Event Reconstruction and Physics Performance of the LHCb Experiment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurement of  David Hutchcroft, University of Liverpool BEACH’06      
Advertisements

ICFP 2005, Taiwan Colin Gay, Yale University B Mixing and Lifetimes from CDF Colin Gay, Yale University for the CDF II Collaboration.
16 May 2002Paul Dauncey - BaBar1 Measurements of CP asymmetries and branching fractions in B 0   +  ,  K +  ,  K + K  Paul Dauncey Imperial College,
LHCb Strategies for  from B→DK Yuehong Xie University of Edinburgh for the LHCb Collaboration ADS with B + →DK + and B 0 → DK* 0 Dalitz with B + →DK +
Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ B mixing at DØ WIN 2005 Delphi, Greece Chris Barnes, Imperial College.
Peter Fauland (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity for the B S - mixing phase  S at LHCb.
The BaBarians are coming Neil Geddes Standard Model CP violation BaBar Sin2  The future.
Ulrich Uwer University of Heidelberg On behalf of the LHCb collaboration Beauty 2003, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Physics Performance.
Beauty 2006 R. Muresan – Charm 1 Charm LHCb Raluca Mureşan Oxford University On behalf of LHCb collaboration.
Jeroen van Hunen The LHCb Tracking System. May 22, 2006 Frontier Detectors for Frontier Physics, Elba, Jeroen van Huenen 2 The LHCb Experiment LHCb.
Cano Ay, Johannes Gutenberg Universität, B mixing and flavor oscillations at DØ Cano Ay University Mainz for the DØ Collaboration 23 may.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
1 Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment Marcel Merk NIKHEF Representing the LHCb collaboration 19 th.
DIS 2004, Strbske Pleso,April LHCb experiment sensitivity to CKM phases and New Physics from mixing and CP violation measurements in B decays LHCb.
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon, FCP Nashville B s Mixing at CDF Frontiers in Contemporary Physics Nashville, May Gavril Giurgiu – for CDF.
Pavel Krokovny Heidelberg University on behalf of LHCb collaboration Introduction LHCb experiment Physics results  S measurements  prospects Conclusion.
High precision and new CP violation measurements with LHCb Michael Koratzinos, CERN EPS HEP 99 Tampere,15 July 1999.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
Prospects for B  hh at LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration CKM2008 Workshop, Rome, 9-13 September 2008 LHCb.
Charm Physics Potential at BESIII Kanglin He Jan. 2004, Beijing
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
3/13/2005Sergey Burdin Moriond QCD1 Sergey Burdin (Fermilab) XXXXth Moriond QCD 3/13/05 Bs Mixing, Lifetime Difference and Rare Decays at Tevatron.
Sergey Burdin FNAL DØ Collaboration 8/12/2005 Chicago Flavor New Bs Mixing Result from DØ.
M.N MinardAspen Winter Meeting LHCb Physics Program On behalf of LHCb collaboration M.N Minard (LAPP) Status LHCb ( R.Jacobson) Single arm spectrometer.
Paul Balm - EPS July 17, 2003 Towards CP violation results from DØ Paul Balm, NIKHEF (for the DØ collaboration) EPS meeting July 2003, Aachen This.
LHCb performance for B s  J/   and B d  J/  K s decays Jeroen van Hunen.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
Jeroen van Hunen (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity to  s and  Γ s at LHCb.
Sinéad Farrington University of Glasgow for the CDF Collaboration European Physical Society Aachen, 17 th -23 rd July 2003 B Lifetimes and Flavour Tagging.
Measurements of  at LHCb Mitesh Patel (CERN) (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration) 14th December 2006.
K. Holubyev HEP2007, Manchester, UK, July 2007 CP asymmetries at D0 Kostyantyn Holubyev (Lancaster University) representing D0 collaboration HEP2007,
1 outline ● Part I: some issues in experimental b physics ● why study b quarks? ● what does it take? ● Part II: LHCb experiment ● Part III: LHCb first.
B meson studies - from commissioning to new physics effects.
Reaching for  (present and future)
Semileptonic and Leptonic D0, D+, and Ds+ Decays at CLEO-c Werner Sun, Cornell University for the CLEO Collaboration XLIVth Rencontres de Moriond, QCD.
Measurement of the phase of Bs mixing with Bs ϕϕ
in rappresentanza di LHCb Italia
Heavy Flavor Results from CMS
Ivan Belyaev LAPP/Annecy & ITEP/Moscow
γ determination from tree decays (B→DK) with LHCb
LHCb Status and Prospects Doris Eckstein (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration 3rd International Conference on Flavor Physics Chungli, Taiwan,
The LHC collider in Geneva
Flavour Tagging performance in LHCb Marc Grabalosa Gándara (14/12/08)
CKM Status In this lecture, we study the results summarized in this plot. November 17, 2018 Sridhara Dasu, CKM Status.
Vincenzo Vagnoni INFN Bologna (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration)
FRONTIERS OF MATTER XI th RENCONTRES DE BLOIS
CP violation in the charm and beauty systems at LHCb
LHCb Status and Prospects Doris Eckstein (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration 3rd International Conference on Flavor Physics Chungli, Taiwan,
Overview of LHCb Poland Ukraine Brazil UK Switzerland France Spain
B physics prospects at LHCb
LHCb Particle Identification and Performance
(Towards) First Physics with LHCb
LHCb Strategies for g from B→DK
Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment
CP violation in Bs→ff and Bs → K*0K*0
Prospects for quarkonium studies at LHCb
Potential for precise Unitarity Triangle angles measurements in LHC
8th International Conference on Advanced Technology and
B Physics at the LHC Neville Harnew University of Oxford.
The Large Hadron Collider beauty Experiment & Physics
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
LHCb Rare Decays Status
Jacopo Nardulli NIKHEF (On behalf of the LHCb collaboration)
LHCb Rare Decays Status
Università di Milano Bicocca LHC2003 International Symposium
Vincenzo Vagnoni INFN Bologna CKM Workshop Durham, April 8th 2003
Bs Physics and Prospects at the Tevatron
B-physics at the LHC Beyond 2010, february
Time dependent measurements of gamma at LHCb Angelo Carbone (INFN-Bologna) on behalf of LHCb collaboration CKM 2008 Roma, 12 September 2008.
Presentation transcript:

Event Reconstruction and Physics Performance of the LHCb Experiment HCP2005, 4-9 July 2005, les Diablerets Switzerland MC truth Reconstructed Event Reconstruction and Physics Performance of the LHCb Experiment Yuehong Xie University of Edinburgh representing the LHCb collaboration

Outline Introduction Event reconstruction capability Physics potential Tracking Vertexing and proper time determination Flavour tagging Particle identification Physics potential Physics programs Bs Mixing CKM angles Rare B decays Conclusions HCP2005, 4-9 July 2005 Yuehong Xie

Introduction Goal of LHCb: look for new physics in CP violation and rare B decays Time-dependant measurements: exclusive signal reconstruction, proper time determination and B flavour tagging Requirements to reconstruction: Exclusive B reconstruction requires good mass resolution → need precise momentum measurement up to 100 GeV Very fast Bs oscillation requires a good proper time resolution → need high precision of primary and secondary vertex position Flavour tagging and background rejection require efficient particle identification for 2-100 GeV HCP2005, 4-9 July 2005 Yuehong Xie

LHCb detector Tracking: Vertex Locator TT T1-T3 Magnet PID: Related LHCb talks: LHCb Status: Roger Forty Particle Identification: Ann Van Lysebetten PID: RICH1/RICH2 SPD/PS ECAL HCAL M1-M5 HCP2005, 4-9 July 2005 Yuehong Xie

Track finding strategy T track Upstream track VELO seeds Long track (forward) Long track (matched) VELO track T seeds Downstream track Multiple pass track finding: Velo seeds T seeds Long tracks  highest quality for physics Downstream tracks  needed for efficient KS finding Upstream tracks  lower p, worse p resolution, useful for RICH1 pattern recognition HCP2005, 4-9 July 2005 Yuehong Xie

Tracking performance Eff = 94% (p > 10 GeV) Long track efficiency vs p Ghost rate = 3% (for pT > 0.5 GeV) Ghost rate vs p : dp/p ~ 0.37% A typical reconstructed event: red = detected hits On average: 26 long tracks 11 upstream tracks 4 downstream tracks 5 T tracks 26 VELO tracks Blue = reconstructed tracks HCP2005, 4-9 July 2005 Yuehong Xie

Mass resolution Mass resolution based on the dp/p ~ 0.37% momentum resolution Mass of Ds-K+K-- Mass of BsDs (KK) K+ Ds mass [GeV/c2] HCP2005, 4-9 July 2005 Yuehong Xie

Vertex detection dIP = 14mm+35mm/pT <dIP> ~ 40mm R-sensor 21 silicon stations placed along the beam direction, 8mm to beam Two detector halves in each station Two sensor types to measure R and f Track impact parameter precision to origin vertex: dIP = 14mm+35mm/pT <dIP> ~ 40mm R-sensor f-sensor HCP2005, 4-9 July 2005 Yuehong Xie

Vertex reconstruction proper time t=lm/(pc) Proper time resolution is dominated by B vertex resolution Bs→Dsp sz=168 mm Proper time sz1=43.9 mm sz2=124 mm (21.8%) st1 = 33 fs st2 = 67 fs (31%) Primary Vertex HCP2005, 4-9 July 2005 Yuehong Xie

Particle identification performance K/p separation is provided by RICH Lepton identification is mainly provided by calorimeter and muon chambers Typical event in the RICH1 photon detectors: Hits from signal tracks and background tracks Reconstructed rings: large from aerogel, small from gas C4F10 RICH PID 2<p<100 GeV/c <e(KK)> = 88% <e(K)> = 3% Lepton ID <e(mm)> = 94% <e( m)> = 1% <e(ee )> = 81% <e( e)> = 1% 95% within calo acceptance HCP2005, 4-9 July 2005 Yuehong Xie

Flavour tagging Opposite side Same side Figure of merit: High Pt leptons K± from b → c → s Vertex charge Jet charge K+ Qvertex ,QJet Same side Opposite side PV e-, m- Bs0signal D K + K- B0opposite Same side Fragmentation K± accompanying Bs p± from B** → B(*)p± Tagging power in % Tag Bd Bs Muon 1.2 1.4 Electron 0.6 Kaon opp.side 2.1 2.4 Jet/ Vertex Charge 0.7 0.8 Same side p / K 0.7 (p) 3.1 (K) Combined ~ 4.4 ~7.5 Figure of merit: eD2=e(1-2w)2: tagging power e: tagging efficiency; w: wrong tagging fraction ( Same opposite side performance for Bd and Bs within errors) HCP2005, 4-9 July 2005 Yuehong Xie

Physics Programs 1012 bb pairs produced in a nominal year (107 s at L=21032 cm2s1) Bd : Bu: Bs: Bc: b-baryons ~ 40 : 40 : 10 : 0.1 : 10 Measuring Bs mixing to look for new physics effect in box diagrams Dms from Bs→Dsp fs and DGs from Bs→J/yf Measuring CKM angles from different processes to over-constrain unitary triangle sin(2b) from Bd → J/yKs g from Bs → DsK , Bd →D*p g from Bd → D0K* g from B → hh a from Bd → rp Looking for new physics effect in rare B decays leptonic rare decays: Bs → mm Semileptonic rare decays: Bd → K*mm Radiative penguin: Bs → fg, Bd → K*g and Bd → r/wg Hadronic penguin: Bs → ff and Bd → fKs Other physics CP violation in Bc decays b hadron spectrum, lifetimes (ratio) charm physics … Red: more details to come HCP2005, 4-9 July 2005 Yuehong Xie

Bs mixing: Dms from Bs→Dsp Statistical uncertainty on Bs oscillation as a function of Dms New physics probe 80k events/year B/S = 0.32 ± 0.10 st ~ 40 fs If Dms = 25 ps -1 Bs mixing can be clearly observed in Bs Ds with one year of data taking Once oscillation observed, Dms can be measured with very high statistical precision s(Dms)=0.01 ps-1 5s sensitivity in one year Dms< 68 ps-1 is well beyond SM preferred value Dms ~ 20 ps-1 HCP2005, 4-9 July 2005 Yuehong Xie

Bs mixing: DGs and fs from Bs→J/yf SM fs = -2l2h ~ -0.04, sensitive to new weak phases in box process DGs: input to other measurements; test of HQET Gold-plated mode: 120k events/year, B/S<1 Admixture of CP-even and CP-odd eigenstates Kinematic variables for angular analysis Fit proper time and angular distribution simultaneously use Dms from Bs→Dsp Can be combined with CP eigenstate modes ( Bs→J/yh, hcf ) to improve precision Using untagged samples can achieve similar sensitivity of DGs HCP2005, 4-9 July 2005 Yuehong Xie

g from Bs→DsK 5.4k events/year, B/S<1 Measure g+fs in tree diagrams fit four time dependant decay rates Bs ( Bs) → Ds- K+ + cc use fs measured in Bs→J/yf Free of new physics contribution to penguin diagrams Measured g is not affected by new physics effect in Bs mixing Discrepancy with indirect g from CKM fit will signify new physics in mixing U-spin combination with Bd→D(*)p to resolve discrete ambiguity 200k events/year s Ds- c b u K+ Bs s s s K+ u Bs b c Ds- s s sensitivity in one year: Dms 20ps-1 25ps-1 30ps-1 s(g) 14.2 16.2 18.3 (55 < g <105 ) HCP2005, 4-9 July 2005 Yuehong Xie

g from B→hh d /K Bd/s Bd/s /K Bd (95%CL) Measure time dependant asymmetries for Bd→pp and Bs→KK to determine Adir and Amix ACP(t) = Adir cos(Dm t) + Amix sin(Dm t) Adir and Amix depend on g Mixing phases fd or fs Penguin/Tree=deiq Use fd and fs from J/ and J/Ks U-spin symmetry: dpp=dKK, qpp=qKK 4 observables, 3 unknowns: solve for g BsKK (95%CL) 26k Bd→pp events/year, B/S<0.7 37k Bs→KK events/year, B/S=0.31±0.1 s(g) ~ 5+ uncertainty from U-spin symmetry breaking Sensitive to new physics in penguin HCP2005, 4-9 July 2005 Yuehong Xie

g from Bd→D0K*0 Gronau-Wyler-Dunietz method can be simply illustrated as Measure 6 time-integrated tree level rates Self-tagged through K*0 or K*0 Only relative rates needed Big ratio: |A2/A1| ~ 0.4 Need to resolve 8-fold ambiguity New physics in D0-D0 mixing could affect this measurement Mode Yield S/B Bd  D0 (K-+) K*0 3400 > 3.3 Bd  D0 (K+-) K*0 500 > 0.6 Bd  D0CP (K+K-) K*0 600 > 0.7 () ~ 8 in a year (55 <  < 105, -20 < D < 20) HCP2005, 4-9 July 2005 Yuehong Xie

a from Bd→ rp → p +p -p 0 ( Further work: systematics; a from B→rr ) reconstructed & selected generated M(p0p-) M(p0p-) M(p0p+) po reconstruction efficienty — merged p0 — resolved p0 M(p0p+) 14k event/year with B/S=0.80 Time dependent Dalitz analysis Theoretically clean extraction of a from a 9-parameter fit, taking into account penguin contribution and resonant background Statistical precision in one year s(a) < 10 ( Further work: systematics; a from B→rr ) HCP2005, 4-9 July 2005 Yuehong Xie

Bs  +- SM: Br = (3.5±1.0) x 10-9 Can be significantly enhanced in some SUSY models Ideal candidate for new physics 17 events/year expected assuming SM Branching ratio Present limit B/S < 5.7 at 90% c.l. from bmx+cc * Require more MC events to obtain precise estimate of B/S Challenges Background suppression trigger and selection efficiency determination Normalization method Worst case mass plot with 5 years data * Events with m from semi-leptonic b decays have been found to be dominating background HCP2005, 4-9 July 2005 Yuehong Xie

Conclusions The LHCb detector and software can efficiently reconstruct many different B decay channels with good performance in proper time resolution, particle identification and mass resolution This enables LHCb to fully explore Bs mixing and decays extract CKM parameters with high precision in different ways perform study of rare B decays which are sensitive to new physics LHCb will have a great opportunity to make precision test of SM in flavour sector in order to find new physics or push possible new physics to a higher mass scale, from the first year of data taking. Thank you! HCP2005, 4-9 July 2005 Yuehong Xie