South Bay Consortium for Adult Education Three Year Regional Plan Study Session 1: Quantitative Data + Consortium Self Assessment Steering Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Se. Mission To increase the organized capacity of people to care for one another.
Advertisements

Indianapolis-Carmel MSA
Demographic Trends and Missouri’s Children Missouri State Board of Education April 21, 2005 Dr. Bill Elder University of Missouri-Columbia Office of Social.
Demographics 14,583 people. 6,137 housing units The racial makeup 97.31% White, 0.23% African American, 2.03% Native American, 0.76% Asian,
Chuck Maxey - School of Business - California Lutheran University Ventura County Demographics A Presentation to the Ventura County Leadership Academy September.
How A Transformed Adult Education System Can Achieve Shared Prosperity and Promote Economic Development in Our Region.
CITY DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS Understanding Your City’s Population | 2 mi | 2 mi | 200’
Environmental Scan: The First Pass Ed Master Plan (EMP) Steering Committee Planning and Resource Council (PaRC) April 29, 2015 E. Kuo FH IR&P.
San Jose Demographic Findings and Trends, Census 2010 Michael Bills, Senior Planner City of San Jose March 16, 2012.
Triennial Community Needs Assessment A Project of the Valley Care Community Consortium.
Educational Master Plan Data Associated Students of Foothill College (ASFC) May 28, 2015 E. Kuo FH IR&P.
Educational Leadership & ELLs Presented By: Reyna P. Hernandez Research and Policy Associate Latino Policy Forum
Texas State Agency Business Administrators Association June 5, 2014 San Marcos, Texas Texas Population Characteristics, Trends, and Projections.
Scholastic Inc.1 Navigating Waves of Change: Driving Academic Improvement Through Challenging Times Sam Howe November 2010.
Rensselaer County Community Health Needs Assessment Sociodemographic Indicators.
San Jose Demographic Findings and Trends, Census 2010 Michael Bills, Senior Planner City of San Jose.
Understanding Your Community Part Two: Demographics.
ALASKA IN THE 21ST CENTURY: MORE DIVERSITY, MORE COMPLEXITY, MORE CHALLENGING Scott Goldsmith Institute of Social and Economic Research University of Alaska.
HOUSTON’S GROWTH AND CHALLENGES: COMPARING HOUSTON TO TEN LARGEST US CITIES CITY OF HOUSTON PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Texas Demography Conference.
Heart of Texas Area Profile Heart of Texas P-20 Summit December 1, 2014.
Regional Data Snapshot
Poverty and the concentration of Poverty in Rochester
AEBG Accountability Training
Michelle Covert, , County of Santa Clara Office of supportive housing Mission, role, Strategies in addressing.
The Hispanic Market United States California Southern California
Loudoun County Housing Needs Assessment
NWSOFA Fiscal & Economic Issues Group Q&A from January Meeting
WIOA Section 166 – Indian and Native American Program
Adult College and Career Education Leadership
The New American Dilemma
Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and Near Poverty Rates for Children Under Age 5, by Living Arrangement: 2015 The data for Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and Near.
FRANKLIN COUNTY THRIVE.
Immigrant Integration Pathway
Jennie J Kronenfeld. PhD Arizona State University
Key Leader Orientation--Selma
Regional Data Snapshot
Florida Institute on Homelessness & Affordable Housing Input Session
USR Opportunity Index A new form-based, user-friendly framework for incentivizing economically stable and socially equitable housing development.
Florida’s Child - Well-being Indicators
Texas Homeless Network Conference
Give. Advocate. Volunteer.
HOMELESSNESS IN WASHINGTON STATE
Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and Near Poverty Rates for Children Under Age 5, by Living Arrangement: 2011 The data for Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and Near.
Emergency Food System Study
WFP-UNICEF Emergency Cash Transfers to support Dominicans affected by Hurricane Maria Dominica, December 2017 – February 2018 November 30th, 2017.
Community Foundation of Collier County
Linda Austin Director of Tribal Operations Ysleta del Sur Pueblo
Community Health Needs Assessment: Inform The Process
Presentation for Mental Health Board
Is the Orange Monster still relevant? What have we done?
Current conditions.
Community Needs Assessment for United Way of Lamar County
Student Success Metrics
WEST HAM CLP WOMEN’S FORUM Every Women Matters
Envision Comanche Employment Focus Group March 14, 2019
Unit 3 Economic Challenges
The Health of our Communities
A PARALLEL PATH: HOMELESSNESS AND EMPLOYMENT
Arkansas Perkins V Stakeholder Meetings 2019
Miami Public Library 3/14/19
The Health of our Communities
Heart of Texas Area Profile
Berrien County FACT SHEET
General Plan Community Advisory Committee Meeting 4
Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and
Arkansas Perkins V Stakeholder Meetings 2019
The Consolidated Plan Nicole Engels City of Omaha Planning Housing and Community Development.
Washington County: The Challenge Ahead
2020 Census – Complete Count Committees
How to Measure and Monitor Outcomes in Opportunity Zones
Presentation transcript:

South Bay Consortium for Adult Education Three Year Regional Plan Study Session 1: Quantitative Data + Consortium Self Assessment Steering Committee and Consultation Council February 8, 2019 AB86 – Engage faculty – Work Groups Bridge Program Development CDCP – Senates approved Academic Senates, VPAAs involvement Transition Support Infrastructure Specialist at all institutions Seamless Transitions

Agenda 11:00 – 2:30 Study Session 11:00 Intro: 3YRP activities + timeline 11:10 Community Demographics 11:20 SBCAE & Student Data (11:20) Small Groups (12:00) Report Out 12:30 LUNCH 1:00 Labor Market Data 1:20 Regional Providers 1:30 Consortium Self Assessment (1:30) Small Groups (1:50) Report Out 2:30 – 3:30 Formal Steering Committee Meeting

3YRP Activities + Timeline Jan – March Quantitative and Qualitative Data Collection Feb – April Goals – Strategies – Indicators May – June Public Comment – Stakeholder Presentations KEY DATES: Feb 8 Study Session 1: Quantitative Data + Self Assessment March, TBD Community Leader Focus Group March 15 Study Session 2: Qualitative Data Review April 2 Student Leader Focus Group May 3 Community Forum May 10 PD Day: Human Centered Design May 24 Public Governance – Formal Plan Approval June 7 Submit Plan to CAEP

Identify common themes Goals Strategies Indicators 3YRP Approach Listening Sessions 1:1 conversations Identify common themes Focus group Reflection on themes Goals Strategies Indicators

3YRP Approach

Community Demographics South Bay Consortium for Adult Education Three Year Regional Plan Study Session 1 Steering Committee and Consultation Council February 8, 2019 Data on SBCAE Region: Community Demographics AB86 – Engage faculty – Work Groups Bridge Program Development CDCP – Senates approved Academic Senates, VPAAs involvement Transition Support Infrastructure Specialist at all institutions Seamless Transitions

Population, Age Santa Clara County Population 1,938,000 San Jose City Population 1,035,000 Median age 36.8 Median age Bay Area 38.7 % over 65 12% % under 17 23% * source: American Communities Survey, 2017

Secondary Education 2017-18 SBCAE HS Diplomas/HSE awarded: 536 2018 County adults w/o a secondary ed: 196,528 18-24 Year Olds w/o secondary education: 16,947 County residents with BA or higher: 50% * source: CASAS annual report; American Communities Survey; Opportunity Youth

Employment % over 16 in the labor force: 67% % unemployed Nov 2018 2.4% % unemployed Nov 2017 2.9% % unemployed Nov 2016 3.6% Average commute time 27min * sources: American Communities Survey, 2017; Federal Reserve Bank, Economic Data

Housing Median gross rent $1955mo Median value owner-occupied house $830,000 Owner-occupied housing % 57% % of families with “high housing burden” 39% * sources: Snapshot of Poverty: Santa Clara County, 2017; American Communities Survey, 2017

Ethnicity (SCC/Bay Area) Asian 37.5%/26% White 31%/39% Latino 27%/24% Multi-Racial 4%/4% Black/AA 3%/6% Hawaiian/PI .3%/.6% Native American .2%/.22% * source: American Communities Survey, 2017

Language and Immigration Foreign born 38% Speak a language other than English at home 52% Average age, native born 29 Average age, foreign born 44 % county residents not US citizen 19% % Spanish speakers 17% % Chinese/mandarin speakers 7% % Vietnamese speakers 6% % Tagalog speakers 3% * sources: American Communities Survey, 2017; DATA USA, Santa Clara County, 2017

Poverty in Santa Clara County Self-sufficiency standard: $62,613 % below SSS (family of 3): 30% % below SSS (single mother): 60% Median household income: $96,310 Median household income East SJ: $78,945 Median income under 25: $47,285 Number on Medi-Cal 444,005 % in county with no insurance 2018 7.2% * sources: United Way, Snapshot of Poverty Santa Clara County, 2017; American Communities Survey, 2017; Open Data Network

Income Inequality in Santa Clara County Top income families earn 17 times more than low income families in Santa Clara County % children living in poverty: 9% Children living in poverty Los Gatos: 5% Children living in poverty NW SJ 43% % of students qualifying for FRL Saratoga 1% % of students qualifying for FRL Alum Rock 86% * source: United Way, Snapshot of Poverty Santa Clara County, 2017

Homeless* Homeless in Santa Clara County 7,394 % homeless with drug and alcohol abuse 48% % who lost job and led to homelessness 37% % homeless because can’t afford rent 62% % homeless with families 72% % homeless veterans 32% * source: Santa Clara County Homeless Census and Survey, 2017

Three Years – Outcome Data Reported to State

Data on SBCAE Schools and Students South Bay Consortium for Adult Education Three Year Regional Plan Study Session 1 Steering Committee and Consultation Council February 8, 2019 Data on SBCAE Schools and Students AB86 – Engage faculty – Work Groups Bridge Program Development CDCP – Senates approved Academic Senates, VPAAs involvement Transition Support Infrastructure Specialist at all institutions Seamless Transitions

Breakout Groups Group I: 4 Colleges Facilitators: Kishan, Emilio Group II: 3 Adult Schools: SCAE – SVAE – CACE Facilitators: Bob, Rommel Group III: 2 Adult Schools: ESAE – MAE Facilitators: Ilse, Brenda F

Discussion Guide 45’ Small groups 25’: Consortium and individual school data review - Review consortium wide data and questions 1-10 on ‘Study Session Data Questions’ handout - Share observations from looking at data from your site.  20’: Respond to report-out prompts: - What is the data telling you? What are some of your observations about consortium/individual schools data? What was surprising?  - How does this data inform areas of focus for the 3YRP? 10’ Report Out per group 

South Bay Consortium for Adult Education Three Year Regional Plan Study Session 1 Steering Committee and Consultation Council February 8, 2019 Labor Market Data AB86 – Engage faculty – Work Groups Bridge Program Development CDCP – Senates approved Academic Senates, VPAAs involvement Transition Support Infrastructure Specialist at all institutions Seamless Transitions

South Bay Consortium for Adult Education Three Year Regional Plan Study Session 1 Steering Committee and Consultation Council February 8, 2019 Regional Providers AB86 – Engage faculty – Work Groups Bridge Program Development CDCP – Senates approved Academic Senates, VPAAs involvement Transition Support Infrastructure Specialist at all institutions Seamless Transitions

Consortium Self-Assessment South Bay Consortium for Adult Education Three Year Regional Plan Study Session 1 Steering Committee and Consultation Council February 8, 2019 Consortium Self-Assessment AB86 – Engage faculty – Work Groups Bridge Program Development CDCP – Senates approved Academic Senates, VPAAs involvement Transition Support Infrastructure Specialist at all institutions Seamless Transitions

Breakout Groups Choose 1 of 5 Quality Indicators: Indicator #1: Capacity Indicator #2: Connection Indicator #3: Entry Indicator #4: Progress Indicator #5: Completion/Transition

Discussion Guide 30’ Small Group Discussion Review performance scores (scale 1-5) and emerging themes Which areas of growth do you think the 3YRP should address? Why? Prioritize 3-4 items. If you have time - How might we address those needs?  5’ Report Out per group