orange Line Reliability Due to Vehicle and Signal Programs 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 6 New Cars Signal Design/Build NTP 58 New Cars Signal Design Underway Expanded Wellington Yard 106 New Cars Expanded Wellington Facility 152 New Cars 8 Signal Sections & ATO Complete Rebuilt Wellington Yard 11 Signal Sections Complete New Headway Operations Increases fleet size by 27% The design considers both reliability and availability. Modern components and systems, which increases reliability. Decreases the need to immediately remove a car from service and impact to service. OL Vehicles Program All track circuits and 90% of relays will be replaced with electronic microprocessor system, providing redundancy and improved life cycle. Provides early warning diagnostic and maintenance alerts to MBTA Maintenance, reducing failure response time. OL Signals Program Updated Maintenance Facility, Facility Equipment and new Electronics Room (to service the new vehicles and accommodate storage needs) Upgraded Yard Infrastructure OL Infrastructure Program Automatic Train Operations (ATO) System Tuning 8/13/2018