Why are reproductive cancers more common in nulliparous women?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Development of guideline-based quality indicators for recurrent miscarriage E. van den Boogaard, M. Goddijn, N.J. Leschot, F. van der Veen, J.A.M. Kremer,
Advertisements

Mostafa Metwally, Cynthia M. Farquhar, Tin Chiu Li 
Effect of androgen supplementation or modulation on ovarian stimulation outcome in poor responders: a meta-analysis  Sesh Kamal Sunkara, Jyotsna Pundir,
Programmes and prospects for ovotechnology
Cancer and fertility: strategies to preserve fertility
Attitudes and policies regarding access to fertility care and assisted reproductive technologies in Israel  Daniel Sperling, Yael Simon  Reproductive.
Diet and endometriosis risk: A literature review
M. Leyder, M. De Vos, B. Popovic-Todorovic, M. Dujardin, P. Devroey, H
E. Jauniaux, I. Ben-Ami, R. Maymon  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
A. Osman, J. Pundir, M. Elsherbini, S. Dave, T. El-Toukhy, Y. Khalaf 
Ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination in women aged 40years or more  Amir Wiser, Einat Shalom-Paz, Shauna Leigh Reinblatt, Weon-Young Son,
E. Jauniaux, I. Ben-Ami, R. Maymon  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
MiR-483–5p and miR-486–5p are down-regulated in cumulus cells of metaphase II oocytes from women with polycystic ovary syndrome  Lin Shi, Shan Liu, Wanqiu.
Willem Ombelet  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
In vitro maturation improves oocyte or embryo cryopreservation outcome in breast cancer patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation 
Cornelia van Zyl, Maretha J. Visser  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
‘It's a bit too much fathering this seed’: the meaning-making of the sperm donor in Italian lesbian mother families  Vittorio Lingiardi, Nicola Carone,
Factors affecting embryo viability and uterine receptivity: insights from an analysis of the UK registry data  Stephen A. Roberts, Mark Hann, Daniel R.
Gillian M. Lockwood  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Establishment and validation of a score to predict ovarian response to stimulation in IVF  Clelia Chalumeau, Jessika Moreau, Nicolas Gatimel, Clementine.
Perinatal outcomes after stimulated versus natural cycle IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis  Mohan Shashikant Kamath, Richard Kirubakaran, Mariano.
K. Gersak, A. Veble  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Moniek van der Zanden, Annemiek W. Nap  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Désirée García, Rita Vassena, Andrés Prat, Valérie Vernaeve 
Consecutive repeat miscarriages are likely to occur in the same gestational period  Junhao Yan, Sotirios H. Saravelos, Ning Ma, Caihong Ma, Zi-Jiang Chen,
Hillary B. Alberta, Roberta M. Berry, Aaron D. Levine 
What’s on the mind of IVF consumers?
S Munné, E Fragouli, P Colls, MG Katz-Jaffe, WB Schoolcraft, D Wells 
Sarah McCredie, William Ledger, Christos A. Venetis 
Effect of N-acetyl-cysteine after ovarian drilling in clomiphene citrate-resistant PCOS women: a pilot study  A. Nasr  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Fertility preservation consultation for women with cancer: are we helping patients make high-quality decisions?  Jayeon Kim, Allison M. Deal, Ursula Balthazar,
Chief editor's 2017 annual report
Effect of energy expenditure and physical activity on the outcomes of assisted reproduction treatment  Mert Kucuk, Fadime Doymaz, Bulent Urman  Reproductive.
M. Dieterich, M. Bolz, T. Reimer, S. Costagliola, B. Gerber 
Vitaly A. Kushnir, Jennifer Choi, Sarah K. Darmon, David F
Cross-border reproductive care: a review of the literature
Myotonic dystrophy type 1 and PGD: ovarian stimulation response and correlation analysis between ovarian reserve and genotype  C. Dechanet, C. Castelli,
Polymorphism in DNMT1 may modify the susceptibility to oligospermia
Mostafa Metwally, Cynthia M. Farquhar, Tin Chiu Li 
Ronit Machtinger, Raoul Orvieto  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Donor information considered important to donors, recipients and offspring: an Australian perspective  I.S. Rodino, P.J. Burton, K.A. Sanders  Reproductive.
A retrospective analysis of ovarian stimulation with letrozole in women undergoing artificial insemination by donor  X.J. Sun, L. Jiang, L.C. Ji, R. Nie,
V Isachenko, E Isachenko, R Kreienberg, M Woriedh, JM Weiss 
Cumulative delivery rates after ICSI with donor spermatozoa in different age groups  Michaël De Brucker, Michel Camus, Patrick Haentjens, Jacques Francotte,
Intra-cycle variation of the uterine cavity indentation assessed with three-dimensional ultrasound in natural and stimulated cycles  Sotirios H. Saravelos,
Should we be promoting embryo transfer at blastocyst stage?
Stephen C. Collins, Esther Chan  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Ovarian stimulation and endometriosis progression or recurrence: a systematic review  Edgardo Somigliana, Paola Viganò, Laura Benaglia, Andrea Busnelli,
Pietro Gambadauro, Ramesan Navaratnarajah 
Implication of apoptosis in sperm cryoinjury
Serum inhibin A concentration in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome and the correlation to ethnicity, androgens and insulin resistance  Shimon Segal,
Samuel Kofi Arhin, Yu Zhao, XiaoSheng Lu, Mandika Chetry, JieQiang Lu 
Does exogenous LH in ovarian stimulation improve assisted reproduction success? An appraisal of the literature  Micah J. Hill, Gary Levy, Eric D. Levens 
The Alpha Consensus Meeting on the professional status of the clinical embryologist: proceedings of an expert meeting    Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Response: time-lapse systems for ART
C Almeida, M Sousa, A Barros  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Elective single-embryo transfer: persuasive communication strategies can affect choice in a young British population  O.B.A. van den Akker, S. Purewal 
Nigel Pereira, Anna Voskuilen-Gonzalez, Kolbe Hancock, Jovana P
Norbert Gleicher, Andrea Weghofer, David H. Barad 
Predictive value of ovarian reserve markers in smoking and non-smoking women undergoing IVF  Thomas Freour, Lionel Dessolle, Miguel Jean, Damien Masson,
Ovarian reserve screening before contraception?
Cryobanking of human ovarian tissue: do women still want their tissue stored beyond 5 years?  Kirsten Tryde Macklon, Erik Ernst, Anders Nyboe Andersen,
Programmes and prospects for ovotechnology
Randomized controlled trial of benzocaine versus placebo spray for pain relief at hysterosalpingogram  E.A. Bachman, S. Senapati, M.D. Sammel, S.K. Kalra 
China’s model of egg donation is a policy lesson for Britain
Yakoub Khalaf, Susan Bewley, Peter Braude 
M. Franz, J. Ott, A. Watrelot, L. Küssel, H. Husslein 
Fertility in cancer patients after cryopreservation of one ovary
Cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies in women with PCOS who do not conceive after six cycles of clomiphene citrate  Lobke M. Moolenaar, Marleen.
Use of progestins to inhibit spontaneous ovulation during ovarian stimulation: the beginning of a new era?  Antonio La Marca, Martina Capuzzo  Reproductive.
Presentation transcript:

Why are reproductive cancers more common in nulliparous women? Norbert Gleicher  Reproductive BioMedicine Online  Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 416-419 (May 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.01.007 Copyright © 2013 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Comparison of three reproductive cancers in nuns and controls: breast cancer (A), ovarian cancer (B) and uterine cancer (C). This figure was modified from Britt and Short, 2012, with permission. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2013 26, 416-419DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.01.007) Copyright © 2013 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions