Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (December 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A non-endoscopic device to sample the oesophageal microbiota: a case-control study  Daffolyn R Fels Elliott, MD, Alan W Walker, PhD, Maria O'Donovan, MD,
Advertisements

Figure 1. The relationships of bacterial operational taxonomic unit richness (A) and phylogenetic diversity (B) with aridity index based on 97% sequence.
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 152, Issue 4, Pages e7 (March 2017)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (December 2017)
Inflammatory phenotypes in patients with severe asthma are associated with distinct airway microbiology  Steven L. Taylor, BSc, Lex E.X. Leong, PhD, Jocelyn.
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 153, Issue 6, Pages e6 (December 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (July 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages (February 2017)
Faecalibacterium prausnitzii subspecies–level dysbiosis in the human gut microbiome underlying atopic dermatitis  Han Song, PhD, Young Yoo, MD, PhD, Junghyun.
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Intestinal microbiota in infants at high risk for allergy: Effects of prebiotics and role in eczema development  Harm Wopereis, BSc, Kathleen Sim, MRCPCH,
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages e5 (June 2017)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (March 2017)
Alterations in the Gut Microbiota Associated with HIV-1 Infection
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Conducting a Microbiome Study
Volume 123, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
A Subset of Polysaccharide Capsules in the Human Symbiont Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron Promote Increased Competitive Fitness in the Mouse Gut  Nathan.
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages (March 2015)
The Host Shapes the Gut Microbiota via Fecal MicroRNA
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (August 2014)
Skin Microbiome Surveys Are Strongly Influenced by Experimental Design
Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plots of fecal and biopsy sample-based Bray-Curtis distances computed from the relative abundances of the 258.
The airway microbiome in patients with severe asthma: Associations with disease features and severity  Yvonne J. Huang, MD, Snehal Nariya, BS, Jeffrey.
The NLR Protein NLRP6 Does Not Impact Gut Microbiota Composition
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (November 2017)
FIGURE 1 α-Diversity comparisons of gut microbiota from DM and MOM infants by age and antibiotic exposure. Using ... FIGURE 1 α-Diversity comparisons of.
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages e3 (October 2018)
Ruth E. Ley, Daniel A. Peterson, Jeffrey I. Gordon  Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Presented by Jacob Miller
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Casey Brewer, Elizabeth Chu, Mike Chin, Rong Lu  Cell Reports 
Altered mycobiota and bacterial-fungal correlation in AS patients receiving different therapeutic regimens. Altered mycobiota and bacterial-fungal correlation.
Shifts in the microbial community compositions of the control and antibiotic groups. Shifts in the microbial community compositions of the control and.
mtDNA genotypes correlate with gut microbiota composition.
Genetic and Epigenetic Regulation of Human lincRNA Gene Expression
Fig. 1 A phylogenetically cohesive core rumen microbiome was found across farms with highly conserved hierarchical structure and tight association to overall.
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages e7 (September 2018)
by Peter J. Turnbaugh, Vanessa K. Ridaura, Jeremiah J
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages (February 2017)
Fig. 1 The seven nasal CSTs and their respective bacterial densities shown in boxplots and composition shown in heatmap visualization and non-metric multidimensional.
Variations in beta and alpha diversity of gut microbiome bacterial communities in relation to presence of Blastocystis. Variations in beta and alpha diversity.
Variations in beta and alpha diversity of gut microbiome eukaryotic communities explained by presence of Blastocystis. Variations in beta and alpha diversity.
Comparison of distal gut microbiota composition between Egyptian and U
Northern shovelers may have unique microbiome differences with respect to IAV infection, relative to the other duck species. Northern shovelers may have.
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages e5 (June 2019)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages 3914-3926 (December 2017) Shaping of Intestinal Microbiota in Nlrp6- and Rag2-Deficient Mice Depends on Community Structure  Eric J.C. Gálvez, Aida Iljazovic, Achim Gronow, Richard Flavell, Till Strowig  Cell Reports  Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages 3914-3926 (December 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.027 Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2017 21, 3914-3926DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.027) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Environmental Factors Contribute to Diverse Microbiota Composition in Nlrp6 Inflammasome-Deficient Mice (A) Scheme for cross-sectional characterization of fecal microbiota composition in WT, Nlrp6−/−, Asc−/−, and Casp1/11−/− mice maintained by inbreeding in conventional housing conditions. (B) NMDS ordination analysis of microbiota composition in mice using Bray-Curtis distances grouped by genotype. (C) Individual effect size of tested covariates. (D–F) NMDS ordination analysis of microbiota composition in Nlrp6−/− (D), Asc−/− (E), and Casp1/11−/− (F) mice using Bray-Curtis distances grouped by colony. Ellipses indicate dispersion of samples within colony. (G and H) Relative abundance of the family Prevotellaceae in mice grouped by genotype (G) and in Nlrp6−/− mice grouped by colony (H). (I) Relative mean abundances of bacterial families in mice grouped by colony. Permutational multivariate ANOVA (ADONIS) was used to calculate the variance explained by individual factors in (C). Mann-Whitney U test was used for (G) and (H). ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p = 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Cell Reports 2017 21, 3914-3926DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.027) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Rederivation of Immunodeficient Mice from Conventional Housing Conditions to eSPF Conditions Normalizes the Microbiota (A) Scheme for rederivation of conventionally housed (Conv) mouse strains into enhanced SPF (eSPF) housing conditions via ET using CD1d foster mothers with eSPF microbiota. (B–E) Fecal samples were obtained from Conv-housed (circles) and eSPF-housed (asterisks) mice of indicated genotypes. (B) NMDS ordination analysis of microbiota composition using Bray-Curtis distances. (C) Similarity analysis of microbiota composition within housing condition using Bray-Curtis distances to the respective centroid. (D) Estimation of α-diversity using the richness and inverse Simpson indices. The dots indicate the outlayers. (E) Heatmap of detected OTUs clustered at family level; the samples were grouped by housing condition (Microbiota) and genotype as indicated. Mann-Whitney U test was used in (C). ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Cell Reports 2017 21, 3914-3926DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.027) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 GI Location and Host Genotype Regulate Spatial Organization of the Gut Microbiome (A) Scheme for dysbiotic microbiota transfer experiment. WT (B/6N), Nlrp6−/− (N6), and Rag2−/−, (Rag2) mice bred in eSPF conditions were subjected to a fecal transplantation (FT) from conventionally housed Nlrp6−/− mice. Fecal samples were taken before and 4 weeks after FT for DNA isolation. Luminal and mucosa-associated samples for RNA isolation were taken from indicated locations (GI locations) 4 weeks after FT. (B) NMDS ordination analysis of microbiota composition using Bray-Curtis distances from fecal DNA of donor Nlrp6−/− mice (Conv-Dys) and recipient mice before (eSPF) and after FT (eSPF+Conv-Dys). The zoomed section includes mice after FT as well as donor mice. (C) Venn diagram indicating the number of shared OTUs between the donor mice and the FT recipients. (D–F) NMDS of fecal samples after FT using DNA as template (D). NMDS analysis and individual effect size of “genotype” and “cage” using pairwise comparison in Nlrp6−/− versus WT mice (E) and Rag2−/− versus WT mice (F). (G–I) NMDS of samples across the GI tract after FT using RNA as template. NMDS ordination and effect size of GI location, genotype, and cage in all samples (G), from lumen (H), or from mucosa (I). Permutational multivariate ANOVA (ADONIS) was used to calculate the variance explained by individual factors in (E) and (F). ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Cell Reports 2017 21, 3914-3926DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.027) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Increased Abundance of Distinct Bacteria in Distal Colon of eSPF+Conv-Dys Nlrp6−/− and Rag2−/− Mice RNA-based microbiome analysis in the proximal colon (PC) and distal colon (DC) of two cohorts of eSPF WT, Nlrp6−/−, and Rag2−/− mice 4 weeks after receiving independent FT from Conv-Dys Nlrp6−/− mice. (A–D) Active communities were analyzed using NMDS, LEfSe, and DESeq2. After LEfSe analysis, bacterial families with LDA scores > 3.0 are displayed. Log ratio and mean average (MA) plots were used to visualize DA OTUs (up: red; down: blue; p < 0.05 after correction for multiple tests) identified using DESeq2. (A and B) Analysis of active communities in PC (A) and DC (B) of WT and Nlrp6−/− mice. (C and D) Analysis of active communities in PC (C) and DC (D) of WT and Nlrp6−/− mice. Data shown summarize two independent experiments. Permutational multivariate ANOVA (ADONIS) was used to calculate the variance explained by individual factors in (A) and (D). A significant effect was attributed when p < 0.05 and R2 > 0.10 (equivalent to 10% of explained variance). ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Cell Reports 2017 21, 3914-3926DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.027) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Distinct Commensals Explore Specific Niches in Immunodeficient Mice RNA-based microbiome analysis in the PC and DC of two cohorts of eSPF WT, Nlrp6−/−, and Rag2−/− mice 4 weeks after receiving independent FT from Conv-Dys Nlrp6−/− mice. (A) Visualization of DA OTUs commonly enriched in Nlrp6−/− and Rag2−/− mice using UpSetR plot. The upper chart shows the number and taxonomy of shared OTUs that were identified in higher abundance in Nlrp6−/− and Rag2−/− mice. The matrix in the bottom visualizes the set of intersections represented by the connected dots. (B and C) Relative abundance of selected DA OTUs in the DC shared between all (B) or at least one (C) luminal site in Nlrp6−/− and Rag2−/− mice. The p values are from the Mann-Whitney U test, with Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple testing. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Cell Reports 2017 21, 3914-3926DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.027) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions