Crain Lewis Brogdon, LLP

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In-House Mock Trial Seminar
Advertisements

Experts & Expert Reports  Experts and the FRE  FRCP, Rule 26 and experts  How are experts used in patent litigation?  What belongs in a Rule 26 report?
Mock Trial Procedures You and the Law. There are 2 sides: Prosecution Prosecution Responsible for proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused committed.
Testifying Skills Julia Pallentino MSN, JD, ARNP.
Forensic Science and the Law
Chapter 13 Testifying in Court. Testifying in Court  To effectively testify in court:  Be prepared.  Look professional.  Act professionally.  Attempts.
Simplified Rules of Evidence How to Behave in the Courtroom.
Direct Examination Caroline Goldner Cinquanto Adjunct Professor
Unit 3 Seminar! K. Austin Zimmer Any question from Unit 2! Please make sure you have completed your Unit 1 & 2 Papers!
Direct Examinations DO NOW: VOCABULARY ON LINE ON MY WEBSITE.
English 9H Ms. Bugasch November 4, 2013 “D” Day Goals 1. Evidence Submittal and Approval 2. Students will be able to: -Understand the purpose of cross-examination.
 WATCH THE VIDEO CLIP, THEN GO TO THE WEB SITE WRITE DOWN WHAT’s THE MOST IMPORTANCE PART OF THE TRIAL AND TELL WHY. 
Chapter 1 The Science of Biology. (What is science?) The Nature of Science.
Justice Robert Beaudoin November 16 th,  Most disputes are solved as a result of the negotiation process.  Our rules prepare every case for an.
The Nature of Science.
The Criminal Trial Process Section 11 (d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that each person charged with an offence is to be ‘presumed innocent.
1 What Is Scientific Evidence? Scientific evidence is most often presented in court by an expert witness testifying on expert opinions. It also includes.
“ Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Criminal Evidence Chapter Nine: Examination of Witnesses This multimedia product and its contents are protected under.
CHAPTER 7: Emond Montgomery Publications 1 Direct Examination of Witnesses.
What is Science? A process based on inquiry that seeks to develop explanations In other words… –Trying to figure out why are things what they are, and.
What A Forensic Scientists Does Ch 1 Notes Pages
CJ305 Criminal Evidence Welcome to our Seminar!!! (We will begin shortly) Tonight – Unit 3 (Chapter 5 – Witnesses -- Lay & Expert) (Chapter 6 – Credibility.
Mock Trial Team Strategies and Formalities. Opening Statements 3 minutes Objective – Acquaint court with the case and outline what you are going to prove.
The Jury System. One of the features of the American Justice system is the concept of a jury. In America a jury is usually a group of twelve men and women.
+ Trial Basics Information you need for the trial!
Attorney/Judge. The purpose of opening statements by each side is to tell jurors something about the case they will be hearing. The opening statements.
Adverse Inferences From the Failure to Call Witnesses.
Week Nine Seminar 1.  By the time that the pleadings have been settled, discovery has been completed, and motions have been resolved, everyone has a.
Closing Arguments Organizing and delivering effective closing arguments.
OBJECTIONS! 13 Most Commonly Used Mock Trial Objections
Psychology Part 1 : Download a Specification AS & A Level Part 2 : Making.
Mock Trials Court Systems and Practices.
PREPARING YOUR CLIENT TO TESTIFY AT TRIAL
Plaintiff’s Counsel v. HR: Survive Your Deposition
Chapter 1 Structure of the Trial & Presentation of Evidence
PRE-SUIT CONSIDERATIONS
“A-B-C’s” of what you need to know for your mock trials!
PREPARATION AND PRESENTATION OF A MOCK TRIAL
Intro to a Virginia courtroom
Law of Evidence Oral Evidence.
Pretrial Conference After discovery, a pretrial hearing is held to clarify the issues, consider a settlement, and set rules for trial Once the trial court.
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
IHS Literature and the Arts
ADVANCED CROSS-EXAMINATION
Lesson 6- Copy the following
Mark Pollitt Associate Professor
Mock Trial Procedures You and the Law.
OBJECTIONS.
Performance Matters Semester Exam Review (1st Quarter)
How Witnesses are Examined
Growth in Recent years is due to:
TIPS FOR IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF YOUR DEPOSITIONS
THE NATURE OF SCIENCE.
Nature of Science & Scientific Investigations Physical Science Honors
Objections Criminal law – unit #3.
CROSS-EXAMINATION Mario Licha Barrister Clarence Chambers
Section 1 The Method of Science.
Belleville High School Law Related Education Program
Civil Pretrial Practice
Section 1 The Method of Science.
Civil Pretrial Practice
CHAP. 8: IMPEACHMENT P. JANICKE 2010.
Cross Examinations.
The Nature of Science.
Law 12 Criminal Trial Process.
1-2 How Scientists Work Objectives: How do scientists test hypotheses?
Courtroom to Classroom:
Mock Trial Objections Part II.
The Expert Valuation Witness and the Different Procedural Models in European Court Proceedings . Associate Prof. (Dr. hab. Magdalena Habdas.
Business Law Final Exam
Presentation transcript:

Crain Lewis Brogdon, LLP Beating the Expert QUENTIN BROGDON  Crain Lewis Brogdon, LLP Dallas, Texas 214-598-1009 cell   qbrogdon@crainlewis.com

“An expert is a person hired to divorce yourself from your common sense.” Mark Twain

“Make 3 correct guesses consecutively and you will establish a reputation as an expert.” Lawrence Peter

Francis Wellman

Assume an expert “has come prepared to do you all the harm that he can, and will avail himself of every opportunity to do so which you may inadvertently give him.”

Cross-Examination

Attorney vs. Expert

The Deposition

Strategy and Goals

Discovery or Trial Depo?

Discovery Deposition Goals

Trial Deposition Goals

Control, Control, Control

To Cross or Not to Cross?

The Art and Science of Cross

Francis Wellman

“Great lawyers have failed lamentably in [cross], while marvelous success has crowned the efforts of those who might otherwise have been regarded as of a mediocre grade in the profession.”

Need “infinite patience and self-control; power to read men’s minds intuitively, ability to act with force and precision; a masterful knowledge of the subject matter itself, the instinct to discover the weak point in the witness under examination.”

“Ninety percent of the game is mental, and the other half is physical Yogi Berra

Myths of Cross

Younger’s 10 Commandments

1. Be brief. 2. Short questions & plain words. 3. Only leading questions. 4. No questions with unknown answers. 5. Listen to answer.

6. Don’t quarrel with witness. 7. Don’t allow witness to explain. 8. Don’t repeat testimony from direct. 9. Avoid one question too many. 10. Save explanation for summation.

Lead Adverse Experts

TRE 611 “When a party calls a hostile witness, an adverse party, or a witness identified with an adverse party, interrogation may be by leading questions.”

Your Cross-Exam Persona

Francis Wellman

Jurors’ sympathies “are invariably on the side of the witness, and they are quick to resent any discourtesy toward him. They are willing to admit his mistakes, if you can make them apparent, but are slow to believe him guilty of perjury.”

Lamented “lawyers who act as if they thought that every one who testifies against their side…is committing willful perjury ...By their shouting, browbeating style they …fail to discredit him with the jury and elicit sympathy for him.”

Preparation

Keep in Mind

Getting in the Mud With an Expert

“Trying to rough up a legitimate expert during cross-examination is like pig wrestling; two things happen: you get dirty and the pig likes it.”

Francis Wellman

“It is unwise for the cross-examiner to attempt to cope with a specialist in his own field of inquiry. Lengthy cross-examinations along the lines of the expert’s theory are usually disastrous and should rarely be attempted.”

“it only affords an opportunity for the [expert] to enlarge upon the testimony he has already given, and to explain what might otherwise have been misunderstood or even entirely overlooked by the jury.”

Four Hurdles

1. Knowledge hurdle. 2. Helpfulness hurdle. 3. Qualifications hurdle. 4. Foundation data.

Helpfulness Hurdle- Reliability 1. Tested? 2. Rate of error? 3. Peer review? 4. Generally accepted by scientists? 5. Relies on subjective interpretation? 6. Non-judicial uses?

Conclusion Starts at beginning. Preparation, game plan, and knowing the law.