Stakeholder Management

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Soft Systems Methodology systems thinking systems thinking systems thinking systems thinking systems thinking systems thinking.
Advertisements

Goals of INFO3315 Learn about the range of techniques to: Understand users Establish requirements Brainstorm alternatives creatively Prototyping alternative.
Laboratorium Sistem Informasi
© Colin Potts B1-1 Organizational approaches to requirements Colin Potts Georgia Tech.
Can the Public Sector understand the concept of Productivity? How to achieve productivity without the private sector bottom line? Responsibility Accountability.
Lecture 4 : Soft Systems Thinking & Practice UFCE8V-20-3 Information Systems Development SHAPE Hong Kong 2010/11.
Soft Systems Methodology
Introduction to Soft Systems Methodology
Soft Systems Methodology
Information Technology IMS5024 Information Systems Modelling Human Activity modelling.
SSM - 1 Soft Systems Methodology SSM Elena Losseva MBA 731 November 12, 2007.
Introduction to Soft Systems Methodology. The Vision SSM Models Use Cases Activity Models Dynamic Models Object Models Programs Databases Business Computing.
淡江資管碩專一 許瀞文 陳雅玲 指導教授:戴敏育 博士 報告日期:
Action Logic Modelling Logic Models communicate a vision for an intervention as a solution to a public health nutrition (PHN) problem to:  funding agencies,
Business Analysis Methodology (MM543)
Aims of the Rich Picture Include all relevant hard facts Include all relevant hard facts Include all relevant soft issues Include all relevant soft issues.
Software Engineering: Analysis and Design - CSE3308
CONTACT SEMINAR November 2008 Project management tools.
Metode Pemecahan Masalah 1 Session 1: Metode Pemecahan Masalah 1 Seminar e-Bisnis Program Studi Manajemen Universitas Bina Nusantara.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
IMS5024 Week 81 IMS 5024 Human Activity modelling.
Writing Objectives for Extension Programs by Glenn Israel.
socio-organizational issues and stakeholder requirements
UFCE8V-20-3 Information Systems Development 3 (SHAPE HK)
Stakeholders and Food Security: Managing Interfaces José Filipe Fonseca FANRPAN Policy Dialogue on Regional Strategies for Addressing the Global Food Crisis.
HOW TO WRITE A GOOD TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR FOR EVALUATION Programme Management Interest Group 19 October 2010 Pinky Mashigo.
Good Pharmacy Practice- GPP Part 7. Quality Management
Project Human Resource Management
Foundation in Business Analysis
ISO Richard Welford CSR Asia © CSR Asia 2011.
Year 12 Business Studies Operations REVIEW.
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
Systems Thinking, Rich Mapping and Conceptual Models.
PABLO RODRÍGUEZ-BILELLA PABLO RODRÍGUEZ-BILELLA Executive Committee Member Evaluation Networks and Governance: The case of the ReLAC (Latin American Network.
PART II – Management Audit: Basic Standards, Values and Norms Shared by Pratap Kumar Pathak.
CB1004 Modelling Business Systems 71 Modelling Business Systems 7 Systems Methods.
CHAPTER 1 BUSINESS INFORMATION SYSTEM ; AN OVERVIEW.
1 Introduction to Evaluating the Minnesota Demonstration Program Paint Product Stewardship Initiative September 19, 2007 Seattle, WA Matt Keene, Evaluation.
Spring ÇGIE398 - lecture 21 lecture 2 : the problem situation we discuss: the components of a problem situation mind maps rich pictures.
Monitoring & Evaluation Presentation for Technical Assistance Unit, National Treasury 19 August 2004 Fia van Rensburg.
BCO Impact Assessment Component 3 Scoping Study David Souter.
Week 4 (2) 2008IS33 ISD - SSM 1 COMP3470 IS33 People-Centred Information Systems Development Week 4 : Lecture 2 ISD Approaches: Soft Systems Methodology.
 Welcome, introductions  Conceptualizing the evaluation problem  stakeholder interests  Divergent and convergent processes  Developing evaluation.
Enterprise Design Process: Business Processes Johan Strümpfer.
Information Modelling Holistic Technique. Rich Picture Root Definition Conceptual Model Cognitive Map SSM Multiview SODA Soft Methodology.
Version VTT TECHNOLOGY STUDIES Evaluating the societal impacts of Public research organisations: A (belated) paradigm shift in the making Kaisa.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division WHAT MAKES AN EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT STATISTICAL SYSTEM Lidia Bratanova, Statistical.
An Interactive Model of Research Design. 1. ID Problem Rich Picture 2. Express Problem 3. CATWOE & Root Def. Five Stakeholder Perspectives 4. Build Conceptual.
M253 Team Work in Distributed Environments Week (3) By Dr. Dina Tbaishat.
Soft Systems Modelling 1 David Millard | davidmillard.org.
Application of Soft Systems Methodology in Solving Real World Problems
Real Estate Institute of Zimbabwe
Connecting to the Global Data Ecosystem
Project Human Resource Management
MODELOS DE GESTIÓN DE CALIDAD
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
CIS300 System Analysis and Design Methods
Public Services Information Management
PROFESSOR ROBIN MATTHEWS KINGSTON UNIVERSITY BUSINESS SCHOOL LONDON
SOFT SYSTEMS AND THE META MODEL SEPTEMBER 2018 perspectives abridged
WATER POLICY And Management in AlabamA
PROFESSOR ROBIN MATTHEWS KINGSTON UNIVERSITY BUSINESS SCHOOL LONDON
WHAT is evaluation and WHY is it important?
Why should the public sector want to innovate?
ILO Decent Work Country Programmes
ECONOMICS IN THE WFD PROCESS
New Approaches to Governance
Civil Society Facility and Media Programme Call for proposals: EuropeAid/162473/DH/ACT/Multi Webinar no. 3: Preparing effective Concept Note.
The Active Citizens Fund in Bulgaria Programme Priorities and Measures for Support Short version of the presentation delivered at the Official Launch.
Information system analysis and design
Presentation transcript:

Stakeholder Management The case of Umgeni Water 7 October 2016

Mapping your stakeholders Using a systems map What are the boundaries of the domain? Who is included and who excluded. A hierarchy of purposes

An awareness of mental models What are the different discourses What are the contributions to the narratives.

An awareness of outputs and outcomes Intended outputs and their optimisation Constraints Unintentional outcomes Intentional outcomes

Ulrich’s four groups of stakeholders Beneficiaries Designers Decision takers Witnesses

Customers or Beneficiaries Those who are intended to benefit from the organisations core purpose Those who depend on the organisation as employer The upstream and downstream beneficiaries Leveraged beneficiaries

Designers Designers of hard systems Designers of soft systems

Decision takers Those responsible for Determining priorities Planning and scheduling work Securing resources Managing supply chains Monitoring work Complying with regulations

Witnesses Those responsible for political oversight Those who hold professional perspectives Those responsible for accountability issues Those who articulate responses in the public media

Ulrich’s 12 boundary questions (Is vs ought) Who is the client of system S to be designed or improved? What is the purpose of the system S? What goal state is envisaged? What is the measure of success of S? Who is the decision taker re the measure of improvement? What components of S are controlled by the decision taker? What resources and conditions are part of the environment? (Outside direct control) Who is the designer of S? Who are the experts and what expertise do they bring? Who is the guarantor for the designer of S? Who are the witnesses representing concerned citizens affected? How are the affected given a chance to make significant inputs? What worldview is being privileged by S?

Dynamics Professional, administrative and legal norms vs cultural, social and economic norms of those affected

Planning collaborative action Collaborative action requires applying systems thinking principles: Advocacy, participation and responsiveness to learning together Sensitivity to stakeholder perceptions Sensitivity to prevailing conditions Co-construction of project pathways A continuing process of co-learning and learning transfer

Seven steps of SSM Situation considered problematical Problem situation expressed Root definitions of relevant purposeful activity systems\Conceptual models of the relevant systems (holons) named in root definitions Comparisons of models and the real world Changes: systematically desirable and culturally feasible Action to improve the problematical situation

Collaborative learning tools Rich pictures Root definitions CATWOE Application and critiquing of root definitions Building new Human Activity Systems (HAS)

CATWOE Customers or beneficiaries Actors Transactions (from – to) Worldview Owners Environment

Tests for actions Is it effective? Is it efficacious? Is it efficient? Is it ethical?

Root definition A system to do P by Q in order to contribute to achieving R What to do? How to do it? Why do it?