Mike Hutjens Professor of Animal Sciences Emeritus

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing Nutrients through Precision Feed Management
Advertisements

Forage Macro-Minerals (Ca, P, K, Mg, Na, Cl, S) and Dairy Cow Requirements Jim Linn, PhD Professor Emeritus – University of Minnesota Milk Specialties.
The Jaylor Advantage Dr. Alan S. Vaage Ph.D. Ruminant Nutritionist.
Where does corn fit into my forage production system? Jean Brisson. agr. R&D Valacta.
Coping With Alfalfa Winterkill Professor Randy Shaver Department of Dairy Science University of Wisconsin - Madison University of Wisconsin - Extension.
By C Kohn, Department of Agricultural Sciences Waterford, WI
Central Wisconsin Dairy Series. Presented by:Matt Lippert, Wood County Ag Agent Bob Kaiser and Randy Shaver Department of Dairy Science University of.
Sexed Semen and Beef Cattle UW Extension Livestock Team Spring 2010.
Developing Dairy Producer Peer Groups in Kansas Kristen Schulte Kevin Dhuyvetter Mike Brouk Rich Llewelyn Kansas State University.
IFAD Partner Logo Nutritional management of dairy animals Y. Ramana Reddy Milk IT Project Nainital, Uttarakhand, India November, 2014.
Evaluation of beef cow-calf nutrition in Yucatan, Mexico: MS thesis progress report Animal Science Kotaro Baba January 2006.
FEEDING TO ENHANCE LIVESTOCK PRODUCTIVITY
The University of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service A Decision Tool for Improved Beef Cattle Production, Management and Marketing System Analysis.
Energy balance changes in cows and matching calving seasons with forage availability TIES Seminar Kotaro Baba.
Unit 9: Dairy Cattle Feeding
SAE: Dairy Production J. Clown. PAY, Hour 5, Marion High School. Introduction: The SAE that I chose is Dairy Production. I have had an interest in dairy.
J. B. Cole 1, P. D. Miller 2, and H. D. Norman 1 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 2 Department.
Ruminal acidosis Part 1 Gabriella Varga Department of Dairy and Animal Science.
Dairy Cow Nutrition Feeding ruminant animals at different life stages Julie Toth.
The Dairy Industry. Dairy Industry Provides milk and other dairy foods to consumers in North America and many foreign markets.
Reproductive Management of Dairy Cows with Particular Reference to Organic Systems Michael G Diskin & Frank Kelly Animal Production Research Centre,
USING A TEST HAY FOR FEEDING LIVESTOCK Shelby J. Filley Regional Livestock & Forage Specialist Proper nutrition at a lower cost.
Dunrenton Ranch LLC Josh, Niki, Nicole, Mark, Jordan, Brennan and John.
December 2014 Proof Changes
P. C. Hoffman Department of Dairy Science University of Wisconsin-Madison Strategies to Improve Feed Efficiency in Dairy Replacement Heifers.
Heifer Raising Lecture 11 ANS 336 2/21/01. Once A Day Feeding - Milk Reduces labor? Reduces scours Promotes faster rumen development When a calf drinks.
Increasing dairy farm profit by maximising forage utilization Edith Charbonneau, Ph.D, agr. Collaborators: M.C. Coulombe M.C. Coulombe R. Roy R. Roy D.
Better business decisions start here 1 A Benchmarking Tool That Allows More Effective Decisions W.J. (Bill) Grexton Manager, Herd Management Services,
Abstract: This study was conducted to determine the effects of reducing rumen degradable protein (RDP) with constant rumen undegradable protein in mid-lactation.
Forage Quality I: Nutritional Quality Lawton Stewart SE Hay Convention March 29, 2011.
Matt Akins, Luiz Ferraretto, Shane Fredin & Randy Shaver Dairy Science Department, UW Madison.
 Breeding Heifers Mark Carson Reproductive Specialist, EastGen.
DAIRY PROFIT MONITOR AND ACTIVITY ANALYSIS PROJECTS Betsey Howland Cornell University PRO-DAIRY Program Department of Animal Science.
Ration Formulation 2/05/2001 ANS Steps in Balancing a Ration Nutrient requirements generally represent the minimum quantity of the nutrients that.
Ruminal acidosis Part II Gabriella Varga Department of Dairy and Animal Science.
Van der Leek, May 9, 2011 Practical & Profitable.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA San Antonio.
ANIMAL SCIENCE 435 APPLIED DAIRY FARM EVALUATION Leo Timms Iowa State U. Spring Semester, :10 – 2:00 M-W 1805 Gilman 8:00 – 9:50.
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD An Example from Dairy.
2006 Mid-Atlantic Dairy Grazing Conference, 2006 (1) Is There a Need for Different Genetics in Dairy Grazing Systems? H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L.
Segregating herds based on animal class and nutritional need Lawton Stewart Grazing School September 22, 2011.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA 2009 meeting.
Diurnal Changes in Forage Quality Affects Animal Preference, Intake, Performance Hank Mayland, Dave Mertens and Bret Taylor USDA-ARS Kimberly, ID; Madison,
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA EAAP.
FAS, Dairy, Livestock & Poultry Division, 1997 U.S. role in the global dairy industry.
Pasture-Based Nutritional Considerations for Beef Cattle Lawton Stewart Grazing School May 6, 2010.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Dairy Cattle Reproductive.
During the last 10 years (Italy)
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
Dairy Business Up date Egypt (November 2010)
Effects of grinding versus steam-flaking on feeding value of blending barley and corn in low-forage diets fed to dairy cows Kh. Safaei1, G.R. Ghorbani1,
Feeding Dairy Cattle Chapter 41.
Developmental Stages of Lambs
Micro Nutrition Role in delivering profitable outcomes for dairy farmers Peter Robson DSM Ruminant Team APAC.
Understanding NDF Digestibility
IHFA Cork Club 27th Jan 2014.
The decision making process behind the change
Joe Vendramini Forage Specialist
Jeremy Bryant NZ Animal Evaluation Ltd Manager
Lignin Effects on Intake and Ruminal Digestion
Leaving Certificate Agricultural Science
Feed Costs on Fond du Lac Farms (& Others)
Ulster Grassland Society
Cross-Breeding What is X-Breeding?.
Analysis of corn silage for dairy cows
Livestock Nutrition Support Offered by County Extension Offices
Micro Nutrition Role in delivering profitable outcomes for dairy farmers Peter Robson DSM Ruminant Team APAC.
Dairy Business Up date Egypt (November 2010)
Economics of Reproduction: the Quality of the Pregnancy
The Future of the U.S. Beef Cattle Industry HPJ 2019 Cattle U by Lee Leachman.
Presentation transcript:

Mike Hutjens Professor of Animal Sciences Emeritus Making A Farm Visit Hints and Strategies 2019 Midwest Regional Dairy Challenge HCC, IL February 14, 2019 Mike Hutjens Professor of Animal Sciences Emeritus

Today’s Changing Economics Cull cows at 40 to 62 ¢/lb Bull calves worth $50 Heifer calves are lower Close up heifers < $1,200+ Wisconsin costs to raise a heifer is $2,000

Changing Dairy Economics Milk Economics (Dec, 2018) Class III milk price: $13.28/cwt Milk fat value: $2.51/lb Milk protein value: $1.14/lb Milk quota and milk base are here

Classification of Today’s Dairy Farms We will survive. We are using up our equity; need to stop the bleeding. We cannot get out, I am not giving the cows away Will the banker extend more line of credit? We will sell period

Making a Farm Visit—Who Arranges? Individual farmer Local veterinarian Feed company/cooperative Consultant Extension Bottom line: Another set of eyes

Making The Farm Visit—Why? Ask the reason why you are invited A clearly defined problem Need to improve production/components Desire to increase profits Ask each person involved: farmer, veterinarian, feed company, extension advisor, spouse, etc.

Goals for the Farm Is the farm positioned to compete with the current size, labor status, and economic situation?

Develop a Strategy: Looking Back Milk yield (Rolling Herd Avg) Trends in Reproduction Somatic cell Health Dry cow program Heifer program Etc. Age of the herd (% of different parity) Number of heifers Herd size Milk components 2016 2017 2018 2019

Developing Your Plan Collecting data before the visit DHI / Dairy Comp / PC Dart Milk processing records On-farm data: health, reproduction, milk quality…. Areas of investigation Your area of specialty Other areas: genetics, culling, financial, feeding, reproduction, milk quality, labor….

Cost Comparison Summary (Cost per cwt) California: Cost of Milk Production 2016 Annual California Department of Food and Agriculture

Collect Data and Evaluate Summarized data with evaluated (milk fat levels are low or 3.6% vs 3.8% Holstein breed average) Consider frequency distributions (average manure score is 3.0 or 30% score 3, 40% score 3, and 30% score 4 for the high pen) Photos can be useful (heifers are heavy) Use research (based on U of WI, NRC-2001, and/or recommended by Mike Hutjens)

Feed Evaluation

Evaluating Rations Nutrient profile (pounds or percent of MP, NDF, starch, DCAD….) Dry cows vs. milk cows groups Feed particle size Forage quality and sources Ingredient selection (palm oil, organic trace minerals, rumen protected, amino acids….)

Evaluating Feeding System Evidence of sorting Inches of feed bunk space per cow Heat stress abatement Feeding frequency Pushing of feed Feed weigh back (orts) and evaluation

Milk Fat and Milk Protein Relationship (Hoard’s Dairyman—August 2018) Protein vs Fat Fat vs Protein Ayrshire 3.89 3.14 81% 1.23 Brown Swiss 4.05 3.32 82% 1.22 Guernsey 4.56 3.35 73% 1.36 Holstein 3.81 3.06 80% 1.24 Jersey 4.89 3.70 75% 1.32

Pounds of Protein and Fat Breed RHA Milk/Day Fat Protein Total Ayrshire 18,886 50 1.97 1.61 3.6 Brown Swiss 22,509 62 2.46 2.04 4.5 Guernsey 16,229 45 2.02 1.47 3.5 Jersey 19,278 53 2.55 1.92 Holstein 25,476 70 2.61 2.24 4.9 80 2.98 2.42 5.4 90 3.36 2.72 6.1 100 3.73 3.02 6.8

Forage Quality: NDFD--48 Summary Average Range Mixed Hay 47 32 - 62 Legume Hay 46 32 - 61 Grass Hay 55 38 - 73 Mixed Haylage 42 25 - 60 Legume Haylage 25 - 58 Grass Haylage 61 51 - 72 Corn Silage 60 48 - 71

Legume Haylage 2018 5yr Avg Moisture 56.4% 54.8% CP 20.6% 20.9% ADF 33.8% 34.3% aNDF 39.0% 40.1% aNDFom 37.0% 37.5% Lignin 7.71% 7.94% uNDFom240 17.2% 17.6% NDFD30 47.3% 45.1% WSC (sugar) 4.28% 4.13% Ash 11.3% 11.4% RFQ 157.3 145.6 Count 2,920 41,669

Corn Silage Fiber Values Normal Range Example Average Low High ADF %DM 24.68 24.66 17.06 32.26 aNDF 38.85 41.00 30.08 51.92 aNDFom 37.90 + 40.10 29.71 50.76 NDFD30 %NDF 51.93 - 53.87 43.57 64.17 NDFD120 61.58 71.54 62.62 80.34 NDFD240 65.83 73.90 65.70 83.20 uNDFom30 18.22 18.20 13.30 23.30 uNDFom120 14.56 - 11.45 7.02 15.78 uNDFom240 12.95 - 10.50 6.00 14.90

Feed Efficiency Feed Efficiency: Pounds of 3.5%fat corrected milk divided by pounds of DM consumed High group, mature cows > 1.7 High group, 1st lactation > 1.6 Low group, all cows > 1.2 One group TMR herds > 1.5 Fresh cows (< 21 days) < 1.5 Concern < 1.3 Example: 75 pounds milk / 50 pounds DMI = 1.5 3.5% FCM = (0.4324 x lbs. of milk) + (16.216 x lbs of milk fat)

Milk Yield Targets (Ohio State University) Milk Yield (lb) Feed efficiency 55 1.25 60 1.32 65 1.38 70 1.44 75 1.49 80 1.54 85 1.58 90 1.63

What is Shrink? The quantity of feed fed that the cow doesn’t eat Varies from 1 to > 20% of available feed Cost 10 cents to 15 cents per cow per day

Shrink Areas of Focus Forage management Pre-blending concentrates Weigh backs Reducing feed variation TMR mixing strategies (precision blending) Storage (bags, vertical storage, etc) Tracking inventory

Physically effective fiber Providing 3 pounds of feed particles over ¾ inch or 19 cm (6% Penn State top box) 550 to 600 minutes of cud-chewing (>450 minutes/cow on rumination collar) 50 to 75% of cows at rest should be cud-chewing > 50 chews per bolus of feed. Result: Rumen pH should be over 6.0 and > 2.2 parts acetate : one part propionate

Penn State Separator (Illinois) % (as fed) Top Middle Bottom TMR < 5% >50 <50 Haylage >20 >60 <25 Corn silage* 5 to 15 <35 * 3/4 TLC-Process

Penn State Separator / PA (3rd box at 4.0 mm) % (as fed) Top 2nd 3rd Bottom TMR < 5 > 50 <30 <20 Haylage 10 to 20 40 to 75 20 to 30 <5 Corn silage* 3 to 8 40 to 60 30 to 40 * 3/4 TLC-Process

Kernel Processing Score ∆Worth 2 lb. Milk or 2 lb. Corn Each change is 2 lbs. more milk RD Shaver UW-Madison

Distribution of Fecal Starch in Dairy TMR (CVAS, 2017)

Feed Bench Marks Feed costs per day: limited value Feed costs per kg of mil: reflects milk yield, shrink, and feed costs Feed costs per kg of dry matter: reflect feed ingredients selection Income over feed costs: reflects profit margin Feed efficiency: evaluates feed conversion to milk yield

Feeding Economics 2019 Feed costs per cow per day $4.57 Feed cost per lb DM $0.09 Milk Production 80 lb 70 lb Feed cost per cwt $ 5.71 $ 6.53 Income over feed costs ($16) $ 10.29 $ 9.47 Feed efficiency (lb milk/lb DM) 1.60 1.40

Total Cost to Raise a Dairy Replacement from Birth to Freshening

Raising Heifers is Not a Profit Center Cost to raise heifers is >$2,000; current market prices between $1000 to $1200 for springing heifers Number of heifers needed: Culling rate Death losses of heifers Calving interval Tools: Genomics (find the best ones) Sex semen (get heifers from the best genetics) Beef crossbreeds (premium +$150, calving ease, and healthy of calves)

When Raising Replacement Heifers Must feed an accelerated liquid diet Textured calf starter at >18% crude protein Heifers must calve at 23 months Must measure rate of gain (>1.8 lbs. Holsteins) Must have health records on respiratory and scour calves (cull candidates)

Reproduction Evaluation

Reproduction Evaluation Preg rate (over 25%) Heat detection rate (>60) Conception rate (> 40%) Synchronization programs Pregnancy loss (< 15%) Sex semen use

Culling Evaluation Genetic Evaluation Labor Evaluation Financial Evaluation Milk Quality Evaluation Heifer Evaluation Lameness Evaluation

“Listening” To Your Herd MUN levels 8 to 12 mg/dl Milk protein test > 3.2% (Hol), 4.0% (Jersey) Milk fat test >3.7% (Hol), > 4.6% (Jersey) Management Level Milk Increasing Fecal scores > 80% at 3 Lameness < 10% at 3