Benefit Re-Determination Hearing: County Ditches #5/#68/#36

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Barhale Procedure for Site Establishment
Advertisements

35 ILCS 200 Article 27 SPECIAL SERVICE AREA TAXING DISTRICT Creating Community Excitement for Lake Dredging/Restoration Projects.
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
Almond Tree Delayed MSBU Retention Ponds Presentation Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 30, 2007.
Breaching the Mahar Regional School Dam Presentation to Ralph C. Mahar Regional School Committee GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. February 9, 2011.
Humans Impacts on Land Objective 2.07
Vegetation Establishment. Exposed soil occurs on all construction sites.
Business Risk and Business Environment Fixed assets are often the large category of assets Because there is typically limited activity in fixed assets.
Aboveground Petroleum Storage Act Workshop (APSA).
Storm Water Discharges from Oil and Gas Related Construction Activities EPA Public Meeting Dallas, Texas May 10, 2005.
Most Common Conservation Practices Forestry Illinois.
Tymber Skan BCC Update Orange County Government January 27, 2015.
Why Annual Revaluation? 8/28/ What We Will Cover What is the Assessor’s job? Why do we have property tax? Brief history of property tax. What is.
Non-Confidential Material Lake Operations Presentation May 9 th, 2002 Sven Hallermann.
NRCS Watershed Rehabilitation
Proposed Benefit Assessment District Overview Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority (TRLIA) TRLIA.ORG March 10,
Public Hearing August 30, 2014 Drive-Way Ordinance Please Sign in…
Sanitary Engineering Lecture 11. Storm Water Runoff Storm water runoff is the precipitation which seeps into the ground if precipitation occurs faster.
Definition: Soil and water conservation engineering is the application of engineering principles to the solution of soil and water management problems.
Chapter 7 Conservation Reserve Program 1. The Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) Administration of CRP –The provisions of G.S (d) apply only.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 2, 2008.
SAGHA Annual Homeowners Meeting August 28, Agenda  Collect ballots  Treasurer’s Report  Common Area Maintenance Presentation  Election Results.
North Carolina Planned Community Act Types of Meetings and Meeting Minutes Ed Bedford, J.D.
After-the-Fact Conservation Area Impact Permit Request* Keene’s Pointe Community Association, Inc. District 1 November 1, 2011 *Postponed from the December.
Lesson Understanding Soil Drainage Systems. Interest Approach Ask students the question, “What determines how fast water will flow through a funnel?”
Options to Address Stormwater, Road and Septic Issues.
Crow Wing County Ditch #13 Public Hearing 10/27/15.
Pollution Control: For Field Office Construction Sites.
Open Meetings, Public Records, Conflicts of Interest, EMC Bylaws, and Penalty Remissions* Jennie Wilhelm Hauser Special Deputy Attorney General Presentation.
permitting.
W.S through  To provide for:  Prevention and control of erosion  Prevention of flood water and sediment damages  Agricultural.
May 14, Planning Commission Planning Commission May 14, 2015.
PROPOSED CITY OF STOCKTON WATERFORD ESTATES EAST PHASE II ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PUBLIC HEARING Stockton City Council January 6, 2004.
SPECIAL DISTRICTS AVIK BONNERJEE, R.T.A. TOMMY LEE, R.T.A.
Discussion of the Differences Public Works Law and Bid Law
Rosalie DeLarme Program Manager Department of Code Enforcement
MACDC Intercounty Drain Procedures Training
Jefferson County Planning Commissioners Hearing June 26, 2013
Community Improvement Districts County Counselors Association of Kansas Annual Meeting November 15, 2010 Janet S. Garms
Environmental Quality Board
Ontario’s Drainage Legislation
Otter Tail County Drainage Ditches #5, #68 and #36
Elections – Dispensing with Primaries
MACDC Intercounty Drain Procedures Training
Environmentally sensitive areas
Manistee County Drain Commissioner
John Martin Reservoir Master Plan Revision
Developers Workshop Agenda Welcome & Introductions Property Events
Springbrook Estates Sewer Improvement Area Informational Meeting
Lady Creek Water System
Election Contracts, Joint Election Agreements & Leases For Equipment
The issue: A Damming report – why are some strategies for flood management more sustainable than others?
Drainage 101 – Council Educational Session
Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources
EPA Public Meeting Dallas, Texas May 10, 2005
Municipal Land Use Law C.40:55D-53 - NEW DEVELOPER
Village of Sherwood Stumpf Subdivision Paving and Drainage Improvements November 7, 2018.
COMMUNITY UPDATE OCTOBER 23, 2013
Emergency Conservation Program (ECP)
Hydrology CIVL341.
Property Tax Levy – Taxes Payable 2019
Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources
Subdivision Applications
Environmentally sensitive areas
Hydrology CIVL341 Introduction
WSUP (Lightning W Tank #2)
Making Local Government a Participatory Sport
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
Tax-Forfeited Land Classification Property Taxation & Records
Presentation transcript:

Benefit Re-Determination Hearing: County Ditches #5/#68/#36 Presented: by Otter Tail County Ditch Inspector Kevin Fellbaum January/25/2016

Re-Determination Presentation Drainage Authority Chair Comments Introductions Ditch Proceedings Reason for Hearing Benefit of Combination History Background on Ditch Viewing Viewer’s Report Recap Questions and Comments

Drainage Authority Chair Comments *Use microphone when you speak, Please speak Loud and Clear *Please state your first and last name *Be respectful to others *2 minute time limit per opportunity to speak *One opportunity to speak until all others have had a chance to speak

Introductions

Ditch Proceedings *County Ditches are owned by all Benefitted Property Owners within that given Ditch System *County Ditches are controlled by the Drainage Authority (County Board) *County Ditches are inspected by the County Ditch Inspector (who reports information and issues of the Ditches to the Drainage Authority) *Right of Entry: According to MN Statute 103E.061- the engineer, the engineer’s assistants, the viewers, and viewer’s assistants may enter any property to make a survey, locate a drain, examine the property, or estimate damages and benefits. *Ditch Viewers are appointed by the Drainage Authority to view and report how and which properties are affected by the in place Ditch System *Any costs associated with the Ditch system are the responsibility of All the Benefitted Property Owners. * Buffer Strips: According to MN Statute 103E.021- A 16.5 foot permanent strip of perennial vegetation approved by the drainage authority be established on each side of the ditch.

Ditch Proceedings *According to MN Statute 103E.735 Maintenance funds are to be established on County Ditches so that Maintenance activities can take place when they are needed. Maintenance funds can be built up to a value of $100,000 or 20% of the total valuation of the assessed benefitted area, whichever is the greater amount. *Otter Tail County is currently working with the County wide plan of only needing to build the Maintenance Fund to a valuation of $50,000. *Once the fund is built to that $50,000 bench mark over several years, the yearly Maintenance assessments will stop if no repair work is being done. If repair work is being done and the fund falls below that benchmark, the Maintenance assessment will resume to bring the fund back up to that mark.

Reason For Hearing A Re-Determination of Benefits has been completed, this Re-determination shows what properties and how those properties are benefitted by having a County Ditch in place Discussion on why and how certain properties are viewed differently(Opportunity to ask Viewers how they viewed properties) Land owners may request that Ditch Viewers review their property if they feel their property was wrongly valued and have sufficient reasoning for this review (This is the only time that these Benefit percentages can be changed until the next time a Re-determination is done) At the end of the meeting I will collect all properties that are requesting a review of their benefits Name, Address, Phone number, Parcel ID # Maintenance Assessments are based off of the percentages derived in the Viewer’s Report (You need to know your %) Discussion on why a Combination of systems is good idea for these three separate systems

Re-determination/ Combination According to MN State Statute 103E. 351 Sub-division 1, A Re-determination shall take place if the Drainage Authority determines that the Original Benefits do not reflect reasonable present day values or if the Drainage area has changed. Ditches #5, #68, and #36 serve the same Drainage Area and are good candidates to be Combined into one Drainage System Re-determinations have not taken place on Ditches #5, #68, and #36 since they were created. Benefit Values have changed in the past 100 years, properties have split, and viewing techniques have changed. Also in order for a Combination to take place, Benefits need to be comparable, thus having these Ditches Re-determined at the same time would get us comparable values. All County Ditches will be going through a Re-determination in the coming years. Countywide Process

Combination By Minnesota State Statute 103E.801 Subdivision 1: Authority to Consolidate or Divide After the Benefitted Area of a Drainage system has been determined, the Drainage Authority may consolidate two or more systems in order to provide more efficient administration of the system consistent with the determined benefitted area. Subdivision 2: Initiation of Action The consolidation may be initiated by the Drainage Authority on its own motion or by any party affected by the Drainage System by filing a petition with the County Auditor. Subdivision 3: Hearing When the Drainage Authority directs by resolution or a petition is filed with the County Auditor, the Drainage Authority will set a time and location for a public hearing. The Drainage Authority may consolidate Ditch Systems if they determine 1) it would be consistent with the re-determination of the benefitted area of the drainage system 2) it would provide for the efficient administration of the drainage system 3) it would be fair and equitable

History Ditch #5 Established: June 8, 1903 Purpose: To drain away the overflow waters that by remaining upon the meadow and farming lands greatly lessen the farm products and also seriously endanger the public health (From Original Petition for Ditch- May 10, 1902 ) Original Cost: $12,516.55 Original Benefit: $23,953.98 Events: 1985 a meeting was held on the possibility of reverting the land back into a lake as it was in 1900. Sept/29/2014- Public Informational Meeting held in Henning to discuss need for upcoming Re-determination Currently: Ditch 5 is an open channel Ditch. The Ditch is operational, but could use some maintenance to restore proper flow, including the removal of beaver dams, cleaning of culverts and the cleanout of sediment that has fallen into the channel. Currently for Ditch 5, the maintenance fund is at a value of $9,559.22

History Ditch #36 Established: January 10,1908 Purpose: So that large tracts of land would thereby be made productive and suitable for cultivation, and to remove stagnant water which endangers public health. (From Original Petition for Ditch- May 24, 1907) Original Cost: $2,227.91 Original Benefit: $3,126.00 Events: 1985 a meeting was held on the possibility of reverting the land back into a lake as it was in 1900 Sept/29/2014- Public Informational Meeting held in Henning to discuss need for upcoming Re-determination Currently: Ditch 36 is an open channel Ditch. The Ditch is semi-operational, but could use some maintenance. Currently for Ditch 36, the maintenance fund is at a value of -$4,732.55

History Ditch #68 Established: December 30,1919 Purpose: To drain away the overflow waters that by remaining upon the meadow and farming lands greatly lessen the farm products and also seriously endanger the public health (From Original Petition for Ditch- November 25, 1919) Original Cost: $43,497.42 Original Benefit: $60,413.00 Events: 1985 a meeting was held on the possibility of reverting the land back into a lake as it was in 1900 Sept/29/2014- Public Informational Meeting held in Henning to discuss need for upcoming Re-determination Currently: Ditch 68 is an open channel Ditch. The Ditch is operational, but could use some maintenance to restore proper flow, including the removal of beaver dams, cleaning of culverts and the cleanout of sediment that has fallen into the channel. Currently for Ditch 68, the maintenance fund is at a value of -$7,660.28

Photos

Original Ditch Map

Map

Benefitted Area

Benefitted Area

Background on Ditch Viewing Ditch Viewing Quick Facts: Ditch Viewing categorizes properties into two different land types (Agriculture and Lake Shore) (A,B,C,D Designation or Lake %) Note: Some Parcels are represented in both land types Ditch Viewing is done by looking at properties using the Highest and Best Use Technique Note: The current use of a parcel is the Property Owners decision but it may not be viewed as that parcels Highest and Best Use Ditch Viewing is done using a snap shot in time approach Note: For agricultural properties, commodity input/sales prices are taken at the point when the Viewers begin the Re-determination Process Benefits for each parcel are determined individually, then all those amounts are added together to give you the Total Benefit amount of that Drainage System Note: A parcel’s benefit amount is then divided by the Total Drainage System Amount to come up with that particular parcels Ditch Percentage

Background on Ditch Viewing Land Descriptions * Before Ditch is in Place A Land: Standing Water or Cattails B Land: Seasonally Flooded/Pasture Land C Land: Generally farmable land with moderate crop potential D Land: Upland areas not specifically needing artificial drainage, with medium to high crop potential *After Ditch is in Place A Land: Drained Slough area with low to medium crop potential B Land: Well drained ground with medium to high crop potential C Land: Well drained ground with highest crop potential D Land: Upland area with highest crop potential with improved farm-ability

Background on Ditch Viewing Lake Lots are described as a percentage. The higher the percentage, needs the Ditch in place to prevent flooding on their property. While the lower percentage does not need the Ditch for flooding but is receiving benefit from the Ditch because it is handling the runoff from that property(Contribution). This percentage is then applied to the Land Value for that Parcel. EX: Land Value (200,000) X Ditch Percentage (50%) = Benefit for Parcel (100,000)

Viewer’s Report Ditch 5/68/36 Benefits A Land Acres: 214.13 Benefit per Acre: $791.00 A Land Irrigated Acres: 0.09 Benefit per Acre: $3,230.00 B Land Acres: 486.39 Benefit per Acre: $316.00 B Land Irrigated Acres: 22.80 Benefit per Acre: $1,503.00 C Land Acres: 1,015.20 Benefit per Acre: $198.00 C Land Irrigated Acres: 94.89 Benefit per Acre: $841.00 D Land Acres: 3,939.41 Benefit per Acre: $82.00 D Land Irrigated Acres: 417.76 Benefit per Acre: $255.00 Building Site Acres: 659.95 Benefit per Acre: $75.00 Tree Acres: 5,302.19 Benefit per Acre: $20.00 Grass Acres: 1354.38 Benefit per Acre: $30.00 Lakeshore Benefit: $00.00 x (Lakeshore %’s) : $00.00 Area’s total Benefit (2016): $1,390,872.18 Ditch 5 Benefit (1903): $23,953.98 Ditch 68 Benefit(1919): $60,413.00 Total: $87,492.98 Ditch 36 Benefit(1908): $3,126.00

Reading The Viewers Report

Recap: What Have we learned Ditch Proceedings: How County Ditches Work Re-determination/Combination: State Statute, Ditches are serving some of the same overlapping areas, more efficient for administration Reason for Hearing: Why are we here, Why was a Re-determination done History: When and Why were these systems created Background on Ditch Viewing: How are properties viewed and looked at Viewer’s Report: How to read the Viewer’s Report ****Reading of any written comments**** Main Item: This is the only time that these Benefit percentages can be changed until the next time a Re-determination is done, A Maintenance Assessment will be based off of your Benefit Percentage * Legal Discussion from the County Attorney David Hauser

Questions and Comments