Echidna: current status and expected performance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(GET FAMILIAR WITH EQUIPMENT)
Advertisements

GSMT Control Workshop Tucson, September 11-12, 2001 Pointing Control for a giant segmented mirror telescope Patrick Wallace Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Pushing Astrometry to the Limit Richard Berry. Barnard’s Star Location: Ophiuchus Location: Ophiuchus Coordinates: 17 h 57 m º41’36”(J2000) Coordinates:
Surveying I. Lecture 2..
Spectroscopic Reference Design Options D. L. DePoy Texas A&M University.
Keck I Cassegrain ADC: Preliminary Design Overview UCO/Lick Observatory 15 October 2003.
Towards Creation of a JWST Astrometric Reference Field: Calibration of HST/ACS Absolute Scale and Rotation Roeland van der Marel Jay Anderson, Colin Cox,
An Echidna-style positioner for DESpec
LBC-Blue pre-commissioning LBC-Blue LBC-Blue –E Giallongo (PI) Rome: diPaola, Pedichini, Speziali, Testa, Gallozzi Rome: diPaola, Pedichini, Speziali,
HMI01567 – Page 1HMI Sun Test Review – November 28, 2005 Sun Test Overview.
AF2 and Wyffos for TO’s and duty engineers Michiel van der Hoeven October 2006 AF2 and Wyffos for TO's and Duty engineers.
An Echidna-style positioner for DESpec Will Saunders 8 March 2011.
Memorandam of the discussion on FMOS observations and data kicked off by Ian Lewis Masayuki Akiyama 14 January 2004 FMOS Science Workshop.
Optical Alignment System for Muon Tracker 1.Hardware 2.Learned from RUN3/4 3.Upgrade 4.Plan and Summary Atsushi Taketani, RIKEN/RIKEN Brookhaven Research.
AAO Fibre Instrument Data Simulator 10 October 2011 ROE Workshop 2011 Michael Goodwin Tony Farrell Gayandhi De Silva Scott Smedley Australian Astronomical.
Ircon ® ScanIR ® 3 Linescanner How to work with Snapshots? Confidential Rev. A 07/2013.
July 13, 2006, Starsplitters of Wyalusing 1 TPoint What the is Bisque doing now?
Science Impact of Sensor Effects or How well do we need to understand our CCDs? Tony Tyson.
MODERN SURVEY (FAMILARISATION WITH EQUIPMENTS). Modern equipments EDM – Electronic distance measurement eqp. EDM – Electronic distance measurement eqp.
PACS FM-ILT SPECTROMETER SPATIAL CALIBRATION A. Contursi (H. Feuchtgruber) PACS Science Verification Review – 8/9 November 2007 MPE-Garching.
MARS Design Review PP-1 Requirements Definition Performance: –Tip/Tilt error < 0.06″ rms mirror coordinates 0.12″ rms image coodinates 0.28″ fwhm image.
FLAO system test plan in solar tower S. Esposito, G. Brusa, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
NIRSpec Operations Concept Michael Regan(STScI), Jeff Valenti (STScI) Wolfram Freduling(ECF), Harald Kuntschner(ECF), Robert Fosbury (ECF)
AST 443/PHY 517 : Observational Techniques November 6, 2007 ASTROMETRY By: Jackie Faherty.
PFI Cobra/MC simulator Peter Mao. purpose develop algorithms for fiducial (FF) and science (SF) fiber identification under representative operating conditions.
1 System wide optimization for dark energy science: DESC-LSST collaborations Tony Tyson LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration meeting June 12-13, 2012.
Subaru/FMOS Commissioning: Brief history & current status Naoyuki Tamura Instrument scientist Subaru Telescope, NAOJ Expected performance Observation “A.
PACS Spectrometer Spatial Calibration plan in PV phase A.Contursi D. Lutz and U. Klaas.
The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.
September 16, 2008LSST Camera F2F1 Camera Calibration Optical Configurations and Calculations Keith Bechtol Andy Scacco Allesandro Sonnenfeld.
The FMOS Facility for the SUBARU telescope Gavin Dalton Oxford/RAL.
LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Scientific Collaboration1 First Results from the Mesa Beam Profile Cavity Prototype Marco Tarallo 26 July 2005 Caltech – LIGO Laboratory.
Data Analysis Software Development Hisanori Furusawa ADC, NAOJ For HSC analysis software team 1.
The Active Optics System S. Thomas and the AO team.
Optimisation of the PACS Chopper Markus Nielbock Ulrich Klaas Jeroen Bouwman Helmut Dannerbauer Jürgen Schreiber Ulrich Grözinger.
POSITIONER SPECIFICATIONS 2250 fibres (c.f. ~400 for FMOS-Echidna) Field diameter ~320mm (c.f. ~150mm for FMOS-Echidna) Fibre core diameter 60µm Spherical.
Low emittance tuning in ATF Damping Ring - Experience and plan Sendai GDE Meeting Kiyoshi Kubo.
Multiobject Spectroscopy: Preparing and performing Michael Balogh University of Durham.
Goals for HETDEX Determine equation of state of Universe and evolutionary history for dark energy from 0
NIC3 FOM Dithered Observations of the Orion Nebula Eddie Bergeron, STScI.
ATF2 beam operation status Toshiyuki OKUGI, KEK The 9 th TB&SGC meeting KEK, 3-gokan Seminar Hall 2009/ 12/ 16.
SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors G. Burtin, R.J. Colchester, G. Ferioli, J.J. Gras, R. Jung,
GSPC -II Program GOAL: extend GSPC-I photometry to B = V ˜ 20 add R band to calibrate red second-epoch surveys HOW: take B,V,R CCD exposures centered at.
SINFONI data reduction using the ESO pipeline. Instrument design and its impact on the data (I) integral field spectrometer using mirrors brickwall pattern.
Markus Nielbock (MPIA) – Herschel Pointing PACS ICC Meeting #38 Herschel Pointing Summary and Recent Developments Markus Nielbock (MPIA Heidelberg) with.
April / 2010 UFOAnalyzerV2 1 UFOAnalyzerV2 (UA2) the key of accuracy UA2 inputs video clip files and outputs meteor trajectories. UA2 does following steps.
David Woody Caltech Owens Valley Radio Observatory
UFOAnalyzerV2 (UA2) the key of accuracy
Using a Radio Telescope
Orbit Response Matrix Analysis
“Whether they ever find life there or not, I think Jupiter should be considered an enemy planet.” Jack Handy HW2 is due on Wednesday. How’s that going?
IncuCyte Training Calibrations and Troubleshooting
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
COS FUV Flat Fields and Signal-to-Noise Characteristics
Tracking System at CERN 06 and 07 test beams
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
Resolving the black hole - nuclear cluster - spheroid connection
WFPC2 1-Gyro Test Results
On-Orbit Performance and Calibration of the HMI Instrument J
GPI Astrometric Calibration
Intro to CCD Imaging Joe Roberts
Introduction to Spectroscopy
The pointing calibration of the WFCTA tracking system
Observational Astronomy Astrometry
FLAMES – an overview Features & points to be aware of, relevant to the observer. In addition to p2pp, there is FPOSS. Layout of FLAMES; link to GIRAFFE.
BACK UP P09045: Membrane Characterization Test Stand
How we do Spectroscopy An Overview
TI8 analysis / J. Wenninger
Meeting 9 Slitmask Planning Ken Nordsieck
Molecular Imager: Focal Plane Array
Presentation transcript:

Echidna: current status and expected performance FMOS review meeting 20080728

Echidna current stand-alone status

Echidna current stand-alone status We did maintenance works between 2008/07/21-25. Sky-camera position was changed. Fibers, sky-camera, and the AG/SH camera are at the same focus position within 0.1mm or so. Cleanliness of the tips of the fibers was checked and tips of dirty fibers were cleaned. Three science fibers (#136, #310, #314) and three guide fibers (#251G, #293G, #378G) are a bit dirty. A few bad-behaving spines were recovered, but still #210G, #253G, and #252, are not working well (step sizes are too small). Three spines (#198, #219, #220) were locked due to breakage of a piezo-magnet mount of one of the three spines. We confirmed Echidna is working well with sufficient accuracy , 12micron accuracy within 13minutes (7iterations), same as in the last review meeting.

Echidna fiber tip cleanliness r=4-5mm

Echidna Fiber positioning tests Intensive positioning tests have been done inside tilted prime-focus unit at various rotation angles. At tilt angle<60deg., 95% of the spines reach target position within 12micron with 7 iterations. About 10 out of 395 fibres cannot reach the target positions. At tilt angle=60deg. with some rotation angles, the performance degrades. ~20 out of 395 fibres cannot reach the target positions with 7 iterations. With 7 iterations, the fibre configuration takes 13 minutes currently. The bad positioning accuracy at ZD=60deg is some spines have difficulty with moving against the direction of the gravity in the current mode. This may be solved with different frequency and voltage signals to the fibre movement. The fine tuning of the frequency and voltage is still underway.

Echidna on-sky commissioning

Echidna constructing “telescope model” “Telescope model” describes conversion between (RA,DEC) <-> (FPI X, FPI Y) Inputs for each observation Pointing center Observation dates, conditions (temperature, humidity, pressure) Parameters need to be calibrated Distortion pattern a*r + b*r^3 + c*r^5 + d*r/lamda + e*(r/lamda)^2, Including scale. Currently only a,b,c are considered. Movement of the distortion pattern against focal plane (see next two slides).

Echidna focal plane schematics r=4-5mm D=30arcmin

Echidna effect of distortion pattern center movement If the corrector move 2mm against focal plane, the distance between a star at the FoV center and a star at the edge of FoV will change by 0.5”.

Echidna three steps to determine parameters 1) Focal plane mapping with the sky-camera Measure positions of stars with the sky-camera, and determine the telescope model parameters (distortion pattern, distortion pattern offset). 2) Checking the telescope model with the guide bandles Configure spines based on the above telescope model, and acquire multiple guide stars. Confirm the telescope model and determine systematic offset. 3) Fine-tune telescope model with “rastering” Configure spines based on the above telescope model, and acquire spectra of 400 fibers by “rastering” telescope. Determine wavelength dependent parameter.

Difference from the linear model determined at the center of the FoV. Echidna sky-camera mapping distortion pattern The observed distortion pattern is roughly consistent with the expected pattern from the optical design. Difference from the linear model determined at the center of the FoV.

Echidna sky-camera mapping residual The residual of the current model is 0.2-0.3” RMS.

Echidna stars acquired with guide-bundles

Echidna spectra of astrometry calibration stars

Echidna current status and next steps 1) Focal plane mapping with the sky-camera Measure positions of stars with the sky-camera, and determine the telescope model parameters. Data analysis almost completing, 0.2-0.3” rms residual. Search for systematic residual by the August engineering run. 2) Checking the telescope model with the guide bandles Configure spines based on the above telescope model, and acquire multiple guide stars. Confirmed. 3) Fine-tune telescope model with “rastering” Configure spines based on the above telescope model, and acquire spectra of 400 fibers by “rastering” telescope. Data taken and reduction on going. Wavelength dependent parameter with August data.

Echidna requirements for the positioner The optimal core size of the science-fibers was determined to be 1.2”, which corresponds to 100micron, maximizing the expected SN ratios of faint galaxies. For misalignment less than 20micron, the reduction of the coupling efficiency is less than 10%, even under a good seeing condition with FWHM=0.5”. Due to a number of physical effects, the repeatability of spine movement is not precise, thus iterations are required to achieve the required accuracy. Position the 400 fibers with the 20micron accuracy to targets within 15 minutes. Coupling efficiency as a function of the misalignment of the fiber to the target. Stellar object is assumed

Echidna: control s/w and GUI Echidna is controlled by the ICS s/w running on the “echidna” PC in the electronics enclosure of the unit. “echidna” PC is a disk-less PC booting using linux image on “fmos01”. Observation catalog with targets’ RA, DEC, priority etc. is fed to the fibre allocation s/w. Optimizing fibre assignment (observe higher priority targets, minimizing fibre tilt, etc.) the s/w determines the fibre allocation and store the data in .s2o file. Based on the allocation, ICS s/w automatically configure fibres with several times (~7) iterations. The results of the configuration will be stored in .efai file in the “fmos01” and fetched by the FITS creation software. The target information, configuration results are stored as ASCII extension header of the FITS images file. Engineering menus (for example calibrating fibre movement automatically) are also available from the GUI.