Learning Quality Support

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technology, Feedback, Action!: The impact of learning technology upon students' engagement with their feedback Stuart Hepplestone
Advertisements

Leading the Way : Access. Success. Impact. Board of Governors Summit August 9, 2013.
1 RSC College of New Scholars, Artists and Scientists – York Internal Nomination Process Office of the Vice-President Research & Innovation Lisa Philipps,
2015 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.
ECTS- the European Credit System Estela Pereira Universidade de Aveiro.
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
Curriculum Summit Part II: Curriculum and Student Interface December 11,
Division of Florida Colleges Update
Notes by Juan Manfredi February 11,  Passed by Arts and Sciences faculty in April 2002 and published in the A & S Gazette on April 15, 2003 (Vol.
IEEE Fellow Program E.Panayırcı IEEE Fellow Committee Member.
Debbie Saunders External Funding Officer. External Funding Officers Chris Beynon ext 5015  Environment & Society;
Chemistry B.S. Degree Program Assessment Plan Dr. Glenn Cunningham Professor and Chair University of Central Florida April 21, 2004.
Understanding TAGs & Course Equivalency Faculty Panel Point Person Meeting September 18, 2008.
Credit Transfer, Cornerstone of the University System of Ohio.
Applying the Principles of Prior Learning Assessment Debra A. Dagavarian Diane Holtzman Dennis Fotia.
Preceptor Orientation
Institutional Overview of Quality Frameworks, Quality Assurance and Enhancement Dr Anne Craven, Head of Quality and Academic Partnerships 25/04/2014.
AN OVERVIEW MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY. MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) pzv/09/09/08 2 Malaysian.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
Quality Assurance of Malaysian Higher Education COPIA – Code of Practice for Institutional Audit COPPA – Code of Practice for Programme Accreditation.
QAA Summative Review Staff Briefing Leeds College of Art 8 September 2010.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
Write On! Your Course Outline. Pedagogy Unbound Series Facilitated by: Deborah Richards Florence Daddey.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Dr. Amina M R El-Nemer Lecturer Maternity and Obstetric Nursing Dep. IQAP Manager Program Specification.
Introduction to Financial Management Li, Jialong
Course Selection Guidance Counselors Mrs. Parker: 10 th -12 th, A-G Ms. Czajkowski: 10 th -12 th H-P Mrs. McCall: 10 th -12 th, Q-Z Mrs. Statham:
Summary of Standard Assessment Regulations Academic Year 2013/14.
Peer Reviewer - Basic Workshop 2 Prof Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP Prof Hussein El-Maghraby Member, NQAAP.
Transfer Workshop. HOW TO TRANSFER FROM R-CCC Make a transfer plan A successful transfer involves careful planning and takes time to develop. Any student.
Periodic Review Report Committee Summary: Amended Monthly Progress Report December 22, 2003.
The Role of the Internal and External Evaluators in Student Assessment Arthur Brown Advisor to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic.
First College-Level Course Guidelines Webinar Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board February 5, 2014.
SZABIST INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH DEPARTMENT QUALITY ENHANCEMENT CELL.
CAA Review Joint CAA Review Steering Committee Charge Reason for Review Focus Revision of Policy Goals Strategies Milestones.
Denise Kirkpatrick Pro Vice-Chancellor The Open University, UK Assessment in DE contexts.
Welcome to Shihezi University Shihezi University is a comprehensive university in Shihezi, a Garden City by the river of Manas, northern foot of the Tianshan.
Course Substitutions & Course Waivers Proposed New Policy AGC 1 st Presentation September 08, 2015 Patti Trepkowski and Diane Patrick.
Curtin Graduate Research School
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Approval of Assessments
Presenters: Lisa McLaughlin, Institutional Data Coordinator
Prior Learning Assessment Process
We’re going to follow the chronological order of the process.
Have you earned an ? Associate of Arts degree, A.A
Curriculum and Accreditation
What is the LCVP? An enhanced Leaving Certificate
Curriculum and Accreditation
Standards and Certification Training
Curriculum Forms Guidelines and Information
9th Grade Literature & Composition
Ashbourne Community School 2017/18
UMKC General Education Revision - Background June 7, 2016
Evaluating Provision for Students with Additional and Special Educational Needs in Post-Primary Schools Briefing for the Education Partners 4th September.
High School 101 Godley Station School.
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
Newbridge College Leaving Certificate Vocational Programme
Final Assignment Review and Discussion
Engineering Science: National 4 and 5
Approval of Assessments
Leaving Certificate Vocational Programme
Rating in 2002 for funding from 2003
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
SLOs, Curriculum, and Other Things that Shape Your Classroom
Evaluating Provision for Students with Additional and Special Educational Needs in Post-Primary Schools Briefing for the Education Partners 4th September.
Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics (KhNUE)
What must I do to progress to Honours Level
Semester System In Higher Education Institutions of Pakistan
This guidance applies to all undergraduate degrees.
Presentation transcript:

Learning Quality Support Go8 QVS Process 2018

What is Go8 QVS? Key features include: A focus on assessment in a sample of final year subjects in undergraduate programs, 25 percent of final year assessment requirements. Benchmarking for comparing grades awarded in similar programs for Go8 universities. Understanding of academic standards in similar universities around the world. Flexibility to complement other quality assurance mechanisms within Go8 universities.

Disciplines QVS 2018 involves ten disciplines: Aerospace Engineering and Technology Business and Management Economics and Econometrics Information Systems Language and Literature Philosophy and Religious Studies Physics and Astronomy Public Health Studies in Human Society Visual Arts and Crafts

Selection Ten disciplines are selected by Go8 & each institution selects two courses per discipline and considers: enrolment numbers courses with electronic submission core courses (not electives).

How do we do it? Part One: The process involves external review of two courses per Go8 selected discipline Assessment materials – a randomly selected and de-identified sample of 5% of students’ assessments at each of the following grade levels or equivalent (fail, pass, credit, distinction, high distinction). Course outlines / guide and learning outcomes. Information on how learning outcomes relate to degree level outcomes. Grading criteria for each assessment task. Grade nomenclature and categories (or grade policy).

How do we do it? Part Two: The process involves reviewing material for other Go8 Universities Senior Academics (Level C or D) with broad experience and knowledge in the subject area are asked to review material. Honorarium at $600 per day. 1-2 days is typical for the review of material. Two reviewers for each discipline.

QVS 2018 Process PHASE 1 PHASE 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 FACULTY/ AREA COURSE CONTACT COURSE CONTACT Go8 REVIEWERS Go8 LQS LQS LQS 1. Nominate a contact person for each academic area under review to liaise with reviewers within their discipline. Nominate reviewers at UofA (Level C or above). 2. Identify and collate documents and materials for each course being reviewed. 3. Upload de-identified assessment items* in preparation for external review. *process to be advised 4. Allocate reviewers from the Go8 list of approved QVS reviewers. 5. Receive material for review. Complete review of allocated material and submit Reviewer Evaluation Form. 6. Disseminate and discuss summary outcome reports. 7. Publish review recommendations and schedule of discipline reviews. 8. Complete evaluation of QVS process and seek feedback. 9. Report to Quality Enhancement Committee on QVS process, evaluation outcomes and feedback.

Summary of Assessment Two UofA courses are to be assessed per Go8 selected discipline.    The material that is required for each course includes: Assessment materials (5 percent at each grade level) Course outline/guide and learning outcomes Information on how learning outcomes relate to degree level outcomes Grading criteria for each assessment task Grade nomenclature and categories (or grade policy) Two UofA Reviewers are put forward per Go8 selected discipline.

Support Learning and Quality Support can support the Go8 QVS process by: Facilitating the identification and collation of material; Providing technical support for uploading/downloading material; Answering questions and queries; and Advising on the end-to-end process.