Template Name: ENGAGE™ Change Impact Assessment Template Template Description: The ENGAGE™ Change Impact Assessment is used as an output when analysing Change Impacts captured during Stage 2 – Change Definition. This template can be used to help group impacts and display them by various view points. ENGAGE™ Stage Alignment: This template is aligned to Stage 3 – Change Preparation

CHANGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT: End State Summary 1. Marketing High level summary & description of the core changes which are impacting this group <<PROCESS OWNER NAME>> 2. Sales High level summary & description of the core changes which are impacting this group <<PROCESS OWNER NAME>> L L 3. Buying High level summary & description of the core changes which are impacting this group <<PROCESS OWNER NAME>> 4. Merchandising High level summary & description of the core changes which are impacting this group <<PROCESS OWNER NAME>> M L 5. Stores High level summary & description of the core changes which are impacting this group <<PROCESS OWNER NAME>> 6. Finance High level summary & description of the core changes which are impacting this group <<PROCESS OWNER NAME>> H L

STORES: High Level Overview SUMMARY PROCESS OWNER <<PROCESS OWNER NAME>> KEY CHANGES IMPACT SUMARY <<Change 1>> HIGH <<Enter summary of the change which should ideally group as much o the similar themed impacts together>> <<Change 2>> <<Change 3>> MEDIUM <<Change 4>> LOW HIGH BUSINESS IMPACT POLICY HIGH BUSINESS PROCESS SKILLS DEVELOPMENT LOW ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE ROLES & REPONSIBILITIES MEDIUM WORKLOAD MANAGEMENT REWARD & RECOGNITION CULTURE TIMESCALES BUSINESS BENEFITS <<BENEFIT NAME>>: <<Benefit Description>> ERP Procurement Module Live Invoice Scanning Solution <<BENEFIT NAME>>: <<Benefit Description>> <<BENEFIT NAME>>: <<Benefit Description>> Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 Q4 2018 Q1 2019 Q2 2019 Q3 2019 Q4 2019

CRITICAL SUCCESSFACTORS STORES: Core Changes KEY CHANGES IMPACT SUMARY RATIONALE CRITICAL SUCCESSFACTORS PROCESSES IMPACTED CHANGE TYPE 1 (IMPLEMENT BEFORE GO-LIVE) <<Change 1>> HIGH <<Enter summary of the change which should ideally group as much o the similar themed impacts together>> <<Enter the justification on why the change needs to be made <<Enter CSF’s which outline what success looks like. E.g. to evidence the fact that change has been made>> <<List the impacted processes>> E.g. Procurement <<Change 2>> CHANGE TYPE 2 (IMPLEMENT DURING GO-LIVE) <<Change 3>> MEDIUM CHANGE TYPE 3 (IMPLEMENT AFTER GO-LIVE) <<Change 4>> LOW CHANGE TYPE 4 (NOT DEPEDNANT ON GO-LIVE) <<Change 5>>

STORES: Benefits Map CHANGE TYPE 1 (IMPLEMENT BEFORE GO-LIVE) KEY CHANGES IMPACT CHANGE TYPE 1 (IMPLEMENT BEFORE GO-LIVE) <<Change 1>> HIGH <<Change 2>> CHANGE TYPE 2 (IMPLEMENT DURING GO-LIVE) <<Change 3>> MEDIUM CHANGE TYPE 3 (IMPLEMENT AFTER GO-LIVE) <<Change 4>> LOW CHANGE TYPE 4 (NOT DEPEDNANT ON GO-LIVE) <<Change 5>> BENEFIT NAME BENEFIT ID BENEFIT NAME BENEFIT ID BENEFIT NAME BENEFIT ID BENEFIT NAME BENEFIT ID