RACE TO THE TOP: An Overview

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Race to the Top Fund Overview of Grant Competition Goals and Requirements (Note: Information contained in this slide is based on draft guidance posted.
Advertisements

The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
1 Welcome! Please find a seat with folks from your school system (if possible) Maine Race To The Top Conceptual Framework Welcome! Please find a seat with.
Race to the Top Years 2 to 4 Finish line webinars July
1 Race to the Top, Phase 2 Webinars: May 4, 6, and 10, 2010.
Race to the Top Discussion Points to determine LUSD’s interest in participating in the State program January 7, 2010.
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP. This presentation is a product of the Maryland State Department of Education 03/03/10 American Recovery and Reinvestment.
STIMULUS AND STATE FISCAL STABILIZATION BOROUGH ASSEMBLY MEETING AUGUST 20, 2009 NANCY WAGNER, FNSBSD SUPERINTENDENT TRACI GATEWOOD, GRANTS AND SPECIAL.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
2011 Bridge to Excellence Master Plan Annual Update Review Division of Student, Family, and School Support Office of Finance Division of Academic Reform.
TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Principals and Teachers Effectiveness and Evaluation NSBA’s Federal Relations Network Conference February
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
Arizona’s Race to the Top State Finalist Presentation Washington, DC August 11, 2010 R e d a c t e d.
Shelda Hale, Title III, ELL and Immigrant Education Kentucky Department of Education.
1 Presentation to USED Review Panel August 10, 2010 North Carolina Race to the Top Proposal R e d a c t e d.
MSBO 2009 CONFERENCESEPTEMBER SECRETARY OF EDUCATION DISCRETIONARY FUNDS Sally Vaughn Deputy Superintendent, Ph.D. Michigan Department of Education.
Nebraska Department of Education Focus on Effective Instruction and Student Learning Revised Standards and NeSA Nebraska’s P-16 Effort Federal Agenda Fiscal.
Support for the Change, Challenge, and Commitment All Maryland Students College and Career Ready.
Common Core State Standards and Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Common Core State Standards and Partnership for.
Florida’s Race to the Top R e d a c t e d. 2 Florida’s Courage to Reform School and district grades A – F Differentiated Accountability High School Grades.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008.
1 Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Standards (OCIS) Update Holiday Inn Albany, New York October 15, 2010.
SAVING AND CREATING JOBS AND REFORMING EDUCATION U.S. Department of Education June 12, 2009.
Massie Ritsch U.S. Department of Education ESEA REAUTHORIZATION.
Recommendations Overview Student Success Task Force.
Leveraging Race to the Top to Maximize the Use of Data To Ensure College & Career Readiness Aimee R. Guidera Achieve ADP September 10, 2009.
Federal Program Monitoring and Support Division Charlotte Hughes, Director Donna Brown, Section Chief.
School Improvement Grants March, Overview American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Goals and purpose of SIG grants Definition of “persistently lowest-
The Federal Stimulus: An Overview
1 Michigan and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 August 11, 2009 State Board of Education.
Eric W. Waldo U.S. Department of Education Deputy Chief of Staff July 2012 U.S. Department of Education Policy Overview.
FY RACE TO THE TOP
An Affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 0f 2009 A Year in Review February 17, 2010.
Race to the Top (RTTT) Overview of Grant Competition Goals and Requirements 1.
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
Race to the Top Scope of Work Broward County Public Schools.
School Improvement Grant Update Fall Grant Purpose School Improvement Grants (SIG), authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Debra Tica Sanchez Vice President, Government Relations Association of Public Television Stations (APTS)
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act K-12 Agenda Webinar Presentation Monday, July 27 th 2009.
U.S. Department of Education Reform Agenda Overview April 2010.
Title I 2010 Spring Admin. Meeting Spring Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education April 13-14, 2010 Presented by: Maria E.
State Board of Education Meeting Race to the Top Update August 1, RTTT3 Overview Allocation of Funds (State and District) State-Level Activities.
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP.  Maryland’s initiatives are about reform, not simply the money.  Reform efforts will continue with or without.
RACE TO THE TOP. What is Race to the Top Funds? It is the largest education initiative in President Obama’s economic stimulus package It will provide.
What Washington Teachers Think About “Race to the Top” Issues Highlights From a Statewide Survey December 2009.
College Access Summit REGIONAL STRATEGY SESSION ON ACCESS TO POST-SECONDARY EDUCATION COMMUNITY COLLEGE PARTNERS Race to the Top Update.
North Carolina’s Race to the Top Proposal. Why RTTT? Teacher Incentive Grant School Improvement Grant Innovation Grant ESEA IDEA SFSF …….
Education Outlook: Where are we headed? “Wild West” Leadership Conference June 18, 2010.
Race to the Top Application State Board of Education Meeting January 6, 2010 January 6, 2010.
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference Crystal City, VA July 30, 2010 Jacqueline Jones, PhD Senior Advisor to the Secretary for Early Learning.
Henderson County’s Grant Application Planning RACE TO THE TOP DISTRICT.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Race to the Top Assessment Competition Public & Expert Input Meetings General Assessment Atlanta, GA November 17, 2009.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
Washington College Access Network Landscape of Education Reform in Washington State March 28, 2011.
Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund
Texas Association of Community Colleges
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act K-12 Agenda
New Jersey Department of Education
Studio School Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
Implementing Race to the Top
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Current Education Legislation Update
Presentation transcript:

RACE TO THE TOP: An Overview December 7, 2009

ABOUT RACE TO THE TOP Competitive grants to encourage and reward states implementing comprehensive reforms across four key areas: Adopting standards & assessments that prepare students for success in college & the workplace Recruiting, rewarding & retaining effective teachers & principals Building data systems that measure student success & inform teachers & principals how they can improve their practices Turning around the lowest-performing schools The $4.35 billion in competitive grants through RttT program is designed for the Federal government to create incentives for improving public schools. Under the guidelines, state seeking funds will be pressed to implement the 4 core reforms sometimes called the FOUR ASSURANCES

ABOUT RACE TO THE TOP Overarching goal of: Driving substantial gains in student achievement Improving high school graduation rates Narrowing achievement gaps

ABOUT RACE TO THE TOP The intent is to reward States that: Have demonstrated success in raising student achievement Have the best plans to accelerate reforms in the future Offer models for others to follow States will be reward based on a competitive structure: Final guidelines issued on November 18, 2009 States apply individually (no consortia) Two opportunities to apply Phase1: January 19, 2010 (Awards made by March 18, 2010) Phase 2: June 1, 2010 (Awards made by August 2, 2010) $4.35 billion in awards NC eligible for $200-$400 million Grant period up to 48 months 50% must go to LEAs The state applications requires a systematic approach to reform – to receive a grant the state plans must address all 4 areas of reform – cannot pick and choose Individual states are applicants and thus must apply individually and not as consortia States have 2 opportunities to apply (NC intends to apply in January. States that do apply in phase 1 and are not awarded may reapply for Phase 2 Nonbinding budget ranges have been developed as guides – each state has been sorted into 1 or 5 groups (or categories) based on their population of children aged 5-17. NC is in Category 2 (2nd highest) with a budget range of $200-$400 million. Applications may be made for more or less than the ranges. When a state receives funding – 50% must flow through to the LEAs in amounts based on the Title I formula and must be spent in ways consistent with the state’s plan. The remaining 50% can be used by the state and/or passed through to LEAs

ABOUT RACE TO THE TOP Selection Criteria (Total of 500 points) State Success Factors (125 points or 25%) Standards and Assessment (70 points or 14%) Data Systems to Support Instruction (47 or 9%) Great Teachers and Leaders (138 points or 28%) Turning Around the Lowest-Achieving Schools (50 points or 10%) General Selection Criteria (55 points or 11%) STEM Priority (15 points or 3%) Success Factors: articulating state’s reform agenda & LEAs participation in it building statewide capacity to sustain the plan Demonstrating progress in raising student achievement & closing gaps (largest single item – 45 pts – securing LEA commitment - MOU Standards & Assessments - common standards/adopting common (national) standards Data Systems: fully implementing a statewide longitudinal data system Great Teachers & Leaders: Group with largest amount of points improving teacher/leader effectiveness based on performance (adding a student growth component to the evaluation system) ensuring equitable distribution of effective teachers/leaders improving effectiveness & provision of support Turning Around Lowest-Performing Schools: ID and intervening General: making education funding a priority charter schools and other innovations (40 pts. – 2nd highest single) demonstrating other significant reform ACCOMPLISHMENTS = 260 PTS (52%) PLAN = 240 pts. (48%)

ABOUT RACE TO THE TOP Priorities Priority 1 (Absolute): Comprehensive Approach to Education Reform Priority 2 (Competitive Preference): Emphasis on STEM Priority 3 (Invitational): Improving Early Learning Outcomes Priority 4 (Invitational): Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems Priority 5 (Invitational): P-20 Coordination and Alignment Priority 6 (Invitational): School-Level Conditions for Reform, Innovation, & Learning There are 3 types of priorities in the RttT competition Absolute: cuts across the entire application & is not addressed separately. It will be assessed in the state’s plan in its entirity. If the application has not met the priority, it will be thrown out. Competitive: also cuts across the entire application. All or nothing proposition 15 points or 0 points. Invitational: addressed in their own separate sections. While applicants are invited to write to the invitational priorities, these will not earn points. USED is interested in receiving applications that meet the invitational priorities, but do not give such applications preference over others.

NC STRATEGIC IMPROVEMENT GOALS Increase student achievement Increase high school graduation rates Produce more career-ready and college-ready graduates Increase the number of students completing challenging capstone courses Increase college-going rate Decrease need for remedial math and language arts courses Improve student achievement growth in low- performing schools

RttT – NEXT STEPS December 9, 2009: Local Board Chairs and Superintendents attend RttT information session December 11, 2009: Local NCAE Presidents attend RttT information session Ongoing: Information shared with ECPS Board members January 11, 2010: ECPS considers MOU January 19, 2010: Deadline for state application

QUESTIONS/ISSUES Adoption of national core standards and assessments, where available Development of a system of formative/diagnostic, benchmarking assessments aligned with summative assessments Development of student learning objectives assessment for areas not being tested Addition of a student growth component to the teacher evaluation process Obtaining signed MOUs ???