MOD_19_18 Part B Housekeeping 1 21st June 2018.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NAESB Measurement and Verification Model Business Practice Retail Electric Demand Response 5/29/09 update.
Advertisements

Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Copyright © 2009 T.L. Martin & Associates Inc. Chapter 3 Requirements of a realistic CPM schedule.
Short Term Testing Mod 65_08 Modification Committee 25 th November 2010.
S10 CONS5Q25 Lara Tookey. Review of estimators workings Decision on what margin to apply Bid submission details Submit your Tender.
INTRA-DAY TRADING Development of Modification(s) 1st February 2011.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
INTRA-DAY TRADING Modification Development 5 April 2011.
Revision of the UNC Post-Emergency Arrangements draft proposal July 2009.
Governance and Charging Methodology for User Pays Services 10 th January 2007.
MCWG Update to WMS 08/14/2013. MCWG Update to WMS General Update -July 31 st Joint MCWG/CWG Meeting Review NPRRs All operational except – NPRR 552 – Additional.
Training Session Managing Formal Queries by Katia Compagnoni.
Explanation of Changes to Draft “Firming” Schedule, Service Schedule E Contact: Arnie Podgorsky Mike Thompson Wright & Talisman PC
© 2011 The Williams Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Consolidated Nominations Jeramie Kilpack Mary White.
CAP169 BSSG 12/03/09. 2 Today  Recap on developments to date  Discuss and agree Terms of Reference for the group  Begin to work through proposal, capturing:
Joint Energy Auction Implementation Proposal of PG&E, SCE and SDG&E California Public Utilities Commission Workshop – November 1, 2006.
Compatible with the latest browsers; Chrome, Safari, Firefox, Opera and Internet Explorer 9 and above.
Payroll Cycles are Changing What is changing
The New Loan Estimate & Closing Disclosure Explained
CLOSING AND DELIVERING SONYMA LOANS
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
Submitting an invoice with the Tungsten Portal
Consolidated EIM Initiatives from 2017 Roadmap Issue Paper
FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES
TuNGSTEN E-INVOICE SUBMISSION GUIDE.
Content of Tender Dossier - Instructions to Tenderers - Tenders
Bills of Quantities Introduction to FIDIC - Bills of Quantities -
Particular Conditions of Contract & Appendix to Tender
Reflecting Losses in DR within ERCOT August 22, 2012
Review of System Alerts
MOD_04_17 Solar in the SEM 9th June 2017.
ESB Networks AIP Programme
Performance Assurance Framework Risk Register Consultation Summary
MM03 - Master Data in Purchasing & Contract
Particular Conditions of Contract & Appendix to Tender
Part C State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report:
IPPC second consultation 1 July to 30 September 2018
CDRL E003 CFAT REPORT TEMPLATE
Continuous improvement is the process by which organizations frequently review their procedures, aiming to correct errors or problems. The most effective.
Capacity Methodology Statements: Impact of Mod 452
TSC Modifications Panel Meeting
Unsecured Bad Energy Debt and Unsecured Bad Capacity Debt Version 2
Agreed Procedure Updates
Correction of Minor Material Drafting Errors
Part B Unsecured Bad Energy Debt and Unsecured Bad Capacity Debt
Review of the requirements regarding Unsecured Bad Debt within I-SEM
Update to Unit Under Test Process
MOD_21_18 Application of Settlement Reallocation Agreements to Market Operator Charges and Settlement Document Definition and Usage 21st June 2018.
Ex Ante Quantities Deferral
Mod_25_18 Unsecured Bad Energy Debt and Unsecured Bad Capacity Debt
Interim Suspension Delay Periods
Mod_38_18 Limitation of Capacity Market Difference Payments to Loss Adjusted Metered Quantity. 12th December 2018.
MOD_13_17 V2 Deferral of SEM NEMO Credit Reports and Non-acceptance of Contracted Quantities 13th March 2018.
Credit Cover Signage and Subscript Correction
Mod_37_18 Housekeeping 12th December 2018.
Agreed Procedure Updates Version 2
Meter Data Publication Timing
AUG Query Responses 21st November 2013.
ESB Networks AIP Programme Update to IGG, June 22nd 2006
Use of Technical Offer Data in Instruction Profiling / QBOA Version 2
Use of Technical Offer Data in Instruction Profiling / QBOA Version 2
MOD_05_19_V2 Amendment to Uninstructed Imbalance Charge (CUNIMB) to correct for negative price scenarios 11th April 2019.
Part B Suspension When Suspended Under Part A
Nexus Workgroup Mod 0473 Presentation
Correction to No Load Cost - “and” vs “or”
Credit Treatment For Adjusted Participants
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
Mod_10_19 Removal of Negative QBOAs Related to Dispatchable Priority Dispatch Units from the Imbalance Price 27th June 2019.
Correction to COP and clarification to CNLR
Market Back Up Price Reference Corrections
Presentation transcript:

MOD_19_18 Part B Housekeeping 1 21st June 2018

Summary Information This proposal seeks to address various (Circa 30) minor housekeeping items. It has been necessary to consolidate these items in an effort to ensure that there are no errors in correcting them as raising them piecemeal would be more difficult to track where there are multiple changes to a single paragraph. Note that where a housekeeping change is proposed for a paragraph which is subject to another proposal which has been approved or recommended for approval we have sought to use the latest drafting – this can be rolled back if necessary but appears the most pragmatic approach to avoid errors The Majority of these changes fall under four categories being; Incorrect References – errant references to other paragraphs which likely resulted from changes to the structure of the Code as drafting progressed Variable Errors – Incorrect acronyms, descriptions and/or subscripts Typographical Errors – Duplicated words, missing words and incorrect capitalisation/use of defined terms Drafting Errors – Wording which is either unclear or incorrect

Summary Information – More Substantial Changes There are three changes which may be considered more significant than the other housekeeping items; Change to Physical Notification granularity from 15 minute to 30 minute within Appendix I Signage correction for para G.14.3.3 by introducing a minus sign (similar to a correction to G.14.8.1) which was omitted from Mod_11_18 Correction to the definition of Demand Side Non Delivery Percentage (FNDDS) to clarify that this percentage reflects all non delivery as opposed to only non delivery related to non compliance with Dispatch Instructions thus appropriately leaving the detail of how the value should be determined to the performance monitoring methodology rather than including prescriptive detail in the Code

Summary Information – Incorrect References This proposal aims to correct a total of five incorrect internal references as follows; Para B.8.2.2 references para F.2.2.7 where this should be F.2.2.4 (submission of IC Schedule Quantities by Scheduling Agent), there is no F.2.2.7 Para E.3.6.2 references para E.4.6 where this should be E.5 (determination of Market Back Up Price), E.4.6 is determination of Administered Scarcity Price Para G.14.4.1 references para G.12.4.2 where this should be G.12.4.3 (submission of forecast values for New or Adjusted Participant), G.12.4.2 details the trigger for being an Adjusted Participant Glossary Definition of MO Charge Account references para G.7.1.5 where this should be G.7.1.4 (Establishment of MO Charge Accounts), G.7.1.5 details the timeline to pay MO Charge Invoice Glossary definition of Actual Exposure references para G.9.1.14 where this should be G.9.1.12 (determination of Actual Exposure) there is no G.9.1.14

Summary Information – Incorrect Variable Use This proposal aims to correct a total of eight errors in the use of variables as follows; Variable for Traded Not Delivered Exposure (ETNDpg) incorrectly has subscript d (ETNDpd) for Trading Day instead of g for Undefined Exposure Period and the description has a similar error in the ‘where‘ clause in three paragraphs (G.14.15.2, G.14.15.6 and G.15.1.1) Variable for Forecast Amount for Settlement Reallocation Agreements for Secondary Participant (FAVRAS) is incorrectly described as relating to a single SRA both in descriptions and via incorrectly applying the subscript ‘a’ in two Paragraphs (G.14.15.9 and G.15.1.1) and in the glossary definition While a Participant may only be the Secondary Participant to one SRA for any given Settlement Day they may theoretically be party to different SRAs on different Settlement Days within a Settlement Risk Period Paragraph G.17.3.2 (which lists the amounts set equal to zero during Administered Imbalance Settlement) is missing a subscript for Imbalance Settlement Period (gamma) in five variable (one existing and four added via mod_11_18) Appendix H Table 1 uses an incorrect acronym for Registered Capacity (qRC i/o qCR)

Summary Information – Typographical Errors This proposal aims to correct a total of fourteen typographical errors; Para B.9.3.2 fails to capitalise the word site in defined term Trading Site Para F.6.4.4, refers to Trading Day in error when the item described relates to a Settlement Day Para F.6.7.9 details the derivation of a ranked set of bids using the allocation of position numbers n=1 etc. where this should be k=1 etc. to align with the nomenclature for the same term elsewhere Para F.15.2.4 refers to Currency Cost Charge Factor where the defined term is Currency Adjustment Charge Factor Para F.18.2.1 refers to the Reserve Adjustment Capacity Quantity where the defined term is Reserve Adjustment Required Capacity Quantity Para F.20.3.2 uses the variable Loss-Adjusted Metered Quantity for Generator Units (QMLFuγ) but omits the description from the ‘where’ clause Para F.20.5.3 omits the word Settlement from the defined term Settlement Day in the ‘where’ clause

Summary Information – Typographical Errors Para G.5.7.1, G.12.4.3 and Appendix G para 14 fail to capitalise the word total when using the defined term Total Daily Amounts in the ‘where’ clause G.14.10.1 uses a sum over Settlement Days d in a Sample Undefined Exposure period ω and refers to this as ‘in each Sample Undefined Exposure Period ω in the Historical Assessment Period’ which incorrectly implies that the sum is over all sample periods in the HAP rather than just one sum in a calculation which is carried out multiple times (once for each ω). The proposed change, to remove the words in red, also aligns to other use of the same summation e.g. G.14.12.1 Note that this proposal includes use of the subscript H in the initial text in G.14.10.1 which we now suggest is not needed (originally included based on another proposal for which the approach then changed but I forgot to remove it here) Para G.18.1.5 fails to capitalise the words non-defaulting when using the defined term Non-Defaulting Participant (which is defined together with Defaulting Participant) Text in Appendix 1 Table 1 contains a duplicate ‘Daily, in advance of the the Trading day’ Five variable definitions (CMWP, CNL, COCMWP, CREVMWP and CSD) fail to capitalise the codified term Make-Whole Payment

Summary Information – Drafting Errors This proposal aims to correct a total of five drafting errors relating to incorrect or imprecise wording as follows; Para G.12.4.2 details the trigger for becoming an Adjusted Participant but is incorrectly worded so that it implies that for Generator Units forecast Total Daily Amounts are compared with preceding Metered Demand as opposed to preceding Total Daily Amounts Para G.12.4.3 is referenced in para G.14.4.1 as detailing submission of forecast volumes for New (and Adjusted Participant as a result of Mod_15_17) but it only refers to submission for Adjusted (and not new) Participant so we propose to extend it to submission for New Participant also Para G.14.3.3 states that EUPECC is a New or Adjusted Participants Exposure in respect of Capacity Charges but does not state that this is only for Undefined Exposure Period g similar to G.14.8.1 which implies that it is for the entire Settlement Risk Period (albeit that the section heading specifies Undefined Exposure Period)

Summary Information – Drafting Errors The term Aggregate Settlement Document Amount is effectively defined twice with a glossary definition for Aggregate Settlement Document Amount and a variable definition for Aggregate Settlement Document (SDA). The glossary definition refers to the value calculated in G.5.7.5 which is a calculation for SDA and uses the term Aggregate Settlement Document amount. This is a bit confused so we propose removing the glossary definition since it is not necessary which is mirrors the Part A approach for the equivalent variables The term Settlement Report is used in various places (e.g. Appendix G) and is capitalised as though it is a codified term but there is no glossary definition. We propose to introduce a glossary definition as follows; “means a supplementary report containing the value of certain variables used to determine Settlement amounts made available to each Participant as described in Appendix G.”