Texas Title 1 Priority Schools Grant

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Principals Role in Systemic Change for Reading Commitment.
Advertisements

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
Texas Transformation Project Seminar September 2010.
Professional Development and Appraisal System
SAU # WELCOME TO THE NEW SCHOOL YEAR.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Silas Deane Middle School Steven J. Cook, Principal Cynthia Fries, Assistant Principal October 22, 2013 Wethersfield Board of Education.
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
TEXAS LITERACY INITIATIVE.  San Antonio Independent School District (SAISD) will partner with an approved service provider to deliver literacy readiness.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
PILOT REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH DISTRICT: Select a minimum of 10% of schools to participate. A minimum of 1 school MUST meet the minimum participant requirements.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012.
“A New Chapter and a New Day” An Update on the School Improvement Grant Staff Meeting Friday, August 5, :30 a.m. LHS Commons.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
SAISD Focus/Priority Training Samantha Gallegos, Coordinator III
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
A Mission of Restoration
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
THEN NOW  Historic approach had been to pull groups of teachers together for whole group/single topic discussions. ◦ District level determination.
George I. Sanchez Charter School [Houston] John De La Cruz Principal.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Texas Transformation Project Sam Houston High Fox Tech High Board Presentation September 20, 2010.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
 A MODEL SCHOOL. The children are the of North Aiken supported by reflective and responsive teachers and staff, devoted parents, a supportive district.
Data Driven Decisions for School Improvement
TTIPS Model Overview.
Montgomery Township Board of Education
Nancy Burstein Sue Sears California State University, Northridge
Creating a culture of greatness
The School Counseling Program
Action Plan Update and Goals
Worlds Best Workforce Annual Report
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM. A school district shall ensure that all teachers are provided with an orientation of the Professional Development.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
What’s the connection to Ohio’s other initiatives?
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Differentiated Supports in Special Education
Focus / Priority School Updates
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Filling Your Buckets: Aligning it ALL!
MSBSD Principal Evaluation
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Strategic Plan: Tri-Cities High School
Loretta Garcia TAP Coordinator TAP Hotline
Kindergarten – Middle School
Taylor ISD Title I Parent Meeting
Family Engagement Policy
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
New Prospect Elementary School
2019 Spring & Fall Timeline May 10, 2019
Making Middle Grades Work
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Lopez High School.
S.T.E.A.M. Focused Instruction:
College Community School District Ten-Year Strategic Plan
Presentation transcript:

Texas Title 1 Priority Schools Grant

TTIPS – Four Campuses Sam Houston High School Fox Tech High School Navarro Academy S. J. Davis Middle School

Texas Title 1 Priority Schools The TTIPS Grant, Texas’ version of the School Improvement Grant, was established to help schools across the state that have the greatest growth opportunities Although the program has specific requirements determined by federal regulation, it also provides local districts ground breaking opportunities to make “bold choices for a bright future.” Four SAISD Schools have been awarded the TTIPS Grant to implement transformational school improvement.

What is Transformation designed to do? Increase Student Achievement Increase Principal Effectiveness Increase Teacher Effectiveness Improve Instruction thru targeted PD Promote Community Oriented Schools Provide Operational Flexibility to Schools

Common Components at our TTIPS Schools Strong Ties to Community Outreach Programs Rededication : Recommitment To School Improvement Performance Based Compensation System College and Career Readiness Culture Increased use of Data to Drive Instruction Parent Engagement And Education Extended Learning Time/Schedule Modification Positive Behavior Intervention System

Program Evaluation All TTIPS schools participate in an extensive program evaluation throughout the school year: Conference calls with the SIRC Program Manager every 90 days. Set agenda in which the principal is asked to lead the discussion. Quarterly Implementation Reports (QIR) - reflects the implementation of activities tied to a particular CSF. The QIR is a compliance report that measures the depth of implementation of the CSF. 90 Day Report - this is a planning document of activities that the school will engage in over a 90 day period that documents the strategies utilized for a particular CSF for the 90 day period. This is turned into the SIRC office every 90 days. Yearly Site Visit – a team from TEA visits the campus and meets with the Principal, visit classrooms, has private meetings with the principal, Shepherd, teacher leaders, parents, and students. Findings are compiled and sent to the Shepherd, PSP, and Principal. End of Year Report EOY – due August 1 and is measured against the stated goals determined by the campus and other data sets.

TTIPS Principal/Teacher Evaluation Where Are We Now and Next Steps This campus is a participant of the Texas Title 1 Priority Schools Grant better known as TTIPS. Requirements of the grant include Incentive Pay and a Principal/ Teacher Evaluation System which directly impacts significant student growth. TTIPS schools will pilot the TEA PDAS Redesign Evaluation System for the 2012-2013 with full implementation during the 2013-2014 school year. Training for teachers will be held online using Teachscape.

Side by Side of Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for Teaching vs Side by Side of Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for Teaching vs. Professional Development Appraisal System…PDAS Charlotte Danielson Model Current SAISD PDAS Four Domains Four Ratings Value Added, looking for growth not necessarily how many students passed or failed Students on a teacher’s roster at Snapshot Date will be the students that reflect a teacher’s value added for each student. Principals and Adm. teams will use an IPAD APP to conduct observations. The APP provides a feature called Time Stamping so that every sentence that the principal writes will be time stamped. All teachers will be rolled back to a standard appraisal Teachers will complete Teacher Self-Reports Part 1 and 2 Eight Domains Four Ratings No Value Added Currently Principals and Administrative teams use online Eduphoria to complete appraisals Teachers complete Teacher Self Report Part 1 and 2

Critical Success Factors For each additional improvement activity entered, enter the Critical Success Factor Code(s) from this table, enter the LEA/campus’ rationale for including the activity, provide the supporting research that indicates the activity will be effective, and indicate the beginning and ending date of the activity. 1 – Improve Academic Performance, including (but not limited to) Reading/ELA and Math A. Data-driven instruction B. Curriculum Alignment (both horizontal and vertical) C. On-going Monitoring of Instruction 2 – Increase the Use of Quality Data to Drive Instruction A. Data Disaggregation/Training B. Data-driven Decisions C. On-going Communication 3 – Increase Leadership Effectiveness A. On-going Job Embedded Professional Development B. Operational Flexibility C. Resource/Data Utilization 4 – Increase Learning Time A. Flexible Scheduling B. Instructionally-focused Calendar C. Staff Collaborative Planning 5 – Increase Parent/Community Involvement A. Increased Opportunities for Input B. Effective Communication C. Accessible Community Services 6 – Improve School Climate A. Increased Attendance B. Decreased Discipline Referrals C. Increased Involvement in Extra/Co-Curricular Activities 7 – Increase Teacher Quality A. Locally Developed Appraisal Instruments B. On-going Job Embedded Professional Development C. Recruitment/Retention Strategies