Aether Aerospace AAE 451 September 19, 2006

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Purdue University AIAA Design Build Fly Team
Advertisements

Propulsion PDR 1 Team 1 September 21, 2006.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Hopper Trajectory February 26, 2009 [Alex Whiteman] [Mission Ops] [Lunar Descent] Page 1.
PROPULSION PDR#1 Brian Barnett Rob Benner Ryan Srogi John Keune Alex Fleck.
AME 441: Conceptual Design Presentation
Vehicle Sizing PDR Presented by: Mark Blanton Chris Curtis Loren Garrison September 21, 2000 Chris Peters Jeff Rodrian DR2.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1 Vehicle Sizing PDR AAE 451 Fall 2006.
October 23, 2003Propulsion QDR1 Scott Bird Mike Downes Kelby Haase Grant Hile Cyrus Sigari Sarah Umberger Jen Watson.
Propulsion QDR #2 AAE451 – Team 3 November 20, 2003 Brian Chesko Brian Hronchek Ted Light Doug Mousseau Brent Robbins Emil Tchilian.
March 8, Propulsion 3 QDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason Tang Joe Taylor.
DR2 Propulsion PDR I Preliminary Design Review II October 17, 2000 Presented By: Mark Blanton Team DR2 Chris Curtis Loren Garrison Chris Peters Jeff Rodrian.
Patrick Dempsey Bridget Fitzpatrick Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok AAE451 Aircraft Design Professor Dominick Andrisani First Flight November 21,
Propulsion PDR #2 Brian Barnett Rob Benner Ryan Srogi John Keune Alex Fleck.
Dane BatemaBenoit Blier Drew Capps Patricia Roman Kyle Ryan Audrey Serra John TapeeCarlos Vergara Team 1: Propulsion QDR 2 Team 1 October 3, 2006.
Propulsion PDR 2 Team Boiler Xpress Michael VanMeter Oneeb Bhutta Matthew Basiletti Ryan Beech October 17, 2000.
 Model airplanes are sized down models of an aircraft  The calculations are easy and the importance is given to building of the plane.
Team 5 Critical Design Review Trent Lobdell Ross May Maria Mullins Christian Naylor Eamonn Needler Charles Reyzer James Roesch Charles Stangle Nick White.
Recent and Future Research for Bird-like Flapping MAVs of NPU Prof. B.F.Song Aeronautics School of Northwestern Polytechnical University.
Kyler Marutzky Motor and Battery Analysis. Objective  Motor capable of powering a 20 lb. aircraft.  Provide enough energy to the motor for a minimum.
Propulsion PDR #2 AAE451 – Team 3 November 11, 2003 Brian Chesko Brian Hronchek Ted Light Doug Mousseau Brent Robbins Emil Tchilian.
Patrick Dempsey Bridget Fitzpatrick Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok Propulsion Preliminary Design Review #2 October 17, 2000.
Trade Study 2 Motor Selection and propeller matching 1 Hadrien guepet.
Order of Presentation David – Intro and Fall Review Matt – Testing and Summary of Changes Josiah – Details on New Design Josh – Electrical Hardware Ona.
Project Plan Review Boiler Xpress Oneeb Bhutta Ryan Beech Matt Basiletti Mike VanMeter.
AAE 451 Aircraft Design First Flight Boiler Xpress November 21, 2000
Team 5 Vehicle Propulsion QDR 2 Presented By: Maria Mullins James Roesch.
AAE 451 AERODYNAMICS PDR 2 TEAM 4 Jared Hutter, Andrew Faust, Matt Bagg, Tony Bradford, Arun Padmanabhan, Gerald Lo, Kelvin Seah November 18, 2003.
THEORY OF PROPULSION 9. Propellers P. M. SFORZA University of Florida.
DR2 Propulsion PDR I Preliminary Design Review September 28, 2000 Presented By: Mark Blanton Team DR2 Chris Curtis Loren Garrison Chris Peters Jeff Rodrian.
Lab 05: System Analysis 1 (Wind Tunnel Testing) Advanced Energy Vehicle.
Dane BatemaBenoit Blier Drew Capps Patricia Roman Kyle Ryan Audrey Serra John TapeeCarlos Vergara Team 1: Propulsion QDR 3 Team 1 October 17, 2006.
Dynamics & Controls PDR 2
Vehicle Sizing AAE 451: Team 2 Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin
VEHICLE SIZING PDR AAE 451 TEAM 4
Propulsion PDR 1 Team #3 Presented by: Greg Davidson Etan Karni
Design/Build/Fly SU DBF
Propulsion Preliminary Design Review #1
Dynamics & Controls PDR 1
Propulsion QDR 2 Team #3 Presented by: Greg Davidson Etan Karni.
Team 5 Final Design Review
PROPULSION PDR 2 AAE 451 TEAM 4
Team 5 Propulsion PDR Scott Bird Mike Downes Kelby Haase Grant Hile
Project Plan Review Team “Canard” September 14th, 2006 Team 1:
Team 5 Final Design Review
Aether Aerospace AAE 451 October 3, 2006
Propulsion 2 QDR AAE 451: Team 2 Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin
Propulsion QDR 2 Team #3 Presented by: Greg Davidson Etan Karni.
Propulsion PDR AAE 451 Fall 2006 Team Whishy Washy Tung Tran Mark Koch
Team 5 Vehicle Propulsion PDR 1
Team 5 Vehicle Propulsion PDR 1
John Apostol, Chris Grupido, Douglas Klutzke
Aether Aerospace AAE 451 September 27, 2006
Propulsion PDR AAE 451: Team 2 Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin
Team “Canard” September 19th, 2006
Propulsion QDR 2 AAE451: Balsa to the Wall Team 2
Prototype Fabrication, Economic, & Test Plan QDR
Structures and Weights 1 QDR
PROPULSION QDR 1 AAE 451 TEAM 4
PROPULSION PDR 1 AAE 451 TEAM 4
Team 5 - Propulsion PDR #2 Scott Bird Mike Downes Kelby Haase
Propulsion QDR Scott Bird Mike Downes Kelby Haase Grant Hile
CDR: Aether “Angry Mosquito”
PROPULSION QDR 2 AAE 451 TEAM 4
Aether Aerospace AAE 451 September 19, 2006
Dynamics N Controls 1 PDR
Propulsion PDR #1 AAE451 – Team 3 October 7, 2003
Dynamics & Controls PDR 2
Vehicle Sizing PDR AAE451: Balsa to the Wall
Aether Aerospace AAE 451 September 6, 2006
Propulsion QDR AAE 451 Fall 2006 Team 4 Tung Tran Mark Koch
Presentation transcript:

Aether Aerospace AAE 451 September 19, 2006 Propulsion PDR 1 Aether Aerospace AAE 451 September 19, 2006 Mark Davis Ashley Gordon Hank Kneitz Ryan Mulligan Joshua Rodewald Brandon Wampler Mathieu Hautier Samantha Pearcy

Overview Phase 1: Aircraft Subsystem Phase 2: Propeller Subsystem Phase 3: Gearbox and Motor Subsystems Phase 4: Battery Subsystem Optimization February 17, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Phase 1: Aircraft Subsystem February 17, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Phase 2: Propeller Subsystem Important Needed Propeller Parameters Pitch to Diameter Ratio: τ=p/D Thrust Coefficient: CT Power Coefficient: CP Advance Ratio: J=V/(nD) V – airspeed (ft/s) n – propeller frequency (hz) D – propeller diameter (ft) February 17, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Phase 2: Propeller Subsystem CT, CP, and J vary with τ Empirical data in propulsion sourcebook February 17, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Phase 2: Propeller Subsystem Data is plotted in constant β lines β is the prop. blade angle at 0.75R p=2πr*tan(β) τ=0.75π*tan(β) February 17, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Phase 2: Propeller Subsystem Now CT, CP, and J can be entered into Matlab code for a range of τ Data may be obtained from gold.m? Perform trade study for propeller diameter Determine max prop diameter February 17, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Phase 3: Gearbox and Motor Need to select a few motors Utilized Motocalc’s huge motor database http://motocalc.com/ Motor only! MotoCalc Suggestions Motor Battery Gear Prop Rating Price Mega ACn 16-25-4 12x3200SHD 3.5:1 12x6 1 $104.99 Plettenberg HP 370/20/A2 S 3:1 0.998 $299.00 Neu 1515/2Y-1100 11x3200SHD 0.996 $280.00 Medusa Research 028-056-1400 4:1 12x7 $99.95 Kontronik Tango 45-13 (12V) 0.995 $283.00 Aveox 27/39/2 10x3200SHD 4:01 0.994 $269.95 Neu 1509/1.5Y-2400 6x3200SHD 2P $195.00 Hacker B50 13XL $269.99 February 17, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Phase 3: Gearbox and Motor Reduced options to cheapest manufacturers Asked Motocalc for motors from Mega and Medusa Research Less Expensive Motors Motor Battery Gear Prop Rating Price Mega ACn 16-25-4 12x3200SHD 3.5:1 12x6 1 $104.99 Mega AC 22/30/3 11x3200SHD 0.991 $129.99 Mega ACn 16-25-3 9x3200SHD 4:1 0.987 Medusa Research 028-056-1400 12x7 $99.95 Medusa Research 028-056-0900 2.5:1 0.998 Medusa Research 028-056-2800 5x3200SHD 2P 0.993 February 17, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Phase 3: Gearbox and Motor These motors are underpowered Low top speed ~ 100 ft/sec Motocalc inputs are inexact For example: Which of these does your airfoil look like? Change Motocalc inputs to gain acceptable top speed from motors from Mega and Medusa. February 17, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Phase 3: Gearbox and Motor Motor Selection Must choose a motor that will satisfy the power requirement of the desired top speed. Utilize Matlab code to determine overall propulsion system with greatest efficiency February 17, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Phase 4: Battery Determine energy required for different mission components Compare batteries Cell Type Volts mA*hr/cell g Energy (J) Energy/m (J/g) NiCad 1.2 1000 14 4320 308.6 NiMH 800 3456 246.9 Lithium Polymer 3.7 1500 36 19980 555.0 February 17, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Optimization What needs to be done: Input CT, CP, and J values for a range of τ Create motor database with required motor parameters Loop Matlab code to determine the velocity, propeller, gear box, motor, and battery that produces the largest overall efficiency February 17, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Optimization Revisit mission analysis and constraint diagram with the updated motor, drag, and flight condition information Repeat as needed February 17, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Questions????????? February 17, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace