ICONS III: Identifying Continence OptioNs after Stroke: developing a combined intervention for stroke survivors with urinary incontinence in the community.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What makes a good NIHR application? 9 February 2012 Professor Jonathan Michaels.
Advertisements

Introduction to the unit and mixed methods approaches to research Kerry Hood.
Early stages of research programmes: pilot and feasibility studies From Scoping to Activity Rehabilitation Conference A Byrne.
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Research Opportunity Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Dr Ian Williams Greater Metro South Brisbane Medicare.
2 Urinary Incontinence in Community- Dwelling Populations: Issues & Challenges for Continence Care Assoc Prof Winsome St John RN, PhD School of Nursing.
A feasibility study to explore patient, clinician and GP decision making of acute recurrent tonsillitis for NATTINA: The NAtional Trial of Tonsillectomy.
Meredith Newlin, Research Fellow and PhD Candidate Centre for Mental Health Social Research This presentation presents independent research funded by the.
Michelle O’Reilly. Quantitative research is outcomes driven Qualitative research is process driven Please offer up your definitions.
How do nurses use new technologies to inform decision making?
Physiotherapy approaches for urgency and urge incontinence Liz Childs Pelvic Health Physiotherapist.
Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care: Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire and Lincolnshire Health and Social Care Forum Community Action.
Developing Cardiac Rehabilitation in Vietnam Dr Juliette Hussey School of Medicine Trinity College Dublin Ireland.
HSRU is funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorates. The author accepts full responsibility for this talk. Health.
Nursing Research Capacity Building. Background CON –opened as 9 th College at SQU in 2008 The CON’s next challenge is promoting nursing care based on.
Caring for you...closer to home Adult Bladder & Bowel Care Service Lee O’Hara Clinical Service Lead Hertfordshire Community NHS Trust.
Dorset Healthcare Continence Advisory Service
Evidence based interventions in dementia: the EVIDEM early diagnosis trial Steve Iliffe, Jane Wilcock, Mark Griffin, Priya Jane, Ingela Thuné- Boyle, Frances.
Pilot and Feasibility Studies NIHR Research Design Service Sam Norton, Liz Steed, Lauren Bell.
NIHR Themed Call Prevention and treatment of obesity Writing a good application and the role of the RDS 19 th January 2016.
HTA Efficient Study Designs Peter Davidson Head of HTA at NETSCC.
NIHR using systematic reviews to inform funding decisions Matt Westmore, Director of Finance and Strategy Sheetal Bhurke, Research Fellow NIHR Evaluation,
Developing a national governance framework for health promotion in Scottish hospitals Lorna Smith Senior Health Improvement Programme Officer NHS Health.
NES/SSSC Promoting Excellence Programme and Human Rights.
Public Health Research Programme Preventing the development and spread of Antimicrobial Resistance am - 2 October 2013 NIHR Public Health Research.
12 year follow up: RCT for postnatal pelvic floor dysfunction ProLong Study Group Cathryn Glazener, Christine MacArthur, Suzanne Hagen, Andrew Elders,
University of South Florida CON
Contact: Patrick Phillips,
Hot Topics in Health & Care - Update of Urinary Catheter Care
admissions in residents in care homes.
A real life example of intervention retention and follow up in the community: problem solving for self-harm in prisons.
Building an Evidence-Based Nursing Practice
The collaborative approach was structured in three phases:
An Exploration of the Transition of An Adult Diabetes Service in England Transition from a hospital based model to a community based model of care (Type.
Proctor’s Implementation Outcomes
A Blighe, C Powell & M Downs Background
John Nelson Opio; Edoardo Aromataris; Catalin Tufanaru
HEE Nursing Associate Programme
Development and feasibility testing of a complex intervention
RUNNING RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIALS
Research Questions Does integration of behavioral health and primary care services, compared to simple co-location, improve patient-centered outcomes in.
How will integrated care help the Irish healthcare system?
Services after Hospital: Action to develop REcommenDations
The DEPression in Visual Impairment Trial:
School Of Health And Related Research
Introduction to Evaluation
Getting to the second 90 in adolescent HIV: What is needed
A New Type of Worker: Developing the End of Life Carer
Research and Evidence Based Medicine
Results of the STRUTI project
Effective evidence-based occupational therapy
What can implementation research offer?
Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, UK
BRIGHTLIGHT: from first glow to now – what, why and how
YSGOL GWYDDORAU GOFAL IECHYD / SCHOOL OF HEALTHCARE SCIENCES
Amanda Lilley-Kelly Senior Trial Co-ordinator
Professor Stephen Pilling PhD
Peer Element of ODDESSI
Pilot Studies: What we need to know
Stroke Early Supported Discharge Team Service Evaluation
What barriers and facilitators influence the implementation of new high-risk medicine services in Scottish community pharmacies? Ms Natalie Weir1, Dr Rosemary.
Claire Bamford & Julie Young on behalf of the research team
SCIMITAR+: a definitive RCT of a smoking cessation intervention for people with severe mental ill health Emily Peckham.
Overview of NEAT What is NEAT? How does NEAT work?
Social prescribing: Less rhetoric and more reality
How to apply successfully to the NIHR HTA Board?
Building Capacity for Quality Improvement A National Approach
Nadine Hendrie Dr Catherine Marchand Dr Grant McGeechan
Women’s & Men’s Health Physiotherapy
Pharmacy Integration Improving care in care homes
Presentation transcript:

ICONS III: Identifying Continence OptioNs after Stroke: developing a combined intervention for stroke survivors with urinary incontinence in the community

ICONS III team Chief Investigator: Professor Lois Thomas Co-applicants 1 Dr Jean Hay-Smith (New Zealand) 2 Professor Joanne Booth (Scotland) 3 Dr Sarah Dean (England 4 Dr Céu Mateus (England) 5 Dr Carol Bugge (Scotland) 6 Dr Rachel Stockley (England) 7 Jacqueline Coupe (England) 8 Lorna Booth (Scotland) 9 Mr Simon Hill (England) 10 Dr Miland Joshi (England) 11 Dr Joan Ostaszkiewicz (Australia) 12 Professor Suzanne Hagen (Scotland) 13 Dr Chantale Dumoulin (Canada) 14 Clare Bolton (England) 15 Professor Brenda Roe (England) Our writing group brings together a new team of highly experienced, multi-disciplinary researchers from Universities and 4 countries to address an important, yet often ignored, global problem experienced by many people after stroke. Our team has all the experience necessary to successfully bid for funding: We have methodological experience in: clinical trials systematic review theory-informed intervention development process evaluation Statistics cost-effectiveness evaluation We also have subject-specific expertise in: Incontinence Nursing Physiotherapy and medicine

Urinary incontinence after stroke is a global problem i) Up to 8.45 million people affected worldwide annually Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Krishnamurthi R, Mensah GA, Connor M, Bennett DA, et al. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2014;383(9913):245-54.

Urinary incontinence is a global problem ii) Urinary incontinence affects half of stroke survivors in the acute phase 44% remain incontinent at 3 months 38% remain incontinence at 1 year Current practice: care focused on containment (e.g. absorbent pads) rather than promoting continence overuse of indwelling urethral catheters – 45% of intervention participants in our ICONS feasibility trial increased risk of IUC-associated urinary tract infections increased morbidity, mortality and resource use

ICONS II Aim: to evaluate the clinical and economic effect of a systematic voiding programme for urinary incontinence (UI) after stroke in secondary care. Systematic voiding programme comprises comprehensive continence assessment protocol for indwelling urethral catheter removal behavioural interventions – bladder training or prompted voiding Pragmatic, multicentre, randomised parallel group trial to compare the effectiveness of the systematic voiding programme (n=512) with usual care (n=512) in reducing the severity of UI in patients with stroke and UI in secondary care. Behavioural interventions: a conservative approach that do not involve treatment with drugs or surgery (ICI 2016) Results from an internal pilot with a target of 355 participants will determine progression to full trial.

ICONS III writing group aim To be commissioned by NIHR to test a theory-informed combined intervention for patients with UI after stroke in the community

Working group plan Update two systematic reviews Combined conservative interventions for urge, stress or mixed incontinence in adults Qualitative narrative review of barriers and facilitators to behavioural interventions for urinary incontinence from the perspective of patients and clinical staff Conduct a critical review of continence programmes for urinary incontinence Develop a theory-informed intervention to treat both urge and stress urinary incontinence in stroke survivors in the community Design a feasibility randomised controlled trial of the intervention Develop a bid for submission to NIHR in April 2019 Our writing group will begin by updating two systematic reviews originally completed for our ICONS programme grant: Combined conservative interventions for urge, stress or mixed incontinence in adults Qualitative narrative review of barriers and facilitators to behavioural interventions for urinary incontinence from the perspective of patients and clinical staff Based on these, the group will develop a theory-informed intervention designed to address both urge and stress urinary incontinence in patients with UI following stroke in the community.

Review 1) Update quantitative evidence for combined behavioural interventions for UI Aim Primary objective: to assess the effects of combined behavioural interventions for urge, stress, or mixed urinary incontinence in adults on the number of participants regaining continence and the number of incontinent episodes   Secondary objective: to assess the effects of combined behavioural interventions on physical measures of the severity of urinary incontinence, quality of life and adverse events Design Quantitative review with meta-analysis

Review 2) Update qualitative evidence of barriers and facilitators to successful implementation of behavioural interventions for UI Aim to evaluate factors influencing uptake and delivery of behavioural interventions for urinary incontinence from the perspective of clients and clinical staff Design Qualitative evidence synthesis

Review 3) Critical review of continence programmes Aim to produce a detailed descriptive account of behavioural interventions used in continence programmes for treating urinary incontinence in adults using Michie et al.’s (2011) behaviour change wheel, to classify the intervention functions studies use (for example training), and which essential conditions of behaviour change (capability, opportunity and motivation) these address Design matrix analysis identify which combinations of intervention components, participants, deliverer (e.g. patient, carer, clinical staff), delivery (e.g. intensity, duration), and context (e.g. setting, mode of delivery) appear to influence outcomes This review aims to produce a detailed descriptive account of behavioural interventions used in continence programmes for treating urinary incontinence in adults. The lack of detailed description of interventions in published studies of complex interventions, including those for urinary incontinence, limits knowledge of the elements required for an effective intervention, hampering implementation and replication of findings. In addition, key components of interventions, the influence of context and the relationship to outcomes have not been described systematically. Successful implementation of interventions, including continence programmes, requires behaviour change by patients, their carers and clinical staff. We will use Michie et al.’s (2011) behaviour change wheel to classify the intervention functions studies use (for example training), and which essential conditions of behaviour change (capability, opportunity and motivation) these address. We have written the protocol for this review. The same search strategy underpins all three reviews: screening for all three reviews using the same search results will enable us to make quicker progress in identifying included studies for each review.

The intervention might comprise … introduce pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) at home alongside bladder training once patients are discharged, perhaps giving patients training while they are in hospital continuing at home with bladder training only use an app for PFMT – Eva Samuelsson has developed one, there is also the NHS Squeezy app https://www.bladderandbowel.org/news/squeezy-the-nhs-physiotherapy-app-for-pelvic-floor-muscle-exercises/  

Thank you! Any questions? lhthomas@uclan.ac.uk +44(0)1772 893643 Funding acknowledgement: ICONS II is funded by the NIHR HTA Programme (16/111/31). Department of Health disclaimer: The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health