Evaluation criteria, process and Consequences of evaluation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation of VS: Addressing Veterinary Statutory Bodies, Private veterinarians and para-professionals Dr. Caroline Planté OIE Sub-regional Representation.
Advertisements

The German Experience: Patent litigation and nullification cases
Chapter Three: FEDERAL COURTS
The judicial system in Albania The judicial power is exercised by the courts of first instance, the courts of appeal and the High Court. Courts may be.
Prosecutor Training Centers Conference Prof. Dr. Mariana SEMINI Jakarta, Indonesia March 16-18, 2011 Albanian Magistrates School.
1 SVERIGES DOMSTOLAR Who does what in Swedish courts.
ZHRC/HTI Financial Management Training
Courts and Tribunals Operation and control of the Courts and Tribunals as well as the legal status of professional Judges and Magistrates, who shall form.
The Finnish Legal Profession of Advocates Who is an advocate? An advocate is an experienced lawyer specialised in handling legal matters of his clients.
Chapter Three: FEDERAL COURTS. The Basic Principles of American Court Organization Jurisdiction Trial and Appellate Courts Dual Courts.
Italian and European Institutions Classe 3C Liceo Scientifico “Albert Einstein” Cervignano del Friuli (UD) Group Group : Virgolin Teacher: Marilena Beltramini.
CHILDREN’S RIGHTS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC - THE VIEW OF THE COMMITTEE FOR THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD ANETA PLAVINOVÁ SECRETARY TO THE COMMITTEE FOR THE RIGHTS.
Dublinbureau Nederland REFORM OF JUDICIARY in Republic of Croatia.
Work Programme for the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration "Integrating and strengthening the European Research.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Planning, Applying, and Evaluating a Treatment Program Chapter 24.
Group 3 1) Nguyen Huu Quy 2) Hoang Tran Duc Hong 3) Nguyen Ngoc Tuyet Mai 4) Ho Thai Binh 5) Dang Van Dao.
General Summing up of the proceedings and debates Dr iur Julia Laffranque (Estonia) Justice at the Supreme Court Vice chair of the CCJE.
European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics Session 26: Census 2011 « Helsinki, 6 May 2010 « Census quality control with BSC: the Portuguese.
REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA The Reform of the Judicial System in the Republic of Macedonia Warsaw, June 2005.
High Level Judicial Forum Second Judicial Reform Project (JRP2) Judicial System of Armenia World Bank The Portuguese System for Judges’ evaluation Yerevan,
1 Priority objectives for development of “Public Administration Reform, Local Government Decentralisation” sector UPGRADING THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR CIVIL.
NATIONAL LEGAL AID BUREAU. 2  The Legal Aid Act was promulgated in the “State Gazette”, issue No. 79/ , coming into force on 1 Jan  13.
The Finnish Legal Profession of Advocates Who is an advocate? An advocate is an experienced lawyer specialised in handling legal matters of his clients.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 16 – Taxation Bilateral screening:
EVALUATION OF SCHOOL LEADERSHIP AND TEACHING PRACTICE BASQUE COUNTRY INSPECTORATE OF EDUCATION. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, LINGÜISTIC POLICY AND CULTURE.
Evaluation of judges in Republic of Croatia Duro Sessa Justice of Supreme Court of Republic of Croatia President of Association of Croatian Judges.
Nacionalna agencija Republike Slovenije za kakovost v viskoem šolstvu - NAKVIS Slovenian Quality Assurance Agency of Higher Education - SQAA presented.
The European Court of Justice EU Institutions The European Commission The European Parliament The Council of the European Union The European Court of.
Overview of Standards on Cost Auditing By: CMA Pradip H.Desai.
The Finnish Legal Profession of Attorneys-at-law
The New Ofsted Framework May 2012
University of Zaragoza
Software Quality Control and Quality Assurance: Introduction
International Association of Tax Judges
Quality of Education - Teachers' Professional Training and Development
European Judicial Training Network - Judicial training
Tax Court system in Germany The role of the Federal Tax Court
Updating the Regulation for the JINR Programme Advisory Committees
Workshop on Regulatory Governance 7 April 2016, Riga, Latvia
What every student should know to pass the Civics & Economics EOC
Agenda 5.11 General Regulations
CIVIL SERVICE REFORM IN EU INTEGRATION PROCESSES
Setting Actuarial Standards
The Citizen Participation Trial
ENQA Agency Reviews – main changes from the old review process
The Portuguese Judicial High Council:
Measuring quantitative indicators Courts performance
Judicial High Council (CSM) Contentious
The Portuguese Judicial System The Judicial High Council
National Judicial Appointment Commission Act, 2014
Evaluation criteria, process and Consequences of evaluation
Experiences and improvement plans
WORKSHOP DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS IN UKRAINE JUDICIAL DISCIPLINARY PRACTICE: PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF JUDICIAL MISCOONDUCT.
JUDICIAL REFORM IN PORTUGAL
Judicial Training on EU Taxation Law
Responsibility and accountability The role of judicial and administrative inspection bodies 4th april, 2018 – Rodolfo de Serpa.
WORKSHOP DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS IN UKRAINE DISCIPLINARY LIABILITY OF JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS WITHIN NATIONAL SYSTEMS PORTUGAL.
Roles and Responsibilities of Judicial Self-Governance Institutions in Safeguarding Judicial Independence LISBON, May 2018.
EU ACCESSION CRITERIA AS SET UP BY THE COUNCIL OF THE EU
Albanian Situation Marsida Xhaferllari and Brunilda Kadi
WORKSHOP DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS IN UKRAINE JUDICIAL DISCIPLINARY PRACTICE: ANALYSIS OF COMPLAINTS ADMISSIBILITY AND OPINIONS.
Disciplinary liability of judges in Romania
LECTURE No 6 - THE EUROPEAN UNION’s JUDICIAL SYSTEM I (courts)
Georgiana Iorgulescu Executive Director Center for Legal Resources
Framework for Recognition
The Finnish Legal Profession of Attorneys-at-law
The Expert Valuation Witness and the Different Procedural Models in European Court Proceedings . Associate Prof. (Dr. hab. Magdalena Habdas.
Mr. Vaton Durguti (Court President, Basic Court of Gjakova)
How Albania Judiciary measure performance of judges
International Standards and Contemporary Technologies,
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation criteria, process and Consequences of evaluation Strengths and Limitations of the Portuguese System of the Evaluation of Judges Evaluation criteria, process and Consequences of evaluation LISBON, May 2018

The Portuguese High Council Strengths and Limitations of the Portuguese System of the Evaluation of Judges Operates under the guidance of the Constitution of the Republic of Portugal, that provides it legitimacy and exclusive responsibility to deal with the subjects of the Judges assessment and their disciplinary rules. The Portuguese High Council

The Performance evaluation of judges Strengths and Limitations of the Portuguese System of the Evaluation of Judges The performance evaluation of the judges is the most relevant activity of our Judicial High Council. The assessment of judges in our system as an evidence that ensures and reinforces our independence as judges. The Performance evaluation of judges

The Performance evaluation of judges Strengths and Limitations of the Portuguese System of the Evaluation of Judges It implies a complex and detailed process where the professional path of each judge is evaluated thoroughly, and thus, naturally, requires a great deal of human and monetary resources from the JHC . The Performance evaluation of judges

The assessment services Strengths and Limitations of the Portuguese System of the Evaluation of Judges The JHC does not interfere in the content of the decisions of the judges, there fore, the merit of judicial decisions is not attected by the inspector. This assessment activity is undertaken only by experienced Judicial Magistrates and not by other legal professionals or academics. The judges have no hierarchical bond or functional connection nor functional connection with the judges. The assessment services

The assessment services Strengths and Limitations of the Portuguese System of the Evaluation of Judges The members of the Judicial Assessment, are chosen by the JHC, that as you know, has a pluralistic and heterogeneous composition. This private group of 20 or 22 inspectors is composed by Judicial Magistrates who are appointed from the Courts of Appeal , requiring quite 20 years of professional experience , and with very good professional classification. The assessment services

The assessment services Strengths and Limitations of the Portuguese System of the Evaluation of Judges Each inspector works with a judicial secretary appointed to the administrative tasks, such as collecting the judicial processes on courts, or leading with the court number rates, that the inspector requires to evaluate the productivity and efficiency rates of the judge . The judicial assessment service must also inform the HJC about the real condition of each court , their needs and deficiencies, in order to require any arrangements and to improve the overall efficiency of the judicial services. The assessment services

The Performance evaluation of judges Strengths and Limitations of the Portuguese System of the Evaluation of Judges The members of judicial assessment service are also in charge of the disciplinary activity. The Performance evaluation of judges

The evaluation criteria and the proceedings of judges evaluation Strengths and Limitations of the Portuguese System of the Evaluation of Judges To consider the merit and progress of the judges, and their adequate classification, the Judicial Assessment Services performs periodical ordinary inspections to the judge every four years of working, and at the end of their his first year of work on court. The evaluation criteria and the proceedings of judges evaluation

The evaluation criteria and the proceedings of judges evaluation Strengths and Limitations of the Portuguese System of the Evaluation of Judges An extraordinary inspection may be performed whenever the HJC deems necessary (in each case assigned), such as when the judge ‘ s last rating is Sufficient, or the difficulty of the judge to deal with the amount of the cases, that can be taking even if he is on the Court of Appeal. The evaluation criteria and the proceedings of judges evaluation

The evaluation criteria and the proceedings of judges evaluation Strengths and Limitations of the Portuguese System of the Evaluation of Judges The assessment criteria in the classification of Judges - (Mediocre, Sufficient, Good and Very Good) must attend the performance of the judge on the mode, volume, difficulty and management of the service the judge is in charge, of his ability to simplify the pleadings, the conditions of that work, their technical preparation and training, intellectual profile, human capacity, published legal works, and civic aptitude; The evaluation criteria and the proceedings of judges evaluation

The evaluation criteria and the proceedings of judges evaluation Strengths and Limitations of the Portuguese System of the Evaluation of Judges The process of the judge inspection ends with a long and detailed report and ends with the proposed classification or rating. After the inspection, the report is distributed to the members of the HJC that will inturn present their own proposal of deliberation, and signing up for the session of the Council; the report is present and discussed, and voted in the council. The evaluation criteria and the proceedings of judges evaluation

The evaluation criteria and the proceedings of judges evaluation Strengths and Limitations of the Portuguese System of the Evaluation of Judges The deliberation may always be contested by the judge, thus respecting the principle of contradiction, and if, required, the possibility on the end , appealing to the Supreme Judicial Court. The evaluation criteria and the proceedings of judges evaluation

Thank you so much for your attention