C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recent Studies of Urban Air Pollution over the Greater Beijing Area Meigen ZHANG (State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric.
Advertisements

P. D. Hien, V. T. Bac, N. T. H. Thinh Vietnam Atomic Energy Commission.
Section highlights Organic Aerosol and Field Studies.
The semi-volatile nature of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area November 2, 2007 EAS Graduate Student Symposium Christopher.
Title EMEP Unified model Importance of observations for model evaluation Svetlana Tsyro MSC-W / EMEP TFMM workshop, Lillestrøm, 19 October 2010.
Title Performance of the EMEP aerosol model: current results and further needs Presented by Svetlana Tsyro (EMEP/MSC-W) EMEP workshop on Particulate Matter.
PM mapping in Scotland, 2007 Andrew Kent. What are we presenting today? 1) Context to the work 2) Modelling process 3) Model results 4) Future work possibilities.
Recent Finnish PM studies / 2 examples. Characterizing temporal and spatial patterns of urban PM10 using six years of Finnish monitoring data Pia Anttila.
WORKING GROUP I MONITORING DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION TFMM Workshop, Paris, 2006, Nov 29 –Dec 1.
1 Source apportionment of PM in the PCM model John Stedman 23 April 2010.
Chemical composition of aerosols Composition of tropospheric aerosols is not uniform. It varies with particle size and source of particles: Ultrafine particles.
What is Particulate Matter and How does it Vary? What is Particulate Matter? How Does PM Vary? The Influence of Emissions, Dilution and Transformations.
Field Methods of Monitoring Atmospheric Systems Chemical Analysis of Particulate Matter Copyright © 2006 by DBS.
ATMOSPHERIC FALLS (DRY, WET) – INDICATOR OF CLIMATIC-CHEMICAL INTERACTION ASSESSMENT Hydrometeorological Research Institute UZHYDROMET Dr. Galina A. TOLKACHEVA.
Simulation of European emissions impacts on particulate matter concentrations in 2010 using Models-3 Rob Lennard, Steve Griffiths and Paul Sutton (RWE.
Total deposition monitoring of nutrients in Corsica K. Desboeufs, E. Bon Nguyen, P. Simeoni, S. Chevaillier, F. Dulac, C. Guieu ANR DUNE.
Angeliki Karanasiou Source apportionment of particulate matter in urban aerosol Institute of Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection, Environmental.
Source Signatures of Organic Compounds and Particle Growth in Bakersfield, CA Lars Ahlm 1, Shang Liu 1, Lynn M. Russell 1, Douglas A. Day 1,2, Robin Weber.
Size-segregated analysis of PM10 at a tandem urban – rural site combination J. K. Gietl 1*, T. Tritscher 1,2, and O. Klemm 1 1 University of Münster, Institute.
IMPROVE Ion Study Plan Presented by Marc Pitchford to the RPO Technical Groups Dallas, TX 12/3/02.
Sources and Processes Affecting the Chemical and Physical Properties of Denver Aerosol during DISCOVER-AQ FRAPPÉ/DISCOVER-AQ Science Team Meeting 4 May.
Title Progress in the development and results of the UNIFIED EMEP model Presented by Leonor Tarrason EMEP/MSC-W 29 th TFIAM meeting, Amiens, France,
Characterization of Aerosol Physical, Optical and Chemical Properties During the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational Study (BRAVO) Jenny.
Technical tool to evaluate the effectiveness of control measures I. ALLEGRINI and C. PERRINO Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche ISTITUTO sull’INQUINAMENTO.
Properties of Particulate Matter Physical, Chemical and Optical Properties Size Range of Particulate Matter Mass Distribution of PM vs. Size: PM10, PM2.5.
Urban vs. Rural Atlanta An assessment of : 1)PM2.5 composition and trends 2)The Atlanta Urban Heat Island Effect.
1/30 2-year observation of Organic Aerosol properties In Cape Corsica J. Sciare, and LSCE.
Exceptional Event Analysis Draft, July 13, 2005
Online measurements of chemical composition and size distribution of submicron aerosol particles in east Baltic region Inga Rimšelytė Institute of Physics.
Atmospheric Particulate Matter: Chemical Composition and Basics of Concentration Estimation Mike Bergin, Ted Russell, Jim Mullholland, Sangil Lee CEE 6319:
Model Evaluation Comparing Model Output to Ambient Data Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, California.
Aerosol Composition and Trends Andrew Martahus. Particulate Matter: Solid or Liquid Particles in Air Size and Composition Although particulate matter.
Temporal variations of aerosol components in Tijuana, Mexico, during the Cal-Mex campaign S. Takahama, A. Johnson, J. Guzman Morales, L.M. Russell Scripps.
Study of ambient air particulates pollutants near Taichung airport sampling site in central Taiwan Journal of Hazardous Materials 144 (2007) 492–498 Student.
Variations of Elemental Concentration in PM 10 and PM June 2007,Colombo. M.C. Shirani Seneviratne Head, Nulear Analytical Services Sec. Atomic.
F. Lucarelli 1, S. Becagli 2, G. Calzolai 1, M. Chiari 1, T. Martellini 2, S. Nava 1, L. Paperetti 1, R. Udisti 2 and E. Yubero 3 1. INFN and Dept. of.
Georgia Institute of Technology SAMI Aerosol Modeling: Performance Evaluation & Future Year Simulations Talat Odman Georgia Institute of Technology SAMI.
August 1999PM Data Analysis Workbook: Characterizing PM1 Characterizing Ambient PM Concentrations and Processes What are the temporal, spatial, chemical,
Properties of Particulate Matter
Willy Maenhaut1, Wan Wang1, Xuguang Chi1, Nico Raes1, Jan Cafmeyer1,
National Wildlife Refuge
The science of urban air quality
Chemical and mineralogical compositions of Asian dust particles
Dr. Tanveer Iqbal Associate Professor,
Aerosol chemistry studies at the SMEARIII station in Kumpula
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
Air Monitoring Trends in New Jersey
大气圈地球化学及其环境效益.
Continuous measurement of airborne particles and gases
Forest fires and air pollution in Portugal
Source identification of aerosols in Mexico City
Steve Griffiths, Rob Lennard and Paul Sutton* (*RWE npower)
A Review of Time Integrated PM2.5 Monitoring Data in the United States
Assessment of Atmospheric PM in the Slovak Republic
On-going developments of SinG: particles
Statistical analysis of the secondary inorganic aerosol in Hungary using background measurements and model calculations Zita Ferenczi   Hungarian Meteorological.
C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution
Rami Alfarra, Urs Baltensperger: Paul Scherrer Institute, CH.
PM modelling assessment in Northern Italy
TFMM PM Assessment Report
Time-Integrated Sampling
Time-Integrated Particle Measurements : Status in Canada
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
Linking the meteorological conditions to air pollution in Italy
19th TFMM Meeting, Geneva May 3rd 2018
RECEPTOR MODELLING OF AIRBORNE PARTICULATE MATTER
Update on activities of Bulgaria within/related to EMEP
EMEP/MSC-W How can EMEP Intensive measurement periods help to improve modelling of acidification, eutrophication, O3 and PM? Views from MSC-W H. Fagerli.
WORK OF THE UNITED KINGDOM AIR QUALITY EXPERT GROUP (AQEG)
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
Presentation transcript:

C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution EMEP TFMM 7th MEETING – HELSINKI, 10th-12th May 2006 PM10 and PM2.5 MASS CLOSURE in the LAZIO region (CENTRAL ITALY) Cinzia PERRINO C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution Montelibretti (Rome) A study funded by the Lazio region

ROME – TRAFFIC STATION : OUR STARTING POINT ROME – TRAFFIC STATION : 194 PM10 EXCEEDANCES IN 2004 C. Perrino C.N.R. Istituto sull’Inquinamento Atmosferico – Montelibretti (Roma)

WHICH ARE THE DRIVING FACTORS DETERMINING THE TIME PATTERN OF ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTANTS? WHICH CONDITIONS LEAD TO EXCEEDANCES? WHICH COMPOUNDS ARE RESPONSABLE FOR THE INCREASE IN PM CONCENTRATION? WHICH SOURCES ARE RESPONSABLE FOR THE DIRECT OR INDIRECT PRODUCTION OF THESE COMPOUNDS? C. Perrino C.N.R. Istituto sull’Inquinamento Atmosferico – Montelibretti (Roma)

A research project funded by the Lazio Region “Fine Dust” 2004 - 2005 A research project funded by the Lazio Region FONTECHIARI regional background station LATINA urban station ROMA MONTEZEMOLO traffic station MONTELIBRETTI semi-rural station ROMA VILLA ADA urban background station VITERBO C. Perrino C.N.R. Istituto sull’Inquinamento Atmosferico – Montelibretti (Roma)

C. PERRINO - C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution Study of the chemical composition of atmospheric particles apportionment of particle sources discrimination between natural and anthropogenic events October 2004 – July 2005 (daily sampling – analysis of the 140 most interesting days) Six stations: 1 regional background, 1 urban background, 1 peri-urban, three urban stations (Roma, Latina Viterbo) Two size fractions: PM10, PM2.5 C. PERRINO - C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution

3-step procedure: Natural radioactivity monitoring Mixing properties of the lower atmosphere Size distribution of particulate matter Chemical composition of particles Natural radioactivity monitoring Optical particle counter Analysis of metals, ions, carbon compounds C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

about the air volume available for pollution dispersion atmospheric concentration of pollutants emission (and physico-chemical trasnformation) mixing properties of the lower atmosphere Having information about the air volume available for pollution dispersion we could uncouple pollutants variations due to changes in the emission rate from those due to changes in the dilution properties of the atmosphere C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

SHORT-LIVED RADON PROGENY STEP 1: Mixing properties of the lower atmosphere 238URANIUM DECAY CHAIN 222RADON SHORT-LIVED RADON PROGENY C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

STEP 1: Mixing properties of the lower atmosphere Convective mixing of the lower atmosphere: Radon dilutes into the whole mixing layer Weak mixing of the lower atmosphere: Radon is trapped in the lower layer and its air concentration increases

STEP 1: Mixing properties of the lower atmosphere ATMOSFERIC STABILITY MONITOR the instrument collects atmospheric particles and determines the natural radioactivity due to Radon progeny (1-h average). good index of the dilution properties of the lower atmosphere identification of stability periods and advection periods

During warm months natural radioactivity shows a well-defined and modulated temporal pattern (all days are similar: nocturnal stability and convective mixing during the day) During cold months high-pressure periods are sporadic and advection often occurs. Diurnal mixing is weak and of limited duration. C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

ROME - Traffic station NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY JUNE – JULY 2003 DECEMBER 2003 NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY JUNE – JULY 2003 NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY DECEMBER 2003 C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

STEP 1: Mixing properties of the lower atmosphere C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

STEP 1: Mixing properties of the lower atmosphere C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

STEP 1: Mixing properties of the lower atmosphere Starting from natural raadioactivity values we can develop Atmospheric Stability Indexes… EXPERIMENTAL FORECASTED … for each day, they give the probability, from the meteorological point of view, for the occurrence of an atmospheric pollution event C. Perrino C.N.R. Istituto sull’Inquinamento Atmosferico – Montelibretti (Roma)

The episode of December 27th 2003 in Rome: traffic or meteorology? C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

The mixing properties of the lower atmosphere are a key factor FIRST REMARK The mixing properties of the lower atmosphere are a key factor in determining PM concentration level and its time variations C. Perrino C.N.R. Istituto sull’Inquinamento Atmosferico – Montelibretti (Roma)

3-step procedure: Natural radioactivity monitoring Mixing properties of the lower atmosphere Size distribution of particulate matter Chemical composition of particles Natural radioactivity monitoring Optical particle counter Analysis of metals, ions, carbon compounds C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

STEP 2: Size distribution of particulate matter Optical particle counter in six size ranges: 0.3 – 0.5 m; 0,5 – 1,0 m; 1,0 – 1,5 m; 1,5 – 2,0 m 2 – 5 m; 5 – 10 m C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

STEP 2: Size distribution of particulate matter Evaluation of the ratio between the number of particles in the coarse ( > 1,5 m) and the fine (0,3 – 0,5 m) ranges C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

IDENTIFICATION OF NATURAL EVENTS STEP 2: Size distribution of particulate matter Daily average ratio between the number of particles in the coarse ( > 1,5 m) and the fine (0,3 – 0,5 m) ranges IDENTIFICATION OF NATURAL EVENTS C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

FASE 2: DISTRIBUZIONE DIMENSIONALE DELLE PARTICELLE In the case of natural events (e.g. Saharan dust intrusions) the Atmospheric Stability Indexes are much lower than the real concentration of PM C. Perrino C.N.R. Istituto sull’Inquinamento Atmosferico – Montelibretti (Roma)

3-step procedure: Natural radioactivity monitoring Mixing properties of the lower atmosphere Size distribution of particulate matter Chemical composition of particles Natural radioactivity monitoring Optical particle counter Analysis of metals, ions, carbon compounds C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

STEP 3: Chemical composition of particles Ion chromatography (IC) Chemical characterisation: 1.  Anions and cations (NO3-, SO4=, Cl-, Na+, Ca++, Mg++, K+, NH4+)  2. Elemental carbon and organic carbon compounds (EC, OC) 3.  Crustal metals (major components) (Si, Al, Fe, Ca, K) 4. Inorganic volatile components (ammnium chloride and nitrate) Termo-optical analyser X-ray fluorescence (ED-XRF) Sampling by diffusion lines and IC analysis C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

PM10 PM2.5 plus DIFFUSION LINES at ML station STEP 3: Chemical composition of particles PM10 PM2.5 Teflon filter Quartz filter Crustal metals ED-XRF Termo-optical analyser Organic carbon Elemental carbon Extraction plus DIFFUSION LINES at ML station Trace metals ICP Ion chromatography Univ.of Rome “La Sapienza” Chemistry Department Anions and cations C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

MASS CONCENTRATION OF PM10 IN MONTELIBRETTI (ROME) MEASURED BY THE DUST MONITOR (blue) AND RECONSTRUCTED BY THE CHEMICAL ANALYSES (red) C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

MASS CONCENTRATION OF PM2.5 IN MONTELIBRETTI (ROME) MEASURED BY THE DUST MONITOR (blue) AND RECONSTRUCTED BY THE CHEMICAL ANALYSES (red) C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

STEP 3: Chemical composition of particles 10-15% of the ammonium nitrate is lost by the 20°C monitor and about 80% is lost by the 45°C monitor C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

[secondary compounds] = NH4+ + SO4= + NO3- + (OM – EC) STEP 3: Chemical composition of particles 4 main sources [sea-spray aerosol] = (Na+ + Cl-) * 1.176 [SO4= Mg Ca K] [crustal] = (1.89 Al + 2.14 Si + 1.4 Ca + 1.2 K + 1.36 Fe) * 1.12 [Mg Na Ti] [primary anthropogenic compounds] = EC * 2 [OM] [secondary compounds] = NH4+ + SO4= + NO3- + (OM – EC) OM = a OC a = 1.6 ÷ 2.1 C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

STEP 3: Chemical composition of particles C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

STEP 3: Chemical composition of particles C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

STEP 3: Chemical composition of particles Sea-spray events: NaCl concentration increases from 1-2% to 20-40% the coarse/fine ratio increases they occur in advection conditions (generally clean air masses) PM10 concentretion is low; the increase due to sea-salt is generally < 10 ug/m3 generally they do no cause exceedances they have low impact on PM2.5 concentration C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

STEP 3: Chemical composition of particles C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

STEP 3: Chemical composition of particles Saharan dust events: crustal matter concentration increases from 10-20% to over 50% the coarse/fine ratio increases they begin in advection conditions (but re-suspension may increase the time duration of the episode) PM10 concentretion can be very high (up to more than 100 ug/m3) they often cause exceedances they also generally cause an increase of PM2.5 concentration C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

STEP 3: Chemical composition of particles 38.0 mg/m3 146.4 mg/m3 58.8 mg/m3 IDENTIFICATION AND CHARACTERISATION OF NATURAL EVENTS: SEA-SPRAY AFRICAN DUST

Natural events can be identified SECOND REMARK Natural events can be identified from an increase of the coarse-to-fine ratio and are characterised by advection conditions C. Perrino C.N.R. Istituto sull’Inquinamento Atmosferico – Montelibretti (Roma)

STEP 3: Chemical composition of particles ELEMENTAL CARBON PRIMARY ANTHROPOGENIC POLLUTANTS C. Perrino C.N.R. Istituto sull’Inquinamento Atmosferico – Montelibretti (Roma)

STEP 3: Chemical composition of particles Average % composition of PM10 in the Lazio region C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

STEP 3: Chemical composition of particles Average % composition of PM2.5 in the Lazio region C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

For primary anthropogenic pollutants we cannot identify “events” THIRD REMARK For primary anthropogenic pollutants we cannot identify “events” Their concentration depends on the proximity to the emission sources and their concentration variations mainly depend on the dispersion capacity of the lower atmosphere C. Perrino C.N.R. Istituto sull’Inquinamento Atmosferico – Montelibretti (Roma)

STEP 3: Chemical composition of particles SULPHATE SECONDARY POLLUTANTS C. Perrino C.N.R. Istituto sull’Inquinamento Atmosferico – Montelibretti (Roma)

STEP 3: Chemical composition of particles Average % composition of PM10 in the Lazio region C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

STEP 3: Chemical composition of particles Average % composition of PM2.5 in the Lazio region C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

PM10 STEP 3: Chemical composition of particles Secondary pollutants are homogeneously distributed at least on a regional scale. C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

STEP 3: Chemical composition of particles PM10 PM2.5 PM10-2.5 C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

For secondary pollutants we cannot identify “events” FOURTH REMARK For secondary pollutants we cannot identify “events” Their concentration is homogeneous on a regional scale and their concentration variations mainly depend on the dispersion capacity of the lower atmosphere C. Perrino C.N.R. Istituto sull’Inquinamento Atmosferico – Montelibretti (Roma)

PM composition during polluted days STEP 3: Chemical composition of particles PM10 concentration lower than 35 mg/m3 PM10 concentration higher than 65 mg/m3 PM composition during polluted days is very close to PM composition during clean days with the exception of days characterised by important natural events C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution – Rome (ITALY)

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION ! C. Perrino C.N.R. Istituto sull’Inquinamento Atmosferico – Montelibretti (Roma)

STEP 3: Chemical composition of particles

PM10 - 2.5 FASE 3: COMPOSIZIONE CHIMICA DEL MATERIALE PARTICELLARE SIA L’AEROSOL MARINO CHE LE SPECIE DI DERIVAZIONE TERRIGENA SONO UNA COMPONENTE QUANTITATIVAMENTE IMPORTANTE DELLA FRAZIONE COARSE C. Perrino C.N.R. Istituto sull’Inquinamento Atmosferico – Montelibretti (Roma)