Making Child Welfare Transformation Work for Clients Staff Planning Phase : Meshing Transformation with Our Mission, Vision and Values March 2006 2/16/2019.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Suffolk’s Wellbeing Board Dr Peter Bradley – Director of Public Health, Suffolk County Council/NHS Janice Steed - LocalPartnerships.
Advertisements

When Change Runneth Over: Lessons Learned From Implementing Multiple Change Projects Simultaneously PDN Presentation July 2013.
Understanding Katie A and the Core Practice Model
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
Building our Model of Service. Quality Assurance, Research and Accountability –Achievement of Outcomes.
Caregiver Support. Child Intervention Intake Statistics  Calgary and Area 2013:  The Region received 14,100 reports about a child or youth who may be.
Investing in Change: Funding Collective Impact
Our three year strategy >Our vision >Children and young people in families and communities where they can be safe, strong and thrive. >Our mission >Embed.
1 Understanding and Developing Child Welfare Practice Models Steven Preister, Associate Director National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational.
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
Bringing Protective Factors to Life in the Child Welfare System New Hampshire.
Children’s Trust Network 19 October 2011 Developments in Safeguarding Anthony May Corporate Director for Children, Families and Cultural Services.
Your Presenters Melissa Connelly, Director, Regional Training Academy Coordination Project, CalSWEC Sylvia Deporto, Deputy Director, Family & Children’s.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
SUPERVISION: SIGNS OF SAFETY STYLE Phase 1 The Supervision Contract Phase 2 Case Specific Supervision Phase 3 Performance Booster Phase 4 Review of P.E.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW Steven Preister,
Presentation on S&T at the Second Managers’ Forum Lynne McHale Federal Science and Technology Community Management Secretariat February 17, 2005.
Developed by: July 15,  Mission: To connect family strengthening networks across California to promote quality practice, peer learning and mutual.
Your Presenters What we’re asking of you Statewide stakeholder review process taking place in all regions We want your feedback on all aspects of the.
Today Oct-Nov 2015 JanFeb Mar - May FY17 Engagement Survey administered Results shared with senior leadership Results shared with HUIT Local meetings in.
7/6/09Office of Training and Professional Development1 Unit 4E: Working with Caregivers.
Community Collaboration Module 1 – Section 4. Purpose To provide trainees with an opportunity to understand and experience the importance of including.
Project Execution Methodology
Channeling Change: Making Collective Impact Work
CT’s DCF-Head Start Partnership Working Together to Serve Vulnerable Families & Support the Development of At-Risk Children Presenters: Rudy Brooks Former.
The Guardian Project Safeguarding and supporting Girls affected by fgm
DCF Initiatives to Prevent and Intervene in Youth Homelessness
OACCA Residential Transformation Conference
Overview of MAAP Accreditation
Eastham Group Practice
Innovations in Family Recruitment
A Review of BSC Vocabulary
Mallee Child and Youth Area Partnership Forum 9th September 2015
Including protective factors in assessment
Overview of the California Child Welfare Core Practice Model (CPM)
Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)
An Overview of the Minnesota Afterschool Accreditation Program (MAAP)
Investing in Children Programme
One ODOT: Positioned for the Future
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Managing Change and Other Keys to Successful Implementation
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
Integrating Protective Factors into Case Planning
2018 Safety Group 1 – 5 Year Program Timeline Guide
NEXT STEPS IN DEVELOPING CULTURALLY-COMPETENT
2017 Safety Group 1 – 5 Year Program Timeline Guide
Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act: New Opportunities for Federal Funding for Child Welfare Key Questions and Considerations.
VMOSA: Developing Strategic and Action Plans
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
Strengthening Program Management Building Capacity, Supporting the Work & Ensuring Quality in Supportive Service Programs Tom Balsley Office of.
Objectives What are Silos? Why silos occur What it causes
Maintaining Child and Family Connections
Applying Critical Thinking in Child Welfare
North Iowa Community Action
2019 Safety Group 1 – 5 Year Program Timeline Guide
Child Welfare Transformation in Leeds and Grenville – Here we go!!!
Lincoln County Social Services Organizational Effectiveness
Achievement of Results for Boards
A Focus on Strategic vs. Tactical Action for Boards
September What has been … What is now … What will come …
Georgia’s State Plan Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Permanency Planning Modified Manual
Creating an Innovation and Culture Change Plan
2016 Safety Group 1 – 5 Year Program Timeline Guide
The Child Welfare Policy and Practice Group
2012 Safety Group 1 – 5 Year Program Timeline Guide
Georgia’s State Plan Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Presentation transcript:

Making Child Welfare Transformation Work for Clients Staff Planning Phase : Meshing Transformation with Our Mission, Vision and Values March 2006 2/16/2019

The Compelling Case for Transformation - Why it Makes Sense It is intended to enhance services to families & children – can’t argue with that! It will involve engaging the broader community in child welfare – we have said for years we can’t do it alone. It will help us capitalize on research and proven best practices Serendipitously, it will move our own mission, vision and values along quite nicely 2/16/2019

Our Vision For Clients …To increase the opportunity for better life outcomes for the families & children we serve For the services we provide … To enhance our processes by capitalizing on research and proven best practices For ourselves … To feel a part of a team that is on the cutting edge of best practices in our profession For & with our community …To engage the professional & the broader community in child welfare efforts that will strengthen families and protect children 2/16/2019

Our Strategy Today, we begin the process of developing the ‘how we will do it’ – be ready to think about how you want to get involved !!! 2/16/2019

The 7 Components of the Transformation ‘House’ Alternative Court Processes Differential Response Permanency Planning Multi-Year Results Based Planning SIS Research Accountability 2/16/2019

The ‘House’ Further Divided Some of the seven main components are too large to tackle on their own so we will likely choose to create distinct projects or teams for each of these. This will capitalize on the expertise we have internally; develop our understanding of specific areas in a more comprehensive way; and give interested staff a chance to enhance their knowledge and skills in these areas. 2/16/2019

Possible Projects Component 1: Differential Response New VAW approaches, alliances Ages 0-6 cross sector services Enhanced Community Linkages Teens - Parent Child Conflict Strategies to keep Children & Youth in their families 2/16/2019

From “No More Bells & Whistles” Miller, Hubble & Duncan What are the Most Influential Factors Contributing to Positive Change for our Clients? 2/16/2019 From “No More Bells & Whistles” Miller, Hubble & Duncan

‘Secretariat Pillars & Our Posts’ Permanency Planning- ‘Secretariat Pillars & Our Posts’ Admission Prevention Will connect back to Differential Response, community linkages etc. Enhanced Foster Care systems & support PRIDE OnLAC Enhanced Adoption Regional Adoption SAFE Open Adoption 2/16/2019

Permanency Planning cont’d Kinship in Care Kinship Out of Care Legal Custody Youth Leaving Care Transitional Aged Developmentally Delayed Youth Others: Enhanced Educational approaches for CIC Supervised Access PIP enhancements e.g. Youth position. 2/16/2019

Multi Year Results Based Planning Alternatives to Court Mediation Family Group Conferencing Talking Circles Multi Year Results Based Planning Will flow from our Service plan process Single Information Systems Technology will be a key component to making everything work efficiently E-forms Electronic documentation for New risk assessment and other Transformation tools 2/16/2019

Research Accountability - QA systems - VAW research with other CAS’s - Client Engagement - Trocme’s measures Accountability - QA systems - Outcomes - File Audits - Training - Orientation processes 2/16/2019

Project Teams The approach to implementing each component needs to fit the individual project. Some may be a Project team, others may take other forms e.g. individual projects, functional teams taking on a piece of work etc. In services we talked about the idea of the default process being something like a ‘Transformation Project Team’ consisting of: Lead person – Responsible for chairing, scheduling & coordinating Champion – Responsible for promoting the team’s work at the management table Team members – staff with an interest or passion for this piece of our work 2/16/2019

Project Meetings We would structure the duration of the project team based on the need to implement that piece in sequence to the others, the scope of the project and the team’s capacity. Meetings would be relatively short in duration, at specified times so that team members could plan ahead & would not be diverted too often or too long from their day to day work. Once the project team’s outcomes have been achieved, they would stop – could be as few as two or three meetings over a two month period or continue on for several months depending on the scope of the project. 2/16/2019

Communication Schedule Teams will need to do a schedule & keep other teams up to speed on their progress as several initiatives will mesh with each other : Fact finding Training Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Sep Oct Nov Dec Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Implementation 2/16/2019

Sample Progress Table Just thinkin’ Some work done Team Formed Train the Trainers Training Done Start Done/ Ongoing OnLAC PRIDE Court QA SIS 2/16/2019

Leading Change – How will we know if a key element for change is lacking in your Project ? Compelling Case Vision Strategy Resources Capability Motivation Feedback =+’ve Change = Inertia = Confusion = Diffusion = FRUSTRATION = Fatigue = Crawl = Doubt 2/16/2019 HR Directors Inter-agency Committee – 2005

Some Questions to Think About Today How do you see the new initiatives fitting into our long term strategic goals? What do you think is working well for us now that we need to keep on doing throughout Transformation ? What hopes/ideas/expectations do you have about changing roles as we move towards a more flexible service model? 2/16/2019

Next Steps Think about what areas you want to move ahead as you move through the ‘kiosks’. Ask the ‘kiosk people’ about their ideas on how each one may unfold but remember, very likely the process will be determined by those on the team. Ask if you want some background information on any specific area & we’ll try to get it to you as soon as we can. 2/16/2019