Thursday, Aug. 31.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Unit VI – The Judicial System
Advertisements

Review.
The Federal Court System. Lower Federal Courts The Constitution allows for Congress to establish a network of lower federal courts as well. These courts.
1 Agenda for 25th Class Admin – Handouts – Name plates – Lunch today Meet at 11:45 outside Rm 433 (Faculty Lounge) Subject matter jurisdiction – Review.
CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTIONS C & F Fall 2005 Class 6 Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Diversity and Alienage Introduction to Personal Jurisdiction.
Act of Aug. 13, 1888, ch. 866, § 1, 25 Stat. 433, 434 That the circuit courts of the United States shall have original cognizance, concurrent with the.
Thurs. Sept. 13. constitutional restrictions on service.
1 Agenda for 15th Class Admin – Handouts – Name plates – Lunch this Wednesday (3/12) Meet outside Rm. 433 (Faculty Lounge) – Summer RA work Review of joinder.
The Judicial Branch. The Original Plan The idea of the judicial branch came from the Virginia Plan. The idea of the judicial branch came from the Virginia.
Substance/procedure. A NY state court wants to know whether it should use PA’s statute of limitations (damages limitations, burden of proof, evidentiary.
C H A P T E R 18 The Federal Court System
Tuesday, Nov. 13. necessary parties Rule 19. Required Joinder of Parties (a) Persons Required to Be Joined if Feasible. (1) Required Party. A person.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 27 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 28, 2002.
Thurs. Sept. 20. federal subject matter jurisdiction diversity and alienage jurisdiction.
Dispute Resolution Chapter 2. Judicial Review Marbury v. Madison –Establishes the idea of judicial review.
1 Agenda for 25th Class Name plates out Introduction to Diversity Jurisdiction Discussion of mediation & court visit Settlement (continued) Fees Next class:
Tuesday, Aug. 26. Civil Procedure Law 102 Section 1.
Thurs., Oct. 17. PERSONAL JURISDICTION IN STATE COURT.
Mon. Sept. 24. removal 1441(a) Except as otherwise expressly provided by Act of Congress, any civil action brought in a State court of which the district.
1 Agenda for 24th Class Name plates out Fee Shifting Diversity Jurisdiction Introduction to Erie.
Article III The Judicial Power. Section 1 The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as.
Dred Scott v Sandford Facts of the Case: Dred Scott was a slave in Missouri. From 1833 to 1843, he resided in Illinois (a free state) and in an area of.
Declining Supplemental Jurisd. Standard of Appellate Review “Standard of review” What mean?
CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTIONS C & F Fall 2005 August Class 5 Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Diversity and Alienage.
The Judicial System The Courts and Jurisdiction. Courts Trial Courts: Decides controversies by determining facts and applying appropriate rules Appellate.
Chapter 14: The National Judiciary. Creation Called for by Alexander Hamilton in Federalist Paper #22. Article III, Section I: The judicial Power of the.
Fri., Oct D Corp (Ore) manufactures thimbles - engaged in a national search to locate a suitable engineer to work at its only manufacturing plant,
1 Agenda for 17th Class Admin –Name plates –Handouts Slides Polinsky –Office hours this week Thursday 12-1PM Not Thursday 2-3PM –Thanks for electing me.
Thurs., Nov. 15. Supplemental Jurisdiction P(NY) D(NY) I(NY) federal securities state law fraud state law breach of contract state law Insurance contract.
Thurs. Feb. 11. Holzer Buchanan v. Doe (Va. 1993)
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 4 SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION I – Federal Question Jurisdiction Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University.
Presentation Pro © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc. Magruder’s American Government C H A P T E R 18 The Federal Court System.
Chapter 18 The Federal Court System. Section 1, The National Judiciary Objectives: Objectives: 1. Explain why the Constitution created a national judiciary,
Wed., Sept. 10. service service when defendant is an individual.
Monday, Aug. 21.
Monday, Aug. 28.
INTRODUCTION TO THE COURT SYSTEM
Wed., Aug. 30.
Thursday, Aug. 24.
Wednesday, Aug. 23.
Mon., Sept. 16.
Types of Federal Courts
Discovering The National Judiciary
Wed., Sept. 7.
Wed., Sept. 14.
Fri., Oct. 31.
Thurs., Sept. 15.
Monday, Aug. 27.
Monday, Sept. 3.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court
“Dual” Court System “Dual” Court System “Dual” Court System.
Discovering The National Judiciary
Dred Scott v. Sanford.
Mon., Sep. 10.
Tues., Sept. 10.
Wed., Oct. 17.
Thurs., Oct. 13.
Tues., Sept. 17.
The United States Court System
Wed., Sept. 5.
The American Civil War and the Failure of Leadership
FEDERAL COURT The Constitution (Article III) allows Congress to grant the federal courts jurisdiction over eight types of cases: cases arising under the.
The Dred Scott Decision
Thurs., Sept. 19.
Review.
8X Tuesday Objective: Describe political developments in the US that led to Civil War. Agenda: Do Now: Explain the rise of the Republican Party.
Professor Keith Rizzardi Part 1 Slides Jurisdiction
Review.
Review.
Presentation transcript:

Thursday, Aug. 31

subject matter jurisdiction

federal subject matter jurisdiction diversity and alienage jurisdiction

U. S. Const. Article III. Section. 2 U.S. Const. Article III.  Section. 2.  Clause 1:The judicial Power shall extend …to Controversies …between a State and Citizens of another State;--between Citizens of different States…and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects. 

Sec. 1332. - Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs (a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and is between-- (1) citizens of different States; (2) citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state, except that the district courts shall not have original jurisdiction under this subsection of an action between citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state who are lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States and are domiciled in the same State; (3) citizens of different States and in which citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional parties . . . (e) The word ''States'', as used in this section, includes the Territories, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico

domicile

intent to remain indefinitely v intent to remain indefinitely v. intent to make it your home (even if not permanently)

no intent to make home but intend to remain indefinitely – Gordon no intent to remain indefinitely but intend to make home – Michael Green example

not residence!

28 U.S.C. §1332(a) complete diversity complete alienage

Examples: is there federal SMJ under 28 USC 1332(a) Examples: is there federal SMJ under 28 USC 1332(a)? assumptions: - jurisdictional minimum is met - action is brought in federal court by the plaintiff - foreign national is domiciled in his own country (unless otherwise stated)

Californian sues a German (1) citizens of different States; (2) citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state, except that the district courts shall not have original jurisdiction under this subsection of an action between citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state who are lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States and are domiciled in the same State; (3) citizens of different States and in which citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional parties;

Californian sues a New Yorker and a Californian (1) citizens of different States; (2) citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state, except that the district courts shall not have original jurisdiction under this subsection of an action between citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state who are lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States and are domiciled in the same State; (3) citizens of different States and in which citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional parties

does it make sense that there is no diversity under 1332(a) for such a case?

German sues a Frenchman (1) citizens of different States; (2) citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state, except that the district courts shall not have original jurisdiction under this subsection of an action between citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state who are lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States and are domiciled in the same State; (3) citizens of different States and in which citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional parties

New Yorker sues Californian and Frenchman (1) citizens of different States; (2) citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state, except that the district courts shall not have original jurisdiction under this subsection of an action between citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state who are lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States and are domiciled in the same State; (3) citizens of different States and in which citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional parties

A New Yorker and a German sue a Californian and a German (1) citizens of different States; (2) citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state, except that the district courts shall not have original jurisdiction under this subsection of an action between citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state who are lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States and are domiciled in the same State; (3) citizens of different States and in which citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional parties

Californian sues a French citizen admitted for permanent residency in the United States who is domiciled in California (1) citizens of different States; (2) citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state, except that the district courts shall not have original jurisdiction under this subsection of an action between citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state who are lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States and are domiciled in the same State; (3) citizens of different States and in which citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional parties; and (4) a foreign state ... as plaintiff and citizens of a State or of different States.

German sues French citizen admitted for permanent residency in the United States who is domiciled in California (1) citizens of different States; (2) citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state, except that the district courts shall not have original jurisdiction under this subsection of an action between citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state who are lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States and are domiciled in the same State; (3) citizens of different States and in which citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional parties

German sues French citizen admitted for permanent residency in the United States who is domiciled in California could Congress send this case to federal court?

U. S. Const. Article III. Section. 2 U.S. Const. Article III.  Section. 2.  Clause 1:The judicial Power shall extend …to Controversies …between a State and Citizens of another State;--between Citizens of different States…and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects. 

Californian sues Elizabeth Taylor, an American national domiciled in France (1) citizens of different States; (2) citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state, except that the district courts shall not have original jurisdiction under this subsection of an action between citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state who are lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States and are domiciled in the same State; (3) citizens of different States and in which citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional parties

- Dred Scott, a slave owned in Missouri, is taken by his master to Wisconsin Territory (a free territory) - Scott lives there for a while and then returns with his master to Missouri. - Sanford, a New York citizen becomes Scott’s master - Scott sues Sanford in federal court to establish that his time in a free territory had made him free under state law - diversity jurisdiction?

A German sues a Frenchman and a New Yorker (1) citizens of different States; (2) citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state, except that the district courts shall not have original jurisdiction under this subsection of an action between citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state who are lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States and are domiciled in the same State; (3) citizens of different States and in which citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional parties

A citizen of DC sues a Virginian under Virginia state law

1332(e) The word ''States'', as used in this section, includes the Territories, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico

is 1332(e) constitutional?

U. S. Const. Article III. Section. 2 U.S. Const. Article III.  Section. 2.  Clause 1:The judicial Power shall extend …to Controversies …between a State and Citizens of another State;--between Citizens of different States…and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects. 

National Mut. Ins. Co. v. Tidewater Transfer Co., Inc. (1949)

Mas v. Perry, 489 F.2d 1396 (5th Cir. 1974)

were they domiciled in Louisiana…?

what happens to SMJ if Judy Mas receives Jean Paul Mas’s domicile at marriage?

what if the 5th Cir. had reversed the district court concerning SMJ?

does it matter that Jean Paul only recovered $5000?

P (NY) seeks to recover funds he believes are due to him under the will of X (CA) P sues X’s executor D (CA) for the funds in federal court SMJ?