Chapter 5 Policing: Legal Aspects

The right against unreasonable searches and seizures are guaranteed under which Constitutional Amendment? Fourth Amendment Fifth Amendment Sixth Amendment Eighth Amendment Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

Correct answer 1. Fourth Amendment Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

What should be done with the exclusionary rule? Abolish the exclusionary rule Create more exceptions Do not allow any exceptions to the exclusionary rule Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

Survey or opinion question Graph answers for class discussion Correct Answer Survey or opinion question Graph answers for class discussion Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

What U. S. Supreme Court decision forms the basis of the exclusionary rule? Miranda v. Arizona Gideon v. Wainwright U. S. v. Leon Weeks v. U. S. Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

Correct answer 4. Weeks v. U. S. Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

This case made the exclusionary rule applicable to criminal prosecutions at the state level. Weeks v. U. S. Miranda v. Arizona Mapp v. Ohio Terry v. Ohio Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

Correct answer Mapp v. Ohio Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

This case limited the police officer’s right to search incident to an arrest to the area under the immediate control of the person arrested. Mapp v. Ohio Chimel v. California U. S. v. Leon Arizona v. Hicks Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

Correct answer Chimel v. California Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

Coolidge v. New Hampshire In this case the U. S. Supreme Court ruled that police officers may not enter a home to conduct a warrantless search if one resident gives permission but the other says no. Georgia v. Randolph Terry v. Ohio Illinois v. Rodriquez Coolidge v. New Hampshire Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

Correct answer Georgia v. Randolph Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

This case is known as the good-faith exception. Minnesota v. Carter Georgia v. Randolph Nix v. Williams U. S. v. Leon Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

Correct answer U. S. v. Leon Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

In this case, the U. S. Supreme Court created a “computer errors exception” to the exclusionary rule. Harris v. U. S. Arizona v. Hicks Arizona v. Evans Miranda v. Arizona Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

Correct answer Arizona v. Evans Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

Stansbury v. California Brown v. Texas This case extended the authority of the police to search locations in a house where a potentially dangerous person could hide while an arrest warrant is being served. Maryland v. Buie Horton v. California Stansbury v. California Brown v. Texas Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

Correct answer Carroll v. U. S. Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

Probable cause warrant Suspicionless search This is a search warrant issued on the basis of probable cause to believe that evidence of a crime, while not currently at the place described, will likely be there when the warrant is executed. Good faith warrant Anticipatory warrant Probable cause warrant Suspicionless search Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

Correct answer Anticipatory warrant Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

This was the first significant case involving an automobile search. California v. Carney Illinois v. Caballes Chambers v. Florida Carroll v. U. S. Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

Correct answer Maryland v. Buie Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

Do you agree in this day and age we need high technology searches and suspicionless searches on public streets and transportation? No it is invasive Yes, I would feel safer Undecided Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

Survey or opinion question Graph answers for class discussion Correct answer Survey or opinion question Graph answers for class discussion Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

This case formally recognized the right to have legal counsel present during police interrogation. Leyra v. Denno Arizona v. Fulminante Escobedo v. Illinois Chapman v. California Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

Correct answer Escobedo v. Illinois Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

This case is known as the public-safety exception. Nix v. Williams U. S. v. Leon Terry v. Ohio New York v. Quarles Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

Correct answer New York v. Quarles Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

Miranda warnings must be given if the offender is being interrogated but is not under arrest. True False Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger

Correct answer False Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e Frank Schmalleger