Investigators Tony Johnson, T. V. Hromadka II and Steve Horton

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 2 Jack Tanabe Old Dominion University Hampton, VA January 2011 Mathematical Formulation of the Two Dimensional Magnetic Field.
Advertisements

Computational Modeling for Engineering MECN 6040
Chapter 8 Elliptic Equation.
P. Venkataraman Mechanical Engineering P. Venkataraman Rochester Institute of Technology DETC2013 – 12269: Continuous Solution for Boundary Value Problems.
P. Venkataraman Mechanical Engineering P. Venkataraman Rochester Institute of Technology DETC2014 – 35148: Continuous Solution for Boundary Value Problems.
Chapter 3 Steady-State Conduction Multiple Dimensions
BVP Weak Formulation Weak Formulation ( variational formulation) where Multiply equation (1) by and then integrate over the domain Green’s theorem gives.
Finite Element Method Introduction General Principle
95 學年度第 2 學期碩士論文口試 1 Derivation of the Green’s function for Laplace and Helmholtz problems with circular boundaries by using the null-field integral equation.
PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
S. Mandayam/ EEMAG-1/ECE Dept./Rowan University Engineering Electromagnetics Fall 2004 Shreekanth Mandayam ECE Department Rowan University.
Theory of Groundwater Flow
MCE 561 Computational Methods in Solid Mechanics
Types of Governing equations
Numerical methods for PDEs PDEs are mathematical models for –Physical Phenomena Heat transfer Wave motion.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
The Finite Element Method
1 Numerical Methods and Software for Partial Differential Equations Lecturer:Dr Yvonne Fryer Time:Mondays 10am-1pm Location:QA210 / KW116 (Black)
Tutorial 5: Numerical methods - buildings Q1. Identify three principal differences between a response function method and a numerical method when both.
Dr. Vasileios Lempessis MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS II COMPLEX ALGEBRA LECTURE - 1 “The imaginary numbers are a wonderful flight of God’s spirit; they are almost.
PTT 204/3 APPLIED FLUID MECHANICS SEM 2 (2012/2013)
Finite Element Method.
MA5251: Spectral Methods & Applications
1 EEE 431 Computational Methods in Electrodynamics Lecture 4 By Dr. Rasime Uyguroglu
Theory of Groundwater Flow
Module 4 Multi-Dimensional Steady State Heat Conduction.
Akram Bitar and Larry Manevitz Department of Computer Science
© Fluent Inc. 11/24/2015J1 Fluids Review TRN Overview of CFD Solution Methodologies.
HEAT TRANSFER FINITE ELEMENT FORMULATION
Engineering Analysis – Computational Fluid Dynamics –
MECH4450 Introduction to Finite Element Methods Chapter 9 Advanced Topics II - Nonlinear Problems Error and Convergence.
FALL 2015 Esra Sorgüven Öner
Discretization Methods Chapter 2. Training Manual May 15, 2001 Inventory # Discretization Methods Topics Equations and The Goal Brief overview.
Generalized Finite Element Methods
Partial Derivatives bounded domain Its boundary denoted by
Partial Derivatives Example: Find If solution: Partial Derivatives Example: Find If solution: gradient grad(u) = gradient.
MULTIDIMENSIONAL HEAT TRANSFER  This equation governs the Cartesian, temperature distribution for a three-dimensional unsteady, heat transfer problem.
Project NExT CAS Panel Session University of Wisconsin, Madison July 30, 2008 Mathematica in the Military: Using CAS tools at the United States Military.
Solving Partial Differential Equation Numerically Pertemuan 13 Matakuliah: S0262-Analisis Numerik Tahun: 2010.
ERT 216 HEAT & MASS TRANSFER Sem 2/ Dr Akmal Hadi Ma’ Radzi School of Bioprocess Engineering University Malaysia Perlis.
1 Variational and Weighted Residual Methods. 2 Introduction The Finite Element method can be used to solve various problems, including: Steady-state field.
Computational Fluid Dynamics Lecture II Numerical Methods and Criteria for CFD Dr. Ugur GUVEN Professor of Aerospace Engineering.
I- Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD-I)
Introduction to the Finite Element Method
A Semi-Lagrangian Laplace Transform Filtering Integration Scheme
Finite Difference Methods
Boyce/DiPrima 10th ed, Ch 10.8: Laplace’s Equation Elementary Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems, 10th edition, by William E. Boyce and.
FEM : Finite Element Method 2017.
Nodal Methods for Core Neutron Diffusion Calculations
Convergence in Computational Science
Introduction to Partial Differential Equations
PDEs and Examples of Phenomena Modeled
Materials Science & Engineering University of Michigan
Finite Difference Method
Analytical Tools in ME Course Objectives
Boundary Element Method
Mathematical modeling techniques in the engineering of landfill sites.
Z TRANSFORM AND DFT Z Transform
Topic 3 Discretization of PDE
Brief introduction to Partial Differential Equations (PDEs)
Lecture 2 Jack Tanabe Old Dominion University Hampton, VA January 2011
topic4: Implicit method, Stability, ADI method
Topic 3 Discretization of PDE
Chapter 2 Equations & Numerical Methods
Second Order-Partial Differential Equations
Ph.D. Thesis Numerical Solution of PDEs and Their Object-oriented Parallel Implementations Xing Cai October 26, 1998.
Hydrology Modeling in Alaska: Modeling Overview
Topic 3 Discretization of PDE
Akram Bitar and Larry Manevitz Department of Computer Science
Presentation transcript:

The CVBEM: A Complex Variable Boundary Element Method for Mixed Boundaries Investigators Tony Johnson, T. V. Hromadka II and Steve Horton Department of Mathematical Sciences, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY 10996, United States

Background The Complex Variable Boundary Element Method or CVBEM is a numerical method, which solves partial differential equations of the Laplace and Poisson type. It is a generalization of the Cauchy integral formula into a boundary integral equation method. This generalization allows an immediate and extremely valuable transfer of the modeling techniques used in real variable boundary integral equation methods (or boundary element methods) to the CVBEM. Modeling techniques for dissimilar materials, anisotropic materials, and time advancement, can be directly applied without modification to the CVBEM.

Advantages of CVBEM over FDM/FEM CVBEM does not require modeling nodal points to be defined on the problem boundary or in the interior of the problem domain. Both the FDM and FEM techniques require nodal points to be defined on the problem boundary and within the problem domain. The CVBEM also solves the governing PDE, while FEM and FDM are only able to develop approximations.

Advantages of CVBEM over FDM/FEM The CVBEM provides an approximation function that is continuous throughout the problem domain where the other methods do not. The CVBEM approximation function exists outside the problem domain, whereas the FEM and FDM approximations do not. The CVBEM is more useful than analytical methods such as a Fourier series expansion because it is not limited to a specific domain.

Consider the twisting behavior of a elliptically oriented, homogeneous, isotropic shaft.

By the Cauchy integral formula, the value of w(z) at any point inside the closed contour C is determined by the values of the function along the boundary contour C. w(z*) w(z) C

Mixed Boundary condition Evaluation points Potentials Mixed Boundary condition Problem Domain x Problem Boundary Streamlines Simple closed contour, C Nodes

Time Analysis Time Number of Nodes 1.5 1 0.5 100 200 300 400 500 600 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Number of Nodes

Two dimensional linear diffusion PDE is solved using CVBEM. The approach is applicable modeling diffusion problems with Dirichlet boundary conditions and an initial condition that is equal on the boundary to the boundary conditions.

Solution Methodology The global initial-boundary value problem is decomposed into a steady-state component and a transient component. The steady state part is modeled using CVBEM. The transient part is modeled using by a linear combination of basis functions that are the products of a two-dimensional Fourier sine series and an exponential function

Solution Methodology The global initial-boundary value problem is decomposed into a steady-state component and a transient component. The steady state part is modeled using CVBEM. The transient part is modeled using by a linear combination of basis functions that are the products of a two-dimensional Fourier sine series and an exponential function

Steady State Results The Figure shows the transient approximation function as it converges to the transient initial condition using various numbers of basis functions (specified by n). The error distribution is shown below.

Steady State Results Contour plot of CVBEM steady-state approximation. Collocation points are shown in red, and potential and streamlines are depicted. Absolute error of CVBEM steady-state approximation on problem boundary.

Transient State Results The Figure depicts the evolution of the global approximation function at various model times. The approximations in this figure were created using 64 terms in the transient approximation function and 32 terms in the CVBEM approximation function.

Application of CVBEM for solving Diffusion and Wave equations was presented at the first colloquia at US Military West Point Academy, 2016.

Finite Volume Method (FVM) is popular in groundwater modeling community. Complex Variable Boundary Element Method (CVBEM) solution is compared with that of bench mark Finite Volume method. This is the first published comparison in literature.

Test Problem The test problem is of two-dimensional ideal fluid flow in a 90-degree horizontal bend. This is chosen due availability of the analytic solution, and the challenge of developing the flow field vector trajectories for a highly spatially variable flow field problem. The focus is on comparing flow field trajectory vectors of the fluid flow, with respect to vector magnitude and direction.

Comparison of Vector Trajectories Overlay of CVBEM velocity vectors on FVM model velocity vectors Overlay of CVBEM velocity vectors on FVM model streamlines

Comparison of Vector Trajectories Error measurement of velocity magnitude of FVM & CVBEM solution Error measurement of velocity vector angle of FVM & CVBEM solution

Conclusions Comparison of the CVBEM and FVM flow field trajectory vectors for the target problem of flow in a 90-degree bend shows good agreement between the considered methodologies. The average relative error in velocity magnitude is 1.1% and in velocity direction is 0.15%. This is the first such work in which velocity vectors developed by the CVBEM are compared to the results from an FVM model and the results indicate that the flow trajectory vectors developed from the CVBEM are correctly determined and properly represent the ideal fluid flow velocity and direction.

Objectives Five new advances in the CVBEM are presented. These are The use of Mathematica and Matlab in tandem to calculate and plot the flow net of a boundary value problem. The magnitude of the size of the problem domain is extended. The modeling results include direct computation and development of a flow net. The graphical displays of the total flownet are developed simultaneously. The nodal point location as an additional degree of freedom in the CVBEM modeling approach is extended to mixed boundaries.

Wolfram Mathematica MATLAB 8 4 6 3 4 2 2 1 -2 -4 -1 -4 -2 2 4 6 8 10 2 -2 -4 -1 -4 -2 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 Wolfram Mathematica MATLAB

The Complex Variable Boundary Element Method or CVBEM is used to develop a computer model for estimating the location of the freezing front in soil-water phase change problems. The model was applied over two-dimensional domain to predict the thermal regime of the soil system.

Definition sketch of domain for phase change of soil water

Boundary Element method nodal definitions

Boundary Element method node numbering scheme

Finite Element model discretization

Comparison between FEM and BEM results

Thank You