Tollgate crossing metro district No

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NEPTUNE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Advertisements

Nancy McCallin September 11, Colorado Has a Long History of Spending Limits: Initiated limits on the ballot back to Failed attempts to pass.
BRIEF HISTORY OF BENTON HARBOR PROPERTY TAXES 1954 – Present10 mills authorized by City Charter, reduced annually for Headlee Rollback 2001 –
2014 Election Ballot Mill Levy Override #3A For the Elizabeth School District Explained.
1 School Funding Discussion November 15, 2007 Brighton Area Schools.
Financing Public Schools In Colorado (The Intersection With TABOR and Gallagher) Presented To: School Finance Partnership Presented By: Rudy Andras Economist.
KINGWOOD UDGET PRESENTATION TOWNSHIP OF KINGWOOD 2012 BUDGET PRESENTATION.
HAMMONDSPORT CENTRAL SCHOOL Budget Information.
FY12 and FY13 Budget Development Special Board Meeting Alachua County Office of Management and Budget May 17, 2011.
Budgets and Mill Levies How they work together…. Make this YOUR session! Stop me and ask specific questions at any time during the presentation. Help.
What is the proposed ballot issue? Referred measure 3B: Increased funding for education in School District 51 only Shall taxes on peoples’ property (house,
Association of Indiana Counties Tax Caps Tax caps are a good policy but is 3, 2, 1 a good policy? Tax caps are a good policy but is 3, 2, 1 a good policy?
Alliance Management Group Tax Year 2012 Update 1.
Property Tax & Referendum Adams/Franklin Ernest W. Werstler, Jr. Business Manager/Board Secretary Exeter Township School District.
On the November 6, 2012 Ballot, Cherokee County voters will be asked to consider a HOST, an additional penny sales tax, which will be used to reduce property.
WARREN TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT 2013 – 2014 PROPOSED BUDGET Dr. Tami Crader, Superintendent of Schools Warren Township Board of Education Mrs. Patricia.
Westchester Putnam School Boards Association John Chow Starr Dinio Maura McAward Linda Purvis.
Property Tax Cap Chapter 97 of the Laws of 2011 Cairo-Durham Central School District February 2, 2012 March 8, 2012.
Joint Task Force on Local Effort Assistance September 25, 2002 Bill Freund, Consultant To The Task Force.
BALLOT ISSUES 2013 League of Women Voters of Colorado Education Fund.
Budget Committee Workshop February16, Oregon’s local budget law is a group of statutes that require local governments to prepare and adopt annual.
2011 Tax Levy Hearing Board of Education Meeting December 19,
Budget Public Hearing Last Day to apply by mail for an Absentee Ballot is April 20th, 2011 Election Day is WEDNESDAY, April 27th Polling Hours.
Leanne Emm, Associate Commissioner – School Finance Update League of Charter Schools Annual Finance.
Space Coast Communities Association Cocoa Beach, Florida September 19, 2015 COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION BUDGETING.
Understanding Your School District Budget  Annual Spending Plan  To provide quality instruction and educational programs  Ensures taxpayers’ money.
1 Community Facilities District & Redevelopment Overview January 19, 2008.
Property Tax Relief and Reform: Special Session 2007-B Overview Presentation to the Florida Taxation and Budget Reform Commission June 26, 2007.
Proposed FY 2016 Budget Town of Lisbon Presentation to Board of Selectmen October 7, 2015.
2008 PROPERTY TAX LEVY RICHFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEVY INFORMATION.
WELCOME TO FRANKLIN CENTRAL SCHOOL BUDGET MEETING
Town meeting handout Article 3
Financial Statement Analysis
Jefferson County Planning Commissioners Hearing June 26, 2013
Ad Valorem Tax Issues Cheree Brown, Itawamba County School District
Drexel R-IV School District
Chapter 3 Learning Objectives
Financing Unit 6.
Proposed School Bond Referendum September 26, 2017
League of Wisconsin Municipalities Urban Policy Forum June 8, 2017
Excellence In Education
Granite School District
Overview of property tax levies for Idaho Schools
Presentation To Board of Education
School Funding History
Fennville Public Schools
Trimble County Public Schools
Waterfront Metropolitan District Service Plan Amendment
Budget changes Senate Bill 2288 and the changes it brought
Chapter 36 Financing the Business
Special District Association
How are schools funded since Proposal A
School Finance CASBO Leanne Emm, Associate Commissioner
Mill Levies & Property Taxes
Octorara Area School District
Taxes and the National Debt
Allen Independent School District.
Metropolitan Districts 101
Property Tax Levy – Taxes Payable 2019
Hammondsport Central School
City of Thief River Falls
Octorara Area School District
Davidson County FY County Manager’s Proposed Budget
© OnCourse Learning.
© OnCourse Learning.
Budget office overview
Presentation to the Special Administrative Board
Franchise Fee Informational Meeting
Frontier Central School District Public Budget Hearing May 3, 2016
MARSHALL PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Presentation transcript:

Tollgate crossing metro district No Tollgate crossing metro district No. 2 town hall meeting on POSSIBLE ballot proposal Prepared by: Brian Matise, Secretary/Treasurer Special meeting February 15, 2018

An opportunity to leverage our excellent financial position to eliminate metro district fees The District is in the best financial position it has been in since inception Our debt – to – assessed value ratio of 40.53% is far better than similar districts Interest on our debt is currently a low 2.25%-2.8% (some resets in 2020) We are on track to be completely debt-free by 2031-2032 Unlike most other districts, once our debt is paid off, we will NOT have to pay Aurora ARI tax for 10 more years ($15,000,000 savings) We are building a capital replacement reserve and making improvements (kiddie pool) from savings Newbridge improvements will be paid off by 2021

Comparison of our debt and taxes to other districts

Idea:. let’s pay owners a dividend by eliminating Idea: let’s pay owners a dividend by eliminating fees and shifting tax revenues to operations

ROADBLOCK: tabor VOTER authorization required The District can collect UNLIMITED property taxes for debt service The District can collect $1,000,000 per year in fees BUT the District can only collect $150,000 per year in property taxes for operations Must get voter approval to shift more tax revenue to operations

Highlights of Proposed ballot question for may 8, 2018 election Would increase property taxes to generate an extra $655,000 annually in operations revenue in 2019 (partially offset by lower debt service requirements) Future years, actual revenue may differ depending on the District’s expenditures Cap the TOTAL property tax mill levy for Tollgate Crossing at 57.556 mills (which is the same % of actual value that Tollgate Crossing Metro District No. 2 was collecting from 2007-2017) 57.556 mill cap will be adjusted up or down if method of calculating assessed value changes in the future

Tollgate crossing property taxes as a percent of actual home value The 57.556 mill cap in 2019 and later years is equal to 0.4144% of home value, the same as the tax rate collected from 2007-2017 This year, Board lowered the rate to 0.36% If we return the property tax rate to the same percentage of home value as 2007-2017, we can generate enough extra revenue to eliminate $576/yr in fees

Typical Savings for OWNER OF $396,472 home Assessor values average home in the District at $396,472 Current owner pays $1,298.84 in debt service tax, $128.46 in operations tax, and $576.00 in fees (TOTAL: $2,003.30) If the proposed ballot question passes, owner would pay $1,015.10 in debt service, $628.01 in operations tax, $0 fees (TOTAL: $1,643.11) Potential savings: $360.19 Savings vary; $420,000 home savings $347.50, $500,000 home savings $275.27

There’s no such thing as free money – how do we offset $576 per home in fees? Extra specific ownership tax (vehicle registration) will yield $42,565 in general fund Bad debt savings estimated at $41,818 (6%) Attorney collection fees will save $20,000 Collection costs (CLA) will save $33,000 offset by 1.5% Treasurer fee ($9,823) Also expect to save up to $5,000 of bank transaction fees

Summary of pros and cons of the ballot question Eliminate $576 per year of fees District will receive more specific ownership tax revenue from the county (approx. 7.5% of taxes) Avoid bad debt write-offs from homeowners who file bankruptcy or are foreclosed Reduced collection costs, attorney fees, bank fees Property taxes may still be deductible for some homeowners who itemize; fees are not Total tax rate is capped at same % of home value as 2007-2017 Higher property taxes overall (57.556 mills versus 50.000 mills) Savings from lower debt service could be used to lower taxes even lower than 50.000 mills No guarantee that future board might re-impose fees Vacant lots/cheaper homes will get bigger savings than more expensive homes Election will cost the district approx. $30,000

PROPOSED ELECTION QUESTION – DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION ONLY! SHALL TOLLGATE CROSSING METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NO. 2 TAXES BE INCREASED $655,000 ANNUALLY (FOR COLLECTION IN CALENDAR YEAR 2019), OR BY SUCH LESSER OR GREATER ANNUAL AMOUNT AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO PAY THE DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATION, OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE, CAPITAL REPLACEMENT, AND OTHER SIMILAR EXPENSES; SUCH TAXES TO CONSIST OF A GENERAL FUND AD VALOREM PROPERTY TAX LEVY IMPOSED WITH SUCH LIMITATIONS AS EXIST IN THE DISTRICT’S SERVICE PLAN, AS IT CURRENTLY EXISTS OR MAY BE AMENDED, OR OTHER APPLICABLE LAW, AND AS MAY BE DETERMINED BY THE DISTRICT, AND BY THE FOLLOWING LIMITATION: THE PROPERTY TAX INCREASE SET FORTH ABOVE SHALL BE REDUCED OR ELIMINATED, BUT SHALL NOT BE BELOW ZERO, IF THE TOTAL MILL LEVY IMPOSED BY TOLLGATE CROSSING METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NO. 2 FOR ALL PURPOSES WOULD OTHERWISE EXCEED 57.556 MILLS, PROVIDED THAT IF ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2019, THERE ARE CHANGES IN THE METHOD OF CALCULATING RESIDENTIAL ASSESSED VALUATION, SUCH MILL LEVY LIMIT SHALL BE INCREASED OR DECREASED SO THAT TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, THE ACTUAL TAX REVENUES AS ADJUSTED FOR SUCH CHANGES ARE NEITHER DIMINISHED NOR ENHANCED AS A RESULT OF SUCH CHANGES; AND SHALL THE PROCEEDS OF SUCH TAXES AND INVESTMENT INCOME THEREON CONSTITUTE VOTER-APPROVED REVENUE CHANGES AND BE COLLECTED AND SPENT BY THE DISTRICT IN 2019 AND IN EACH YEAR THEREAFTER WITHOUT REGARD TO ANY SPENDING, REVENUE-RAISING, OR OTHER LIMITATION CONTAINED WITHIN ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION, OR SECTION 29-1-301, COLORADO REVISED STATUTES?