Econometrics Chengyuan Yin School of Mathematics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dummy Dependent variable Models
Advertisements

Probit The two most common error specifications yield the logit and probit models. The probit model results if the are distributed as normal variates,
Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University Lab Sessions.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University Lab Sessions.
Brief introduction on Logistic Regression
3. Binary Choice – Inference. Hypothesis Testing in Binary Choice Models.
Nguyen Ngoc Anh Nguyen Ha Trang
1Prof. Dr. Rainer Stachuletz Limited Dependent Variables P(y = 1|x) = G(  0 + x  ) y* =  0 + x  + u, y = max(0,y*)
Binary Response Lecture 22 Lecture 22.
QUALITATIVE AND LIMITED DEPENDENT VARIABLE MODELS.
GRA 6020 Multivariate Statistics; The Linear Probability model and The Logit Model (Probit) Ulf H. Olsson Professor of Statistics.
FIN357 Li1 Binary Dependent Variables Chapter 12 P(y = 1|x) = G(  0 + x  )
In previous lecture, we dealt with the unboundedness problem of LPM using the logit model. In this lecture, we will consider another alternative, i.e.
Part 20: Sample Selection 20-1/38 Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business Department of Economics.
Generalized Linear Models
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
9. Binary Dependent Variables 9.1 Homogeneous models –Logit, probit models –Inference –Tax preparers 9.2 Random effects models 9.3 Fixed effects models.
MODELS OF QUALITATIVE CHOICE by Bambang Juanda.  Models in which the dependent variable involves two ore more qualitative choices.  Valuable for the.
Empirical Methods for Microeconomic Applications William Greene Department of Economics Stern School of Business.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Logistic Regression STA2101/442 F 2014 See last slide for copyright information.
[Part 4] 1/43 Discrete Choice Modeling Bivariate & Multivariate Probit Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
9-1 MGMG 522 : Session #9 Binary Regression (Ch. 13)
April 4 Logistic Regression –Lee Chapter 9 –Cody and Smith 9:F.
Forecasting Choices. Types of Variable Variable Quantitative Qualitative Continuous Discrete (counting) Ordinal Nominal.
Maximum Likelihood Estimation Methods of Economic Investigation Lecture 17.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable
Logistic Regression. Linear Regression Purchases vs. Income.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Qualitative and Limited Dependent Variable Models ECON 6002 Econometrics Memorial University of Newfoundland Adapted from Vera Tabakova’s notes.
Machine Learning 5. Parametric Methods.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
6. Ordered Choice Models. Ordered Choices Ordered Discrete Outcomes E.g.: Taste test, credit rating, course grade, preference scale Underlying random.
Logistic Regression and Odds Ratios Psych DeShon.
[Part 5] 1/43 Discrete Choice Modeling Ordered Choice Models Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction.
Computacion Inteligente Least-Square Methods for System Identification.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
1/26: Topic 2.2 – Nonlinear Panel Data Models Microeconometric Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University New York NY USA William.
Instructor: R. Makoto 1richard makoto UZ Econ313 Lecture notes.
5. Extensions of Binary Choice Models
The Probit Model Alexander Spermann University of Freiburg SoSe 2009
Microeconometric Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Limited Dependent Variables
M.Sc. in Economics Econometrics Module I
QUALITATIVE AND LIMITED DEPENDENT VARIABLE MODELS
THE LOGIT AND PROBIT MODELS
William Greene Stern School of Business New York University
Discrete Choice Modeling
Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable.  Linear Probability Model  Probit and Logit Regression Probit Model Logit Regression  Estimation and Inference.
Generalized Linear Models
Econometric Analysis of Panel Data
THE LOGIT AND PROBIT MODELS
Microeconometric Modeling
Econometrics Chengyuan Yin School of Mathematics.
Econometrics Chengyuan Yin School of Mathematics.
Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business
Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business
Chengyuan Yin School of Mathematics
Microeconometric Modeling
Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business
Microeconometric Modeling
Empirical Methods for Microeconomic Applications University of Lugano, Switzerland May 27-31, 2019 William Greene Department of Economics Stern School.
Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business
Empirical Methods for Microeconomic Applications
Limited Dependent Variables
Presentation transcript:

Econometrics Chengyuan Yin School of Mathematics

Econometrics 21. Two Applications of Maximum Likelihood Estimation and a Two Step Estimation Method

Model for a Binary Dependent Variable Describe a binary outcome. Event occurs or doesn’t (e.g., the democrat wins, the person enters the labor force,… Model the probability of the event Requirements 0 < Probability < 1 P(x) should be monotonic in x – it’s a CDF

Two Standard Models Based on the normal distribution: Prob[y=1|x] = Φ(β’x) = CDF of normal distribution The “probit” model Based on the logistic distribution Prob[y=1|x] = exp(β’x)/[1+ exp(β’x)] The “logit” model Log likelihood P(y|x) = (1-F)(1-y) Fy where F = the cdf Log-L = Σi (1-yi)log(1-Fi) + yilogFi = Σi F[(2yi-1) β’x] since F(-t)=1-F(t) for both.

Coefficients in the Binary Choice Models E[y|x] = 0*(1-Fi) + 1*Fi = P(y=1|x) = F(β’x) The coefficients are not the slopes, as usual in a nonlinear model ∂E[y|x]/∂x= f(β’x) β These will look similar for probit and logit

Application: Female Labor Supply 1975 Survey Data: Mroz (Econometrica) Subsample of the 753 Observations Descriptive Statistics =============================================================================== Variable Mean Std.Dev. Minimum Maximum Cases LFP .600000000 .490880694 .000000000 1.00000000 250 WHRS 799.840000 915.603480 .000000000 4950.00000 250 KL6 .236000000 .511223432 .000000000 3.00000000 250 K618 1.36400000 1.37077353 .000000000 8.00000000 250 WA 42.9200000 8.42648340 30.0000000 60.0000000 250 WE 12.3520000 2.16491186 5.00000000 17.0000000 250 WW 2.27523000 2.59774974 .000000000 14.6310000 250 HHRS 22.3483200 6.00670151 7.68000000 50.1000000 250 HA 45.0240000 8.17132217 30.0000000 60.0000000 250 HE 12.5360000 3.10600920 3.00000000 17.0000000 250 HW 7.49443480 4.63619249 1.08980000 40.5090000 250 FAMINC 23.0625400 12.9239815 3.30500000 91.0440000 250 KIDS .684000000 .465845520 .000000000 1.00000000 250

Marginal Effects

GARCH Models: A Model for Time Series with Latent Heteroscedasticity Bollerslev/Ghysel, 1974

ARCH Model

GARCH Model

Estimated GARCH Model

2 Step Estimation (Murphy-Topel) Setting, fitting a model which contains parameter estimates from another model. Typical application, inserting a prediction from one model into another. A. Procedures: How it's done. B. Asymptotic results: 1. Consistency 2. Getting an appropriate estimator of the asymptotic covariance matrix The Murphy - Topel result Application: Equation 1: Number of children Equation 2: Labor force participation

Setting Two equation model: Procedure: Model for y1 = f(y1 | x1,θ1) Model for y2 = f(y2 | x2, θ2, x1, θ1)) (Note, not ‘simultaneous’ or even ‘recursive.’) Procedure: Estimate θ1 by ML, with covariance matrix (1/n)V1 Estimate θ2 by ML treating θ1 as if it were known. Correct the estimated asymptotic covariance matrix, (1/n)V2 for the estimator of θ2

Murphy and Topel (1984) Results Both MLEs are consistent

M&T Computations

Example Equation 1: Number of Kids - Poisson Regression p(yi1|xi1, β)=exp(-λi)λiyi1/yi1! λi = exp(xi1’β) gi1 = xi1 (yi1 – λi) V1 = [(1/n)Σ(-λi)xi1xi1’]-1

Example - Continued Equation 2: Labor Force Participation – Logit p(yi2|xi2,δ,α,xi1,β)=exp(di2)/[1+exp(di2)]=Pi2 di2 = (2yi2-1)[δ’xi2 + αλi] λi = exp(β’xi1) Let zi2 = (xi2, λi), θ2 = (δ, α) di2 = (2yi2-1)[θ2’zi2] gi2 = (yi2-Pi2)zi2 V2 = [(1/n)Σ{-Pi2(1-Pi2)}zi2zi2’]-1

Murphy and Topel Correction

? Data transformations. Number of kids, scale income variables Create ; Kids = kl6 + k618 ; income = faminc/10000 ; Wifeinc = ww*whrs/1000 $ ? Equation 1, number of kids. Standard Poisson fertility model. ? Fit equation, collect parameters BETA and covariance matrix V1 ? Then compute fitted values and derivatives Namelist ; X1 = one,wa,we,income,wifeinc$ Poisson ; Lhs = kids ; Rhs = X1 $ Matrix ; Beta = b ; V1 = N*VARB $ Create ; Lambda = Exp(X1'Beta); gi1 = Kids - Lambda $ ? Set up logit labor force participation model ? Compute probit model and collect results. Delta=Coefficients on X2 ? Alpha = coefficient on fitted number of kids. Namelist ; X2 = one,wa,we,ha,he,income ; Z2 = X2,Lambda $ Logit ; Lhs = lfp ; Rhs = Z2 $ Calc ; alpha = b(kreg) ; K2 = Col(X2) $ Matrix ; delta=b(1:K2) ; Theta2 = b ; V2 = N*VARB $ ? Poisson derivative of with respect to beta is (kidsi - lambda)´X1 Create ; di = delta'X2 + alpha*Lambda ; pi2= exp(di)/(1+exp(di)) ; gi2 = LFP - Pi2 ? These are the terms that are used to compute R and C. ; ci = gi2*gi2*alpha*lambda ; ri = gi2*gi1$ MATRIX ; C = 1/n*Z2'[ci]X1 ; R = 1/n*Z2'[ri]X1 ; A = C*V1*C' - R*V1*C' - C*V1*R' ; V2S = V2+V2*A*V2 ; V2s = 1/N*V2S $ ? Compute matrix products and report results Matrix ; Stat(Theta2,V2s,Z2)$

Estimated Equation 1: E[Kids] +---------------------------------------------+ | Poisson Regression | | Dependent variable KIDS | | Number of observations 753 | | Log likelihood function -1123.627 | +---------+--------------+----------------+--------+---------+----------+ |Variable | Coefficient | Standard Error |b/St.Er.|P[|Z|>z] | Mean of X| Constant 3.34216852 .24375192 13.711 .0000 WA -.06334700 .00401543 -15.776 .0000 42.5378486 WE -.02572915 .01449538 -1.775 .0759 12.2868526 INCOME .06024922 .02432043 2.477 .0132 2.30805950 WIFEINC -.04922310 .00856067 -5.750 .0000 2.95163126

Two Step Estimator +---------------------------------------------+ | Multinomial Logit Model | | Dependent variable LFP | | Number of observations 753 | | Log likelihood function -351.5765 | | Number of parameters 7 | +---------+--------------+----------------+--------+---------+----------+ |Variable | Coefficient | Standard Error |b/St.Er.|P[|Z|>z] | Mean of X| Characteristics in numerator of Prob[Y = 1] Constant 33.1506089 2.88435238 11.493 .0000 WA -.54875880 .05079250 -10.804 .0000 42.5378486 WE -.02856207 .05754362 -.496 .6196 12.2868526 HA -.01197824 .02528962 -.474 .6358 45.1208499 HE -.02290480 .04210979 -.544 .5865 12.4913679 INCOME .39093149 .09669418 4.043 .0001 2.30805950 LAMBDA -5.63267225 .46165315 -12.201 .0000 1.59096946 +---------+--------------+----------------+--------+---------+ |Variable | Coefficient | Standard Error |b/St.Er.|P[|Z|>z] | Constant 33.1506089 5.41964589 6.117 .0000 WA -.54875880 .07780642 -7.053 .0000 WE -.02856207 .12508144 -.228 .8194 HA -.01197824 .02549883 -.470 .6385 HE -.02290480 .04862978 -.471 .6376 INCOME .39093149 .27444304 1.424 .1543 LAMBDA -5.63267225 1.07381248 -5.245 .0000