Academy for Research Professionals Series September 26, 2018

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
University Contracting The University of Arizona Office of Research and Contract Analysis (ORCA)
Advertisements

USC Clinical Trials Office (CTO) Answers to CTOs who, what, when, and how questions Soheil Jadali Director, Clinical Trial Office.
Clinical Trial Agreements
University Contracting The University of Arizona Contracting & Research Services (CRS)
Christina Hansen, Assistant Vice Chancellor Bob Johnson, Research Librarian for Nursing & Allied Health May 2008 NIH Public Access Policy UCI Libraries.
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.
Working with DSP (main phone) Wendy Beaver Diana Boeglin Jessica Boyle Erin Brothers Pat Cone-Fisher Caite Flaherty.
November 10, Office of Research Administration: Clinical Research Contracting Presented to: Research Administration Professionals Group Patricia.
Instructions for VCU’s Internal Approval Form Form is required to obtain Authorized Official’s signature on proposals and awards OSP – 8/2006.
CSBS Fourth Friday Faculty Workshop 1: Grant Management CSBS: Frances Solano ORSP: Stefanie Friesen TUC: Stacey Lord / Maryann Camarillo 1/23/
University Contracting The University of Arizona Office of Research and Contract Analysis (ORCA)
The Contracting Process (Why Does it Take So Long?) Libby Salberg, Associate Director Beth Watkins, Contract Analyst, Team Manager Janet Fry, Manager Clinical.
The proper protocol for grant approval at LCSC GRANT-WRITING 101: INTERNAL PROCEDURES.
Managing Your Grant Roberta Teliska Vice President for Sponsored Programs Operations The Research Foundation of SUNY October 6, 2008.
Driving Innovation to Market. Partnering with the Office of Intellectual Property and Industry Sponsored Research December 10, 2013 Tara A. Kamin, Esq.
WORKING WITH SPO AND IAO Lynne HollyerNoam Pines Associate Director Research Administrator Industry Alliances OfficeSponsored Projects Office
CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDIES Janette Hannam, MS, CTRA Asst. Director for Research, OSP.
Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research 1 Update on PHS New Rule on Financial Conflicts of Interest (FCOI) Presentation to Business Managers January.
Tips on Routing and Contracts: An Intro for the Campus Research Coordinator Michelle Artmeier Director of Award Services Ron.
Office of Research & Sponsored Programs (ORSP) Darren McCants, Director David Azbill, Assistant Director Cindy Brown, Program Mgr, Corporate Research Robbie.
LETTER OF INTENT FOR INDUSTRY SPONSORED RESEARCH Signe Denmark, SCTR Research Opportunities & Collaborations Ryan Mulligan, SCTR Grants & Contracts Navigator.
Business Operations Pre-Award. What is required to begin the business process? Possible indicators CDA executed Cancer Center MDG/PRC approvals Department.
PRESENTED BY: Cherron Payne, Esq., Office of Clinical and Translational Research Dowling North, Second Floor Ext CONTRACT PROCEDURE.
Getting a study done at Jefferson:. Startup Activities: Image courtesy of CITI Program Clinical Research Coordinator course.
IU-CLINICAL TRIALS OFFICE A. Marisa King, MBA, MA, LMHC Clinical Research Contract Officer 1IU-CTO RCEP 19OCT15.
Business Operations Pre-Award. Confidential Disclosure Agreements (CDA)/ Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDA)
Award Set-Up and Advances
Decision Tree for eIRB Submission Revised: 01/25/2016
COCE Institutional Review Board Academic Spotlight
Study Startup The Treasure Map
Study Feasibility and Start-up
Clinicaltrials.gov Update
Investigator of Record – Definition
Outgoing Subawards Award Stage
Reportable Events & Other IRB Updates February 2017
Introduction to Clinical Trials: Documents and Processes
ClinicalTrials.gov: An introduction
Clinical Trial Contracts Office -What’s the Hold Up?
Sponsored Programs (SP)
Outgoing Subawards Proposal Stage
Contract Review and Processing
Academy for Research Professionals Series January 11, 2018
Decision Tree for eIRB Submission Revised: 01/25/2016
Outgoing Subawards Proposal Stage
SCD Grants & Contracts Policy & Procedure 670.
Agreements OSR Symposium
Industry Funded Research - Process for Contracts
AAHRPP + IRB Update Michael Mahoney
Outgoing Subawards Award Stage
Getting a Study Done at Jefferson:
Clinical Trials Budgeting, Part 2
Transfer of Materials, Confidential Information, and Data
Click Training Agreements Module
Investigator of Record – Definition
Investigator of Record – Definition
Purchasing Contracts Training
Outgoing Subawards Proposal Stage
Academy for Research Professionals Series May 15, 2018
Outgoing Subawards Award Stage
KSU Sponsored Projects Overview
Changes to the Common Rule and Single IRB (sIRB)
CTSA27 So you want COMIRB to be your sIRB: What you need to know.
All the Things I Didn’t Know I Needed to Know When My Award Came
Research Billing Compliance University of Iowa Health Care
Research with Human Subjects
Step 3. Initiate Proposal
Presentation transcript:

Division of Sponsored Programs: Who are we and How do we impact Clinical Trials? Academy for Research Professionals Series September 26, 2018 Presented by: Caitlin Flaherty J.D. & Katherine Gonzales B.A.

Today’s Agenda Overview of DSP’s role in clinical trial studies CDA/CTA Definitions UIRIS Routing Forms The DSP Process Issues in CTAs Accelerated Research Agreements Resources

Meet our DSP Clinical Trial Staff: Jessica Boyle (Associate Director) Confidential Disclosure Agreement (CDA) Reviewers: Carrie Damon Melissa Shriver Clinical Trial Agreements (CTA) Contract Reviewers: Kathie Gonzales Caite Flaherty Adwin Hesseltine Linda Jones Kristen Stoll (new) See also: DSP Staff Directory https://dsp.research.uiowa.edu/dsp-staff-directory

Who is DSP & What do We Do? Division of Sponsored Programs (DSP) reviews all external funding agreements for research that involve UI staff and/or occur on the UI or UIHC campuses. We are a resource for campus. Review and negotiate contract terms to ensure compliance with Iowa law, federal law & UI policies DSP is the signature authority for all externally funded research agreements *Note* A Principal Investigator (PI) is not an authorized signatory

Confidential Disclosure Agreement (CDA) A Confidential Disclosure Agreement (CDA) or a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) is a binding contract to safeguard confidential information CDAs are signed prior to a Sponsor disclosing their Protocol for review or a Feasibility Study completion Please note any real Sponsor deadlines on the UIRIS routing form (e.g., site visit scheduled?) Note on Investigator-Initiated Trials: If your PI is interested in proposing a study Protocol that utilizes either an approved or un-approved drug/device or a new method, contact DSP to have a mutual CDA drafted or to add mutual confidentiality terms.

Clinical Trial Agreement (CTA) A Clinical Trial Agreement (CTA) is the legally binding agreement that manages the relationship between the sponsor & the UI. Sponsor may provide: Study drug or device Financial support Proprietary information Institution may: Enroll/consent subjects Provide data and/or results Contribute to a publication Further develop intellectual property The CTA allocates risk, responsibility, funds and obligations, and protects academic and intellectual property interests. Please note actual deadlines on the UIRIS routing form & call DSP (e.g., expanded access CTA, life/death situation)

Getting Started with a CDA or CTA Every CDA and CTA requires a UIRIS routing form: CDAs – use non-monetary routing from CTAs – use proposal routing form  See also:  University of Iowa Research Information System (UIRIS), https://dsp.research.uiowa.edu/university-iowa-research-information-system-uiris 

UIRIS Routing Form: Proposal and Non-Monetary V3 - https://uiris.uiowa.edu/dashboard V2 -- https://uiris.research.uiowa.edu/

UIRIS Routing Form Start a new Routing form Search Unsubmitted Voided Approved Links to templates Editors

UIRIS Routing Form Project Purpose: Clinical Trial, Corporate Sponsored Clinical Trial, Other

Clinical Trial definitions have been updated in 2018 by the NIH. UIRIS Routing Form Clinical Trial definitions have been updated in 2018 by the NIH. NIH funded studies: Does the study involve human participants? Are the participants prospectively assigned to an intervention? Is the study designed to evaluate the effect of the intervention on the participants? Is the effect being evaluated a health-related biomedical or behavioral outcome? Non-NIH funded studies: Clinical trials are studies that involve evaluation of a technology or product. These studies include Phase 1-3 clinical investigations, Phase 4 post-marketing studies, IDE investigations, and post-market surveillance studies involving human subjects. Resource: https://grants.nih.gov/policy/clinical-trials/definition.htm

UIRIS Routing Form Include your IRB application number here or add ‘pending’ Adding the IRB # will prevent follow-up emails! Central IRB: please indicate on routing form Don’t have the IRB submission # yet? No problem! Please email the DSP contract reviewer once it is submitted and we will update the file. Human and Animal Research - Question 7.1

UIRIS Routing Form Attachments: CDAs: CTAs: CDA template (prefer Word version) Related protocol or study title Deadline, if applicable CTAs: CTA template (prefer Word version) Budget (draft version) Protocol Other information: Is the protocol written or co-written by a UI researcher? (Investigator Initiated Study) Will there be a central IRB? *If there are missing attachments, the contract is NOT ready for DSP to review and this WILL cause delays*

UIRIS Routing Form Include the Sponsor/CRO contact information (including an email address!) *Actual* due dates Add comments regarding the study (e.g., Investigator Initiated, Expanded Access or Compassionate Use situation, etc.)

UIRIS Routing Form Submit a completed Proposal or Non- Monetary Routing form to DSP a minimum of 5 Business Days in advance of a deadline! *Note: Most Agreements will take time (average 2-6 weeks) to negotiate, excluding budget and IRB reviews.

The DSP Process: CTA Reviews Three Simultaneous Processes: Contract Negotiation (DSP + Sponsor) Budget Negotiation (PI/Coordinator + Sponsor) IRB & Other Committee Approvals (PI/Coordinator work with HSO/committees) All of these processes take time and depend on the complexity of your study. Route the CTA to DSP to begin negotiations while working with the IRB.

The DSP Process: Budgets DSP does not review clinical trial budgets. The PI’s department is responsible for ensuring that all costs to conduct the Study are covered, including IRB fees and applicable indirect costs (F&A).

The DSP Process: Budgets Industry Funded Clinical Trials = 26% on (TDC) Total Direct Costs NIH funded Clinical Trials = 52.5% F&A on MTDC (Modified Total Direct Costs) This rate also applies to NIH pass-through funding Resource: https://dsp.research.uiowa.edu/facilities-administrative-fa-costs 

The DSP Process: Budgets Many contracts include budget and payment terms in the text of the agreement itself, as well as in the specific budget exhibit to the contract. Please review and notify the DSP reviewer if you have problems or concerns with any terms of an agreement.

The DSP Process: Budgets CTA Example #1 – Payment language Payments Payment shall be made in accordance with the Payment Schedule, Terms and Budget attached hereto (the “Budget”) and incorporated herein as Appendix A. Payment for partially completed cases, i.e., early withdrawals, shall be made pro rata for procedures performed according to the Budget. Protocol violations are non-payable.

The DSP Process: Budgets CTA Example #2 - Payment language

The DSP Process: Requirements to sign a clinical trial agreement: Agreement on contract terms (DSP Contract Reviewer) Agreement on the budget (Study Coordinator)   If applicable: Conflicts of Interest in Research office approval Export Control review and/or approval 

The DSP Process: Obtaining signatures Signature Process PI may have to sign as having “Read & Acknowledged” the terms of the contract Institutional signatory: DSP’s Executive Director (Wendy Beaver) Signature Process DocuSign / other electronic system Ink signatures – scanned to pdf Wet Ink signatures – mailed to sponsor PI-specific signature instructions: note on routing form

The DSP Process: Requirements for release of MFK ($$$): Fully signed contract and IRB approval for the study  AAAN is issued and MFK assigned Common Delay: DSP does not have your IRB number. Submit your IRB number (even if still pending) on your routing form or send to dsp-contracts@uiowa.edu.  

Issues in CTAs: Investigator-Initiated Studies Liability and Indemnification Subject Injury Publication AAHRPP Working with Contract Research Organizations (CRO)

Issues in CTAs: Investigator-Initiated Studies UI Principal Investigator or other UI employees are an author or co-authors on the Protocol or Study design. Notify the IRB Notify DSP by adding a comment on the Routing Form or emailing dsp-contracts@uiowa.edu IIS agreements typically take longer to negotiate - route as soon as possible.

Issues in CTAs: Indemnification A legal claim that involves a third party (e.g., a Study subject sues the University for something that occurred as a result of their participation in the Study). Resource: UI Operations Manual II-27.1.d(2) requires contractual safeguards (indemnification) to protect the University in corporate funded clinical trials. The University can agree to be responsible for some actions (negligence), but we are limited as a state-funded institution.

Issues in CTAs: Subject Injury Coverage is always sought from industry sponsors where the study involves the Sponsor’s protocol; this language is reflected in the informed consent. Sample language: Sponsor agrees to promptly reimburse Institution for all hospital and medical costs required for the diagnosis and treatment of any injury or illness suffered by a Subject related to Protocol-mandated procedures, including, but not limited to, the administration of the Study Drug/Device in accordance with the Protocol.

Issues in CTAs: Publication University faculty, staff and students must be able to disseminate their research results in a timely manner. Allowing a sponsor to review and comment on the content of such publications is acceptable. Allowing a sponsor to approve the content of a publication is not acceptable.

Issues in CTAs: AAHRPP The Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs, Inc., (AAHRPP) is an independent accrediting body that protects the rights and welfare of research participants. Clinical Trial Agreements must contain language that a Sponsor will notify the University of any information that could directly affect the health or safety of past or current Study Subjects even after a Study is over.

Issues in CTAs: Contract Research Organizations (CRO) Many sponsors contract with a CRO to manage certain aspects of a study. Some CROs negotiate terms of the CTA. Delay of the negotiation process - CRO is a ‘middle man’ Can require a Letter of Indemnification from Sponsor if CRO is signing the CTA

Other Issues in CTAs: Central IRB Will non-UI Employees be involved? PI must submit a HawkIRB application even if using a Central IRB Will non-UI Employees be involved? Inform DSP and HSO Protocol Amendments Did the change affect the budget? Do not hesitate to contact the Sponsor to revise the budget in an amendment to the contract!

Accelerated Research Agreements Master Confidential Disclosure Agreements: 12 Master Clinical Trial Agreements: 41 Contact DSP if a Master Agreement may be beneficial or a sponsor indicates interest

Accelerated Research Agreements Accelerated Clinical Trial Agreement (ACTA) Accelerated Confidential Disclosure Agreement (ACDA) Created to facilitate relationships with Sponsors/CROs and expedite the contract process See https://ctsacentral.org/tools/acta/ for more information

Other Agreements DSP also reviews: Grant Proposals to the federal government, industry sponsors, private foundations or non-profit organizations Material Transfer Agreements (MTA) Data Use Agreements (DUA) Equipment Loan Agreements (for research purposes or in connection with external funding)

Resources DSP Research Tracker Find the DSP contact in DSP who is negotiating your agreement Easily find access to the status of the Agreement ‘DSP Review’=DSP reviewer is still waiting on documents or is still reviewing the agreement ‘Negotiating’=DSP has emailed edits to the Sponsor ‘Pending Signature’ (either PI, UI or Sponsor)=Agreement is out for signature ‘Held for IRB’= `IRB approval has not been rec’d from HSO or UI department has not responded to an email from DSP ‘Pending GAO Action’=Agreement is final but MFK has not yet been assigned.

Resources Excellent "How to" information: https://dsp.research.uiowa.edu/how DSP Research Tracker-https://uiris.uiowa.edu/combined_log/main/view Look up the submission/negotiation status of your routing form. Find your DSP contact for your Study. Access your final contract or award information Training-https://dsp.research.uiowa.edu/training-opportunities Sign up for our Listservs! RAD-Research Administrator Dispatch/Grant Bulletin https://dsp.research.uiowa.edu/sign-dsp-newsletters-research-administration-dispatch-rad-and- grant-bulletin-gb

Questions? DSP 2 Gilmore Hall 112 N. Capitol Street The University of Iowa Iowa City, Iowa 52242 (319) 335-2123 Dsp-contracts@uiowa.edu https://dsp.research.uiowa.edu/ Staff Directory: https://dsp.research.uiowa.edu/dsp-staff-directory