May 22/23 2007 SAGE Meeting1 EVLA Hardware Systems: Status and Prognosis Rick Perley.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 National Radio Astronomy Observatory The EVLA -- Status, Future Rick Perley National Radio Astronomy Observatory.
Advertisements

14-Jun-2004EVLA Software Design Review Transition Plan Bill Sahr 1 EVLA Hybrid Array & Transition Plan.
Dale E. Gary Professor, Physics, Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New Jersey Institute of Technology 1 9/25/2012Prototype Review Meeting.
Mark McKinnon EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting May 8-9, Budget, Schedule, Contingency Mark McKinnon Project Manager.
Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting December 14-15, EVLA Hardware Testing Rick Perley With much essential help from Barry Clark, Ken Sowinski,
Prototype SKA Technologies at Molonglo: 3. Beamformer and Correlator J.D. Bunton Telecommunications and Industrial Physics, CSIRO. Australia. Correlator.
Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting May , EVLA Technical Performance Rick Perley With much essential help from Barry Clark, Ken Sowinski,
Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Expanded Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array EVLA Observations of.
1 National Radio Astronomy Observatory EVLA Status -- Jim Ulvestad, for Mark McKinnon, Rick Perley, and the EVLA Team.
C. ChandlerEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting September 6-7, Scientific Commissioning Plan Claire Chandler.
Rick PerleyNSF Mid-Project Review May , EVLA Technical Performance Rick Perley With much essential help from Barry Clark, Ken Sowinski, Vivek.
National Radio Astronomy Observatory May 17, 2006 – Legacy Projects Workshop VLA/VLBA Large Projects Jim Ulvestad Assistant Director, NRAO.
EVLA Early Science: Shared Risk Observing EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting, March 19-20, 2009 Claire Chandler Deputy AD for Science, NM Ops.
P.Napier, Synthesis Summer School, 18 June Antennas in Radio Astronomy Peter Napier Interferometer block diagram Antenna fundamentals Types of antennas.
EVLA Overall System Specifications Rick Perley EVLA Project Scientist.
Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Expanded Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array The Expanded Very Large.
Polarization at IRAM Status and Plans S.Guilloteau Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Bordeaux.
Mark McKinnon EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting May 8-9, Project Overview Mark McKinnon Project Manager.
Introducing the EVLA NRAO Postdoctoral Symposium, 29 April-1 May 2009 Michael P. Rupen Project Scientist for WIDAR.
April 19, 2007 EVLA Update1 The EVLA Project An Update Rick Perley National Radio Astronomy Observatory.
The Expanded Very Large Array: Phase I Science and Technical Requirements Rick Perley NRAO - Socorro.
1 SAGE Committee Meeting – December 19 & 20, 2008 National Radio Astronomy Observatory EVLA Goals, Progress, Status, and Projections Rick Perley Mark McKinnon.
Correlator Growth Path EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting, March 19-20, 2009 Michael P. Rupen Project Scientist for WIDAR.
C. ChandlerEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting September 6-7, Transition Operations Claire Chandler.
JVLA capabilities to be offered for semester 2013A Claire Chandler.
1 EVLA System Commissioning Results EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting, March 19-20, 2009 Rick Perley EVLA Project Scientist.
Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting September 6-7, 2007 EVLA Antenna and Array Performance Rick Perley.
Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting May , Scientific Impact of Descopes Rick Perley.
EVLA L-Band Spectral-Line Science Below 1200 MHz Emmanuel Momjian NRAO-Socorro.
Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) : Design and Status Divya Oberoi, Lenoid Benkevitch MIT Haystack Observatory doberoi, On behalf.
Sub-mm/mm Observing TechniquesThe EVLAAug 14, 2006 The EVLA Project Sean Dougherty National Research Council Herzberg Institute for Astrophysics Rick Perley.
ASKAP: Setting the scene Max Voronkov ASKAP Computing 23 rd August 2010.
P.NapierEVLA Advisory Comm, 14 Dec 2004 Project Overview Peter Napier, EVLA Project Manager Status 2003 Committee Response.
Mark McKinnon NSF Mid-Project Review May 11-12, Baseline Project Definition Mark McKinnon Project Manager.
Rick PerleyNSF Mid-Project Review May 11-12, Scientific Impact of Descopes Rick Perley.
Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Expanded Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array The Expanded Very Large.
M.P. RupenEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting September 6-7, Correlator Test Plan Michael P. Rupen.
M. McKinnonEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting September 6-7, Project Overview Mark McKinnon Project Manager.
R. HaywardEVLA Feeds CDR – Project Budget & Schedule 17 Feb EVLA Feeds CDR Project Schedule & Budget.
Rick PerleyEVLA Front-End CDR – On the Sky Tests April 24, EVLA Front-End CDR On the Sky Tests.
Frazer OwenNSF EVLA Mid-Project Review May 11-12, Transition to EVLA
Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting December 14 – 15, EVLA `Descoping’ Options Rick Perley.
Rick PerleyEVLA Phase II Definition Meeting Aug 23 – 25, The Expanded Very Large Array Phase II Baseline Plan and Constraints.
What is EVLA? Giant steps to the SKA-high ParameterVLAEVLAFactor Point Source Sensitivity (1- , 12 hr.)10  Jy1  Jy 10 Maximum BW in each polarization0.1.
10 January 2006AAS EVLA Town Hall Meeting1 The EVLA: A North American Partnership The EVLA Project on the Web
Transition Observing and Science EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting, March 19-20, 2009 Claire Chandler Deputy AD for Science, NM Ops.
SAGE meeting Socorro, May 22-23, 2007 WIDAR Correlator Overview Michael P. Rupen Project Scientist for WIDAR & Software.
WIDAR Correlator Options and Potential Craig Walker NRAO Socorro U.S. VLBI Technical Coordination Meeting May 14-15, 2007.
Surveying Cosmic Time with the WIDAR Correlator
EVLA Spectral-Line Science Below 1200 MHz
EVLA Availability - or - When Can I Use It?
EVLA Project Peter Napier
Committee Charge Fred K.Y. Lo
Budget, Schedule, Contingency
EVLA Status and Prospects
Rick Perley National Radio Astronomy Observatory
Shared Risk Observing Claire Chandler EVLA SSS Review, June 5, 2009
EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting
Some Illustrative Use Cases
EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting
Prototype Correlator Testing
Shared Risk Science with the EVLA
Mark McKinnon EVLA Project Manager
Correlator Growth Path
Transition Observing and Science
EVLA Construction Status
Transition Observing and Science
EVLA Advisory Panel Mtg. System Overview
Rick Perley NRAO - Socorro
EVLA Technical Performance
Presentation transcript:

May 22/ SAGE Meeting1 EVLA Hardware Systems: Status and Prognosis Rick Perley

May 22/ SAGE Meeting2 Key EVLA Project Goals Fundamental Goal: By building on the existing infrastructure, multiply ten-fold the VLAs observational capabilities. Full frequency coverage from 1 to 50 GHz. –8 frequency bands with cryogenic receivers. –Two separately-tunable polarization pairs – with no restrictions on their tuning (unlike current VLA). 1 Jy point-source continuum sensitivity (most bands) New correlator with 8 GHz/polarization capability –16384 minimum channels/baseline with full polarization –Full recirculation capability for increased flexibility –128 independently tunable frequency slots. Noise-limited full-beam imaging in all Stokes parameters Completion by 2012.

May 22/ SAGE Meeting3 EVLA-I Performance Goals ParameterVLAEVLAFactor Point Source Sensitivity (1-, 12 hours)10 Jy1 Jy 10 Maximum BW in each polarization0.1 GHz 8 GHz80 # of frequency channels at max. bandwidth1616, Maximum number of frequency channels5124,194, Coarsest frequency resolution50 MHz2 MHz25 Finest frequency resolution381 Hz0.12 Hz3180 (Log) Frequency Coverage (1 – 50 GHz)22%100%5 The EVLAs performance is vastly better than the VLAs: The cost to the NSF for this >10-fold improvement is $59M – about 1/3 the cost of the original VLA.

Band Availability Timescale

May 22/ SAGE Meeting5 Scientific Capabilities Growth Until the WIDAR correlator is available for scientific use (earliest will be mid 2009), new science capabilities come from new frequency access: –L-Band (1.2 – 2.0 GHz) – The new space from 1.74 – 2.0 GHz appears free of RFI! –C-Band: Good sensitivity, but poor polarization outside old frequency range. (Will be corrected by new OMTs). With only 10 days notice, the special C-band call for proposals returned 19 proposals (9 for D config., 10 for A config.) –K-Band: Full tuning range of 18 – 26.5 GHz now available. –Ka-Band: By end of 2008, a sufficient number (~9) of new Ka band (26 – 40 GHz) receivers will be on line for good new science. –Q-Band: The old tuning separation limitation of 400 MHz between IF pairs is gone.

May 22/ SAGE Meeting6 EVLA Status – End of 2008 In 18 months (at which point the prototype correlator testing should be completed, and the final system under installation), we expect to have on line: BandFinalInterimOld 4/P14010 L41410 S300 C8 X0028 Ku0010 K18010 Ka900 Q18010 Definitions: Final: The system in its final, EVLA State, with full tuning capabilities. Interim: Modern electronics, but old narrow-band OMT, limiting sensitivity or polarization purity. Old: The VLA system, either on an unmodified VLA antenna, or transferred to an upgraded EVLA antenna. Limited tuning capabilities.

May 22/ SAGE Meeting7 Project Book Requirements Chapter 2 of EVLA Project Book contains all the detailed technical performance requirements. –Sensitivity, stability, pointing accuracy, polarization purity, bandpass stability, and much more. Tests conducted so far indicate we should meet all the requirements. Some requirements will need special tests to determine if we meet specs. New EVLA post-doc (Brigette Hesman) will take charge of acceptance procedures.

May 22/ SAGE Meeting8 Short-Term Issues of Concern Phase and Amplitude Stability –We believe all major issues affecting stability are understood. –Remaining problems are mainly due to VLA design, and observing methodologies to avoid them are on EVLA Returns web page. Cross-Array (VLA x EVLA) Performance Issues –Hybrid-array performance not ideal. –Some problems will be eliminated upon Modcomp replacement. –Others (closure error, loss of sensitivity due to bandpass mismatch, Doppler tracking) will remain until completion of retrofit process. Modcomp Replacement –Modcomps to be retired June 27. –Although some special modes will not be available in July, we are confident all existing capabilities will be restored shortly afterwards.

May 22/ SAGE Meeting9 Longer-Term Issues of Concern Optimized High Frequency Performance –Fine tuning of optics (primarily via holography) will be needed to improve high frequency performance. –This work cannot even begin until late 2007, and is likely to be deferred to late Decommissioning VLA antennas? –In Jan 2009, ten VLA antennas left. –By Jan 2010, only four VLA antennas left. –At some point in 2009 (or 2010?), it will not be worth continuing to operate these. –The committees opinion on when these should be decommissioned will be helpful.

May 22/ SAGE Meeting10 Frequency Band Implementation The 10 frequency bands (8 Cassegrain, 2 PF) are being installed on three schedules: –7 bands installed during antenna retrofit: 4, P, Interim L, Interim C, Old X, K, Q –2 new bands installed, and 2 bands upgraded in the field, after retrofit: Final L, Final C, Ka, S –1 decommissioned band, and 1 upgraded band, deferred to the end of the project: Ku, Final X

May 22/ SAGE Meeting11 Bands Installed During Retrofit Five currently existing receiver systems re-installed with few changes: –4 (73.0 – 74.6 MHz) –P (300 – 340 MHz) –X (8.0 – 8.8 GHz) –K (18 – 26.5 GHz) –Q (40 – 50 GHz) 4 and P bands are unchanged, but are now free of internally- generated RFI. X-band is the existing (JPL) system. K and Q bands have same receivers, but different electronics, allowing full-band tuning.

May 22/ SAGE Meeting12 Interim L and C Bands These new bands are installed during retrofit without their wide-band OMTs: –Design/testing of their full-band orthomode transducers (OMTs) is not yet complete. –Old (narrow-band) OMTs are temporarily installed, limiting sensitivity/tuning range/polarization. L-Band limited to 1.2 – 2.0 GHz. C-Band has nearly full-band tuning, but reduced performance. Tests of new OMT show excellent performance, with installation of these scheduled to begin later this year.

May 22/ SAGE Meeting13 Bands Installed Following Retrofit Upgrading of Interim C and L Bands to Final Status: –These are upgraded via addition of the final design OMTs –The OMTs will be installed in the field, beginning later this year. C-band OMT deployment has higher priority. L-band OMT deployment likely delayed, pending further study of efficacy of DME removal in 1.0 – 1.2 GHz range. Two new bands: –S-Band (2.0 – 8.0 GHz) Prototype horn being laminated in Albuquerque now, with on-antenna installation by years end. Receiver will not be ready for on-sky tests until mid –Ka-Band (26.5 – 40 GHz) Receiver under construction now, with on-sky tests by end of this year. –We expect suberb performance from each of these new systems.

May 22/ SAGE Meeting14 Bands Deferred until End of Retrofit Process Due to supply issues (money, people), two bands had to be deferred to the end of the retrofit process: –X (8 – 12 GHz) –Ku (12 – 18 GHz) Design of X-band OMT now beginning. Receiver tests begin late 2008, deployment begins in One, or both, of these bands are vulnerable to descope, should contingency become tight.