Surveying the Freshman Class

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Faculty Said… (pt.3) Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – September 14, 2006.
Advertisements

Learning Community II Survey Spring 2007 Analysis by Intisar Hibschweiler (Core Director) and Mimi Steadman (Director of Institutional Assessment)
The Towson University Learning Environment Results of the 2002 National Survey of Student Engagement Linda Suskie, Director Office of Assessment.
1 Student Characteristics And Measurements of Student Satisfaction Prepared for: The Faculty Council Subcommittee on Retention The Office of Institutional.
Lindsey Wilson College October, In 2010, the LWC faculty adopted new institutional student learning outcomes including: Lindsey Wilson students.
 Evolving Assessment & ePortfolio at LaGuardia Community College J. Elizabeth Clark LaGuardia Community College--CUNY.
The Personal Development Plan (PDP)
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
Faculty Said/Student Said 2008 Update (First Look) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings LaSylvia Pugh – February 16, 2009.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Drake Curriculum Analysis Committee Update December 2012.
Measuring the Gap Between Faculty and Student Perceptions of Engagement: Results from the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement University Assessment Office.
High School Redesign in Madison: Some Early Results Results from the Analysis of Graduates Results from 2006 High School Survey of Student Engagement.
LCI/ IND 101 Survey Results Fall 2007 Analysis by I. Hibschweiler and Mimi Steadman.
Surveying the Freshman Class Eva Fernández Center for Teaching & Learning September 16, 2011.
AAC&U Members on Recent Trends in General Education Design, Learning Outcomes, and Teaching Approaches Key findings from a survey among 325 Chief Academic.
MT ENGAGE Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment April 27, 2015.
C OLLEGIATE L EARNING A SSESSMENT Dr. Pedro Reyes, Executive Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs January 2014.
USU Student Climate for Diversity
MMCC CO-Curricular Activity
Assessment Planning and Learning Outcome Design Dr
ePortfolios and the First-Year
First-Year Experience Seminars: A Benchmark Study of Targeted Courses for Developmental Education Students.
Marla M. Bell Associate Dean of Student Success
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Director, Center for Teaching, Learning, & Assessment
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Learning Assistance Department
Bringing Active Learning to Scale at Bronx Community College (BCC) of the City University of New York (CUNY) Dr. Nancy Ritze August 3, 2016.
Jackson College CCSSE & CCFSSE Findings Community College Survey of Student Engagement Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Administered:
General Education Review
Dissertation Findings
How Technologically Literate are EMCC Students?
NSSE Data Conversations
NSSE Results for Faculty
UTRGV 2016 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
The University of Texas-Pan American
As Good As It Gets…For Now:
Surprise. Look who’s engaged
2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Program Review 2.0 Training: SLO Assessment Participation Module
Guided Pathways at California Community Colleges
Perspective Interview: Sofia Perez
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Guided Pathways at California Community Colleges
Timothy S. Brophy, Director of Institutional Assessment
Your Institutional Report Step by Step
Assessment Day 2017 New Student Experience Presented by Jenny Lee
Purposeful Pathways: Designing Relevant and Transparent HIPs
Helping US Become Knowledge-Able About Student Engagement
Guided Pathways at California Community Colleges
TOP TIER STRATEGIC PLAN
Rory McFadden, Gustavus Adolphus College
Dean of the Lash Division of Teaching and Learning
UTRGV 2018 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
General Studies ePortfolio Pilot
Jillian Kinzie, Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research
General Education Redesign Task Force
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Student Equity Planning August 28, rd Meeting
UTRGV 2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
EDUCAUSE MARC 2004 E-Portfolios: Two Approaches for Transforming Curriculum & Promoting Student Learning Glenn Johnson Instructional Designer Penn State.
Curriculum Committee Report
HART RESEARCH A S O T E C I AAC&U Members On Trends In Learning Outcomes, General Education, and Assessment Key findings from online survey among 433 Chief.
“We Go Together”: Discipline-Based Linked Course Learning Community Leads to Positive Developments for Students Dawn McKinney and Karen Peterson University.
Assessment Day 2017 New Student Experience Presented by Jenny Lee
2013 NSSE Results.
Learning Community II Survey
General Studies ePortfolio Pilot
Presentation transcript:

Surveying the Freshman Class Eva Fernández Center for Teaching & Learning September 16, 2011

Freshman Year Initiative New model, fall 2010 : Two classes: English 110 (College Writing) linked to a general education Perspectives course Learning communities sometimes also involved a thematic links: e.g., Environment English 110 courses standardized with carefully selected readings and sets of assignments (assessment currently underway) Technology infused curriculum: blogs, netbooks, video assignments, etc. Fall 2011: almost all freshmen in FYI

Freshman Survey 11 questions on demographics 75 questions, 7 different question types, on: active/collaborative learning, general education, home life and values, quantitative reasoning, student-faculty contact, study skills, supportive and diverse campus community, use of technology, writing 2 questions on long-term plans for degree September: 46 sections, 766 respondents December: 42 sections, 556 respondents 365 respondents completed survey twice (311 FYI, 54 non-FYI) Demographics very similar to QC population at large and to larger samples

For 75 scalar-response questions, mean difference between answers in September and December Negative change Positive change

How important to you is… How important to you is…? Learning process, contact with others, specific skills, etc. (20 questions) Developing strong critical thinking and analytic skills Making a life-long commitment to learning Developing time management and organizational skills Attending campus events and activities … Having contact with people from different backgrounds Becoming a community leader

HS-college comparison: in high school/during the current semester, how often did you…? Making a class presentation Coming to class having read assignments Working with others on projects in / out of class Discussing assignments with faculty Talking about career plans Participating in co-curricular activities … Writing long papers or reports Using e-medium for an assignment Including diverse perspectives Discussing ideas outside of class …

Evidence of impact? Questions about writing (N=6) Questions about technology (N=4)

Next moves… ePortfolios to address the negatives: Second semester seminars: general education courses, where gen ed ePortfolios are introduced Support group beyond class: student ePortfolio showcases Linkage to majors that use ePortfolios

Limitations Not enough non-FYI respondents (54 out of 365) No identifying information collected, so not possible to correlate responses to survey with indicators of academic achievement (past and future grades, e.g.) Design including eclectic question types; scales too narrow to elicit fine-grained judgments Procedure to administer very labor-intensive

Recommendations Use data like this, and other data we routinely collect (NSSE, alum surveys, evaluations, etc.) to learn more about our students Continue to build well-supported and coherent institutional programming Foster engagement in our future freshmen by continuing to pay attention to their diversity and through the development of programs with experiential education components