IETF 16ng Working Group Update IEEE 802.16 Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16maint-08/157r1 Date Submitted: 2008-03-17 Source: David Johnston Voice: 503 200 0214 Intel Corporation E-mail: dj.johnston@intel.com Venue: Orlando Florida, 802 Plenary Base Contribution: Purpose: Security Rapporteur Report Notice: This document does not represent the agreed views of the IEEE 802.16 Working Group or any of its subgroups. It represents only the views of the participants listed in the “Source(s)” field above. It is offered as a basis for discussion. It is not binding on the contributor(s), who reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.16. Patent Policy: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE-SA Patent Policy and Procedures: <http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6> and <http://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3>. Further information is located at <http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-material.html> and <http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat >.

Security Comments 2026, 2029, 2032, 2052, 2061, 2088, 2089, 2090, 2091, 2092, 2093, 2094, 2095, 2096, 2097, 2098, 2099 4 Submissions 08-002, 08-003, 08-59r1, 08-128

Issue strongly overlaps with Security HO Latency Reduction Issue strongly overlaps with Security 2061 & 2088 Suggest not to deal with in Security, but handle jointly with HO.

Discussion expected on: Ease Of Passage? Discussion expected on: 2026, 2029, 2032, 2094, 2095, 2096, 2097, 2098, 2099 Possible Harmomy on: 2052, 2089, 2090, 2091, 2092, 2093

2026 Joe Schumacher 08/059r1 Network Auth ID in RNG-REQ 2 Reject 2029 Yeongmoon Sun HMAC in more RNG-REQ contexts 1 Reject, 1 Acc-Mod 2032 Geunhwi Lim SA-TEK REQ Attributes 2 Acc-Mod 2052 Zheng Shang 08/128 GTEK Updating 1 Accept 2061 08/003 HO Latency Reduction 2088 08/002 Overhead due to TEK Update Through RNG-RSP 1.5 Rejects 2089 Erik Colban EAP Reauth Initiation Issues No comment. 2090 CMAC Key counter clarifications 2091 CMAC Lock State Ambiguity 2092 SA-TEK Treatment of AK context 2093 SA-TEK Clarification 2094 Vladimir Yanover AK Activation Superceeded 2093 2095 AK use contradiction Superceeded 2092 2096 Null SAID rules 1 Reject 2097 Cached AK Clarification 2098 AK State Machine 2099 PKM text wrongly specific to only PKMv1 No Comment.