Example of IRB Application and Resulting Research Paper

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation and Human Subjects Research Julie M. Aultman, Ph.D. Chair, Institutional Review Board Associate Professor, Family and Community Medicine Northeast.
Advertisements

Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Human Subjects Protections, Concepts, and Procedures Office of Research and Sponsored Programs Tom Lombardo, Ph.D., Director, Research Integrity & Compliance.
Fundamentals of IRB Review. Regulatory Role of the IRB Authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove all research.
Ethical Considerations when Developing Human Research Protocols A discipline “born in scandal and reared in protectionism” Carol Levine, 1988.
Laura Noll Research Compliance Manager Radford University.
Institutional Review Board Guidance.  Independent Ethics Committee  Ethical Review Board  Research Ethics Committee 2.
 Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D Barry Gribbons, Ph.D RP Conference: April 2, 2013.
Forgo the Fear Factor: It’s Not That Scary! Holly Gutman, LEJA Graduate Student Research Symposium Spring 2011.
IRB 101: Introduction to Human Subject Research
Protecting Human Participants in Research syr
Usable Privacy and Security Carnegie Mellon University Spring 2008 Lorrie Cranor 1 Designing user studies February.
Human Subjects Research Dr. John S. Irvine Chairperson, NMSU Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects Research
RESEARCH COMPLIANCE: Health Sciences Institutional Review Board.
Evaluation and analysis of the application of interactive digital resources in a blended-learning methodology for a computer networks subject F.A. Candelas,
Avoiding the Pitfalls of an IRB Submission Chris Ayres Chair, Institutional Review Board Social & Behavioral Science & Chair, Department of Kinesiology,
IMPLEMENTING A 4 WEEK BALANCE PROTOCOL TO IMPACT QUALITY OF LIFE IN CANCER PATIENTS Alyssa Bender, Lauren Braun, Kayla Franklin, Megan Kidd, Nikki Rendler.
 Understanding the IRB Process University of Tennessee Health Science Center Institutional Review Board.
What you need to know about the Saint Leo IRB review process.
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD HISTORY AND ETHICS. 2 Ethical History : Holocaust : Nuremburg Trials 1964: Declaration of Helsinki :
 The IRB application  The Review Process  Summary of Protocol  Appendixes  Informed Consent  Recruiting materials  Research Instruments  Other.
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
Office of Research Integrity and Compliance March 2011.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
Human Subjects Research at ASU An Overview. Overview Definitions Historical Framework Federal Guidelines Human Subjects Research at ASU.
Adam Mills Human Subjects Office September 18, 2015 IRB Basics.
A step-by-step guide to help you determine if your research protocol is required to be reviewed by the Lindenwood University IRB INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Institutional Review Board Protecting Human Research Subjects.
Human Subjects Research Nellie Quezada-Aragon, Director Office of Compliance Dr. Luis A. Vazquez, Chair NMSU Institutional Review Board
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
IRB Process Overview Ling Wang IRB Representative Graduate School of Computer and Information Sciences.
Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
Senta Baker Sharon Moran IU Human Subjects Office Human Subjects Office IRB Submissions and KC Demostration School of Music November 13, 2015.
Paul Hryvniak MS, CIP Alyssa Speier, MS, CIP September 30, 2014 Student Human Research Education Session Tel:
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
 What is an IRB and why do we need one at Western?  Who needs to submit proposals to the IRB?  If approved, how long is your proposal good for?  Is.
Research Ethics Office of Research Compliance. Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Covers 9 content areas –Animal Subjects (IACUC) –Human Subjects (IRB)
SoTL Research and the IRB Process Kathleen McKinney, Cross Chair in SoTL Nancy Latham, Campus IRB Executive Committee Phyllis McCluskey-Titus, SoTL Scholar.
THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
Created by Steve Martin, PA-C IRB Application Received Exempt Complete Yes No Mississippi College IRB Application Process Determine Review Category Expedited.
 The purpose of IRB is to ensure the rights of research subjects are protected  In accordance with the ethical standards of the U.S. Department of Health.
PSYCH 610 guide / psych610guidedotcom.  PSYCH 610 Week 1 Individual Assignment Research Studies Questionnaire  PSYCH 610 Week 2 Individual Assignment.
 The purpose of IRB is to ensure the rights of research subjects are protected  In accordance with the ethical standards of the U.S. Department of Health.
 The purpose of IRB is to ensure the rights of research subjects are protected  In accordance with the ethical standards of the U.S. Department of Health.
Tips for Success in Navigating the Human Subjects Protection System
Introduction to the Human Research Protections Office (HRPO)
IRB BASICS Ethics and Human Subject Protections Summer 2016
University of Charleston’s
Ethics in Social Psychology
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Research with human participants at Carnegie Mellon University
Protection of Human Subjects In Research
Navigating eIRB and eIRB Submission Types
The Most Gracious and The Most Merciful.
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Scholars in Medicine 2015 Student Projects IRB Submission Process
What Every Harvard LMA Student Investigator Should Know
IRB The purpose of IRB is to ensure the rights of research subjects are protected In accordance with the ethical standards of the U.S. Department of Health.
What Every Harvard LMA Student Investigator Should Know
What types of research are exempt and ohrp guidance on exemptions
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. Associate Dean,
Example of IRB Application and Resulting Research Paper
Human Participants Research
International Academic Multidisciplinary Research Conference in Rome
Research Compliance: Protections for Research Subjects
Presentation transcript:

Example of IRB Application and Resulting Research Paper Presented by Sonu Jose https://www.uwec.edu/orsp/faculty-academic-staff/research-using-human-subjects/

Outline What is IRB? Types of IRB Review IRB Application Procedure IRB Proposal Forms Research Paper - Goals Methodology Results Conclusion

IRB - Institutional Review Board Jems.com https://www.ccga.edu/page.cfm?p=742

IRB - Contd.. Protect the rights and welfare of human subjects Pre-approval from IRB is required for human subjects involved research IRB approve, disapprove or ask for modifications

Types of IRB Review Exempt Expedited Full Board Review

Exempt Review Review by one IRB member Research activity is low risk Reviews are completed within two weeks Example: UI usability testing, Computer-based training

Review by the IRB chair and one or more experienced reviewers Only minimal risk involved Does not employ sensitive populations or topics Appropriate informed consent procedures Three weeks of review time Example: a) Collection of physical data through ECG, MRI, ultrasound b) Interaction with Robots - Identifying the behaviors of the participants, for example, emotions. - Expedited Review

Full Board Review Involves more than minimal risk Involves protected populations such as children, prisoners, or disabled individuals Research that uses procedures that are personally intrusive, and stressful Take upto a month or longer

IRB Application Procedure CITI Certification - Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative - Both Principal Investigator (PI) and Student Investigators need certification Create an account with IRBNet Upload the CITI certificate https://www.irbnet.org/release/index.html https://www.unr.edu/research-integrity/human- research/irbnet

IRB Proposal Forms 2. Consent form template - Informed Consent 1. Responsible official attestation - to be signed by the Department Chair 2. Consent form template - Informed Consent 3. Exempt form - to be signed by the Principal Investigator (PI). 4. Cover sheet 5. Research Narrative 6. Pre-study questionnaire - experimental group 7. Pre-study questionnaire - control group 8. Post-study questionnaire - experimental group 9. Post-study questionnaire - control group 10. Pre-test and post-test questions

Exempt Form

Exempt Form - Contd..

Exempt Form - Contd..

Exempt Form - Contd..

Exempt Form - Contd..

Exempt Form - Contd..

Exempt Form - Contd..

Exempt Form - Contd..

Exempt Form - Contd..

Exempt Form - Contd..

Exempt Form - Contd..

Exempt Form - Contd..

RESEARCH PAPER RESULTED FROM IRB

Learning through Simulations: The Ship Simulator for Learning the Rules of the Road Authors: Sonu Jose, Sushil J. Louis, Siming Liu, and Sergiu M. Dascalu

GOALS To develop a simulation in order to learn concepts while doing or experiencing things in the real world To help the users to learn about the Rules of Navigation To educate the users about the ship types, target angle and light configuration using an interactive simulation-based learning. To identify the best of two instructional techniques -Simulation vs Online Study material

RESEARCH QUESTIONS Can we maximize learning using simulation when compared with online study material? - Do users perform better while learning using simulation than with other traditional learning methods? - Do users learn a set of concepts in less time while using simulation?

SIMULATION

Online Study Material

PARTICIPANTS University students 44 participants - 22 participants in the intervention group (Simulation) - 22 participants in the control group (Online study material) Age ranged from 18 to 35 years An equal percentage of male and female participants

PROCEDURE Pre-approval from IRB (Institutional Review Board) Conducted in the university library Out of 44 participants: -> 22 participants used RoR Simulation -> 22 participants used Online study material Prior to the experiment, a consent form was provided to the participant Consent form explained the objective of the research and the procedure of the experiment Participation in this study was on a voluntary basis Pre-study questionnaire Pre-test: A quiz that contains 20 questions A self-study session - 20 minutes Post-test: A quiz that contains 20 questions Post-study questionnaire

PRE-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE Demographic data Knowledge about ship navigation rules Most preferred learning method

PRE-TEST and POST-TEST: Quiz Questions

PRE-TEST and POST-TEST: Quiz Questions (Contd..)

PRE-TEST and POST-TEST: Quiz Questions (Contd..)

POST-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE Effectiveness of simulation in learning the ship navigation concepts User friendliness Prefered learning method Feedback and suggestions

DESIGN 2 x 2 in-between subjects 2 independent variables: - Simulation - Online study material 2 dependent variables: - Quiz score - Quiz completion time

RESULTS IBM SPSS Statistics Data Editor Tool used for analyzing data Paired-samples T-test: For testing within-subjects factors Mixed-Design ANOVA or Split-Plot ANOVA: For testing in-between subject factors

Table 1: Analysis Within Subjects

Table 2: Analysis Between Subjects

Fig 1: Online vs. Simulation in terms of pre-test and post-test score

Fig 2: Online vs. Simulation in terms of pre-test and post-test time

Fig 3: Students’ most preferred learning method before self-study using simulation

Fig 4: Students’ most preferred learning method after learning using RoR simulation

Fig 5: The difficulty level of learning using Simulation vs Online Study Material

Fig 7: Users likely to recommend learning using simulation to others

Fig 8: Level of knowledge about the rules of navigation before and after self-study using simulation

CONCLUSION Presented a simulation for learning the Rules of Navigation Users who used simulation achieved significantly better results on the posttest quiz than who used online study material The intended users of this simulation are midshipmen where they can experience real environment for learning about the different ship types, target angles, and light configuration Results showed that simulation could enhance learning outcome when compared with a traditional educational method Students are motivated to use the simulation as the learning tool in future

THANK YOU