Day 1 Breakout Report Session 1: Incident Response

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An e-Learning Strategy to promote technology enabled learning i n UCC Teaching & Learning workshop 30 October, 2012.
Advertisements

School College Work Initiative: Phase May 11, 2006.
SDMX – AN OECD PERSPECTIVE Paul Schreyer OECD CCSA Special Session, September 2014 Rome.
Coaching Workshop A good coach will make the players see what they can be rather than what they are. –Ara Parseghian ®
Coaching Workshop.
Opportunities & Implications for Turkish Organisations & Projects
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
EDU 385 EDUCATION ASSESSMENT IN THE CLASSROOM
Participatory research to enhance climate change policy and institutions in the Caribbean: ARIA toolkit pilot 27 th meeting of the CANARI Partnership January.
Call to Community: Building Connections that Make a Difference for Students with Disabilities CA Community Meeting April 28, 2008.
1. 2 Business Process Reengineering (BPR) “the fundamental rethinking and redesign of processes to achieve dramatic improvements in critical, contemporary.
1 Guiding Principles for Nationwide Interoperability A Brief Overview of Recent Efforts and Progress.
CLARIN work packages. Conference Place yyyy-mm-dd
Microsoft Office Project 2003: Selling EPM in your Organization Matt Wilson Business Solutions Specialist LMR Solutions.
Day 2 Breakout Report Session 1: Incident Response Chair: Brent Woodsworth Co-Chairs: Ellen Sogolow & Rufus Edwards.
Business Analysis. Business Analysis Concepts Enterprise Analysis ► Identify business opportunities ► Understand the business strategy ► Identify Business.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
WeADAPT Principles of Adaptation Ben Smith and Tahia Devisscher SEI Oxford.
Integrated Corridor Management Initiative ITS JPO Lead: Mike Freitas Technical Lead: John Harding, Office of Transportation Management.
SAAS National Conference & NIATx Summit July 11, 2010 Pre-Conference Workshop Implementing Electronic Behavioral Health Records: Understanding Key Issues.
Regional Coordinators Meeting
Incident Management Information Sharing Capability Maturity Model
Bob Jones EGEE Technical Director
Projects, Events and Training
Benchmarking Excellence in Restorative Conferencing
2016 NC Teacher Working Conditions Survey Results
Q & A Overview of the Coalition Surge Test (CST)
Curriculum (Article 6) Teachers should be involved in all phases of curriculum development ..(design, piloting, implementation and review). Promote understanding.
Alberta Livestock and Meat Agency
System Planning To Programming
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 12. Risk Management.
Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, London
Steven Newhouse Project Director, EGI.eu
Summit 2017 Breakout Group 2: Data Management (DM)
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals
ARRL Field Organization for Emergency Communications
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 8. Routine monitoring.
Item #8 Metropolitan Area Transportation Operations Coordination (MATOC) Program TPB Planning and Implementation Briefing May 21, 2008 Richard W Steeg,
Coaching.
Chapter 1 Introduction and Early Phases of Market Research
The Transportation Information Gateway An Open Source Web Platform for Collaboration in the Planning Process AMPO 2017 Annual Meeting Brian ten Siethoff,
1. What are the challenges that CI researchers and practitioners face when they aim to mobilize resources for the development of a CI for a specific community?
Hyper-V Cloud Proof of Concept Kickoff Meeting <Customer Name>
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)
“CareerGuide for Schools”
Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR)
Setting Actuarial Standards
ITSM Governance is Imperative to Succeed
Commissioning principles
SYSTEMS, DATA, AND INFORMATION
Brand New Edition! Field Test, AGC’s BIM Education Program and
2017 Health care Preparedness and Response Draft Capabilities
Durable solutions for IDPs: challenges and way forward
Johns Hopkins Medicine Innovation 2023 Strategic Plan
SwafS Ethics and Research Integrity
SAMANVITHA RAMAYANAM 18TH FEBRUARY 2010 CPE 691
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Statistical Information Technology
SwafS Ethics and Research Integrity
From The Outside Looking In To The Inside Looking Out
Afghanistan Climate Budgeting Guidelines
WP2 Bridging the planning-implementation gap in eco- and smart cities
Johns Hopkins Medicine Innovation 2023 Strategic Plan
ISSUE MANAGEMENT PROCESS MONTH DAY, YEAR
Workshop Overview 1. Why assess process?
UNFCCC Needs-based Finance (NBF) Project
Project objectives and benefits
Concept Development Template
Experienced Headteacher Development Programme
Presentation transcript:

Day 1 Breakout Report Session 1: Incident Response Chair: Brent Woodsworth Co-Chairs: Ellen Sogolow & Rufus Edwards

Needed Capabilities (Gaps) Intelligent data, data filtering, and data routing Ability to get the right information to the right responders and adapt to the environment. Intelligence with respect to providing the right data to the right people in the right format, at the right time. Protocols and procedures for deploying the information to the “right responders” Capability to decide to what level information is “useful”? What is the information I need to make decisions. How do we filter out the information and have relevant information. Way to portray information that can be absorbed quickly. Differentiation of information in the types of incidents we are dealing with. Information to consume vs information to push out and reception of information being pushed out (how was it received and interpreted) Can not just rely on the technology. (Technology dependence) Technology needs to be reliable and support the workflow of the individual using it. Need for a “translation phase” that bridges the science-to-practice gap. (Technology transfer) Need for training in appropriate environments. (tabletop exercises, etc) Need the involvement of the communities that allow the process to become more adoptable. Usefulness of the tool to the user. (user-friendly and relevant) Collaborative response. (pre-incident) Ability for communications equipment to match the environments in which they are deployed.

Challenges Short-term (<3 years) Long-term (3-5years) Reaching early adopters – getting good practices and models out there. Building community trust and identifying the roles and responsibilites. Funding How do we achieve resiliency with what we already have? Maximize the resources you have with potentially no increase or decrease even in your budget. Data validity and consistency Long-term (3-5years) Taking those practices and making them policies/standards and conducting the education to implement them. How can the technology help make us more adaptable? Adapting the response. Data governing body to distribute guidelines for entities to record and define their data. (consistency)

Opportunities Data sharing is being shared at more levels and between more disciplines than we ever have. Take advantage of the technology already out there. Take advantage of the collaboration and cooperation in place and ongoing. Developing tools that can be used on a daily basis as well as in a major incident/emergency. Foster the industry/government/academic collaboration (i.e. this workshop concept) Improving the quality of the existing data and the levels of detail. UICDS – leveraging systems such as this and other similar existing systems. Take advantage of the newer social networking tools in a way that can be “trustable” to improve the way traditional EM has disseminated and received data.

Recommendations/Conclusions Have more venues for industry/academia/government to develop a plan forward (a collaborative piloting tool) Need executive level and practitioner level sponsor to support to help push the output to become a reality Piloting a tool while continuing research Involvement of smaller local jurisdictions in developing system and functional requirements. Set forth a challenge (incentivize) to support the work of academics and practitioners to develop these community projects. (i.e. DARPA Grand Challenge)