A functional proteomics platform to reveal the sequence determinants of lysine methyltransferase substrate selectivity by Evan M. Cornett, Bradley M. Dickson,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structural Basis of Substrate Methylation and Inhibition of SMYD2
Advertisements

Figure 1. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) characterization of the pol β-Impα interaction. (A) Overlay of 1H-15N HSQC spectra of.
Networks of Dynamic Allostery Regulate Enzyme Function
Structural Basis for Substrate Selectivity of the E3 Ligase COP1
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Using Enhanced Sampling and Structural Restraints to Refine Atomic Structures into Low-Resolution Electron Microscopy Maps  Harish Vashisth, Georgios.
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Evolving Catalytic Properties of the MLL Family SET Domain
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages (May 2016)
Biochemical Studies of Mycobacterial Fatty Acid Methyltransferase: A Catalyst for the Enzymatic Production of Biodiesel  Nektaria Petronikolou, Satish K.
Retinal Conformation Changes Rhodopsin’s Dynamic Ensemble
Accurate design of megadalton-scale two-component icosahedral protein complexes by Jacob B. Bale, Shane Gonen, Yuxi Liu, William Sheffler, Daniel Ellis,
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Evolving Catalytic Properties of the MLL Family SET Domain
X-Ray Crystal Structure and Functional Analysis of Vaccinia Virus K3L Reveals Molecular Determinants for PKR Subversion and Substrate Recognition  Arvin.
Peter Chien, Robert A. Grant, Robert T. Sauer, Tania A. Baker 
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Complementary Structural Mass Spectrometry Techniques Reveal Local Dynamics in Functionally Important Regions of a Metastable Serpin  Xiaojing Zheng,
Fig. 2 Crystal structures and mannose binding of FimH variants in a tip-like setting. Crystal structures and mannose binding of FimH variants in a tip-like.
Complex Energy Landscape of a Giant Repeat Protein
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Allosteric Activation of DegS, a Stress Sensor PDZ Protease
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Large-Scale Conformational Dynamics of the HIV-1 Integrase Core Domain and Its Catalytic Loop Mutants  Matthew C. Lee, Jinxia Deng, James M. Briggs, Yong.
Mapping Global Histone Acetylation Patterns to Gene Expression
Structure-Guided Design of Fluorescent S-Adenosylmethionine Analogs for a High- Throughput Screen to Target SAM-I Riboswitch RNAs  Scott F. Hickey, Ming C.
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Structure of Bax  Motoshi Suzuki, Richard J. Youle, Nico Tjandra  Cell 
Yuan Yang, Chang Shu, Pingwei Li, Tatyana I. Igumenova 
A Subdomain Swap Strategy for Reengineering Nonribosomal Peptides
Structural Basis for Protein Recognition by B30.2/SPRY Domains
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 5-11 (January 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages e5 (December 2017)
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (July 2004)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e7 (January 2018)
Structure of an RNA Silencing Complex of the CRISPR-Cas Immune System
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Structural Analysis of the Protein Phosphatase 1 Docking Motif: Molecular Description of Binding Specificities Identifies Interacting Proteins  Heike.
Diverse Pore Loops of the AAA+ ClpX Machine Mediate Unassisted and Adaptor- Dependent Recognition of ssrA-Tagged Substrates  Andreas Martin, Tania A. Baker,
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Structural Basis for Substrate Selectivity of the E3 Ligase COP1
Peter Chien, Robert A. Grant, Robert T. Sauer, Tania A. Baker 
Structure of the Kinesin13-Microtubule Ring Complex
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Brandon Ho, Anastasia Baryshnikova, Grant W. Brown  Cell Systems 
Structure of the Get3 targeting factor in complex with its membrane protein cargo by Agnieszka Mateja, Marcin Paduch, Hsin-Yang Chang, Anna Szydlowska,
Structure of the Siz/PIAS SUMO E3 Ligase Siz1 and Determinants Required for SUMO Modification of PCNA  Ali A. Yunus, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Computational Modeling of Structurally Conserved Cancer Mutations in the RET and MET Kinases: The Impact on Protein Structure, Dynamics, and Stability 
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Structural and Thermodynamic Basis for Enhanced DNA Binding by a Promiscuous Mutant EcoRI Endonuclease  Paul J. Sapienza, John M. Rosenberg, Linda Jen-Jacobson 
Fine Details of IGF-1R Activation, Inhibition, and Asymmetry Determined by Associated Hydrogen /Deuterium-Exchange and Peptide Mass Mapping  Damian Houde,
Petra Hänzelmann, Hermann Schindelin  Structure 
Fig. 2 Mitochondria-encoded genes affect heat and cold tolerance.
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2009)
Presentation transcript:

A functional proteomics platform to reveal the sequence determinants of lysine methyltransferase substrate selectivity by Evan M. Cornett, Bradley M. Dickson, Krzysztof Krajewski, Nicholas Spellmon, Andrew Umstead, Robert M. Vaughan, Kevin M. Shaw, Philip P. Versluis, Martis W. Cowles, Joseph Brunzelle, Zhe Yang, Irving E. Vega, Zu-Wen Sun, and Scott B. Rothbart Science Volume 4(11):eaav2623 November 28, 2018 Published by AAAS

Fig. 1 K-OPL platform for mapping KMT substrate selectivity. K-OPL platform for mapping KMT substrate selectivity. (A) Composition and design of the K-OPL. (B) Cartoon depiction of the SPA developed for screening the activities of KMTs with K-OPL. TEG, triethylene glycol; SAM, S-adenosylmethionine. Evan M. Cornett et al. Sci Adv 2018;4:eaav2623 Published by AAAS

Fig. 2 K-OPL reveals the substrate selectivity of G9a, SET7/9, and SMYD2. K-OPL reveals the substrate selectivity of G9a, SET7/9, and SMYD2. K-OPL substrate selectivity profiles for G9a (A), SET7/9 (B), and SMYD2 (C). Mean results of two independent K-OPL SPA screens for each enzyme are reported as position-normalized heat maps (see fig. S1 for global normalized heat maps and raw K-OPL data). The color code is proportional to the creation of enzyme product, where red (1) is most active and blue (0) is least active. Rows show the identity of each fixed residue, and columns show the position within the sequence. Initial rate measurements with peptides corresponding to known and newly identified substrates for G9a (D), SET7/9 (E), or SMYD2 (F). cpm, counts per minute. Point mutations predicted to decrease or increase the rate of methylation are indicated in red or green, respectively. Data points are shown as the mean of three independent measurements, and error is presented as ±SEM. For some data points, error bars are masked by the symbol weight. Evan M. Cornett et al. Sci Adv 2018;4:eaav2623 Published by AAAS

Fig. 3 MS analysis of methylation products. MS analysis of methylation products. The products from reactions of G9a (A), SET7/9 (B), and SMYD2 (C) with their corresponding peptide substrates were analyzed by MS. Mass spectra are shown in the absence (top) or presence (bottom) of enzyme treatment, as indicated. Evan M. Cornett et al. Sci Adv 2018;4:eaav2623 Published by AAAS

Fig. 4 Structural and kinetic analysis of SMYD2. Structural and kinetic analysis of SMYD2. (A) Hybrid ribbon-surface representation of SMYD2 (white) bound to SAH and GWKLNleSKRG (Nle, norleucine) (blue sticks). Costructure has been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) as PDB: 6MON. (B) Overlay of peptide substrates from SMYD2-GWKLNleSKRG (PDB: 6MON) and SMYD2-p53K370 (PDB: 3TG5) structures. (C) Scatterplot comparing the relationship between the methylation rate calculated from Fig. 2F and the dynamics of substrate coordination by SMYD2. Root mean square displacement (RMSD) of the Cα atoms of the indicated peptides was calculated from 500-ns whole-atom MD simulations. Peptide orientations at several time points over the course of the MD simulations are shown, indicated by color with the corresponding color scale (top left). (D) Kinetic analysis of SMYD2 methylation of p53, PER2, and PER2 derivative substrates. Data points are the mean of three independent measurements, and error is presented as ±SEM. PER2 and WKLKSKR were fit to a substrate inhibition kinetic model. DKLKSKR and SHLKSKK were fit to a standard Michaelis-Menten (MM) model. (E) IC50 (median inhibitory concentration) measurements of Nle peptide inhibitors of SMYD2 using PER2 as a substrate. Data points are the mean of three independent measurements, and error is presented as ±SEM. Evan M. Cornett et al. Sci Adv 2018;4:eaav2623 Published by AAAS

Fig. 5 Novel SMYD2 substrates identified with K-OPL. Novel SMYD2 substrates identified with K-OPL. (A) Representative in vitro SMYD2 methyltransferase assay with known and predicted protein substrates. K to R refers to a missense mutation (lysine to arginine) introduced at the target lysine. Coomassie-stained gel is shown on top in blue, and 3H fluorography is shown on the bottom. (B) Representative in vitro SMYD2 methyltransferase assay with mutant forms of PRDM11 and MAPKAPK3 substrates predicted to decrease or increase substrate efficiency, respectively. WT, wild-type. (C) Scatterplot of the LoB score for SMYD2 methylation motifs that are created (blue), weakened (red), strengthened (green), or unchanged (black) by missense mutations found in primary human cancer sequencing data. Evan M. Cornett et al. Sci Adv 2018;4:eaav2623 Published by AAAS

Fig. 6 K-OPL analysis reveals a gap in MS-based lysine methylation datasets. K-OPL analysis reveals a gap in MS-based lysine methylation datasets. (A) Comparison of the arginine and lysine content between the top 50 K-OPL–predicted SMYD2 substrates (blue) and the 35 substrates identified using MS (red) (Olsen et al.). (B) Lysine and arginine content in the entire lysine methylome as curated by PhosphoSitePlus (8). Evan M. Cornett et al. Sci Adv 2018;4:eaav2623 Published by AAAS