NMMB-DUST developments

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sedimentation Test of Soil Texture
Advertisements

Soil Characteristics and Texture
A numerical simulation of urban and regional meteorology and assessment of its impact on pollution transport A. Starchenko Tomsk State University.
Dust modelling Earth Science BSC activites ●BSC - DREAM8b 72h daily forecast - ●BSC - DREAM8b evaluation.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
WRAP RMC Phase II Wind Blown Dust Project ENVIRON International Corporation and University of California, Riverside 15 November 2005 Tempe, AZ.
Soil Texture Getting a feel for the soil!. Soil Texture Defined The relative proportions of the various size groups of individual soil grains (namely.
SOIL PHYSICAL COMPONENTS “Getting to the root of the problem” sand silt clay air water Cation exchange tillage roots.
Atmospheric modelling activities inside the Danish AMAP program Jesper H. Christensen NERI-ATMI, Frederiksborgvej Roskilde.
1 NGGPS Dynamic Core Requirements Workshop NCEP Future Global Model Requirements and Discussion Mark Iredell, Global Modeling and EMC August 4, 2014.
Suspended Load Above certain critical shear stress conditions, sediment particles are maintained in suspension by the exchange of momentum from the fluid.
Next Gen AQ model Need AQ modeling at Global to Continental to Regional to Urban scales – Current systems using cascading nests is cumbersome – Duplicative.
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
© University of Reading 2007www.reading.ac.uk RMetS Student Conference, Manchester September 2008 Boundary layer ventilation by mid-latitude cyclones Victoria.
RAMS Customization. Example customizations  Higher-resolution topography  Topography steepness  Vegetation parameters  SST modifications (lakes, bays,
Development of WRF-CMAQ Interface Processor (WCIP)
The July 2003 dust storm over Italy A strong Saharan dust outbreak occurred from 15 to 19 July 2003 over Italy. The figures below show the SeaWIFS image.
© Crown copyright Met Office Met Office dust forecasting Using the Met Office Unified Model™ David Walters: Manager Global Atmospheric Model Development,
Computational Modelling of Aerosol Cycle An Integrated Environmental Modelling System and Its Applications Dr. Yaping Shao CEMAP, School of Mathematics.
Clouds, Aerosols and Precipitation GRP Meeting August 2011 Susan C van den Heever Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University Fort Collins,
Recent developments in CHIMERE. Accuracy and Realism for research and operational applications Accuracy Realism/Complexity Time.
A cell-integrated semi-Lagrangian dynamical scheme based on a step-function representation Eigil Kaas, Bennert Machenhauer and Peter Hjort Lauritzen Danish.
L-band Microwave Emission of the Biosphere (L-MEB)
Rick Saylor 1, Barry Baker 1, Pius Lee 2, Daniel Tong 2,3, Li Pan 2 and Youhua Tang 2 1 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Air Resources Laboratory.
Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications: Introduction to NASA’s Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications:
Overview of the tracer code in RegCM Tracers Aerosols ( droplets, smoke particles, dust, pollens, flying cats …) Gazeous phase, chemical species Evolution.
Page 1 Met Office © Crown copyright 2007 CAMM model performance assessed during DODO2 Steph Woodward – climate model dust scheme Glenn Greed – implementation.
Presented by Gerard E. Mansell ENVIRON International Corporation Novato, California October 29, 2003 DETERMINING FUGITIVE DUST EMISSIONS FROM WIND EROSION.
Contribution of MPI to CLIMARES Erich Roeckner, Dirk Notz Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg.
Dust aerosols in NU-WRF – background and current status Mian Chin, Dongchul Kim, Zhining Tao.
Initial Results from the Diurnal Land/Atmosphere Coupling Experiment (DICE) Weizhong Zheng, Michael Ek, Ruiyu Sun, Jongil Han, Jiarui Dong and Helin Wei.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Environmental Modeling University of California at Riverside CALCULATING FUGITIVE DUST EMISSIONS FROM.
___________________________________________________________________________CMAQ Basics ___________________________________________________Community Modeling.
Module 6 MM5: Overview William J. Gutowski, Jr. Iowa State University.
WRAP RMC Phase II Wind Blown Dust Project ENVIRON International Corporation and University of California, Riverside WRAP Dust Emission Joint Forum Meeting.
WRAP RMC Phase II Wind Blown Dust Project Results & Status ENVIRON International Corporation and University of California, Riverside Dust Emission Joint.
 Process of where soil particles are displaced  Wind Erosion.
Modeling the emission, transport, and optical properties of Asian dust storms using coupled CAM/CARMA model Lin Su and Owen B. Toon Laboratory for Atmospheric.
Implementation of a boundary layer heat flux parameterization into the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System Erica McGrath-Spangler Dept. of Atmospheric.
Forecasting smoke and dust using HYSPLIT. Experimental testing phase began March 28, 2006 Run daily at NCEP using the 6Z cycle to produce a 24- hr analysis.
Representing Effects of Complex Terrain on Mountain Meteorology and Hydrology Steve Ghan, Ruby Leung, Teklu Tesfa, PNNL Steve Goldhaber, NCAR.
Day 19 Objective You will learn about soil texture and composition in order to determine soil’s value as a resource and conservation measures. Warm-Up.
Soil Texture and Textural Class
Operational COSMO of MeteoSwiss
Simulation of stream flow using WetSpa Model
Status of the COSMO-Software and Documentation
Impact of soil moisture on near-surface atmospheric layers
Department of Hydrology and Water Resources
Coupled atmosphere-ocean simulation on hurricane forecast

Volcanic Ash Detection and Prediction at the Met Office
Soil Texture.
Assessing Volcanic Ash Hazard by Using the CALPUFF System
WRF Modelling of Volcanic Ash Dispersion
Physical Properties of Soils
RHS - Soil Texture Tutor – Mike Tanti.
مثلثهای کلاس بندی بافت خاک
Soil Texture.
Han, J. , W. Wang, Y. C. Kwon, S. -Y. Hong, V. Tallapragada, and F
DATABASE OF MINERAL CONTENT IN ARID SOILS
Infiltration.
Chapter Soils.
pub/ hurtado/2412
I. What? ~ II. Why? ~ III. How? Modelling volcanic plumes with WRF
Recognizing Soil Texture & Structure
Preliminary validation results of the prognostic 3d-TKE-scheme
Global distribution of minerals in arid soils
Contribution from Natural Sources of Aerosol Particles to PM in Canada
Oleg Travnikov EMEP/MSC-E
Maarten van Loon and Leonor Tarrasón (met.no/EMEP)
Presentation transcript:

NMMB-DUST developments Carlos Pérez 29 July 2008 Includes preprocessing and first succesful model tests with: - Dust emission with viscous sublayer Dust horizontal advection Dust vertical advection Horizontal diffusion Vertical diffusion Also some notes, comments and future steps

Dust preprocessing in the NMMB-DUST

Dust calculations in preprocessing Surface concentration (instead of emission) is the basis of viscous sublayer emission scheme during model integration Surface concentration Tunning parameter Friction velocity Threshold Friction velocity Dry Threshold Friction velocity Soil moisture Soil water potential Parameter function of particle Reynolds number Particle radius Particle density (1-Veg) air density Landuse fraction (desert mask) Mass available for uptake (fraction ~source size distribution) Calculated in preprocessing fractions of clay (bins 1 to 4) or silt (bins 5 to 8) Calculated during model integration Veg Vegetation fraction (NEW) k Size bin number (total is 8)

MAPS produced in preprocessing Interpolation from initial database format to NMM B grid In this example NMM B grid global at ~50 km resolution

Land use dust producing categories 2 LOW SPARSE GRASSLAND 8 BARE DESERT 11 SEMIDESERT 50 SAND DESERT 51 SEMIDESERT SHRUBS 52 SEMIDESERT SAGE

Land use fraction (0-1) Set to 1 at this point (future tunning) if(landusedust(i,j).eq.2) landusefrac(i,j)=1.0 !LOW SPARSE GRASSLAND (DREAM 0.2) if(landusedust(i,j).eq.8) landusefrac(i,j)=1.0 !BARE DESERT if(landusedust(i,j).eq.11)landusefrac(i,j)=1.0 !SEMIDESERT (DREAM 0.8) if(landusedust(i,j).eq.50)landusefrac(i,j)=1.0 !SAND DESERT if(landusedust(i,j).eq.51)landusefrac(i,j)=1.0 !SEMIDESERT SHRUBS (DREAM 0.7) if(landusedust(i,j).eq.52)landusefrac(i,j)=1.0 !SEMIDESERT SAGE (DREAM 0.7)

Vegetation fraction (0-1) NEW Vegetation fraction (0-1) NEW!! Daily interpolated from monthly climatology. Not existing in DREAM

1-Vegetation fraction (0-1)

Top soil type (New STASGO database 30s… previous DREAM Class No. Soil texture class 1 Sand 2 Loamy Sand 3 Sandy Loam 4 Silt Loam 5 Silt 6 Loam 7 Sandy Clay Loam 8 Silty Clay Loam 9 Clay Loam 10 Sandy Clay 11 Silty Clay 12 Clay Top soil type (New STASGO database 30s… previous DREAM was a combination of FAO (2min) and ZOBLER (1º) )

Soil Texture triangle to determine the fractions of clay and silt Class No. Soil texture class % Sand % Silt % Clay 1 Sand 92 5 3 2 Loamy Sand 82 12 6 Sandy Loam 58 32 10 4 Silt Loam 17 70 13 Silt 85 Loam 43 39 18 7 Sandy Clay Loam 15 27 8 Silty Clay Loam 56 34 9 Clay Loam Sandy Clay 52 42 11 Silty Clay 47 Clay 22 20

Clay Fraction (0-1) Class No. % Clay 1 3 2 6 10 4 13 5 18 7 27 8 34 9 42 11 47 12 58 Clay Fraction (0-1)

Silt Fraction (0-1) Class No. % Silt 1 5 2 12 3 32 4 70 85 6 39 7 15 8 56 9 34 10 11 47 20 Silt Fraction (0-1)

w´ Soil water potential (volume fraction (%))

DELTA * Tunning parameter ( * ) Shown for k=4 (kg * s2 /m5)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Dry threshold friction velocity (m/s) Comes from old Bagnold’s theory which is valid for coarse particles (>30-40um radius) But in fact, the friction velocity for saltation of fine particles should increase due to cohesive forces Theory says that fine particles are uplifted by sandblasting (not saltation) which is not taken into account by DREAM parameterization with viscous sublayer. Instead, in DREAM the decreasing function of Balgnold uplifts the fine particles by saltation (which is strictly incorrect if we believe in Saltation/Sandblasting Theory). We need to conciliate viscous sublayer approach with saltation/sanblastingtheory. If not possible we will have to switch to a flux form emission scheme taking into account saltation and sandblasting.

BSC NMMB-DUST (V200712 with old ESMF) First successful test simulation including: - Dust emission with viscous sublayer (PHYSICS) - Dust vertical diffusion (PHYSICS) - Dust horizontal diffusion (DYNAMICS) - Dust horizontal advection (DYNAMICS) Dust vertical advection (DYNAMICS)

In this version, dust is included in the existing components of the ESMF/NMMB Experience has shown that switching to a new NMMB version would take 3-4 days. This is the best way to develop at this moment. Final version may include a separate module for dust emission, vertical diffusion and deposition although this is not strictly necessary: it can be included as a subroutine in the already existing physics component. Dust dynamics will be kept in the NMMB dynamics component. ATM Coupler DYN-PHYS Dynamics export T, U, V, Q, CW, Q2, OMGALF, DUST RUN DYN (Now includes dust hadv,vadv and hdiff) RUN PHYS (Now includes dust emission and vdiff) Coupler DYN-PHYS Physics Export T, U, V, Q, CW, Q2, DUST

PRELIMINARY ENCOURAGING RESULTS Simulation set-up: Global Cycle 20080124 12 UTC 60 hours forecast 160 CPU’s 8 dust bins 769x541 64 sigma layers

Cycle 20080124_12 54h forecast Dust conc bin 4 Sigma layer 52 Kg/m3 Sorry for such a rudimentary visualization

Cycle 20080124_12 60h forecast Dust conc bin 4 Sigma layer 52 Kg/m3

Next steps (I): Finish a crude version of the model in the NMMB V200712 version. This means: include dry deposition (sedimentation and turbulent mix out) and wet deposition as implemented in DREAM Turbulent mix out parameterization from Giorgi 1986 in DREAM is a good option. However I have checked the sedimentation scheme and compared to other models (Chimere, Gocart) and needs to be changed (we need to talk about it). We should remember also that wet deposition is very very simple and should be changed as well in future versions Once everything works in V200712: switch to the new V200807 (includes new ESMF Version). Also includes new tracer advection schemes (Old ones are lagrangian. New ones are Eulerian, positive definite, mass conservative and monotonic). This change will be straightforward. Once a full version of the system works, Karsten can go on with his thesis and improve/change emission, deposition schemes.

Next steps (I): Other things to be done in the near future (list is not exhaustive): - tests in regional mode - postprocessing of DUST (currently does not write through the ESMF write component), visualization of the NMMB in general scalability tests improvement of parallel behaviour with introduced dust component ….